SchizophreniaPhase 2NCT00044044
A Comparison of Study Drug With Placebo and Haloperidol in Patients With Schizophrenia
A Phase 2 study testing Lurasidone 20 mg, Lurasidone 40mg and Lurasidone 80 mg in people with Schizophrenia, run by Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. at 34 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the drug SM-13496 compared to a placebo and to haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia
- What is being tested?
- Lurasidone 20 mg, Lurasidone 40mg and Lurasidone 80 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2002to May 2003
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient has a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia
- The patient has been hospitalized with acute or relapsing schizophrenia within 3 weeks of screening
- The patient has had a duration of illness of at least one year.
- The patient has a BPRS score of at least 42 at baseline and a score of at least 4 in two or more items of the positive symptom subcluster on the PANSS
- The patient is able to remain off antipsychotic medication for a 4 day washout period
Who cannot join
- The patient has had psychiatric hospitalizations other than current hospitalizations within 1 month prior to screening.
- The patient is considered treatment resistant-Substance abuse-Prolactin level of > 200 ng/mL at baseline
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 1 country.
34 sites in 1 country
United States34 sites
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Community Clinical Research
Austin, Texas, 78756
FutureSearch Trials
Austin, Texas, 78756
Claghorn Lesem Research Clinic, Inc.
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Northwest Clinical Research Center
Belleview, Washington, 98004
Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Institute for Psychopharmacology Research
Cerritos, California, 90703
Psychiatric Professional Services Inc
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Comprehensive Clinical Research CNS, PC
Clementon, New Jersey, 08021
St. Paul Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235
University Hills Clinical Research
Dallas, Texas, 75235
CNS, Inc.
Falls Church, Virginia, 22041
CNS Network
Garden Grove, California, 92845
California Clinical Trials Medical Group
Glendale, California, 91206
Alexian Brothers Behavioral Health Hospital
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60194
Hawaii Research Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96826
ClinSearch, Inc.
Kenilworth, New Jersey, 07033
Optimum Health Services
La Mesa, California, 91942
Comprehensive Neuroscience. Inc.
Melbourne, Florida, 32935
Medstream, Inc.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53210
Lake Mead Hospital
North Las Vegas, Nevada, 89030
Segal Institute for Clinical Research
North Miami, Florida, 33161
American Medical Research
Oak Brook, Illinois, 60523
University of California, Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Quantum Clinical Services Group
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19139
Albert Einstein Medical Center - Dept. of Psychiatry
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
Centers for Behavioral Health, LLC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Affiliated Research Institute
San Diego, California, 92108
Sharp Mesa Vista Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
California Neuropsychopharmacolgoy Clinical Research Insitute
San Diego, California, 92126
Carman Research
Smyrna, Georgia, 30080
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Comprehensive Neuroscience. Inc.
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
Coordinated Research of Florida, Inc.
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: A 6-Week, Double-Blind, Randomized, Fixed-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of SM-13496 Compared to Placebo and Haloperidol in Patients With Schizophrenia Who Are Experiencing an Acute Exacerbation of Symptoms
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the drug SM-13496 compared to a placebo and to haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia.
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Being tested
- Lurasidone 20 mg, Lurasidone 40mg, Lurasidone 80 mg, Haloperidol 10mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, Latuda, Lurasidone
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lurasidone 20 mgDrug
Lurasidone 20mg/day tablets
Lurasidone 40mgDrug
Lurasidone 40mg/day tablets
Lurasidone 80 mgDrug
Lurasidone 80mg/day - 2 40mg tablets
Haloperidol 10mgDrug
Haloperidol 10mg/day tablets
PlaceboDrug
Matching Placebo to Lurasdione and Haloperidol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20 mg | Experimental | Lurasidone 20 mg tablets Receives: Drug: Lurasidone 20 mg |
| Lurasidone 40 mg | Experimental | Lurasidone 40 mg tablets Receives: Drug: Lurasidone 40mg |
| Lurasidone 80 mg | Experimental | Lurasidone 2 40 mg tablets Receives: Drug: Lurasidone 80 mg |
| Haloperidol 10mg | Active comparator | Haloperidol 10mg tablets Receives: Drug: Haloperidol 10mg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching Placebo to Lurasidone and Haloperidol Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)Total Score
The BPRS consists of 18 ordered categorical items (from "not present" to "extremely severe," on a 1- to 7-point scale), each developed to assess patient symptomatology in a relatively discrete symptom area. The BPRS will be extracted from the PANSS by adding the scores of the 18 items (P2 to P7, N1, N2, and G1 to G10) of the PANSS and will not be assessed separately. The minimum score on the BPRS is 18 and the maximum is 126. The higher number indicates a worsening of schizophrenia.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores
The PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale)is a 30-item scale that evaluates positive, negative, and other symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme). Scores range from 30-210 with higher scores representing a worsening of schizophrenia.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores
The CGI Severity (CGI-S) assesses the severity of illness of the patient relative to the particular population on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients).
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores
The MADRS is a 10-item rating scale that assesses apparent and reported sadness, lassitude, pessimism, inner tension, suicidality, reduced sleep or appetite, difficulty in concentration, and lack of interest. Each item is scored on a 7-point scale with a score of 0 reflecting no symptoms and a score of 6 reflecting symptoms of maximum severity.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2002 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2002
- Primary completionMay 2003
- Study completionMay 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SchizophreniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, MD, Study director, Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00044044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D1050049
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2002
- Last updated
- 17 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Storman D, Koperny M, Styczen K, Datka W, Jaeschke RR. Lurasidone versus typical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 20;1(1):CD012429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012429.pub2.
PubMed 39831535
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 6-Week, Double-Blind, Randomized, Fixed-Dose, Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of SM-13496 Compared to Placebo and Haloperidol in Patients With Schizophrenia Who Are Experiencing an Acute Exacerbation of Symptoms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00044044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D1050049
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Keywords
- Schizophrenia, Latuda, Lurasidone
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 356 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2002
- Primary completion
- May 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Apr 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the drug SM-13496 compared to a placebo and to haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20 mg | Experimental | Drug: Lurasidone 20 mgLurasidone 20 mg tablets |
| Lurasidone 40 mg | Experimental | Drug: Lurasidone 40mgLurasidone 40 mg tablets |
| Lurasidone 80 mg | Experimental | Drug: Lurasidone 80 mgLurasidone 2 40 mg tablets |
| Haloperidol 10mg | Active comparator | Drug: Haloperidol 10mgHaloperidol 10mg tablets |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching Placebo to Lurasidone and Haloperidol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient has a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia
- The patient has been hospitalized with acute or relapsing schizophrenia within 3 weeks of screening
- The patient has had a duration of illness of at least one year.
- The patient has a BPRS score of at least 42 at baseline and a score of at least 4 in two or more items of the positive symptom subcluster on the PANSS
- The patient is able to remain off antipsychotic medication for a 4 day washout period
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient has had psychiatric hospitalizations other than current hospitalizations within 1 month prior to screening.
- The patient is considered treatment resistant-Substance abuse-Prolactin level of > 200 ng/mL at baseline
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lurasidone 20 mgLurasidone 20mg/day tablets | Drug | Lurasidone 20 mg |
| Lurasidone 40mgLurasidone 40mg/day tablets | Drug | Lurasidone 40 mg |
| Lurasidone 80 mgLurasidone 80mg/day - 2 40mg tablets | Drug | Lurasidone 80 mg |
| Haloperidol 10mgHaloperidol 10mg/day tablets | Drug | Haloperidol 10mg |
| PlaceboMatching Placebo to Lurasdione and Haloperidol | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)Total Score
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
The BPRS consists of 18 ordered categorical items (from "not present" to "extremely severe," on a 1- to 7-point scale), each developed to assess patient symptomatology in a relatively discrete symptom area. The BPRS will be extracted from the PANSS by adding the scores of the 18 items (P2 to P7, N1, N2, and G1 to G10) of the PANSS and will not be assessed separately. The minimum score on the BPRS is 18 and the maximum is 126. The higher number indicates a worsening of schizophrenia.
3 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the CGI-S (Clinical Global Impression of Severity) Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the MADRS (Montgomery Asberg-Depression Scale) Scores
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Apr 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39831535Storman D, Koperny M, Styczen K, Datka W, Jaeschke RR. Lurasidone versus typical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 20;1(1):CD012429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012429.pub2.
Related trials for Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia
Treatment Resistant Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director, MD study director
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
34 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lurasidone 20 mg, Lurasidone 40mg and Lurasidone 80 mg in people with Schizophrenia, run by Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. at 34 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Apr 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment in the BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale)Total Score (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00044044, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2014.