AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT00069095

A Study of Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Bevacizumab as a First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2, Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 236 sites in 33 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 4 arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) or intravenous (iv) fluorouracil/leucovorin, in combination with iv oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) with or without iv bevacizumab (Avastin), as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2, Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2,035 participants
Where
236 sitesin 33 countries
Study dates
Jul 2003to Apr 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • ≥ 1 target lesion.

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with oxaliplatin or bevacizumab.
  • Previous systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease.
  • Progressive disease during or within 6 months of completion of previous adjuvant therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

236 sites in 33 countries.

236 sites in 33 countries

United States49 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-0001

  • Study site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30341

  • Study site

    Berkeley, California, 94704

  • Study site

    Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501

  • Study site

    Boca Raton, Florida, 33486

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02135

  • Study site

    Burlington, Vermont, 05401

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28233-3549

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • Study site

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29209

  • Study site

    East Orange, New Jersey, 07019

  • Study site

    Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007

  • Study site

    Fargo, North Dakota, 58122

  • Study site

    Farmington, New Mexico, 87401

  • Study site

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Study site

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Study site

    Gainesville, Florida, 33610-0277

  • Study site

    Gilroy, California, 95020

  • Study site

    Greenbrae, California, 94904

  • Study site

    Hamilton, New Jersey, 08690

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77024

  • Study site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0098

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • Study site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38120

  • Study site

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901

  • Study site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

  • Study site

    New Port Richey, Florida, 34652

  • Study site

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Study site

    Norwich, Connecticut, 06360

  • Study site

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Study site

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Study site

    Peoria, Illinois, 61615-7828

  • Study site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02906

  • Study site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23294

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York, 14623

  • Study site

    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Study site

    Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840

  • Study site

    Scarborough, Maine, 04074

  • Study site

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida, 33647

  • Study site

    Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013

  • Study site

    Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708

Other trials in United States

Canada24 sites
  • Study site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Study site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Study site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • Study site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • Study site

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3

  • Study site

    Lévis, Quebec, G6V 3Z1

  • Study site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • Study site

    Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2N1

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5

  • Study site

    North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7L 2L7

  • Study site

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9

  • Study site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Study site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • Study site

    St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 7C6

  • Study site

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M9N 1N8

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1H5

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5

  • Study site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6

Other trials in Canada

France21 sites
  • Study site

    Besançon, 25030

  • Study site

    Bobigny, 93009

  • Study site

    Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104

  • Study site

    Brest, 29609

  • Study site

    Chambray-lès-Tours, 37171

  • Study site

    Colmar, 68024

  • Study site

    Dijon, 21079

  • Study site

    Grenoble, 38100

  • Study site

    Lyon, 69373

  • Study site

    Metz, 57072

  • Study site

    Nice, 06189

  • Study site

    Nice, 06202

  • Study site

    Nîmes, 30029

  • Study site

    Paris, 75475

  • Study site

    Paris, 75651

  • Study site

    Paris, 75679

  • Study site

    Pierre-Bénite, 69495

  • Study site

    Rouen, 76031

  • Study site

    Saint-Herblain, 44093

  • Study site

    Saint-Herblain, 44805

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31052

Other trials in France

United Kingdom17 sites
  • Study site

    Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN

  • Study site

    Birmingham, B18 7QH

  • Study site

    Cardiff, CF14 2TL

  • Study site

    Derby, DE1 2QY

  • Study site

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Study site

    Guildford, GU2 7XX

  • Study site

    Hull, HU8 9HE

  • Study site

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Study site

    Maidstone, ME16 9QQ

  • Study site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

  • Study site

    Northwood, HA6 2RN

  • Study site

    Nottingham, NG5 1PB

  • Study site

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • Study site

    Salisbury, SP2 8BJ

  • Study site

    Southampton, SO9 4PE

  • Study site

    Sutton, SM2 5PT

  • Study site

    Taunton, TA1 5DA

Other trials in United Kingdom

Spain16 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Study site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Study site

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Study site

    Granada, 18014

  • Study site

    Leganés, 28911

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28007

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28034

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28046

  • Study site

    Málaga, 29010

  • Study site

    Santander, 39008

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46009

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46010

  • Study site

    Valencia, 46026

  • Study site

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Australia15 sites
  • Study site

    Adelaide, 5011

  • Study site

    Box Hill, 3128

  • Study site

    Brisbane, 4101

  • Study site

    Camperdown, 2050

  • Study site

    Fitzroy, 3065

  • Study site

    Footscray, 3011

  • Study site

    Kurralta Park, 5037

  • Study site

    Malvern, 3144

  • Study site

    Melbourne, 3002

  • Study site

    Melbourne, 3181

  • Study site

    Perth, 6000

  • Study site

    Port Macquarie, 2444

  • Study site

    St Leonards, 2065

  • Study site

    Sydney, 2031

  • Study site

    Sydney, 2139

Other trials in Australia

China11 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing, 100021

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100853

  • Study site

    Guangdong, 510515

  • Study site

    Guangzhou, 510060

  • Study site

    Jiangsu, 210009

  • Study site

    Jiangxi, 330000

  • Study site

    Shandong, 250117

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200025

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200092

  • Study site

    Tianjin, 300060

  • Study site

    Wuhan, 430030

Other trials in China

Germany10 sites
  • Study site

    Bochum, 44892

  • Study site

    Halle, 06120

  • Study site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Study site

    Herne, 44625

  • Study site

    Leipzig, 04129

  • Study site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Study site

    Mannheim, 68167

  • Study site

    Regensburg, 93053

  • Study site

    Stralsund, 18435

  • Study site

    Trier, 54290

Other trials in Germany

Italy8 sites
  • Study site

    Ancona, 60121

  • Study site

    Genova, 16132

  • Study site

    Modena, 41100

  • Study site

    Padova, 35100

  • Study site

    Parma, 43100

  • Study site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Study site

    Reggio Emilia, 42100

  • Study site

    Sassari, 07100

Other trials in Italy

Israel5 sites
  • Study site

    Haifa, 31096

  • Study site

    Jerusalem, 91120

  • Study site

    Petah Tikva, 49100

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv, 64239

  • Study site

    Tsrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

Russia5 sites
  • Study site

    Moscow, 105229

  • Study site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Study site

    Moscow, 117837

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg, 198255

Other trials in Russia

Sweden5 sites
  • Study site

    Gävle, 80187

  • Study site

    Karlstad, 65185

  • Study site

    Stockholm, 17176

  • Study site

    Uppsala, 751 85

  • Study site

    Västerås, 72189

Other trials in Sweden

Czechia4 sites
  • Study site

    Brno, 656 53

  • Study site

    Chomutov, 430 12

  • Study site

    Hradec Králové, 500 36

  • Study site

    Ostrava, 708 52

Other trials in Czechia

Hungary4 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1082

  • Study site

    Budapest, H-1122

  • Study site

    Győr, 9002

  • Study site

    Kecskemét, 6000

Other trials in Hungary

Ireland4 sites
  • Study site

    Cork

  • Study site

    Dublin, 4

  • Study site

    Dublin, 8

  • Study site

    Galway

Other trials in Ireland

Taiwan4 sites
  • Study site

    Kueishan, 333

  • Study site

    Taipei, 100

  • Study site

    Taipei, 112

  • Study site

    Taipei, 114

Other trials in Taiwan

Brazil3 sites
  • Study site

    Jaú, 17210-080

  • Study site

    Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050

  • Study site

    São Paulo, 05403-000

Other trials in Brazil

Denmark3 sites
  • Study site

    Copenhagen, 2100

  • Study site

    Herlev, 2730

  • Study site

    Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Finland3 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, 00029

  • Study site

    Tampere, 33520

  • Study site

    Turku, 20520

Other trials in Finland

Norway3 sites
  • Study site

    Bergen, 5021

  • Study site

    Oslo, 0407

  • Study site

    Tromsø, 9038

Other trials in Norway

South Africa3 sites
  • Study site

    Cape Town, 7506

  • Study site

    Pretoria, 0001

  • Study site

    Sandton, 2199

Other trials in South Africa

Thailand3 sites
  • Study site

    Bangkok, 10110

  • Study site

    Bangkok, 10700

  • Study site

    Khon Kaen, 40002

Other trials in Thailand

Austria2 sites
  • Study site

    Vienna, 1090

  • Study site

    Wels, 4600

Other trials in Austria

Guatemala2 sites
  • Study site

    Guatemala City, 01009

  • Study site

    Guatemala City, 01015

Other trials in Guatemala

Portugal2 sites
  • Study site

    Beja, 7801-849

  • Study site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

Other trials in Portugal

Switzerland2 sites
  • Study site

    Bern, 3010

  • Study site

    Geneva, 1205

Other trials in Switzerland

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Study site

    Istanbul, 34300

  • Study site

    Izmir, 35100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Hong Kong1 site
  • Study site

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

Mexico1 site
  • Study site

    Mexico City, 14000

Other trials in Mexico

New Zealand1 site
  • Study site

    Christchurch

Other trials in New Zealand

Panama1 site
  • Study site

    Panama City

Other trials in Panama

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Study site

    San Juan, 00907

Other trials in Puerto Rico

South Korea1 site
  • Study site

    Seoul, 135-170

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A 2x2 Factorial Randomized Phase III Study of Intermittent Oral Capecitabine in Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q3W) ("XELOX") With/Without Intravenous Bevacizumab (Q3W) Versus Bolus and Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil/Intravenous Leucovorin With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q2W) ("FOLFOX-4") With/Without Intravenous Bevacizumab (Q2W) as First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

This 4 arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) or intravenous (iv) fluorouracil/leucovorin, in combination with iv oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) with or without iv bevacizumab (Avastin), as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to receive 1) XELOX (Xeloda 1000 mg/m^2 orally [po] twice a day [bid] on Days 1-15 + oxaliplatin in 3 week cycles), 2) FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin + leucovorin + fluorouracil [5-FU] in 2 week cycles), 3) XELOX + bevacizumab (7.5 mg iv on Day 1 in 3 week cycles), or 4) FOLFOX-4 + bevacizumab (5 mg iv on Day 1 in 2 week cycles).

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted in 2 parts: An initial 2-arm part in which patients were randomized to 1 of 2 different treatment groups (XELOX or FOLFOX-4), and a subsequent 2 x 2 factorial part, added to the study through a protocol amendment, in which additional patients were randomized into one of 4 different treatment groups (XELOX + placebo, FOLFOX-4 + placebo, XELOX + bevacizumab, or FOLFOX-4 + bevacizumab). Due to the comparison of the oral agent capecitabine with bolus and infused fluorouracil, the study was not blinded with respect to these 2 treatments. The study was double-blind with regard to the administration of bevacizumab, ie, there was a placebo control for bevacizumab in the second part of the study.

The study consisted of 3 phases, a Primary Study Treatment Phase, a Post-Study Treatment Phase, and a Follow-Up Phase.

Primary Study Treatment Phase

Patients were to receive up to 16 cycles (2-arm part of the study) or 24 cycles (4-arm part of the study) of treatment during the Primary Study Treatment Phase (48 weeks).

Post-Study Treatment Phase

Patients who completed the 48-week primary study treatment phase without progressive disease were eligible to enter the post-study treatment phase at the discretion of the investigator and the sponsor. Patients who entered this phase were to continue treatment on the same regimen to which they were initially randomized until either progression of disease was documented, unacceptable toxicity occurred, or the patient withdrew consent.

Follow-up Phase

Patients who terminated study treatment during the primary or post-study treatment phase were followed until disease progression or death.

Being tested
Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2, Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2, Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, Placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2Drug

    Also called Eloxatin

    Oxaliplatin was administered in a 2 h infusion before the first dose of capecitabine.

  • Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2Drug

    Also called Xeloda

    Capecitabine was taken within 30 min after the end of breakfast and dinner.

  • Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgDrug

    Also called Avastin

    Bevacizumab was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

  • Placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kgDrug

    Placebo control for bevacizumab (volume equivalent to 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab) was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

  • Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2Drug

    Also called Eloxatin

    Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 was administered simultaneously with leucovorin in a 2 h infusion.

  • Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2Drug

    Leucovorin was administered simultaneously with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 in a 2 h infusion.

  • Fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2Drug

    Also called Efudex

  • Bevacizumab 5 mg/kgDrug

    Also called Avastin

    Bevacizumab was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

  • Placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kgDrug

    Placebo control for bevacizumab (volume equivalent to 5 mg/kg bevacizumab) was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

Study groups in NCT00069095
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
XELOX (oxaliplatin+capecitabine)ExperimentalPatients in the 2-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle + capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day for the first 2 weeks of every 3 week cycle. Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received the same treatments plus placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle.
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2; Drug: Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2; Drug: Placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
XELOX (oxaliplatin+capecitabine) + bevacizumabExperimentalPatients in the 4-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle + capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day for the first 2 weeks of every 3 week cycle + bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle.
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2; Drug: Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2; Drug: Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin+leucovorin+fluorouracil)Active comparatorPatients in the 2-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) + leucovorin 200 mg/m^2 iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle + fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2 to 4 min followed by 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion over 22 h on Days 1 and 2 of every 2 week cycle. Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received the same treatments plus placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle.
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2; Drug: Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2; Drug: Fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2; Drug: Placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kg
FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin+leucovorin+fluorouracil) + bevacizumabActive comparatorPatients in the 4-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) + leucovorin 200 mg/m^2 iv + bevacizumab 5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle + fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2 to 4 min followed by 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion over 22 h on Days 1 and 2 of every 2 week cycle.
Receives: Drug: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2; Drug: Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2; Drug: Fluorouracil 400 mg/m^2; Drug: Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by General Approach (Participants With Curative Surgery Censored): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline who were alive at the time of clinical cutoff were censored at the date of randomization. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms compared with the FOLFOX-4- containing arms was investigated.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  2. PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by General Approach (Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline who were alive at the time of clinical cutoff were censored at the date of randomization. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. PFS as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was analyzed on the basis of the tumor response assessments made by the IRC. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  2. PFS as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was analyzed on the basis of the tumor response assessments made by the IRC. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the bevacizumab-containing arms was compared with the placebo-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  3. PFS (On-treatment Approach): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. The on-treatment analysis included only tumor assessments and death events that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Participants who did not have an event during this interval were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment within this time window, or on day 1 if no tumor assessment was available after baseline. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression within 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase were censored at the date of surgery. The on-treatment approach excluded the possible impact of other treatments that might have been started before disease progression. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  4. PFS (On-treatment Approach): Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. The on-treatment analysis included only tumor assessments and death events that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Participants who did not have an event during this interval were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment within this time window, or on day 1 if no tumor assessment was available after baseline. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression within 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase were censored at the date of surgery. The on-treatment approach excluded the possible impact of other treatments that might have been started before disease progression. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  5. PFS by General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Not Censored: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who underwent curative surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of their tumor were not censored at the date of surgery, but any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or death was considered as an event. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  6. PFS by General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Not Censored: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who underwent curative surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of their tumor were not censored at the date of surgery, but any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or death was considered as an event. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  7. Overall Survival: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who were not reported to have died at the time of the clinical cut-off date for the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  8. Overall Survival: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who were not reported to have died at the time of the clinical cut-off date for the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months

  9. Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    According to the RECIST criteria, BOR in an individual participant was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence. Only tumor assessments as assessed by the investigator and made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase not later than date of first curative surgery were included in these analyses. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  10. Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    According to the RECIST criteria, BOR in an individual participant was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence. Only tumor assessments as assessed by the investigator and made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase not later than date of first curative surgery were included in these analyses. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  11. BOR as Assessed by the IRC According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    According to the RECIST criteria, the BOR in an individual participant was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking the smallest measurements recorded since the baseline assessment as a reference for PD). The BOR as assessed by the IRC was determined based on tumor assessments that were made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  12. BOR as Assessed by the IRC According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    According to the RECIST criteria, the BOR in an individual participant was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking the smallest measurements recorded since the baseline assessment as a reference for PD). The BOR as assessed by the IRC was determined based on tumor assessments that were made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  13. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase.The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  14. Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach included all tumor assessments or deaths that occurred during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase, or the follow-up phase. The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  15. Time to Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    For participants whose BOR was CR or PR, time to response was measured as the time from randomization to the first time when the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Results were reported as the number of participants achieving a response in 8 time categories from Week 1 to Week 54. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: Week 1 to Week 54

  16. Time to Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    For participants whose BOR was CR or PR, time to response was measured as the time from randomization to the first time when the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Results were reported as the number of participants achieving a response in 8 time categories from Week 1 to Week 54. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: Week 1 to Week 54

  17. Duration of Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date when progressive disease or death was documented. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants undergoing surgical resection with curative intent were censored at the date of surgery. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  18. Duration of Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority Analysis of Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone

    Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date when progressive disease or death was documented. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants undergoing surgical resection with curative intent were censored at the date of surgery. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  19. Duration of Complete Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4

    For complete responders, the duration of complete response was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for complete response until the date that progressive disease (or death) was documented. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

  20. Duration of Complete Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone

    For complete responders, the duration of complete response was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for complete response until the date that progressive disease (or death) was documented. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.

    Measured: From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2003 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2003
  3. Primary completionJan 2006
  4. Study completionApr 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
2,035 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00069095
Sponsor's protocol ID
NO16966
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
15 Sep 2003
Last updated
6 Oct 2016

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2, Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 and Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 236 sites in 33 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 236 sites in United States, Canada, France, United Kingdom, Spain and 28 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by General Approach (Participants With Curative Surgery Censored): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4 (time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in