Retinopathy of PrematurityPhase 2/3NCT00027222
The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP)
A Phase 2/3 study testing retinal ablation in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 26 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP) is to test the hypothesis that earlier treatment in carefully selected cases will result in an overall better visual outcome than treatment at the conventional CRYO-ROP threshold point in the disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 years to 42 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- retinal ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- 26 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2001to not given
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 years to 42 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Infants <1251 grams birthweight born at participating centers and/or examined by 42 days of life are eligible. The early treatment trial requires that an infant have prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Trial locations and contacts
26 sites in 1 country.
26 sites in 1 country
United States26 sites
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201-1595
The Zanvyl Krieger Children's Eye Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Tufts University School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
The Children's Hospital of Buffalo Department of Ophthalmology
Buffalo, New York, 14222-2099
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425-2236
UIC Eye Center Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences The Lions of Illinois Eye Research Institute
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-724
Columbus Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
Pediatric Ophthalmology Associates, PC
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
Duke University Eye Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Baylor College of Medicine Feigin Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Department of Pediatrics
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46002-2119
University of Louisville Health Sciences Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202-1594
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0591
Tulane University Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112-2699
Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute
New York, New York, 10032
The Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Stanford University School of Medicine
Palo Alto, California, 94304
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4399
Magee-Women's Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3180
Oregon Health Sciences University Casey Eye Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97201-4197
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
John Moran Eye Center University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
San Francisco, California, 94115-1813
Eastern Long Island Retina Associate
Shirley, New York, 111967
Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital Neonatology Office
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
About this study
The goal of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP) is to test the hypothesis that earlier treatment in carefully selected cases will result in an overall better visual outcome than treatment at the conventional CRYO-ROP threshold point in the disease.
Read the detailed description
At age 5 1/2 years, the oldest age for which follow-up data are available, children with threshold ROP who were enrolled in the Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) -- Outcome Study showed fewer treated eyes (31.5 percent) than control eyes (48 percent) that were blind (P<0.001). Of those eyes that had a favorable structural outcome, with or without retinal ablation (cryotherapy to destroy the fringe of the retina through freezing), only a small percentage had best corrected visual acuity better than or equal to 20/40 at age 5 1/2 years (13 percent in the treated group; 17 percent in the untreated control group (P=0.19)). Among the 1398 followed from the 5 large natural history centers of the CRYO-ROP follow-up study, children with retinal residua of ROP (structural changes) had measurable visual acuity that was severly affected and tended to worsen with age. The CRYO-ROP Study proved conclusively that peripheral retinal ablation improves the chances of avoiding blindness, but at least 80 percent of eyes are left with acuity less than 20/40.
Two concerns emerged from the CRYO-ROP extensive study on the natural history of ROP and treatment of threshold ROP. The first of these is failure of peripheral retinal ablation to eliminate all, or nearly all cases, of retinal detachment due to ROP. In the CRYO-ROP Study, 26 percent of eyes with threshold disease in zone II and 78 percent of eyes with zone I threshold disease had an unfavorable structural outcome despite treatment. The second concern is that most children who developed threshold ROP disease had visual acuity worse than 20/40 even if the eye had a favorable structural outcome.
Since no other treatment has yet been shown to be effective in preventing blindness from ROP, retinal ablation remains the treatment of choice. The ETROP Study will test whether earlier treatment is more effective than treatment at threshold in improving functional (visual acuity) outcome following ROP, as well as determining whether earlier treatment decreases the probability of an unfavorable structural outcome.
Earlier treatment is defined as retinal ablation administered to the avascular retina when an eye reaches high risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Prethreshold indicates any Zone I ROP; or Zone II stage 2 with plus disease, or stage 3; or Zone II with less than 5 contiguous or 8 cumulative clock hours of stage 3 ROP with plus disease. Recognizing that a substantial number of eyes undergo spontaneous resolution of ROP, eyes will be randomized to early treatment only when high risk for an unfavorable visual acuity outcome is identified. High risk will be determined using a risk model analysis program based on longitudinal natural history data obtained from the CRYO-ROP study. This model integrates risk factors to assign a risk of progression to blindness without treatment. These factors include birth weight, gestational age, ethnicity, singleton/multiple status, outborn status, Zone on first exam, severity of ROP and rate of progression of ROP. When an infant develops prethreshold ROP and greater than or equal to 15 percent risk of unfavorable outcome, randomization to early treatment of one eye will occur. Visual acuity outcome will be measured by masked observers after wearing best correction using the Teller Acuity Card Procedure at 9 months corrected age.
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Being tested
- retinal ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
retinal ablationProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2001 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2001
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Retinopathy of PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Eye Institute (NEI)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Investigators
- William V. Good, M.D., Study chair, Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00027222
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEI-83
- Status last verified
- Dec 2003
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2001
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2005
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Wallace DK, Bremer DL, Good WV, Fellows R, Summers CG, Tung B, Hardy RJ. Correlation of recognition visual acuity with posterior retinal structure in advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1512-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2118.
PubMed 22892757Good WV, Hardy RJ, Wallace DK, Bremer D, Rogers DL, Siatkowski RM, De Becker I, Summers CG, Fellows R, Tung B, Palmer EA. beta-Blocking and racial variation in the severity of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;130(1):117-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.130.1.117. No abstract available.
PubMed 22232483VanderVeen DK, Bremer DL, Fellows RR, Hardy RJ, Neely DE, Palmer EA, Rogers DL, Tung B, Good WV; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Prevalence and course of strabismus through age 6 years in participants of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity randomized trial. J AAPOS. 2011 Dec;15(6):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.017.
PubMed 22153396Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group; Dobson V, Quinn GE, Summers CG, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Good WV. Grating visual acuity results in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;129(7):840-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.143.
PubMed 21746974Quinn GE, Dobson V, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Palmer EA, Good WV; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Visual field extent at 6 years of age in children who had high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;129(2):127-32. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.360.
PubMed 21320954Christiansen SP, Dobson V, Quinn GE, Good WV, Tung B, Hardy RJ, Baker JD, Hoffman RO, Reynolds JD, Rychwalski PJ, Shapiro MJ; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Progression of type 2 to type 1 retinopathy of prematurity in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;128(4):461-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.34.
PubMed 20385942Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group; Good WV, Hardy RJ, Dobson V, Palmer EA, Phelps DL, Tung B, Redford M. Final visual acuity results in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):663-71. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.72. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
PubMed 20385926
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2005. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00027222
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEI-83
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Lead sponsor
- National Eye Institute (NEI)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- Oct 2001
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2001 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (ETROP) is to test the hypothesis that earlier treatment in carefully selected cases will result in an overall better visual outcome than treatment at the conventional CRYO-ROP threshold point in the disease.
Detailed description
At age 5 1/2 years, the oldest age for which follow-up data are available, children with threshold ROP who were enrolled in the Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) -- Outcome Study showed fewer treated eyes (31.5 percent) than control eyes (48 percent) that were blind (P<0.001). Of those eyes that had a favorable structural outcome, with or without retinal ablation (cryotherapy to destroy the fringe of the retina through freezing), only a small percentage had best corrected visual acuity better than or equal to 20/40 at age 5 1/2 years (13 percent in the treated group; 17 percent in the untreated control group (P=0.19)). Among the 1398 followed from the 5 large natural history centers of the CRYO-ROP follow-up study, children with retinal residua of ROP (structural changes) had measurable visual acuity that was severly affected and tended to worsen with age. The CRYO-ROP Study proved conclusively that peripheral retinal ablation improves the chances of avoiding blindness, but at least 80 percent of eyes are left with acuity less than 20/40.
Two concerns emerged from the CRYO-ROP extensive study on the natural history of ROP and treatment of threshold ROP. The first of these is failure of peripheral retinal ablation to eliminate all, or nearly all cases, of retinal detachment due to ROP. In the CRYO-ROP Study, 26 percent of eyes with threshold disease in zone II and 78 percent of eyes with zone I threshold disease had an unfavorable structural outcome despite treatment. The second concern is that most children who developed threshold ROP disease had visual acuity worse than 20/40 even if the eye had a favorable structural outcome.
Since no other treatment has yet been shown to be effective in preventing blindness from ROP, retinal ablation remains the treatment of choice. The ETROP Study will test whether earlier treatment is more effective than treatment at threshold in improving functional (visual acuity) outcome following ROP, as well as determining whether earlier treatment decreases the probability of an unfavorable structural outcome.
Earlier treatment is defined as retinal ablation administered to the avascular retina when an eye reaches high risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Prethreshold indicates any Zone I ROP; or Zone II stage 2 with plus disease, or stage 3; or Zone II with less than 5 contiguous or 8 cumulative clock hours of stage 3 ROP with plus disease. Recognizing that a substantial number of eyes undergo spontaneous resolution of ROP, eyes will be randomized to early treatment only when high risk for an unfavorable visual acuity outcome is identified. High risk will be determined using a risk model analysis program based on longitudinal natural history data obtained from the CRYO-ROP study. This model integrates risk factors to assign a risk of progression to blindness without treatment. These factors include birth weight, gestational age, ethnicity, singleton/multiple status, outborn status, Zone on first exam, severity of ROP and rate of progression of ROP. When an infant develops prethreshold ROP and greater than or equal to 15 percent risk of unfavorable outcome, randomization to early treatment of one eye will occur. Visual acuity outcome will be measured by masked observers after wearing best correction using the Teller Acuity Card Procedure at 9 months corrected age.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 years to 42 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| retinal ablation | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2005.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22892757Wallace DK, Bremer DL, Good WV, Fellows R, Summers CG, Tung B, Hardy RJ. Correlation of recognition visual acuity with posterior retinal structure in advanced retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1512-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2118.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22232483Good WV, Hardy RJ, Wallace DK, Bremer D, Rogers DL, Siatkowski RM, De Becker I, Summers CG, Fellows R, Tung B, Palmer EA. beta-Blocking and racial variation in the severity of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;130(1):117-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.130.1.117. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22153396VanderVeen DK, Bremer DL, Fellows RR, Hardy RJ, Neely DE, Palmer EA, Rogers DL, Tung B, Good WV; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Prevalence and course of strabismus through age 6 years in participants of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity randomized trial. J AAPOS. 2011 Dec;15(6):536-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21746974Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group; Dobson V, Quinn GE, Summers CG, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Good WV. Grating visual acuity results in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;129(7):840-6. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.143.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21320954Quinn GE, Dobson V, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Palmer EA, Good WV; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Visual field extent at 6 years of age in children who had high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;129(2):127-32. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.360.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20385942Christiansen SP, Dobson V, Quinn GE, Good WV, Tung B, Hardy RJ, Baker JD, Hoffman RO, Reynolds JD, Rychwalski PJ, Shapiro MJ; Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Progression of type 2 to type 1 retinopathy of prematurity in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;128(4):461-5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.34.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20385926Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group; Good WV, Hardy RJ, Dobson V, Palmer EA, Phelps DL, Tung B, Redford M. Final visual acuity results in the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;128(6):663-71. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.72. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
Related trials for Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Collect Data on How Aflibercept (Eylea) Given Using a Paediatric Dosing Device is Used in Preterm Babies With Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United Kingdom (UK)
Retinopathy of Prematurity, Preterm Infants
RecruitingObservational study
The Correlation Between Red Cell Transfusion and Complications of Prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Retinal Vasculature in Infant Eyes
Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, PK and PD of FLQ-101 in Premature Neonates
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Recruiting
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William V. Good, M.D. study chair
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
26 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing retinal ablation in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 26 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2005. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 26 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00027222, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2005.