Breast CancerPhase 3NCT00047099
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Women With Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and epirubicin hydrochloride in people with Breast Cancer, run by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich at 2 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells following surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and epirubicin hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 446 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Aug 2001to Mar 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Diagnosis of primary epithelial invasive carcinoma of the breast
- T1-4, N1-2, M0
- Must have 4 metastatic axillary lymph nodes
- Complete resection of the primary tumor within the past 5 weeks
- Free of invasive carcinoma with at least 10 lymph nodes removed
- No inflammatory breast cancer
- No distant metastases by chest x-ray, liver ultrasound, and whole body bone scan
- Hormone receptor status:
- Estrogen and/or progesterone receptor status known
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 to 70
Sex
- Female
Menopausal status
- Not specified
Performance status
- ECOG 0-1
Life expectancy
- At least 32 weeks
Hematopoietic
- WBC at least 3,000/mm3
- Platelet count at least 100,000
Hepatic
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- SGOT/SGPT no greater than 1.5 times ULN
- Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 1.5 times ULN
- Albumin no greater than 1.5 times ULN
Renal
- Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times ULN
Cardiovascular
- No cardiomyopathy with impaired ventricular function
- No New York Heart Association class III or IV heart disease
- No cardiac arrhythmias influencing LVEF and requiring medication
- No myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- No angina pectoris within the past 6 months
- No uncontrolled arterial hypertension
Other
- No other primary malignancy except carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell skin cancer
- No known hypersensitivity to docetaxel, epirubicin, fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, or other study medication
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior cytotoxic or other antineoplastic therapy
- No other concurrent cytotoxic or other antineoplastic therapy
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery
- See Disease Characteristics
Other
- At least 3 weeks since prior investigational agents
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Germany2 sites
I. Frauenklinik und Hebammenschule der Ludwig-Maximillians Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, D-80337
Klinikum Rechts Der Isar - Technische Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, D-81675
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FEC-Chemotherapy vs. EC-Doc-Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells following surgery. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating women who have primary breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the time to progression of women with primary breast cancer treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide.
- Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to metastatic axillary lymph node involvement (4-9 vs 10 or more), hormone receptor status (estrogen and/or progesterone) of the primary tumor (negative vs positive), and timing of adjuvant radiotherapy (intermittently after completion of 50% of chemotherapy vs after completion of all chemotherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 10-15 minutes and epirubicin IV over 15 minutes on days 1 and 8 and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV over 15 minutes and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days 1, 21, 42, and 63 and docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 84, 105, 126, and 147 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Within 21 days after the completion of chemotherapy, patients undergo adjuvant radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks. Alternatively, patients may undergo radiotherapy intermittently after completion of 50% of chemotherapy.
Upon completion of chemotherapy, patients with positive hormone receptor status (estrogen and/or progesterone) receive oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. Additionally, patients with positive hormone receptor status who are under age 40 receive goserelin subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 2 years.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, prior to each course of chemotherapy, 4 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, 6 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, and then at 6 months after completion of chemotherapy.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 446 patients (223 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, epirubicin hydrochloride, fluorouracil, goserelin acetate
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cyclophosphamideDrug
docetaxelDrug
epirubicin hydrochlorideDrug
fluorouracilDrug
goserelin acetateDrug
tamoxifen citrateDrug
adjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of time to progression
Secondary outcomes (3)
Overall survival time
Toxicity
Changes in quality of life over time as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2001
- Primary completionFeb 2012
- Study completionMar 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 446 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Harald Sommer, MD, Study chair, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00047099
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LMU-ADEBAR
- Other IDs
- LMU-ADEBAR, EU-20221
- Status last verified
- Dec 2002
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2002
- Last updated
- 30 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Janni JW, Sommer H, Rack B, et al.: The ADEBAR trial: final toxicity analysis of a phase III study evaluating the role of docetaxel in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients with extensive lymph node involvement. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-585, 24s, 2007.
Gauger K, Bismarck FV, Heinrigs M, et al.: Phase III study evaluating the role of docetaxel in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer patients with = 4 involved lymph nodes: ADEBAR study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-908, 104s, 2005.
Sommer HL, Janni W, Rack B, et al.: The ADEBAR-trial: the sequencing of regional radiotherapy and chemotherapy does not influence cytostatic dose intensity. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-744, 64s, 2005.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FEC-Chemotherapy vs. EC-Doc-Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00047099
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LMU-ADEBAR
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 446 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2001
- Primary completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug and giving them after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells following surgery. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating women who have primary breast cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the time to progression of women with primary breast cancer treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide vs docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide.
- Compare the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to metastatic axillary lymph node involvement (4-9 vs 10 or more), hormone receptor status (estrogen and/or progesterone) of the primary tumor (negative vs positive), and timing of adjuvant radiotherapy (intermittently after completion of 50% of chemotherapy vs after completion of all chemotherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive fluorouracil IV over 10-15 minutes and epirubicin IV over 15 minutes on days 1 and 8 and oral cyclophosphamide on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive epirubicin IV over 15 minutes and cyclophosphamide IV over 1 hour on days 1, 21, 42, and 63 and docetaxel IV over 1 hour on days 84, 105, 126, and 147 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Within 21 days after the completion of chemotherapy, patients undergo adjuvant radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5.5 weeks. Alternatively, patients may undergo radiotherapy intermittently after completion of 50% of chemotherapy.
Upon completion of chemotherapy, patients with positive hormone receptor status (estrogen and/or progesterone) receive oral tamoxifen daily for 5 years. Additionally, patients with positive hormone receptor status who are under age 40 receive goserelin subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 2 years.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, prior to each course of chemotherapy, 4 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, 6 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, and then at 6 months after completion of chemotherapy.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 446 patients (223 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cyclophosphamide | Drug | – |
| docetaxel | Drug | – |
| epirubicin hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| fluorouracil | Drug | – |
| goserelin acetate | Drug | – |
| tamoxifen citrate | Drug | – |
| adjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Comparison of time to progression
3 secondary outcomes
Overall survival time
Toxicity
Changes in quality of life over time as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2013.
- Results publicationJanni JW, Sommer H, Rack B, et al.: The ADEBAR trial: final toxicity analysis of a phase III study evaluating the role of docetaxel in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer patients with extensive lymph node involvement. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-585, 24s, 2007.
- Results publicationGauger K, Bismarck FV, Heinrigs M, et al.: Phase III study evaluating the role of docetaxel in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer patients with = 4 involved lymph nodes: ADEBAR study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-908, 104s, 2005.
- Results publicationSommer HL, Janni W, Rack B, et al.: The ADEBAR-trial: the sequencing of regional radiotherapy and chemotherapy does not influence cytostatic dose intensity. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-744, 64s, 2005.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harald Sommer, MD study chair
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and epirubicin hydrochloride in people with Breast Cancer, run by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich at 2 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of time to progression. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00047099, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2013.