Heart TransplantationNCT00042614
Study of Heart Transplant Rejection
An observational study of Heart Transplantation, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will investigate the causes of acute and chronic rejection of transplanted hearts. To find better ways to detect, treat and possibly prevent heart transplant rejection, more information about the cause is needed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Transplantation
- How many people
- 188 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2003to not given
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who have had heart transplants, Patients Awaiting Heart Transplant, and Controls screened to obtain. Controls matched to patients for age, gender and race.@@@
Who may be able to join
- Adult heart transplant center generally accepts patients within the physiologic age range of 12 to 65 years old, however, for our study heart transplant patients must be 18 years of age or above.
- Indication for cardiac transplantation as outlined by the 24th Bethesda Conference on Cardiac Transplantation. These are as follows:
- Peak VO(2) less than 10 ml/kg per minute or less than 50% of maximal predicted VO(2) with achievement of anaerobic metabolism.
- Severe cardiac ischemia consistently limiting routine activity not amenable to surgical or percutaneous revascularization.
- Recurrent symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias refractory to all accepted therapeutic modalities.
- Any healthy normal man or women who is the appropriate age and gender for matching to a transplant patient.
Who cannot join
- Adult heart transplant centers exclude infants, toddlers, and children with a physiologic age less than 12, and adults with advanced physiologic age (less than 65), however, for our study we will exclude heart transplant patients less than 18 years of age.
- The final decision to exclude a candidate from cardiac transplantation will be made by the hospital's heart transplant committee. The committee uses, as a guideline, the criteria outlined in the 24th Bethesda conference.
- EKG with evidence of clinically relevant heart disease.
- Echocardiogram with evidence of clinically relevant heart disease.
- Any disease process that is not well controlled by medications.
- Total tobacco use for greater than one month over the last 5 years.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Symptoms of coronary or cardiac insufficiency.
- More than one major risk factor for coronary artery disease excluding gender or age.
- Confirmed intrauterine pregnancy in women.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
About this study
Official title: Acute Cardiac Allograft Cellular Rejection and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers and Target Pathways for Preventive Therapy
This study will investigate the causes of acute and chronic rejection of transplanted hearts. To find better ways to detect, treat and possibly prevent heart transplant rejection, more information about the cause is needed. Acute and chronic heart transplant rejection may be caused by certain substances the body produces in response to the new heart. This study will try to find a blood or urine test that detects genes and proteins that can serve as markers of rejection. Such a test may lead to earlier detection and improved treatment.
Patients 18 years and above who are on a wait list for heart transplant at a UNOS-approved heart transplant center, whose institutional review board has approved this protocol, may be eligible for this study. Healthy volunteers will also be included in the study to establish a database of normal values for comparison with patients undergoing heart transplant. In addition, patients who have had a heart transplant within the past 1 to 5 years will be enrolled in a pilot study. Normal volunteers will be screened for participation with an electrocardiogram (EKG) and echocardiogram, non-invasive tests to evaluate heart function.
Read more
Participants will undergo the following procedures:
- Review of medical records Patients who have had a heart transplant and those on a wait list to receive a heart will have their medical records reviewed to collect information on their condition.
- Blood samples 60 cc (about 3 tablespoons) of blood will be collected from all participants by needle stick in a vein. The sample will be analyzed for genes and proteins that might predict heart rejection. In addition, many genes in blood cells and cells lining blood vessels that are unrelated to heart transplant rejection and whose functions or significance are unknown will also be examined for ideas for future research. Patients enrolled while on a wait list will, after transplantation, have an additional 44 cc (about 2 tablespoons) of blood collected at each heart biopsy and rejection episode during the first year of transplant, and 60 cc collected with each yearly biopsy for the next 9 years.
- Urine samples Between 100 and 300 cc (3 to 10 ounces) of urine may be collected from all participants to confirm blood test results
Read the detailed description
Cardiac transplantation has been successful in improving survival in end stage heart failure. But graft rejection has limited survival after transplantation. In the first year, acute cellular rejection and infection remain the most common causes of morbidity and mortality. Afterwards, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), as a result of chronic vascular rejection, is the major cause of morbidity and mortality. Within the first year post-transplantation, almost two-thirds of recipients will experience at least one rejection episode. At five years post-transplantation, nearly 50% of survivors will have CAV. Clinically, the symptoms of acute rejection are relatively nonspecific (fatigue, dyspnea, fever). Most CAV patients remain asymptomatic until they develop serious problems such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, ventricular dysrhythmias or sudden cardiac death. Presently, the gold standard for diagnosing acute cardiac allograft rejection is right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. This is an invasive method of diagnosis subject to morbidity and random sampling and interpretation error. Likewise, the gold standard for diagnosing CAV is cardiac catheterization with intravascular ultrasound, an invasive procedure also subject to morbidity. Noninvasive methods such as electrocardiography, echocardiography, and nuclear studies all have been studied, but have been unsuccessful, thus far, for either condition. Peripheral blood evaluations of cytokines and cytoimmunologic markers have also been unsuccessful in either condition. This clinical trial studies the feasibility of using functional genomics and proteomics to identify genes and proteins respectively that can serve as reliable biomarkers of acute cardiac cellular rejection and CAV. We plan to recruit subjects who are on the transplant waiting list. We will analyze the blood of these patients pre-transplant and serially post-transplant over one year and then regularly on a yearly basis. By correlating putative biomarkers with clinical, histological, and imaging based evidence of allograft disease we hope to build a database comprised of functional genomics, cytokine, cytoimmunologic and proteomics data relevant to the immunologic relationship between the donor organ and recipient. With this database we hope to obtain a minimal subset of differentially expressed genes, cytokines, cytoimmunologic and protein change profiles that is most predictive of both acute allograft rejection and CAV. This will eventually serve as the basis for a diagnostic blood test. Thus, with the application of functional genomics, cytokine, and cytoimmunologic analysis and proteomics we hope to derive a noninvasive method to detect both acute cellular cardiac allograft rejection and CAV, thereby minimizing the need for invasive methods of diagnosis. Further better understanding the genetic programs triggered and protein changes induced during rejection may lead to the identification of target pathways for developing new therapeutic approaches aimed at prevention.
Recently, several published reports have established that detection of donor DNA in recipient s blood can serve as a diagnostic tool of graft injury. The level of donor DNA measured as percentage of circulating cell-free donor DNA (%ccfdDNA) accurately diagnoses acute rejection with a high sensitivity and specificity, at times several months before the diagnosis by examining endomyocardial biopsies. The ability of cell free DNA to diagnose graft injury early opens a new window to re-examine markers of rejection. These markers are traditionally evaluated using biopsy results, often positive late during rejection. %ccfdDNA offers an opportunity to better characterize our analyses.
- Conditions
- Heart Transplantation
- Keywords
- Genes, Heart, Lymphocytes, Proteomics, Transplant, Natural History, Heart Transplant, Healthy Volunteer, HV, Normal Control
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Controls | Matched to patients for age, gender and race | |
| Patients | Who have had heart transplants, awaiting, or controls screened. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rejection warranting medical intervention
Medical intervention
Measured: end of study
Pathologically determined tissue rejection grades irrespective of treatment.
Tissue Rejection
Measured: end of study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2002 (estimated)
- Study start7 Apr 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michael A Solomon, M.D., Principal investigator, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00042614
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 020266
- Other IDs
- 02-CC-0266
- Status last verified
- 8 Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Aug 2002
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zavazava N, Bottcher H, Ruchholtz WM. Soluble MHC class I antigens (sHLA) and anti-HLA antibodies in heart and kidney allograft recipients. Tissue Antigens. 1993 Jul;42(1):20-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1993.tb02161.x.
PubMed 8248891Pelletier RP, Morgan CJ, Sedmak DD, Miyake K, Kincade PW, Ferguson RM, Orosz CG. Analysis of inflammatory endothelial changes, including VCAM-1 expression, in murine cardiac grafts. Transplantation. 1993 Feb;55(2):315-20. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199302000-00017.
PubMed 7679529Herskowitz A, Mayne AE, Willoughby SB, Kanter K, Ansari AA. Patterns of myocardial cell adhesion molecule expression in human endomyocardial biopsies after cardiac transplantation. Induced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 related to implantation and rejection. Am J Pathol. 1994 Nov;145(5):1082-94.
PubMed 7977640
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Cardiac Allograft Cellular Rejection and Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers and Target Pathways for Preventive Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00042614
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 020266
- Conditions
- Heart Transplantation
- Keywords
- Genes, Heart, Lymphocytes, Proteomics, Transplant, Natural History, Heart Transplant, Healthy Volunteer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 188 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate the causes of acute and chronic rejection of transplanted hearts. To find better ways to detect, treat and possibly prevent heart transplant rejection, more information about the cause is needed. Acute and chronic heart transplant rejection may be caused by certain substances the body produces in response to the new heart. This study will try to find a blood or urine test that detects genes and proteins that can serve as markers of rejection. Such a test may lead to earlier detection and improved treatment.
Patients 18 years and above who are on a wait list for heart transplant at a UNOS-approved heart transplant center, whose institutional review board has approved this protocol, may be eligible for this study. Healthy volunteers will also be included in the study to establish a database of normal values for comparison with patients undergoing heart transplant. In addition, patients who have had a heart transplant within the past 1 to 5 years will be enrolled in a pilot study. Normal volunteers will be screened for participation with an electrocardiogram (EKG) and echocardiogram, non-invasive tests to evaluate heart function.
Participants will undergo the following procedures:
- Review of medical records Patients who have had a heart transplant and those on a wait list to receive a heart will have their medical records reviewed to collect information on their condition.
- Blood samples 60 cc (about 3 tablespoons) of blood will be collected from all participants by needle stick in a vein. The sample will be analyzed for genes and proteins that might predict heart rejection. In addition, many genes in blood cells and cells lining blood vessels that are unrelated to heart transplant rejection and whose functions or significance are unknown will also be examined for ideas for future research. Patients enrolled while on a wait list will, after transplantation, have an additional 44 cc (about 2 tablespoons) of blood collected at each heart biopsy and rejection episode during the first year of transplant, and 60 cc collected with each yearly biopsy for the next 9 years.
- Urine samples Between 100 and 300 cc (3 to 10 ounces) of urine may be collected from all participants to confirm blood test results
Detailed description
Cardiac transplantation has been successful in improving survival in end stage heart failure. But graft rejection has limited survival after transplantation. In the first year, acute cellular rejection and infection remain the most common causes of morbidity and mortality. Afterwards, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), as a result of chronic vascular rejection, is the major cause of morbidity and mortality. Within the first year post-transplantation, almost two-thirds of recipients will experience at least one rejection episode. At five years post-transplantation, nearly 50% of survivors will have CAV. Clinically, the symptoms of acute rejection are relatively nonspecific (fatigue, dyspnea, fever). Most CAV patients remain asymptomatic until they develop serious problems such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, ventricular dysrhythmias or sudden cardiac death. Presently, the gold standard for diagnosing acute cardiac allograft rejection is right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. This is an invasive method of diagnosis subject to morbidity and random sampling and interpretation error. Likewise, the gold standard for diagnosing CAV is cardiac catheterization with intravascular ultrasound, an invasive procedure also subject to morbidity. Noninvasive methods such as electrocardiography, echocardiography, and nuclear studies all have been studied, but have been unsuccessful, thus far, for either condition. Peripheral blood evaluations of cytokines and cytoimmunologic markers have also been unsuccessful in either condition. This clinical trial studies the feasibility of using functional genomics and proteomics to identify genes and proteins respectively that can serve as reliable biomarkers of acute cardiac cellular rejection and CAV. We plan to recruit subjects who are on the transplant waiting list. We will analyze the blood of these patients pre-transplant and serially post-transplant over one year and then regularly on a yearly basis. By correlating putative biomarkers with clinical, histological, and imaging based evidence of allograft disease we hope to build a database comprised of functional genomics, cytokine, cytoimmunologic and proteomics data relevant to the immunologic relationship between the donor organ and recipient. With this database we hope to obtain a minimal subset of differentially expressed genes, cytokines, cytoimmunologic and protein change profiles that is most predictive of both acute allograft rejection and CAV. This will eventually serve as the basis for a diagnostic blood test. Thus, with the application of functional genomics, cytokine, and cytoimmunologic analysis and proteomics we hope to derive a noninvasive method to detect both acute cellular cardiac allograft rejection and CAV, thereby minimizing the need for invasive methods of diagnosis. Further better understanding the genetic programs triggered and protein changes induced during rejection may lead to the identification of target pathways for developing new therapeutic approaches aimed at prevention.
Recently, several published reports have established that detection of donor DNA in recipient s blood can serve as a diagnostic tool of graft injury. The level of donor DNA measured as percentage of circulating cell-free donor DNA (%ccfdDNA) accurately diagnoses acute rejection with a high sensitivity and specificity, at times several months before the diagnosis by examining endomyocardial biopsies. The ability of cell free DNA to diagnose graft injury early opens a new window to re-examine markers of rejection. These markers are traditionally evaluated using biopsy results, often positive late during rejection. %ccfdDNA offers an opportunity to better characterize our analyses.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Controls | – | –Matched to patients for age, gender and race |
| Patients | – | –Who have had heart transplants, awaiting, or controls screened. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who have had heart transplants, Patients Awaiting Heart Transplant, and Controls screened to obtain. Controls matched to patients for age, gender and race.@@@
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Peak VO(2) less than 10 ml/kg per minute or less than 50% of maximal predicted VO(2) with achievement of anaerobic metabolism.
- Severe cardiac ischemia consistently limiting routine activity not amenable to surgical or percutaneous revascularization.
- Recurrent symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias refractory to all accepted therapeutic modalities.
- Any healthy normal man or women who is the appropriate age and gender for matching to a transplant patient.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adult heart transplant centers exclude infants, toddlers, and children with a physiologic age less than 12, and adults with advanced physiologic age (less than 65), however, for our study we will exclude heart transplant patients less than 18 years of age.
- The final decision to exclude a candidate from cardiac transplantation will be made by the hospital's heart transplant committee. The committee uses, as a guideline, the criteria outlined in the 24th Bethesda conference.
- EKG with evidence of clinically relevant heart disease.
- Echocardiogram with evidence of clinically relevant heart disease.
- Any disease process that is not well controlled by medications.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Rejection warranting medical intervention
Time frame: end of study
Medical intervention
Pathologically determined tissue rejection grades irrespective of treatment.
Time frame: end of study
Tissue Rejection
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 8248891Zavazava N, Bottcher H, Ruchholtz WM. Soluble MHC class I antigens (sHLA) and anti-HLA antibodies in heart and kidney allograft recipients. Tissue Antigens. 1993 Jul;42(1):20-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1993.tb02161.x.
- Background: PubMed 7679529Pelletier RP, Morgan CJ, Sedmak DD, Miyake K, Kincade PW, Ferguson RM, Orosz CG. Analysis of inflammatory endothelial changes, including VCAM-1 expression, in murine cardiac grafts. Transplantation. 1993 Feb;55(2):315-20. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199302000-00017.
- Background: PubMed 7977640Herskowitz A, Mayne AE, Willoughby SB, Kanter K, Ansari AA. Patterns of myocardial cell adhesion molecule expression in human endomyocardial biopsies after cardiac transplantation. Induced ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 related to implantation and rejection. Am J Pathol. 1994 Nov;145(5):1082-94.
- NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web PageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Heart Transplantation
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Risk Assessment For Kidney Transplantation - Utility of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Assessment of Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation
Cardiovascular Diseases, Kidney Transplant; Complications
Recruiting
Multidisciplinary Non-Pharmacological Intervention to Improve Quality of Life in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Heart Transplant Patients, Kidney Transplant Patients
RecruitingPhase 3
SWITCH: Apixaban vs Vitamin K in HM3
LVAD (Left Ventricular Assist Device) Thrombosis, Heart Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael A Solomon, M.D. principal investigator
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Transplantation, run by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rejection warranting medical intervention (time frame: end of study). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00042614, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.