AsthmaPhase 3NCT00045955
Long-Term Safety Performance of Fexofenadine in Asthma
A Phase 3 study testing Fexofenadine, Comparator = Montelukast in people with Asthma, run by Sanofi at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety performance of fexofenadine compared to montelukast in subjects with asthma Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Fexofenadine, Comparator = Montelukast
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2002to Nov 2003
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding females 12 through 80 years of age
- FEV1 in the context of this study is greater than 40% and not less or equal to 87% of predicted values for subjects not currently taking ICS and greater than 40% and not less or equal to 95% for those subjects taking ICS at Visit 1 and/or Visit 2 (and no albuterol use within 6 hours prior to spirometry)
- Improvement in FEV1 of at least 12% of predicted value and at least 200ml within 15 to 30 minutes of inhaling 2 puffs of albuterol 90mcg/actuation demonstrated at study entry OR documented during the previous 12 months at the study site.
- Use of a short-acting, beta-agonist inhaler to treat asthma symptoms on an average of at least 2 days per week during the previous 2 weeks (greater than or equal to 4 days total during the previous 2 weeks, excluding prophylactic use).
Who cannot join
- Otherwise healthy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Aventis Pharmaceutical Inc.
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Groups Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety Performance of Fexofenadine Compared to Montelukast in Subjects With Asthma
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety performance of fexofenadine compared to montelukast in subjects with asthma
Read the detailed description
The incidence of respiratory allergy in the US has increased gradually over the past several years, and current estimates suggest that allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma affect approximately 20% and 5% of the population, respectively. Rhinitis and asthma frequently coexist, and large-scale population surveys indicate that up to 38% of subjects with rhinitis have asthma, and up to 78% of subjects with asthma have chronic nasal symptoms. Safety concerns with the increased use of inhaled corticosteroids, the heterogeneity of the disease, and poor compliance with asthma medication regimens, point to the need for the development of safe and convenient oral therapies for asthma. Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (eg montelukast) are the latest class of inflammation-modulating asthma drugs and appear to cause fewer long-term side effects than systemic corticosteroids and reduce the need for shorter-acting bronchodilator reliever medicines. However variability in response between patients has been observed and clinical experience with these agents is still limited.
Histamine is an important chemical mediator of inflammation in asthma. The benefits of antihistamine treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma have been well documented, however their clinical use has been previously limited due to the high doses required for efficacy and their associated side effects including sedation and cognitive impairment. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to H1-receptor antagonism, some of the newer nonsedating, non-impairing antihistamines appear to possess various anti-inflammatory properties at concentrations achieved at therapeutic dosages suggesting an additional benefit of these drugs in the management of allergic diseases and asthma. The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety performance of fexofenadine compared to montelukast in subjects with asthma.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Fexofenadine, Comparator = Montelukast
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Fexofenadine, Comparator = MontelukastDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety evaluation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pulmonary function tests.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2002 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2002
- Primary completionNov 2003
- Study completionNov 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- ICD CSD, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00045955
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M016455P/3003
- Other IDs
- M016455
- Status last verified
- Aug 2008
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2002
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2008
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2008. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel Groups Study to Assess the Long-Term Safety Performance of Fexofenadine Compared to Montelukast in Subjects With Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00045955
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M016455P/3003
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2002
- Primary completion
- Nov 2003 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2003 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2002 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety performance of fexofenadine compared to montelukast in subjects with asthma
Detailed description
The incidence of respiratory allergy in the US has increased gradually over the past several years, and current estimates suggest that allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma affect approximately 20% and 5% of the population, respectively. Rhinitis and asthma frequently coexist, and large-scale population surveys indicate that up to 38% of subjects with rhinitis have asthma, and up to 78% of subjects with asthma have chronic nasal symptoms. Safety concerns with the increased use of inhaled corticosteroids, the heterogeneity of the disease, and poor compliance with asthma medication regimens, point to the need for the development of safe and convenient oral therapies for asthma. Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists (eg montelukast) are the latest class of inflammation-modulating asthma drugs and appear to cause fewer long-term side effects than systemic corticosteroids and reduce the need for shorter-acting bronchodilator reliever medicines. However variability in response between patients has been observed and clinical experience with these agents is still limited.
Histamine is an important chemical mediator of inflammation in asthma. The benefits of antihistamine treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma have been well documented, however their clinical use has been previously limited due to the high doses required for efficacy and their associated side effects including sedation and cognitive impairment. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to H1-receptor antagonism, some of the newer nonsedating, non-impairing antihistamines appear to possess various anti-inflammatory properties at concentrations achieved at therapeutic dosages suggesting an additional benefit of these drugs in the management of allergic diseases and asthma. The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term safety performance of fexofenadine compared to montelukast in subjects with asthma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Males and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding females 12 through 80 years of age
- FEV1 in the context of this study is greater than 40% and not less or equal to 87% of predicted values for subjects not currently taking ICS and greater than 40% and not less or equal to 95% for those subjects taking ICS at Visit 1 and/or Visit 2 (and no albuterol use within 6 hours prior to spirometry)
- Improvement in FEV1 of at least 12% of predicted value and at least 200ml within 15 to 30 minutes of inhaling 2 puffs of albuterol 90mcg/actuation demonstrated at study entry OR documented during the previous 12 months at the study site.
- Use of a short-acting, beta-agonist inhaler to treat asthma symptoms on an average of at least 2 days per week during the previous 2 weeks (greater than or equal to 4 days total during the previous 2 weeks, excluding prophylactic use).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Otherwise healthy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Fexofenadine, Comparator = Montelukast | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Safety evaluation
1 secondary outcome
Pulmonary function tests.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2008.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ICD CSD study director
Sanofi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fexofenadine, Comparator = Montelukast in people with Asthma, run by Sanofi at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety evaluation. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2008.