AnemiaPhase 3NCT00077610
A Study of Intravenous Mircera for the Treatment of Anemia in Dialysis Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Epoetin alfa or beta, RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) and RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 99 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, given as maintenance treatment for renal anemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis who were previously receiving iv epoetin. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia
- What is being tested?
- Epoetin alfa or beta, RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) and RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 673 participants
- Where
- 99 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2004to Aug 2005
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients >=18 years of age;
- chronic renal anemia;
- on dialysis therapy for at least 12 weeks before screening;
- receiving IV epoetin for at least 8 weeks before screening.
Who cannot join
- women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or using unreliable birth control methods;
- administration of another investigational drug within 4 weeks before screening, or during the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
99 sites in 8 countries.
99 sites in 8 countries
United States60 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Study site
Augusta, Georgia, 30901
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78705
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35211
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Study site
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Study site
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, 55430
Study site
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Study site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7155
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0585
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Study site
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Study site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202-2689
Study site
Encino, California, 91356
Study site
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16502
Study site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Study site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77054
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77099
Study site
Irvine, California, 92868
Study site
Lakewood, Colorado, 80260
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202-1718
Study site
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Study site
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Study site
Mineola, New York, 11501
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Monterey Park, California, 91754
Study site
Montgomery, Alabama, 36106
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Study site
New York, New York, 10021
Study site
New York, New York, 10128
Study site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Study site
Orangeburg, South Carolina, 29118
Study site
Paterson, New Jersey, 07503
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
Study site
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Study site
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
Study site
Riverside, California, 92501
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95816-5119
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
San Diego, California, 92103-8342
Study site
San Diego, California, 92120
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94117
Study site
San Jose, California, 95116-1906
Study site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Study site
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8161
Study site
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Study site
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1023
Canada9 sites
Study site
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6
Study site
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Study site
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Study site
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K 1N4
Study site
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1H 3G4
Study site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M9N 1N8
France7 sites
Study site
Aubervilliers, 93307
Study site
Bordeaux, 33076
Study site
La Tronche, 38700
Study site
Paris, 75 016
Study site
Paris, 75015
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
Germany7 sites
Study site
Dortmund, 44263
Study site
Ellwangen, 73479
Study site
München, 80804
Study site
Nuremberg, 90431
Study site
Stuttgart, 70191
Study site
Wiesbaden, 65191
Study site
Wiesloch, 69168
Italy5 sites
Study site
Como, 22100
Study site
Lecco, 23900
Study site
Lodi, 26900
Study site
Milan, 20162
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Spain5 sites
Study site
A Coruña, 15006
Study site
Barcelona, 08003
Study site
Madrid, 28007
Study site
Málaga, 29010
Study site
Seville, 41013
Norway4 sites
Study site
Bergen, 5021
Study site
Levanger, 7600
Study site
Lillehammer, 2629
Study site
Trondheim, 7006
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of RO0503821 When Administered Intravenously for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are on Dialysis.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, given as maintenance treatment for renal anemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis who were previously receiving iv epoetin. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Being tested
- Epoetin alfa or beta, RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks), RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks)
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epoetin alfa or betaDrug
Also called Epoetin
intravenously 3 times weekly for 52 weeks, as prescribed
RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks)Drug
Also called Mircera
60, 100, or 180 microgram (mcg) (starting dose) once every two weeks intravenously for 52 weeks.
RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks)Drug
Also called Mircera
120, 200 or 360 mcg (starting dose) once every four weeks intravenously for 52 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) | Experimental | Participants received RO0503821 (Mircera [methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta]) once every two weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of RO0503821 (60, 100, or 180 microgram [mcg]) that was based on the Epoetin dose (<8000, 8000-16000, >16000 International units [IU]/Week) administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug. Receives: Drug: RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) |
| RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) | Experimental | Participants received RO0503821 once every four weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of RO0503821 (120, 200, or 360 mcg) that was based on the Epoetin dose (<8000, 8000-16000, >16000 IU/Week) administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug. Receives: Drug: RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) |
| Epoetin (1-3x/Weeks) | Active comparator | Participants received their ongoing weekly intravenous dose of Epoetin alfa or beta one, two or three times weekly for 52 weeks. Receives: Drug: Epoetin alfa or beta |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to Evaluation Period
A time adjusted mean change in Hb concentration was calculated using an Area Under the Curve (AUC) approach, for both periods separately. Change in Hb concentration between the Baseline and evaluation periods was calculated by subtracting the calculated average baseline Hb from the average evaluation period Hb. At the end of the Week 36, data allowing the evaluation of the therapeutic response was available for 188 out of 221 eligible participants in RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) arm; 172 out of 220 eligible participants in RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks); and 180 out of 225 participants in Epoetin (1-3x/Weeks) arm.
Measured: Baseline, Week 29 to Week 36
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration During Evaluation Period Within +/- 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dl) of Average Baseline Hemoglobin Concentration.
The mean Hb of all values recorded during the evaluation period were calculated, and were subtracted from the mean baseline Hb for each participant. The number of participants maintaining their average Hb within +/- 1 g/dL of their average baseline hemoglobin concentration is given.
Measured: Baseline, Week 29 to Week 36
The Incidence of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation Periods
The number of participants who received RBC transfusions during the titration and evaluation periods were reported .
Measured: Week 1 to Week 36
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities in Platelet, White Blood Cell Counts (WBC) and Red Blood Cells (RBC)
Marked laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the Roche marked abnormality reference range. These abnormality laboratory values were flagged as Low or High if they were below the lower limit or above the upper limit of Roche marked abnormality reference range, respectively. The marked abnormality reference range for Platelet was 100-550x10^9/Litre [L], for WBC was 3.0-18.0.0x10^9/L, and for RBC was 3.80-6.10x10^12/L.
Measured: Up to Week 53
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities for Blood Chemistry and Electrolytes
Marked laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the Roche marked abnormality reference range. These abnormality laboratory values were flagged as Low or High if they were below the lower limit or above the upper limit of Roche marked abnormality reference range, respectively. The marked abnormality reference range for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was 0-80 (unit per litre [U/L]), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 0-110 U/L, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 0-220 U/L, albumin >=30.0 gram/litre (g/L), glucose in non-diabetics 2.80-11.10 (millimol/litre [mmol/L]); potassium 2.90-5.80 mmol/L, and phosphorus 0.75-1.60 mmol/L
Measured: Up to Week 53
Mean Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 36 and Week 52
Blood pressure was measured by manual assessment or automated reading throughout the entire study for every participant. Blood pressure was taken in the sitting position after at least 5 minutes rest. An appropriate -sized cuff was used and both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures were recorded before dialysis (BD) and after dialysis (AD).
Measured: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 52
Mean Change in Pulse Rate (Sitting) From Baseline at Week 36 and Week 52
Change in pulse rate (beats per minute [bpm]) from baseline values includes only those participants with both a baseline value and a value for specified time period.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 52
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes. Overall deaths occurred in the study were reported.
Measured: Upto Week 53
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2004
- Primary completionAug 2005
- Study completionAug 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 673 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00077610
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BA16739
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2004
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.
PubMed 36791280Levin NW, Fishbane S, Canedo FV, Zeig S, Nassar GM, Moran JE, Villa G, Beyer U, Oguey D; MAXIMA study investigators. Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for haemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis: a randomised non-inferiority trial (MAXIMA). Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1415-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61599-2.
PubMed 17950856
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center, Parallel-group Study to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of RO0503821 When Administered Intravenously for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Who Are on Dialysis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00077610
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BA16739
- Conditions
- Anemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 673 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2004
- Primary completion
- Aug 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous Mircera, given as maintenance treatment for renal anemia in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis who were previously receiving iv epoetin. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) | Experimental | Drug: RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks)Participants received RO0503821 (Mircera [methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta]) once every two weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of RO0503821 (60, 100, or 180 microgram [mcg]) that was based on the Epoetin dose (<8000, 8000-16000, >16000 International units [IU]/Week) administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug. |
| RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) | Experimental | Drug: RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks)Participants received RO0503821 once every four weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of RO0503821 (120, 200, or 360 mcg) that was based on the Epoetin dose (<8000, 8000-16000, >16000 IU/Week) administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug. |
| Epoetin (1-3x/Weeks) | Active comparator | Drug: Epoetin alfa or betaParticipants received their ongoing weekly intravenous dose of Epoetin alfa or beta one, two or three times weekly for 52 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adult patients >=18 years of age;
- chronic renal anemia;
- on dialysis therapy for at least 12 weeks before screening;
- receiving IV epoetin for at least 8 weeks before screening.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or using unreliable birth control methods;
- administration of another investigational drug within 4 weeks before screening, or during the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epoetin alfa or betaAlso: Epoetinintravenously 3 times weekly for 52 weeks, as prescribed | Drug | Epoetin (1-3x/Weeks) |
| RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks)Also: Mircera60, 100, or 180 microgram (mcg) (starting dose) once every two weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. | Drug | RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) |
| RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks)Also: Mircera120, 200 or 360 mcg (starting dose) once every four weeks intravenously for 52 weeks. | Drug | RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to Evaluation Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 29 to Week 36
A time adjusted mean change in Hb concentration was calculated using an Area Under the Curve (AUC) approach, for both periods separately. Change in Hb concentration between the Baseline and evaluation periods was calculated by subtracting the calculated average baseline Hb from the average evaluation period Hb. At the end of the Week 36, data allowing the evaluation of the therapeutic response was available for 188 out of 221 eligible participants in RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) arm; 172 out of 220 eligible participants in RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks); and 180 out of 225 participants in Epoetin (1-3x/Weeks) arm.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Maintaining Average Hemoglobin Concentration During Evaluation Period Within +/- 1 Gram Per Deciliter (g/dl) of Average Baseline Hemoglobin Concentration.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 29 to Week 36
The Incidence of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Titration and Evaluation Periods
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 36
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities in Platelet, White Blood Cell Counts (WBC) and Red Blood Cells (RBC)
Time frame: Up to Week 53
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities for Blood Chemistry and Electrolytes
Time frame: Up to Week 53
Mean Change in Blood Pressure From Baseline at Week 36 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 52
Mean Change in Pulse Rate (Sitting) From Baseline at Week 36 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36 and Week 52
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Death
Time frame: Upto Week 53
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36791280Chung EY, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anaemia in adults with chronic kidney disease: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 13;2(2):CD010590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17950856Levin NW, Fishbane S, Canedo FV, Zeig S, Nassar GM, Moran JE, Villa G, Beyer U, Oguey D; MAXIMA study investigators. Intravenous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta for haemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis: a randomised non-inferiority trial (MAXIMA). Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1415-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61599-2.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
99 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Epoetin alfa or beta, RO0503821 (1x/2 Weeks) and RO0503821 (1x/4 Weeks) in people with Anemia, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 99 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 99 sites in United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Concentration From Baseline to Evaluation Period (time frame: Baseline, Week 29 to Week 36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00077610, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2017.