Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPhase 2/3NCT00077844
Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Patients, an International Randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Enoxaparin sodium in people with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Sanofi.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing non-emergent PCI, as assessed by measuring the incidence of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major and minor bleeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- What is being tested?
- Enoxaparin sodium
- How many people
- 3,532 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2004to Sep 2005
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant female greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Undergoing non-emergent single or multiple sites/vessels PCI during the same procedure
- PCI to be performed with a femoral approach
Who cannot join
- Known or suspected pregnancy in women of childbearing potential
- Thrombolytic therapy within the previous 24 hours
- Undergoing primary PCI for ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Undergoing rescue PCI after failed thrombolysis
- Any other elective PCI scheduled within the following 30 days after the index PCI
- Increased bleeding risk: ischemic stroke within the last year or any previous hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial tumor or aneurysm; recent (<1 month) trauma or major surgery (including bypass surgery); active bleeding
Show all 15Show fewer
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension
- Recent (<48 hours) or planned spinal/epidural anesthesia or puncture
- Impaired haemostasis: known International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5; past or present bleeding disorder (including congenital bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia, acquired bleeding disorders, and unexplained clinically significant bleeding disorders), thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/µL)
- History of hypersensitivity or contraindication to heparin or LMWH
- Treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy within 72 hours prior to inclusion or current need for vitamin-K antagonist therapy
- Treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor, low molecular weight heparin, or unfractionated heparin within the 24 hours preceding enrolment
- Use of abciximab within the previous 7 days or, tirofiban, or eptifibatide within the past 12 hours of index PCI
- Inability to give informed consent or high likelihood of being unavailable for follow-up
- Treatment with other investigational agents or devices within the previous 30 days, planned use of investigational drugs or devices, or previous enrollment in this trial
About this study
Official title: An International Phase 2-3, Stratified, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Intravenous Bolus of Enoxaparin Versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Undergoing Non-emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing non-emergent PCI, as assessed by measuring the incidence of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major and minor bleeding.
- Conditions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Being tested
- Enoxaparin sodium
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enoxaparin sodiumDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the composite of non-CABG major and minor bleeding
Measured: up to H48 after index PCI
Secondary outcomes (1)
success rate of achieving ACT target range
Measured: at the beginning and end of procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2004
- Primary completionSep 2005
- Study completionSep 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Percutaneous Coronary InterventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,532 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Luc Sagnard, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00077844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XRP4563_4001
- Other IDs
- EudraCT #: 2004-003743-44
- Status last verified
- Jan 2011
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2004
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2011
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Montalescot G, White HD, Gallo R, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Chiariello M, King SB 3rd, Harrington RA, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 7;355(10):1006-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052711.
PubMed 16957147Montalescot G, Cohen M, Salette G, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Aylward PE, Steg PG, White HD, Gallo R, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Impact of anticoagulation levels on outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the STEEPLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2008 Feb;29(4):462-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn008.
PubMed 18276619White HD, Aylward PE, Gallo R, Bode C, Steg G, Steinhubl SR, Montalescot G; STEEPLE Investigators. Hematomas of at least 5 cm and outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial. Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.034.
PubMed 20102875Montalescot G, Gallo R, White HD, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Chiariello M, King SB 3rd, Harrington RA, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention 1-year results from the STEEPLE (SafeTy and efficacy of enoxaparin in percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an international randomized evaluation) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.016.
PubMed 19926048White HD, Gallo R, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Steinhubl S, Montalescot G. The use of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with renal impairment: results from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial. Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
PubMed 19081408
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jan 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An International Phase 2-3, Stratified, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Intravenous Bolus of Enoxaparin Versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in Patients Undergoing Non-emergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00077844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XRP4563_4001
- Conditions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,532 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2005 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing non-emergent PCI, as assessed by measuring the incidence of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major and minor bleeding.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant female greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Undergoing non-emergent single or multiple sites/vessels PCI during the same procedure
- PCI to be performed with a femoral approach
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Known or suspected pregnancy in women of childbearing potential
- Thrombolytic therapy within the previous 24 hours
- Undergoing primary PCI for ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Undergoing rescue PCI after failed thrombolysis
- Any other elective PCI scheduled within the following 30 days after the index PCI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enoxaparin sodium | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
the composite of non-CABG major and minor bleeding
Time frame: up to H48 after index PCI
1 secondary outcome
success rate of achieving ACT target range
Time frame: at the beginning and end of procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jan 2011.
- Results publication: PubMed 16957147Montalescot G, White HD, Gallo R, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Chiariello M, King SB 3rd, Harrington RA, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 7;355(10):1006-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052711.
- Results publication: PubMed 18276619Montalescot G, Cohen M, Salette G, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Aylward PE, Steg PG, White HD, Gallo R, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Impact of anticoagulation levels on outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the STEEPLE trial. Eur Heart J. 2008 Feb;29(4):462-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn008.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20102875White HD, Aylward PE, Gallo R, Bode C, Steg G, Steinhubl SR, Montalescot G; STEEPLE Investigators. Hematomas of at least 5 cm and outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial. Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.034.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19926048Montalescot G, Gallo R, White HD, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Chiariello M, King SB 3rd, Harrington RA, Desmet WJ, Macaya C, Steinhubl SR; STEEPLE Investigators. Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention 1-year results from the STEEPLE (SafeTy and efficacy of enoxaparin in percutaneous coronary intervention patients, an international randomized evaluation) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1083-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19081408White HD, Gallo R, Cohen M, Steg PG, Aylward PE, Bode C, Steinhubl S, Montalescot G. The use of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with renal impairment: results from the SafeTy and Efficacy of Enoxaparin in PCI patients, an internationaL randomized Evaluation (STEEPLE) trial. Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
Related trials for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Not yet recruiting
Hs-CRP-Guided Colchicine Treatment Targets in Very-High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After PCI (TARGET-CHD)
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Not yet recruiting
ADVA ACE Coronary Stent System in Coronary Artery Disease Patients (ADVANCE)
Coronary Artery Disease, De Novo Stenosis Lesion
Recruiting
Algorithm-based Tailoring of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Improve Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
RecruitingPhase 3
Safety and Efficacy of Very Short DAPT in Older Patients Undergoing PCI
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luc Sagnard study director
Sanofi
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Enoxaparin sodium in people with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, run by Sanofi.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the composite of non-CABG major and minor bleeding (time frame: up to H48 after index PCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00077844, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2011.