AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 2NCT00078624

Knee Stability Training for Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)

A Phase 2 study testing Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis and Knee stability training in people with Osteoarthritis and Joint Diseases, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

People with knee osteoarthritis (OA) frequently complain of knee instability. This study will test whether certain exercises can improve knee stability, reduce pain, and improve physical function in people with knee OA. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Joint Diseases
What is being tested?
Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis and Knee stability training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
231 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2004to Dec 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet the 1986 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for knee osteoarthritis
  • Grade II or greater Kellgren and Lawrence radiographic changes

Who cannot join

  • History of two or more falls within the year prior to study entry
  • Unable to walk a distance of 100 feet without an assistive device or a rest period
  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • History of cardiovascular disease
  • History of neurological disorders that affect lower extremity function such as stroke or peripheral neuropathy
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Corticosteroid injection to the quadriceps or patellar tendon in the past month, or 3 or more within the past year
  • Quadriceps tendon rupture, patellar tendon rupture, or patellar fracture that could place them at risk of re-injury during quadriceps strength testing
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Knee Stability Training in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis

People with knee osteoarthritis (OA) frequently complain of knee instability. This study will test whether certain exercises can improve knee stability, reduce pain, and improve physical function in people with knee OA.

Study hypotheses: 1) Participants in the stability training group will demonstrate less pain and higher levels of physical function, based on self-report measures of pain and function (WOMAC, Lower Extremity Function Scale), and less time to complete the Get Up and Go test, a physical performance measure of function. 2) During walking and the step down task, participants in the stability training group will demonstrate greater knee motion during weight bearing, greater vertical ground reaction forces and loading rates, and reduced ratios of co-contraction between quadriceps/hamsting and tibialis anterior/gastrocnemius muscle pairs compared to the standard group. Participants in the stability group will also demonstrate greater step lengths, single limb support times, and average walking velocity compared to the standard group.

Read the detailed description

Traditional exercise therapy for knee OA primarily focuses on lower limb strength and joint motion deficits. Recent evidence has suggested that changes in lower limb biomechanical factors during weight bearing activities may have substantial impact on physical function and disease progression in individuals with knee OA. The effectiveness of exercise therapy programs might be improved by incorporating balance and agility training techniques (knee stability training). The aim of this trial is to test the effectiveness of supplementing traditional exercise therapy with knee stability training techniques tailored for individuals with knee OA.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The first group will participate in a standard rehabilitation program of traditional exercise therapy for knee OA. The second group will participate in a standard rehabilitation program supplemented with a knee stability program. Study visits will occur at study entry, 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year. At each study visit, changes in pain, physical function, and biomechanical factors will be assessed. This study will last for one year.

Being tested
Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis, Knee stability training
Keywords
Osteoarthritis, Knee Joint, Joint Stability, Motor Control, Exercise Therapy
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Joint Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritisOther

    Exercises include stretching, strengthening, and aerobic exercise

  • Knee stability trainingOther

    The addition of agility and perturbation training techniques to the traditional exercise program

Study groups in NCT00078624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalTraditional exercise program supplemented with knee stability training activities
Receives: Other: Knee stability training
2Active comparatorTraditional exercise program
Receives: Other: Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster OA index (WOMAC)

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

  2. Lower Extremity Function Scale

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

  3. Get Up and Go test (a physical performance measure of function)

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months

  4. Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Cartilage morphology changes as measured by MRI

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 1 year

  2. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

  3. Quadriceps strength and activation

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months

  4. Radiographic severity of OA

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 1 year

  5. Fear Avoidance questionnaire for the knee

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2months, 6 months, 1 year

  6. Beck Anxiety Index

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

  7. Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year

  8. Motion analysis variables (knee motion, vertical ground reaction force, loading rates, knee adduction/abduction moment, and lower extremity muscle co-contractions during walking and a step-down task)

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2004
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
231 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00078624
Sponsor's protocol ID
NIAMS-117
Other IDs
R01AR048760-01A2
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
3 Mar 2004
Last updated
24 Jan 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Fitzgerald GK, White DK, Piva SR. Associations for change in physical and psychological factors and treatment response following exercise in knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Nov;64(11):1673-80. doi: 10.1002/acr.21751.

    PubMed 22674892
  • Teixeira PE, Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK. Effects of impairment-based exercise on performance of specific self-reported functional tasks in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;91(12):1752-65. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100269. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

    PubMed 22003157
  • Fitzgerald GK, Piva SR, Gil AB, Wisniewski SR, Oddis CV, Irrgang JJ. Agility and perturbation training techniques in exercise therapy for reducing pain and improving function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011 Apr;91(4):452-69. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100188. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

    PubMed 21330451

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Traditional exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis and Knee stability training in people with Osteoarthritis and Joint Diseases, run by University of Pittsburgh at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Western Ontario and McMaster OA index (WOMAC) (time frame: Measured at baseline, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00078624, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in