AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionNCT00048815

Drug Therapy to Treat Minor Depression

A study testing Citalopram and St. John's Wort in people with Depression, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 6-month study will compare the effectiveness of citalopram (Celexa®), hypericum (St. John's Wort), and placebo for the treatment of minor depression. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Depression
What is being tested?
Citalopram and St. John's Wort
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
73 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2003to Apr 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Minor Depression symptoms for at least 6 months
  • Endorse one of the DSM-IV "A" criteria for MDD and at least one other symptom of MDD or endorse both of the "A" criteria for MDD
  • Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score < 70
  • Short form health survey (SF-36) social functioning score <= 75% or an emotional role functioning score <= 67%
  • HAM-D-17 score 10-17, inclusive
  • Minor depression symptoms for at least 6 months

Who cannot join

  • Major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia within the past year or in partial remission of MDD
  • At least a 12-week course of either citalopram at a minimum or 40 mg/day or St. John's Wort at a minimum of 900 mg/day during the current episode of depression
  • Previous intolerance to either citalopram or St. John's Wort or history of nonresponse to either citalopram at a minimum of 40 mg/day or St. John's Wort at a minimum of 900 mg/day for at least 12 weeks
  • Unstable medical illness, including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurologic, or hematologic disease
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • The following DSM-IV diagnoses: organic mental disorders; substance use disorders, including alcohol, active within the last year or patients with a positive urine drug screen; schizophrenia; delusional disorder; psychotic disorders not elsewhere classified; bipolar disorder; bereavement; adjustment disorder; antisocial personality disorder; panic disorder, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Patients may have a lifetime diagnosis of an anxiety disorder as long as it is not current.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Mood-congruent or mood-incongruent psychotic features
  • Psychotropic drugs
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Investigational psychotropic drugs within the last year
  • Positive toxicology screen
  • Medications metabolized by the CYP3A4 system, where induction of this system poses a risk to the medical stability of the patient
  • Pregnancy or refusal to use a medically accepted method of contraception
  • Serious suicide or homicide risk
  • Psychotherapy beginning less than 3 months ago

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • University of Pittsburgh, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pharmacotherapy for Minor Depression

This 6-month study will compare the effectiveness of citalopram (Celexa®), hypericum (St. John's Wort), and placebo for the treatment of minor depression.

Read the detailed description

Minor depression is highly prevalent, causes substantial morbidity and disability, presents a serious risk factor for the development of major depressive disorder, yet is under recognized and under treated. Researchers have determined that patients with minor depression frequently seek treatment from general practitioners and are often treated with prescription antidepressants. There is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of St. John's Wort in the management of minor depression. If the proposed study demonstrates the efficacy of St. John's Wort and/or citalopram, it will suggest treatment paradigms that can be tested and applied in primary care settings.

Subjects participated in a 12-week double-blind randomized study comparing St. John's Wort, citalopram, and placebo. Subjects were recruited through clinical referrals and community advertising. Data were obtained at the baseline visit (just prior to randomization) and at postrandomization visits conducted at 2-week intervals for the next 12 weeks, for a modified intent-to-treat sample consisting of all 73 subjects with at least 1 post-randomization visit (evaluable sample).

Conditions
Depression
Being tested
Citalopram, St. John's Wort, Placebos
Keywords
Minor Depression, St. John's Wart
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CitalopramDrug

    Also called Celexa, Cipramil

    Established Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor antidepressant

  • St. John's WortDrug

    Also called Hypericum

    Natural extract from the St. John's Wort plant.

  • PlacebosDrug

    Placebo pill

Study groups in NCT00048815
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
citalopramActive comparatorSubjects in this arm received 20mg/day of citalopram taken orally for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Citalopram
St. John's WortExperimentalSubjects in this arm received 810 mg/day of St. John's Wort taken orally (in three tablets of 270mg each) for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: St. John's Wort
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects in this arm received double-dummy (look-alike) placebo for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebos

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy Assessed Using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C)

    We expect that subjects with minor depression treated for 12 weeks with St. John's Wort or citalopram will have significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity than those treated with placebo. This will be measured by blind ratings on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C) which has a total score range from 0 to 84 with 0 being not depressed at all and 84 being the most depressed. The change will be calculated by subtracting the Week 12 score from the Baseline score.

    Measured: Change from Baseline to Week 12

  2. Number of Adverse Events (Physical Symptoms) Emerging or Worsening During 12 Weeks of Treatment

    We expect that subjects treated for Minor Depression for 12 weeks with either St. John's Wort or citalopram will have similar safety profiles to subjects treated with placebo, and will not differ by more than 20% in rates of adverse side effects (e.g., nausea, headache, insomnia, hypersomnia, diarrhea) from subjects treated with placebo. This was measured by the number of adverse events (physical symptoms) emerging or worsening during 12 weeks of treatment.

    Measured: Change from Baseline to Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2002 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2003
  3. Primary completionApr 2007
  4. Study completionApr 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
73 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00048815
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01MH061758
Other IDs
R01MH061758, R01MH061757, R01MH061394, DSIR AT-SO
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
8 Nov 2002
Last updated
11 May 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Citalopram and St. John's Wort in people with Depression, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy Assessed Using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Clinician Rated (IDS-C) (time frame: Change from Baseline to Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in