AnorexiaPhase 3NCT00031707
Comparison of Megestrol and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid-Enriched Nutritional Supplement in Treating Patients With Cancer-Related Weight Loss and Lack of Appetite
A Phase 3 study testing eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate in people with Anorexia and Cachexia, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 44 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Megestrol and /or an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement may improve cancer-related weight loss and lack of appetite. It is not yet known whether megestrol alone, an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement alone, or a combination of both is most effective in treating cancer-related… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 429 participants
- Where
- 44 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2000to Jan 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically proven cancer other than brain, breast, ovarian, endometrial, or prostate cancer
- Compelling clinical evidence of cancer is allowed when tissue sample is unobtainable
- Considered incurable with available therapies
- At least 5 pounds weight loss within the past 2 months (excluding perioperative weight loss) and/or have estimated caloric intake of less than 20 cal/kg daily
- Weight loss must be perceived as a problem by the patient
- Potential weight gain must be considered beneficial by the attending physician
- No history of primary brain cancer or brain metastases
- No clinical evidence of ascites
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- ECOG 0-2
Life expectancy:
- At least 3 months
Cardiovascular:
- No poorly controlled congestive heart failure
- No poorly controlled hypertension
- No history of thromboembolic disease
Other:
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Alert and mentally competent
- Able to reliably take oral medication
- No known mechanical obstruction of the alimentary tract, malabsorption, or intractable vomiting (more than 5 episodes per week)
- No diabetes requiring insulin
- Diabetes requiring an oral hypoglycemic agent or diet control allowed
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Chemotherapy:
- Concurrent chemotherapy allowed
Endocrine therapy:
- At least 1 month since prior adrenal steroids, androgens, progestational agents, or appetite stimulants (e.g., dronabinol)
- No concurrent adrenal steroids, androgens, other progestational agents, or appetite stimulants (e.g., dronabinol)
- Inhalant, topical, or optical steroids allowed
- Short-term dexamethasone as an anti-emetic during chemotherapy allowed
Radiotherapy:
- Concurrent radiotherapy allowed
Other:
- No tube feedings or parenteral nutrition
Trial locations and contacts
44 sites in 2 countries.
44 sites in 2 countries
United States22 sites
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Medcenter One Health System
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
CCOP - Ochsner
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212-4772
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
CentraCare Health Plaza
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882
Canada22 sites
William Osler Health Centre
Brampton, Ontario, L6W 2Z8
Tom Baker Cancer Center - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, PEI
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 8T5
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Cancer Care Ontario-Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3
Kingston Regional Cancer Centre
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9
Cancer Care Ontario-London Regional Cancer Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Trillium Health Centre
Mississauga, Ontario, L5B 1B8
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6
Nanaimo Cancer Clinic
Nanaimo, British Columbia, V9S 2B7
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1C4
Peterborough Oncology Clinic
Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 7B6
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
L'Hopital Laval
Ste-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: Phase III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Comparison of Megestrol Acetate (Megace) Versus an N-3 Fatty Acid (EPA) Enriched Nutritional Supplement Versus Both for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia and Anorexia
RATIONALE: Megestrol and /or an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement may improve cancer-related weight loss and lack of appetite. It is not yet known whether megestrol alone, an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement alone, or a combination of both is most effective in treating cancer-related weight loss and loss of appetite.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of megestrol with or without an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement to that of the omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement alone in treating patients who have cancer-related weight loss and lack of appetite.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the appetite-stimulating properties of megestrol vs an eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched nutritional supplement vs both, in terms of patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite, in patients with cancer-related cachexia and anorexia.
- Determine the effect of these regimens on nausea and vomiting in these patients.
- Assess quality of life in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate interleukin-6 concentration changes with appetite and weight changes in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to primary cancer (lung vs gastrointestinal vs other), severity of weight loss in the past 2 months (less than 10 pounds vs 10 pounds or more), planned concurrent chemotherapy (yes vs no), age (under 50 vs 50 and over), and prognosis (good vs bad vs unsure). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Being tested
- eicosapentaenoic acid, megestrol acetate, placebo
- Keywords
- anorexia, cachexia
- Medical subject headings
- Anorexia, Cachexia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eicosapentaenoic acidDietary supplement
megestrol acetateDrug
placeboOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| megestrol + placebo | Active comparator | Patients receive oral megestrol once daily and oral placebo twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. Receives: Drug: megestrol acetate; Other: placebo |
| eicosapentaenoic acid + placebo | Active comparator | Patients receive oral placebo once daily and an eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched nutritional supplement twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. Receives: Dietary Supplement: eicosapentaenoic acid; Other: placebo |
| megestrol + eicosapentaenoic acid | Experimental | Patients receive oral megestrol once daily and an EPA-enriched nutritional supplement twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment.
Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. Receives: Dietary Supplement: eicosapentaenoic acid; Drug: megestrol acetate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare the appetite-stimulating properties (eg, patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite)
Measured: Up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Assess quality of life
Measured: Up to 5 years
Overall survival
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2000
- Primary completionJan 2004
- Study completionJan 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnorexiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 429 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aminah Jatoi, MD, Study chair, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00031707
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCCTG-989255
- Other IDs
- CDR0000069218, CAN-NCIC-SC18, NCI-P02-0205
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2002
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Jatoi A, Rowland K, Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Dakhil SR, MacDonald N, Gagnon B, Novotny PJ, Mailliard JA, Bushey TI, Nair S, Christensen B; North Central Cancer Treatment Group. An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2469-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.024.
PubMed 15197210
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Comparison of Megestrol Acetate (Megace) Versus an N-3 Fatty Acid (EPA) Enriched Nutritional Supplement Versus Both for the Treatment of Cancer Cachexia and Anorexia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00031707
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NCCTG-989255
- Keywords
- anorexia, cachexia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 429 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Study start
- Mar 2000
- Primary completion
- Jan 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2004 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Megestrol and /or an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement may improve cancer-related weight loss and lack of appetite. It is not yet known whether megestrol alone, an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement alone, or a combination of both is most effective in treating cancer-related weight loss and loss of appetite.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of megestrol with or without an omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement to that of the omega-3 fatty acid-enriched nutritional supplement alone in treating patients who have cancer-related weight loss and lack of appetite.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the appetite-stimulating properties of megestrol vs an eicosapentaenoic acid-enriched nutritional supplement vs both, in terms of patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite, in patients with cancer-related cachexia and anorexia.
- Determine the effect of these regimens on nausea and vomiting in these patients.
- Assess quality of life in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate interleukin-6 concentration changes with appetite and weight changes in patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to primary cancer (lung vs gastrointestinal vs other), severity of weight loss in the past 2 months (less than 10 pounds vs 10 pounds or more), planned concurrent chemotherapy (yes vs no), age (under 50 vs 50 and over), and prognosis (good vs bad vs unsure). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| megestrol + placebo | Active comparator | Drug: megestrol acetate, Other: placeboPatients receive oral megestrol once daily and oral placebo twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment. Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. |
| eicosapentaenoic acid + placebo | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: eicosapentaenoic acid, Other: placeboPatients receive oral placebo once daily and an eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)-enriched nutritional supplement twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment. Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. |
| megestrol + eicosapentaenoic acid | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: eicosapentaenoic acid, Drug: megestrol acetatePatients receive oral megestrol once daily and an EPA-enriched nutritional supplement twice daily. Treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity and as long as the patient and physician feel it is beneficial. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, weekly for 1 month, and then monthly thereafter during study treatment. Patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eicosapentaenoic acid | Dietary supplement | eicosapentaenoic acid + placebo, megestrol + eicosapentaenoic acid |
| megestrol acetate | Drug | megestrol + eicosapentaenoic acid, megestrol + placebo |
| placebo | Other | eicosapentaenoic acid + placebo, megestrol + placebo |
Primary outcome
Compare the appetite-stimulating properties (eg, patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
2 secondary outcomes
Assess quality of life
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 15197210Jatoi A, Rowland K, Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Dakhil SR, MacDonald N, Gagnon B, Novotny PJ, Mailliard JA, Bushey TI, Nair S, Christensen B; North Central Cancer Treatment Group. An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2469-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.024.
Related trials for Anorexia
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruiting
Be Body Brave: Digital Written Exposure Therapy for Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders
RecruitingObservational study
Speech Groups for Children Living With a Sibling Who Suffers From Anorexia Nervosa
Anorexia Nervosa
Enrolling by invitation
Sleep and Activity For Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders, Anorexia Nervosa
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers in EV Associated With Marrow Adiposity in Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type, Anorexia Nervosa (DSM-IV Revised Criteria)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aminah Jatoi, MD study chair
Mayo Clinic
44 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate in people with Anorexia and Cachexia, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 44 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 44 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare the appetite-stimulating properties (eg, patient weight, rate of weight change, and appetite) (time frame: Up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00031707, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2016.