Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT00063882
Interstitial Brachytherapy With or Without External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Brachytherapy (100/110), Brachytherapy (125/145) and External Beam Radiation Therapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 170 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other sources to damage tumor cells. Interstitial brachytherapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Combining interstitial brachytherapy with external-beam radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Brachytherapy (100/110), Brachytherapy (125/145) and External Beam Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 588 participants
- Where
- 170 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2003to 22 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- T1c-T2b, N0, M0
- Intermediate-risk disease, as defined by 1 of the following:
- Gleason score < 7 AND prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10-20 ng/mL
- Gleason score 7 AND PSA < 10 ng/mL
- No evidence of distant metastases
- Prostate volume ≤ 60 cc by transrectal ultrasonography
- American Urological Association voiding symptom score no greater than 15 (alpha blockers allowed)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- Zubrod 0-1
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- Not specified
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Not specified
Other
- Patients must use effective contraception
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ at any other site
- No major medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude study therapy
- No hip prosthesis
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
- Prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy allowed provided the following are true:
- Therapy was initiated within 2-6 months of study enrollment
- Therapy was no more than 6 months in duration
- Use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride) is discontinued before registration
- No concurrent hormonal therapy
Radiotherapy
- No prior pelvic radiotherapy
Surgery
- No prior radical surgery for prostate cancer
- No prior transurethral resection of the prostate
- No prior cryosurgery
Other
- No prior transurethral needle ablation of the prostate
- No prior transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate
Trial locations and contacts
170 sites in 2 countries.
170 sites in 2 countries
United States168 sites
Hickman Cancer Center at Bixby Medical Center
Adrian, Michigan, 49221
Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital
Akron, Ohio, 44309-2090
Radiation Oncology Center
Alliance, Ohio, 44601
Saint Joseph Mercy Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106-0995
CCOP - Michigan Cancer Research Consortium
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Auburn Radiation Oncology
Auburn, California, 95603
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
Barberton Citizens Hospital
Barberton, Ohio, 44203
Alta Bates Summit Comprehensive Cancer Center
Berkeley, California, 94704
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center at Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83706
New York Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263-0001
Peninsula Medical Center
Burlingame, California, 94010
Radiation Oncology Centers - Cameron Park
Cameron Park, California, 95682
Sands Cancer Center
Canandiaqua, New York, 14424
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, 95608
East Bay Radiation Oncology Center
Castro Valley, California, 94546
Valley Medical Oncology Consultants - Castro Valley
Castro Valley, California, 94546
Sandra L. Maxwell Cancer Center
Cedar City, Utah, 84720
Blumenthal Cancer Center at Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28232-2861
Adena Regional Medical Center
Chillicothe, Ohio, 45601
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish St. Peters Hospital - St. Peters
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
Riverside Methodist Hospital Cancer Care
Columbus, Ohio, 43214-3998
CCOP - Columbus
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Grant Medical Center Cancer Care
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Mount Carmel Health - West Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43222
Doctors Hospital at Ohio Health
Columbus, Ohio, 43228
Geisinger Cancer Institute at Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-0001
Oakwood Cancer Center at Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center
Dearborn, Michigan, 48123-2500
Grady Memorial Hospital
Delaware, Ohio, 43015
Community Cancer Center
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
Hematology Oncology Center
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
St. Francis Hospital
Federal Way, Washington, 98003
Genesys Hurley Cancer Institute
Flint, Michigan, 48503
Hurley Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, 48503
Michael and Dianne Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center at Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
Fredericksburg Oncology, Incorporated
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401
Valley Medical Oncology
Fremont, California, 94538
California Cancer Center - Woodward Park Office
Fresno, California, 93720
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Van Elslander Cancer Center at St. John Hospital and Medical Center
Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, 48236
Saint Francis/Mount Sinai Regional Cancer Center at Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06105
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Hayward
Hayward, California, 94545
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Cape Cod Hospital
Hyannis, Massachusetts, 02601
Foote Memorial Hospital
Jackson, Michigan, 49201
Ella Milbank Foshay Cancer Center at Jupiter Medical Center
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute at Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
St. Joseph Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
North Kansas City Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
Parvin Radiation Oncology
Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
Research Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132
Kingsbury Center for Cancer Care at Cheshire Medical Center
Keene, New Hampshire, 03431
Sparrow Regional Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48912-1811
CCOP - Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
Nevada Cancer Institute
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002
Liberty Hospital
Liberty, Missouri, 64068
Lima Memorial Hospital
Lima, Ohio, 45804
St. Mary Mercy Hospital
Livonia, Michigan, 48154
Logan Regional Hospital
Logan, Utah, 84321
Shields Radiation Oncology Center - Mansfield
Mansfield, Massachusetts, 02048
Strecker Cancer Center at Marietta Memorial Hospital
Marietta, Ohio, 45750
Fox Chase Virtua Health Cancer Program at Virtua Memorial Hospital Marlton
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
Martinez, California, 94553-3156
Northwest Ohio Oncology Center
Maumee, Ohio, 43537-1839
Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital - Ozaukee
Mequon, Wisconsin, 53097
CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Columbia-Saint Mary's Cancer Care Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53211
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Coleman Radiation Oncology Center at Carter General Hospital
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
El Camino Hospital Cancer Center
Mountain View, California, 94040
Jon and Karen Huntsman Cancer Center at Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84157
CarolinaEast Cancer Care
New Bern, North Carolina, 28560
Hospital of Saint Raphael
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Beth Israel Medical Center - Petrie Division
New York, New York, 10003-3803
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Licking Memorial Cancer Care Program at Licking Memorial Hospital
Newark, Ohio, 43055
Sutter Health - Western Division Cancer Research Group
Novato, California, 94945
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center - Summit Campus
Oakland, California, 94609
Bay Area Breast Surgeons, Incorporated
Oakland, California, 94609
CCOP - Bay Area Tumor Institute
Oakland, California, 94609
Larry G Strieff MD Medical Corporation
Oakland, California, 94609
Tom K Lee, Incorporated
Oakland, California, 94609
Kaiser Permanente - Division of Research - Oakland
Oakland, California, 94611
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Oakland
Oakland, California, 94611
Val and Ann Browning Cancer Center at McKay-Dee Hospital Center
Ogden, Utah, 84403
St. Charles Mercy Hospital
Oregon, Ohio, 43616
Menorah Medical Center
Overland Park, Kansas, 66209
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
Arizona Oncology Services Foundation
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
St. Joseph Mercy Oakland
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341-2985
Mercy Regional Cancer Center at Mercy Hospital
Port Huron, Michigan, 48060
CCOP - Kansas City
Prairie Village, Kansas, 66208
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center - Provo
Provo, Utah, 84604
Good Samaritan Cancer Center
Puyallup, Washington, 98372
South Suburban Oncology Center
Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169
All Saints Cancer Center at Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare
Racine, Wisconsin, 53405
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Rancho Cordova
Rancho Cordova, California, 95670
McGlinn Family Regional Cancer Center at Reading Hospital and Medical Center
Reading, Pennsylvania, 19612-6052
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Redwood City
Redwood City, California, 94063
Renown Institute for Cancer at Renown Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Richmond
Richmond, California, 94801
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Highland Hospital of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14620
University Radiation Oncology at Parkridge Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14626
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Rohnert Park Cancer Center
Rohnert Park, California, 94928
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Roseville
Roseville, California, 95661
Radiation Oncology Center - Roseville
Roseville, California, 95661
Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Incorporated
Sacramento, California, 95815
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95819
South Sacramento Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95823
South Sacramento Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95823
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Sacramento
Sacramento, California, 95825
Seton Cancer Institute at Saint Mary's - Saginaw
Saginaw, Michigan, 48601
Norris Cotton Cancer Center - North
Saint Johnsbury, Vermont, 05819
Heartland Regional Medical Center
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506
Saint Joseph Oncology, Incorporated
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64507
Cancer Care Center, Incorporated
Salem, Ohio, 44460
Utah Cancer Specialists at UCS Cancer Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - San Francisco Geary Campus
San Francisco, California, 94115
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
California Pacific Medical Center - California Campus
San Francisco, California, 94118
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Teresa
San Jose, California, 95119
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - San Rafael
San Rafael, California, 94903
North Coast Cancer Care, Incorporated
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Clara Kiely Campus
Santa Clara, California, 95051
Study site
Santa Clara, California, 95051
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - South San Francisco
South San Francisco, California, 94080
Cancer Institute at St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62702
Regional Cancer Center at Memorial Medical Center
Springfield, Illinois, 62781-0001
Community Hospital of Springfield and Clark County
Springfield, Ohio, 45505
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Dixie Regional Medical Center - East Campus
St. George, Utah, 84770
Kaiser Permanente Medical Facility - Stockton
Stockton, California, 95210
South Atlantic Radiation Oncology, LLC
Supply, North Carolina, 28462
Flower Hospital Cancer Center
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
Franciscan Cancer Center at St. Joseph Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98405-3004
CCOP - Northwest
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
MultiCare Regional Cancer Center at Tacoma General Hospital
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Mercy Hospital of Tiffin
Tiffin, Ohio, 44883
Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43608
Medical University of Ohio Cancer Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43614
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43617
St. Anne Mercy Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Toledo Clinic, Incorporated - Main Clinic
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Solano Radiation Oncology Center
Vacaville, California, 95687
Sutter Solano Medical Center
Vallejo, California, 94589
Fox Chase Virtua Health Cancer Program at Virtua West Jersey
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Walnut Creek
Walnut Creek, California, 94596
St. John Macomb Hospital
Warren, Michigan, 48093
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
West Allis Memorial Hospital
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
Mount Carmel St. Ann's Cancer Center
Westerville, Ohio, 43081
Frank M. and Dorothea Henry Cancer Center at Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
Coastal Carolina Radiation Oncology Center
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Winchester Hospital Radiation Oncology Center
Winchester, Massachusetts, 01890
Cancer Treatment Center
Wooster, Ohio, 44691
York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17405
Genesis - Good Samaritan Hospital
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
Canada2 sites
Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study Comparing Combined External Beam Radiation and Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Brachytherapy With Brachytherapy Alone for Selected Patients With Intermediate Risk Prostatic Carcinoma
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other sources to damage tumor cells. Interstitial brachytherapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Combining interstitial brachytherapy with external-beam radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether interstitial brachytherapy is more effective with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interstitial brachytherapy with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients who have prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the 5-year freedom from progression in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
- Compare biochemical (i.e., prostate-specific antigen) failure, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition, disease-specific survival, local progression, and distant metastases in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare morbidity and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the feasibility of collecting Medicare data in a large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) prostate cancer clinical trial for cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of combined treatment with interstitial brachytherapy and EBRT.
- Prospectively collect diagnostic biopsy samples from these patients for future biomarker analyses.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (T1c vs T2a or T2b), Gleason score (≤ 6 vs 7), prostate-specific antigen (< 10 ng/mL vs 10-20 ng/mL), and prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo external beam radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Within 2-4 weeks of radiotherapy, patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy with iodine I 125 or palladium Pd 103 seeds.
- Arm II: Patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy only, as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 4, 12, and 24 months, and then annually for 3 years.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3-5 weeks, at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Brachytherapy (100/110), Brachytherapy (125/145), External Beam Radiation Therapy
- Keywords
- stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Brachytherapy (100/110)Radiation
100 Gy Palladium-103 (P-102) or 110 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 2-4 weeks of completion of external beam radiotherapy.
Brachytherapy (125/145)Radiation
125 Gy Palladium-103 (P-103) or 145 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 4 weeks of study entry.
External Beam Radiation TherapyRadiation
Also called EBRT
Total dose of 45 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles as a daily dose of 1.8 Gy given 5 times per week. The prescribed dose is defined at the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point. Both 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EBRT + Brachytherapy | Experimental | External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (100/110) Receives: Radiation: Brachytherapy (100/110); Radiation: External Beam Radiation Therapy |
| Brachytherapy Only | Active comparator | Transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (125/145) Receives: Radiation: Brachytherapy (125/145) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate
A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (14)
Biochemical Failure Rate (Protocol Definition)
Biochemical failure is defined as having 3 consecutive rises of post-treatment PSA or starting hormones after one or more elevations in post-treatment PSA but before 3 consecutive elevations are documented. The sum of the 3 consecutive rises must exceed 1 ng/mL above the nadir. If 3 consecutive PSA rises occur during the first 24 months followed by a subsequent non-hormonal induced PSA decrease, patients will not be considered PSA failures. Three consecutive rises with any of the 3 PSA values occurring more than 24 months after the implant procedure will constitute a failure. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Biochemical Failure (Phoenix Definition)
Biochemical Failure is defined as an increase of 2 ng/ml or more in PSA over the nadir PSA after 24 months from the start of treatment or the start of salvage hormones. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Prostate Cancer Death
Prostate cancer death is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of treatment or death associated with any of the following: 1) further clinical tumor progression occurring after initiation of salvage androgen suppression therapy; 2) a rise that exceeds 1.0 ng/ml in the serum PSA level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy; and 3) disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy. Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of prostate cancer death, last known follow-up (censored), or death without prostate cancer (competing risk). Prostate cancer death rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Local Failure
Failure is defined as progression (increase in palpable abnormality) at any time, failure of regression of the palpable tumor by two years, and redevelopment of a palpable abnormality after complete disappearance of previous abnormalities. Histologic criteria for local failure are presence of prostatic carcinoma upon biopsy and positive biopsy of the palpably normal prostate more than two years after the start of treatment. Time to local failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first local failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without local failure (competing risk). Local failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Distant Metastases
Failure is defined as the appearance of any distant metastases. Time to distant metastases is defined as time from randomization to the date of first distant metastases, last known follow-up (censored), or death without distant metastases (competing risk). Distant metastases rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Overall Survival
Failure is defined as death due to any cause. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Percentage of Patients With Acute Grade 2+ and Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]
Acute toxicities are scored according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring ≤ 180 days from start of radiation. The CTC v 2.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to based.
Measured: Zero to 180 days from the start of radiation
Time to Late Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]
Late toxicities are scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring > 180 days from radiation start. Grade 3+ GU/GI and overall were analyzed. RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Time to late grade 3+ toxicity is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 3+ toxicity, last known follow-up (censored), or death without late grade 3+ toxicity (competing risk). Late grade 3+ toxicity rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
Measured: From 181 days after the start of radiation to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 4 Months
The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 4 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 4 months.
Measured: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 24 Months
The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 24 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 24 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 24 months.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 4 Months
The AUA-SI is a validated 7-item measure used to assess urinary symptoms. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms for the individual questions and overall total. Six questions ask about frequency of symptoms over the past month with possible responses: 0= Not at all; 1 = Less than 1 time in 5; 2 = less than half the time, 3 = About half the time, 4 = More than half the time, 5 = Almost always. An additional question asks the number of times one gets up to urinate after going to bed, with response indicating the exact number of times ranging from 0 to 5. The total score is the sum of the questions and ranges from 0 to 35. Change is calculated as follow-up timepoint score - baseline score such that a negative change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint.
Measured: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 24 Months
The AUA-SI is a validated 7-item measure used to assess urinary symptoms. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms for the individual questions and overall total. Six questions ask about frequency of symptoms over the past month with possible responses: 0= Not at all; 1 = Less than 1 time in 5; 2 = less than half the time, 3 = About half the time, 4 = More than half the time, 5 = Almost always. An additional question asks the number of times one gets up to urinate after going to bed, with response indicating the exact number of times ranging from 0 to 5. The total score is the sum of the questions and ranges from 0 to 35. Change is calculated as follow-up timepoint score - baseline score such that a negative change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 4 Months
The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The change score was calculated as the value at the follow-up timepoint minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint.
Measured: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 24 Months
The EQ5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The change score was calculated as the value at the follow-up timepoint minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint.
Measured: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2003
- Primary completionMay 2017
- Study completion22 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 588 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NRG Oncology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bradley R. Prestidge, MD, Principal investigator, Bon Secours Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00063882
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTOG 0232
- Other IDs
- CDR0000288823, NCI-2009-01091
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 8 Jul 2003
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Michalski JM, Winter KA, Prestidge BR, Sanda MG, Amin M, Bice WS, Gay HA, Ibbott GS, Crook JM, Catton CN, Raben A, Bosch W, Beyer DC, Frank SJ, Papagikos MA, Rosenthal SA, Barthold HJ, Roach M 3rd, Moughan J, Sandler HM. Effect of Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Brachytherapy Alone for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0232 Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4035-4044. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01856. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PubMed 37315297
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study Comparing Combined External Beam Radiation and Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Brachytherapy With Brachytherapy Alone for Selected Patients With Intermediate Risk Prostatic Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00063882
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RTOG 0232
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IIB prostate cancer, stage IIA prostate cancer, adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 588 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NRG Oncology
- Study start
- Jun 2003
- Primary completion
- May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other sources to damage tumor cells. Interstitial brachytherapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Combining interstitial brachytherapy with external-beam radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether interstitial brachytherapy is more effective with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interstitial brachytherapy with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients who have prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the 5-year freedom from progression in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
- Compare biochemical (i.e., prostate-specific antigen) failure, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition, disease-specific survival, local progression, and distant metastases in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare morbidity and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the feasibility of collecting Medicare data in a large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) prostate cancer clinical trial for cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of combined treatment with interstitial brachytherapy and EBRT.
- Prospectively collect diagnostic biopsy samples from these patients for future biomarker analyses.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (T1c vs T2a or T2b), Gleason score (≤ 6 vs 7), prostate-specific antigen (< 10 ng/mL vs 10-20 ng/mL), and prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo external beam radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Within 2-4 weeks of radiotherapy, patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy with iodine I 125 or palladium Pd 103 seeds.
- Arm II: Patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy only, as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 4, 12, and 24 months, and then annually for 3 years.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3-5 weeks, at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EBRT + Brachytherapy | Experimental | Radiation: Brachytherapy (100/110), Radiation: External Beam Radiation TherapyExternal beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (100/110) |
| Brachytherapy Only | Active comparator | Radiation: Brachytherapy (125/145)Transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (125/145) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy (100/110)100 Gy Palladium-103 (P-102) or 110 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 2-4 weeks of completion of external beam radiotherapy. | Radiation | EBRT + Brachytherapy |
| Brachytherapy (125/145)125 Gy Palladium-103 (P-103) or 145 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 4 weeks of study entry. | Radiation | Brachytherapy Only |
| External Beam Radiation TherapyAlso: EBRTTotal dose of 45 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles as a daily dose of 1.8 Gy given 5 times per week. The prescribed dose is defined at the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point. Both 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted. | Radiation | EBRT + Brachytherapy |
Primary outcome
5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate
Time frame: From randomization to 5 years
A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
14 secondary outcomes
Biochemical Failure Rate (Protocol Definition)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Biochemical Failure (Phoenix Definition)
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Prostate Cancer Death
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Local Failure
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Distant Metastases
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Percentage of Patients With Acute Grade 2+ and Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]
Time frame: Zero to 180 days from the start of radiation
Time to Late Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]
Time frame: From 181 days after the start of radiation to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 4 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 4 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 4 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation
Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37315297Michalski JM, Winter KA, Prestidge BR, Sanda MG, Amin M, Bice WS, Gay HA, Ibbott GS, Crook JM, Catton CN, Raben A, Bosch W, Beyer DC, Frank SJ, Papagikos MA, Rosenthal SA, Barthold HJ, Roach M 3rd, Moughan J, Sandler HM. Effect of Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Brachytherapy Alone for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0232 Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4035-4044. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01856. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-101556143 With Best Supportive Care in Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
PULSE Registry: for Patients Receiving Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Relugolix and Enzalutamide in Combination With Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Very High Risk Prostate Cancer, OPTIMAL Trial
Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bradley R. Prestidge, MD principal investigator
Bon Secours Cancer Institute
170 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Brachytherapy (100/110), Brachytherapy (125/145) and External Beam Radiation Therapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 170 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 170 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate (time frame: From randomization to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00063882, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2026.