AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT00082979

Duct Endoscopy in Assessing Cellular Atypia in the Breast Duct Fluid of Women With a Genetic Risk for Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing cytogenetic analysis, proteomic profiling and cytology specimen collection procedure in people with Breast Cancer, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as breast duct endoscopy, may improve the ability to detect breast cancer earlier and plan more effective treatment. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well breast duct endoscopy works in assessing cellular atypia (abnormal cells) in the breast ducts of women with a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
cytogenetic analysis, proteomic profiling and cytology specimen collection procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Oct 2003to not given
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of cellular atypia in nipple aspirate or ductal lavage fluid
  • Enrollment on RMNHS-2242 or RMNHS-2269 required
  • No inflammatory breast cancer
  • Hormone receptor status:
  • Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 to 64

Sex

  • Female

Menopausal Status

  • Any status

Performance status

  • Not specified

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

Other

  • No prior allergy to eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) cream or lidocaine
  • No severe illness that would preclude study participation
  • No mental illness or handicap that would preclude study compliance
  • No active infection or inflammation in the breast being studied
  • No nursing within the past 12 months
  • Not pregnant
  • Not unconscious

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • Not specified

Endocrine therapy

  • No prior tamoxifen

Radiotherapy

  • Not specified

Surgery

  • No prior subareolar surgery (e.g., papilloma resections, biopsies, or fine needle aspirations) or any other surgery that may disrupt the ductal systems within 2 cm of the nipple
  • Biopsies and fine needle aspirations > 2 cm from the nipple are allowed
  • No prior breast implantation on proposed lavage side

Other

  • No prior chemopreventative agents

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Royal Marsden - London

    London, England, SW3 6JJ

    Gerald Gui, MD, MS, FRCS(Edin), FRCS(Eng), 44-20-7808-2783, gerald.gui@rmh.nhs.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Role of Duct Endoscopy in the Assessment of Cellular Atypia Within Breast Duct Fluid in High-Risk Women Carrying BRCA1/2 or p53 Gene Mutations

RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as breast duct endoscopy, may improve the ability to detect breast cancer earlier and plan more effective treatment.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well breast duct endoscopy works in assessing cellular atypia (abnormal cells) in the breast ducts of women with a genetic risk for breast cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Correlate cell yield and morphology findings from ductal lavage with duct endoscopy findings and any subsequent surgical pathology findings in high-risk women with BRCA1, BRCA2, or p53 gene mutations who have cellular atypia.
  • Determine the prevalence of occult breast cancer in patients with cellular atypia undergoing duct endoscopy.

Secondary

  • Determine patient acceptance of duct endoscopy.
  • Perform immunohistochemical analysis (including estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2-neu receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, p53, and proliferation marker expression) for markers potentially associated with breast cancer in these patients.
  • Determine potential molecular markers of malignancy by gene methylation, gene expression, and proteomics in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients undergo nipple aspiration to identify productive ducts and collect fluid for tumor marker assessment followed by ductal lavage over 15 minutes. Patients undergo duct endoscopy over approximately 30 minutes under local anesthesia. If no abnormality is found, duct endoscopy is repeated in 6 months. If the repeat duct endoscopy is normal, patients continue to undergo nipple aspiration or ductal lavage as specified in protocols RMNHS-2242 and RMNHS-2269. If an abnormality is found during either the initial or repeat duct endoscopy, patients may undergo further assessment comprising imaging or biopsy and/or appropriate surgical intervention.

Fluid is analyzed for tumor markers by immunohistochemistry. Candidate genes are analyzed by gene methylation studies, gene expression arrays, and proteomic analysis.

Patients are followed for at least 5 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 45-60 patients will be accrued for this study within 2 years.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
cytogenetic analysis, proteomic profiling, cytology specimen collection procedure, immunohistochemistry staining method, laboratory biomarker analysis
Keywords
breast cancer
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cytogenetic analysisGenetic

  • proteomic profilingGenetic

  • cytology specimen collection procedureOther

  • immunohistochemistry staining methodOther

  • laboratory biomarker analysisOther

  • breast duct lavageProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of cell yields and morphology from ductal lavage vs the ductal anatomy visualized at duct endoscopy

  2. Prevalence of occult pathology (malignant and benign) as assessed by duct endoscopy on intraduct sampling

  3. Sensitivity and specificity of ductal lavage to duct endoscopy in detecting atypia or malignancy

  4. Comparison of cell yields vs final surgical pathology

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00082979
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDR0000361751
Other IDs
RMNHS-2282, EU-20351
Status last verified
Dec 2005
First submitted
14 May 2004
Last updated
26 Aug 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing cytogenetic analysis, proteomic profiling and cytology specimen collection procedure in people with Breast Cancer, run by Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of cell yields and morphology from ductal lavage vs the ductal anatomy visualized at duct endoscopy. The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in