AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerPhase 3NCT00058201

Two Chemotherapy Regimens Compared With Observation in Treating Patients With Completely Resected Pancreatic Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride and leucovorin calcium in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Royal Liverpool University Hospital at 27 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective, or whether chemotherapy is more effective than observation, in treating pancreatic cancer after surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatic Cancer
What is being tested?
fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride and leucovorin calcium
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,030 participants
Where
27 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
Jul 2001to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas OR
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of 1 of the following types of cancer:
  • Acinar cell carcinoma or cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas
  • Cancers of the periampullary region
  • Cancers of the intrapancreatic part of the bile duct
  • Periampullary cancers of uncertain origin
  • Complete macroscopic resection (R0 or R1 resection)
  • Histological examination of all resection margins required
  • No stage IVB disease
  • No evidence of malignant ascites
  • No liver or peritoneal metastases
  • No evidence of spread to other distant abdominal or extra-abdominal organs
  • No pancreatic lymphoma

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • WHO 0-2

Life expectancy

  • More than 3 months

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

Other

  • Not pregnant
  • Able to participate in long-term follow-up
  • No other prior or concurrent malignancy except curatively treated basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • No serious medical or psychological condition that would preclude study treatment

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • No neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • No other concurrent chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • Not specified

Surgery

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • Recovered from prior resection

Trial locations and contacts

27 sites in 13 countries.

27 sites in 13 countries

Canada14 sites
  • Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Hopital Charles Lemoyne

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Nova Scotia Cancer Centre

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • British Columbia Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3

  • Cancer Research Institute at Queen's University

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

  • Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9

  • London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6

  • Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Edmond Odette Cancer Centre at Sunnybrook

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Princess Margaret Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • St. Joseph's Health Centre - Toronto

    Toronto, Ontario, M6R 1B5

  • British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Centre

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5

  • CancerCare Manitoba

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9

Other trials in Canada

Australia2 sites
  • Flinders Medical Centre

    Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042

  • Institute of Oncology at Prince of Wales Hospital

    Randwick, New South Wales, 2031

Other trials in Australia

Czechia1 site
  • Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

    Preha 4, 14021

Other trials in Czechia

Finland1 site
  • Tampere University Hospital

    Tampere, 33521

Other trials in Finland

France1 site
  • Hopital Tenon

    Paris, 75970

Other trials in France

Germany1 site
  • Universitaets-Kinderklinik Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, D-69120

Other trials in Germany

Greece1 site
  • Agia Olga Hospital

    Athens, G-15233

Other trials in Greece

Hungary1 site
  • Petz Aladar County Hospital

    Gydr, h-9024

Other trials in Hungary

Italy1 site
  • Policlinico Borgo Roma

    Verona, 37134

Other trials in Italy

Japan1 site
  • Kyoto University Hospital

    Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507

Other trials in Japan

Sweden1 site
  • Uppsala University Hospital

    Uppsala, S-75185

Other trials in Sweden

Switzerland1 site
  • Inselspital Bern

    Bern, CH-3010

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom1 site
  • Royal Liverpool University Hospital

    Liverpool, England, L69 3GA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: European Study Group For Pancreatic Cancer - Trial 3

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known which chemotherapy regimen is more effective, or whether chemotherapy is more effective than observation, in treating pancreatic cancer after surgery.

PURPOSE: Phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two chemotherapy regimens with no further therapy in treating patients who have completely resected pancreatic cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine vs fluorouracil and leucovorin calcium (vs observation only in patients with ampullary or other pancreatic malignancy), in terms of overall survival, in patients with completely resected pancreatic cancer.

Secondary

  • Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare the quality of life and 5-year survival of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to histology (ductal adenocarcinoma vs ampullary or other pancreatic malignancy), resection margin status, and participating country. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Randomization for patients with ampullary or other pancreatic malignancy includes an observation arm.

  • Arm I: Patients receive leucovorin calcium IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1-5.
  • Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15.
  • Arm III (patients with ampullary or other pancreatic malignancy only): Patients undergo observation.

Treatment in arms I and II repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually for 5 years.

Patients are followed every 3 months.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,030 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (515 per arms I and II) will be accrued for this study.

Being tested
fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium, clinical observation
Keywords
acinar cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, duct cell adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, stage I pancreatic cancer, stage II pancreatic cancer, stage III pancreatic cancer, stage IV pancreatic cancer
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00058201
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm IActive comparatorPatients receive leucovorin calcium IV and fluorouracil IV on days 1-5.
Receives: Drug: fluorouracil; Drug: leucovorin calcium
Arm IIExperimentalPatients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15.
Receives: Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride
Arm IIINo interventionPatients undergo observation.
Receives: Other: clinical observation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Toxicity as measured by NCI CTC v2.0

  2. Quality of life as measured by EORTC QLQ C-30 and ESPAC-QLQ at 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually for 5 years

  3. Survival rate at 2 and 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2001
  3. Primary completionApr 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Enrolment
1,030 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00058201
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000287023
Other IDs
RLUH-NCRI-ESPAC-3V2, EU-20043, CAN-NCIC-PA2, AGITG-ESPAC-3
Status last verified
May 2008
First submitted
7 Apr 2003
Last updated
18 Dec 2013
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352.

    PubMed 22782416
  • Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, Ghaneh P, Cunningham D, Goldstein D, Padbury R, Moore MJ, Gallinger S, Mariette C, Wente MN, Izbicki JR, Friess H, Lerch MM, Dervenis C, Olah A, Butturini G, Doi R, Lind PA, Smith D, Valle JW, Palmer DH, Buckels JA, Thompson J, McKay CJ, Rawcliffe CL, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Sep 8;304(10):1073-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1275.

    PubMed 20823433
  • Jones RP, Psarelli EE, Jackson R, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Palmer DH, Campbell F, Valle JW, Faluyi O, O'Reilly DA, Cunningham D, Wadsley J, Darby S, Meyer T, Gillmore R, Anthoney A, Lind P, Glimelius B, Falk S, Izbicki JR, Middleton GW, Cummins S, Ross PJ, Wasan H, McDonald A, Crosby T, Ting Y, Patel K, Sherriff D, Soomal R, Borg D, Sothi S, Hammel P, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Tjaden C, Strobel O, Hackert T, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the ESPAC-4 Randomized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial. JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1038-1048. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3337.

    PubMed 31483448
  • Ghaneh P, Kleeff J, Halloran CM, Raraty M, Jackson R, Melling J, Jones O, Palmer DH, Cox TF, Smith CJ, O'Reilly DA, Izbicki JR, Scarfe AG, Valle JW, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Goldstein D, Padbury R, Shannon J, Dervenis C, Glimelius B, Deakin M, Anthoney A, Lerch MM, Mayerle J, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Campbell F, Strobel O, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. The Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Survival and Recurrence Following Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):520-529. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002557.

    PubMed 29068800

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride and leucovorin calcium in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Royal Liverpool University Hospital at 27 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 27 sites in Canada, Australia, Czechia, Finland, France and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00058201, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in