Metastatic CancerPhase 3NCT00082927
Single-Dose Local Radiation Therapy Compared With Ibandronate in Treating Patients With Localized Metastatic Bone Pain
A Phase 3 study testing ibandronate sodium in people with Metastatic Cancer and Pain, run by Cancer Research UK at 52 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Ibandronate may be effective in reducing bone pain caused by metastatic cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether ibandronate is more effective than standard treatment with radiation therapy in treating metastatic bone pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Cancer, Pain, Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- ibandronate sodium
- How many people
- 580 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2003to Jul 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed primary prostate cancer OR sclerotic bone metastases (for patients with serum prostate-specific antigen > 100 ng/mL)
- Radiologically confirmed bone metastases by plain x-ray, isotope scan, CT scan, or MRI
- Clinical diagnosis of metastatic bone pain for which radiotherapy is indicated
- Single localized metastatic bone pain AND receiving optimal analgesics and adjuvant drugs, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, unless contraindicated
- Hormone receptor status:
- Not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- Over 18
Sex
- Male
Menopausal status
- Not specified
Performance status
- Not specified
Life expectancy
- At least 3 months
Hematopoietic
- Not specified
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Creatinine ≤ 3.0 mg/dL
- No hypercalcemia (corrected calcium > 10.8 mg/dL)
- No hypocalcemia (corrected calcium < 8.2 mg/dL)
Other
- No known hypersensitivity to ibandronate or other bisphosphonates
- No history of aspirin-sensitive asthma
- Able to comply with pain chart and quality of life assessments
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- More than 4 weeks since prior change in systemic chemotherapy
- No prior high-dose chemotherapy (dose intensity > 3 times standard dose)
Endocrine therapy
- More than 4 weeks since prior change in hormonal therapy
Radiotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior external beam radiotherapy to index site
- No prior systemic radioisotope therapy (e.g., strontium chloride Sr 89 or samarium Sm 153 lexidronam pentasodium)
Surgery
- Not specified
Other
- More than 6 months since prior bisphosphonate treatment
- More than 4 weeks since prior aminoglycoside antibiotics
- More than 30 days since prior investigational drugs
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 1 country.
52 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom52 sites
William Harvey Hospital
Ashford-Kent, England, TN24 0LZ
North Devon District Hospital
Barnstaple, England, EX31 4JB
Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust
Basingstoke, England, RG24 9NA
Royal United Hospital
Bath, England, BA1 3NG
Sussex Cancer Centre at Royal Sussex County Hospital
Brighton, England, BN2 5BF
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, England, BS2 8ED
Queen's Hospital
Burton-on-Trent, England, DE13 0RB
Kent and Canterbury Hospital
Canterbury, England, CT1 3NG
Cumberland Infirmary
Carlisle, England, CA2 7HY
Essex County Hospital
Colchester, England, C03 3NB
Walsgrave Hospital
Coventry, England, CV2 2DX
Mayday University Hospital
Croydon, England
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley, England, DY1 2HQ
Ninewells Hospital
Dundee, Scotland, DD1 9SY
Eastbourne District General Hospital
Eastbourne, England, BN21 2UD
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter, England, EX2 5DW
Diana Princess of Wales Hospital
Grimsby, England, DN33 2BA
St. Luke's Cancer Centre at Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, England, GU2 7XX
Harrogate District Hospital
Harrogate, England, HG2 7SX
Kidderminster Hospital
Kidderminster Worcestershire, England, DY11 6RJ
Leeds Cancer Centre at St. James's University Hospital
Leeds, England, LS9 7TF
Lincoln County Hospital
Lincoln, England, LN2 5QY
Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre
London, England, NW1 2ND
Royal Marsden - London
London, England, SW3 6JJ
St. Mary's Hospital
London, England, W2 1NY
Charing Cross Hospital
London, England, W6 8RF
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
Merseyside, England, CH63 4JY
Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
Northampton, England, NN1 5BD
Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
Northwood, England, HA6 2RN
Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust
Nottingham, England, NG5 1PB
King's Mills Hospital
Nottinghamshire, England, NG17 4JL
George Eliot Hospital
Nuneaton, England, CV10 7DJ
Alexandra Healthcare NHS
Redditch, Worcestershire, England, B98 7UB
Glan Clwyd Hospital
Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales, LL 18 5UJ
Oldchurch Hospital
Romford, England, RM7 OBE
Conquest Hospital
Saint Leonards-on-Sea, England, TN37 7RD
Scarborough General Hospital
Scarborough, England, YO12 6QL
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Scunthorpe, England, DN15 7BH
Royal Shrewsbury Hospital
Shrewsbury, England, SY3 8XQ
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
Royal Marsden - Surrey
Sutton, England, SM2 5PT
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton, England, TA1 5DA
Torbay Hospital
Torquay, England, TQ2 7AA
Warrington Hospital NHS Trust
Warrington, England, WA5 1QG
Warwick Hospital
Warwick, England, CV34 5BW
Sandwell General Hospital
West Bromwich, England, B71 4HJ
Weston General Hospital
Weston-super-Mare, England, BS23 4TQ
West Cumberland Hospital
Whitehaven, England, CA28 8JG
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton, England, WV10 0QP
Worthing Hospital
Worthing, England, BN11 2DH
Yeovil District Hospital
Yeovil, England, BA21 4AT
Cancer Care Centre at York Hospital
York, England, Y031 8HE
About this study
Official title: A Multicentre Randomised Trial Of Single Dose Radiotherapy Compared To Ibandronate For Localised Metastatic Bone Pain
RATIONALE: Ibandronate may be effective in reducing bone pain caused by metastatic cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether ibandronate is more effective than standard treatment with radiation therapy in treating metastatic bone pain.
PURPOSE: This phase III randomized clinical trial is studying ibandronate to see how well it works compared to single-dose local radiation therapy in treating patients with localized metastatic bone pain.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare pain response at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment in patients with localized metastatic bone pain treated with single-dose ibandronate vs single-dose local radiotherapy .
Secondary
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate urinary markers of osteoclast activity (pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline) with the clinical outcome of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, crossover, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to primary tumor type and participating center. Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive a single dose of local radiotherapy to the site of pain (8Gy/1f).
- Arm II: Patients receive a single dose of ibandronate IV over 15 minutes. Patients who do not achieve a partial or complete response at 4 weeks crossover to the alternate arm.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 4 and 12 weeks. Pain is assessed at baseline, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and then at 6 months.
Patients are followed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and then at 6 and 12 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 470 patients (235 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Cancer, Pain, Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- ibandronate sodium
- Keywords
- stage IV prostate cancer, bone metastases, pain, recurrent prostate cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis, Pain, Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ibandronate sodiumDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2003
- Study completionJul 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Metastatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 580 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Research UK
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Heather Purnell, Cancer Research UKKatherine Monson, Cancer Research UK
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00082927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRUK-NCRI-RT-02-01
- Other IDs
- CDR0000361728, EU-20224, RIB, ISRCTN86185157
- Status last verified
- Jun 2009
- First submitted
- 14 May 2004
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicentre Randomised Trial Of Single Dose Radiotherapy Compared To Ibandronate For Localised Metastatic Bone Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00082927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRUK-NCRI-RT-02-01
- Conditions
- Metastatic Cancer, Pain, Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IV prostate cancer, bone metastases, pain, recurrent prostate cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 580 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cancer Research UKUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2003
- Study completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Ibandronate may be effective in reducing bone pain caused by metastatic cancer. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known whether ibandronate is more effective than standard treatment with radiation therapy in treating metastatic bone pain.
PURPOSE: This phase III randomized clinical trial is studying ibandronate to see how well it works compared to single-dose local radiation therapy in treating patients with localized metastatic bone pain.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare pain response at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment in patients with localized metastatic bone pain treated with single-dose ibandronate vs single-dose local radiotherapy .
Secondary
- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Correlate urinary markers of osteoclast activity (pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline) with the clinical outcome of patients treated with these regimens.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, open-label, crossover, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to primary tumor type and participating center. Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive a single dose of local radiotherapy to the site of pain (8Gy/1f).
- Arm II: Patients receive a single dose of ibandronate IV over 15 minutes. Patients who do not achieve a partial or complete response at 4 weeks crossover to the alternate arm.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline and then at 4 and 12 weeks. Pain is assessed at baseline, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and then at 6 months.
Patients are followed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and then at 6 and 12 months.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 470 patients (235 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ibandronate sodium | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2013.
Related trials for Metastatic Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Dual Energy CT - a Tool for Delineation of Tumor and Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy
Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Serplulimab, DOS and Lenvatinib Combine With PIPAC in the Oligometastatic Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma, Oligometastatic Peritoneal Metastasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Combination Amivantamab and Carboplatin-Pemetrexed Therapy, Compared With Carboplatin-Pemetrexed, in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Characterized by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Exon 20 Insertions
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of Lasofoxifene Combined With Abemaciclib Compared With Fulvestrant Combined With Abemaciclib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer With an ESR1 Mutation
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heather Purnell
Cancer Research UK
Katherine Monson
Cancer Research UK
52 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ibandronate sodium in people with Metastatic Cancer and Pain, run by Cancer Research UK at 52 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2013.