Lung CancerPhase 2NCT00083083
Fludeoxyglucose F18 Positron Emission Tomography Imaging In Assessing Patients Before and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and docetaxel in people with Lung Cancer, run by American College of Radiology Imaging Network at 49 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (^18FDG-PET), may improve the ability to detect disease progression and help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and plan more effective treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- carboplatin, cisplatin and docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 49 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to Jun 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Clinical stage IIB or III disease
- No small cell carcinoma
- No stage IV disease*
- No diffuse bronchoalveolar subtype
- No planned definitive surgical resection NOTE: *Patients with evidence of stage IV disease by positron emission tomography are eligible if the evidence cannot be confirmed by other means AND the physician still plans to proceed with definitive chemoradiation
- Planning treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy
- May be treated on another Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol (except phase I studies) OR with conventional concurrent NSCLC chemoradiotherapy
- Radiotherapy ≥ 60 Gy AND chemotherapy to include concurrent platinum-based therapy
- No brain metastases by head CT scan or MRI
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- Zubrod 0-1
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- Not specified
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Not specified
Other
- Medically suitable for early concurrent chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy dose ≥ 60 Gy)
- Able to tolerate positron emission tomography imaging
- No poorly controlled diabetes (defined as fasting glucose level > 200 mg/dL)
- No other malignancy within the past 3 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after study participation
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- No anticipated use of adjuvant biologic therapy beyond 14 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy
Chemotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
- No anticipated use of adjuvant chemotherapy beyond 14 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy
Endocrine therapy
- Not specified
Radiotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior thoracic radiotherapy
- No concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Surgery
- See Disease Characteristics
Trial locations and contacts
49 sites in 3 countries.
49 sites in 3 countries
United States46 sites
McDowell Cancer Center at Akron General Medical Center
Akron, Ohio, 44302
Saint John's Cancer Center at Saint John's Medical Center
Anderson, Indiana, 46016
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Lurleen Wallace Comprehensive Cancer at University of Alabama - Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Dana-Farber Partners Cancer Care
Boston, Massachusetts, 02129
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Bethesda Comprehensive Cancer Care Center at Bethesda Memorial Hospital
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33435
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Rush Cancer Institute at Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center at Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
North Broward Medical Center
Dearfield Beach, Florida, 33064-3596
Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Center for Cancer Care at Goshen General Hospital
Goshen, Indiana, 46526
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009
Integrated Community Oncology Network at Baptist Cancer Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90089-9181
University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-6164
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
Hospital of Saint Raphael
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Oklahoma University Cancer Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541
Fox Chase Cancer Center - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
Albert Einstein Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
UPMC Cancer Centers
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Knight Cancer Institute at Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098
Roger Williams Medical Center
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908-4735
Brown University School of Medicine
Providence, Rhode Island, 02912
Renown Institute for Cancer at Renown Regional Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Bon Secours Cancer Institute at St. Mary's Hospital
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group at Sutter Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95816
Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Limited
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85262
CCOP - Northern Indiana CR Consortium
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
South Shore Hospital
South Weymouth, Massachusetts, 02190
Gibbs Regional Cancer Center at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Sister Patricia Lynch Regional Cancer Center at Holy Name Hospital
Teaneck, New Jersey, 07666
J. Phillip Citta Regional Cancer Center at Community Medical Center
Toms River, New Jersey, 08755
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Canada2 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre - Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre at Grand River Hospital
Kitchner, Ontario, N2G 1G3
About this study
Official title: Positron Emission Tomography Pre- and Post-treatment Assessment For Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (^18FDG-PET), may improve the ability to detect disease progression and help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and plan more effective treatment.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well ^18FDG-PET imaging works in detecting disease progression and determining response to treatment in patients who are undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine whether peak standardized uptake value (SUV) for fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of long-term survival of patients with inoperable stage IIB or III non-small cell lung cancer.
Secondary
- Determine whether max SUV for FDG-PET shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of long-term survival in these patients.
- Determine whether post-treatment imaging using peak and max SUV for FDG-PET shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of local disease control in these patients.
- Determine whether pre-treatment imaging using these techniques is predictive of long-term survival and local disease control in these patients.
- Correlate, if possible, Ki-67 expression with overall survival of patients assessed with these imaging techniques.
OUTLINE: This is a diagnostic, multicenter study.
Before starting chemoradiotherapy, patients undergo baseline whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Patients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (^18FDG) IV followed 50-70 minutes later by PET imaging. Patients then receive concurrent definitive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients enrolled in other treatment-oriented clinical trials receive therapy as per that trial. Other patients receive standard thoracic radiotherapy (dose ≥ 60 Gy) and standard chemotherapy comprising a platin (cisplatin or carboplatin) and a second non-platin, non-gemcitabine drug (etoposide, vinblastine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel). Approximately 14 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (if given), patients undergo post-treatment ^18FDG-PET imaging.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for at least 1 year.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 250 patients (including at least 75 with stage IIB/IIIA disease and at least 75 with stage IIIB disease) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- carboplatin, cisplatin, docetaxel, etoposide, paclitaxel
- Keywords
- stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carboplatinDrug
cisplatinDrug
docetaxelDrug
etoposideDrug
paclitaxelDrug
vinblastine sulfateDrug
vinorelbine tartrateDrug
gene expression analysisGenetic
positron emission tomographyProcedure or surgery
fludeoxyglucose F 18Radiation
radiation therapyRadiation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relationship of survival to post-treatment peak standardized uptake value (SUV) as determined by the imaging institution
Secondary outcomes (8)
Relationship of survival to post-treatment max SUV as determined by the imaging institute
Relationship of local control to post-treatment peak and max SUV as determined by the imaging institution
Relationship of survival and of local control to pre-treatment peak and max SUV as determined by the imaging institution
Reliability between peak and max SUV measurements both pre- and post-treatment
Proportion of participants who are either upstaged or downstaged by positron emission tomography scan
Reliability between PET scan-defined response to therapy measurements
Correlation of Ki-67 expression with peak and max pre-treatment SUV
Association between Ki-67 expression and overall survival at 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
- Primary completionJun 2006 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- American College of Radiology Imaging Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Investigators
- Mitchell Machtay, MD, Study chair, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00083083
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000362061
- Other IDs
- ACRIN-6668, RTOG-0235
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 14 May 2004
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Zhang J, Hu Y, Tian C, Zhang X, Bian Y. Development of a Prognostic Predictive Model for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer using PET-CT Radiomics Based on Multi-Center and Heterogeneous Data and External Validation. Pak J Med Sci. 2026 May;42(5):1214-1221. doi: 10.12669/pjms.42.5.14183.
PubMed 42291584
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Positron Emission Tomography Pre- and Post-treatment Assessment For Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00083083
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000362061
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- American College of Radiology Imaging NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2006 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 May 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Imaging procedures, such as fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (^18FDG-PET), may improve the ability to detect disease progression and help doctors predict a patient's response to treatment and plan more effective treatment.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well ^18FDG-PET imaging works in detecting disease progression and determining response to treatment in patients who are undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Determine whether peak standardized uptake value (SUV) for fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of long-term survival of patients with inoperable stage IIB or III non-small cell lung cancer.
Secondary
- Determine whether max SUV for FDG-PET shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of long-term survival in these patients.
- Determine whether post-treatment imaging using peak and max SUV for FDG-PET shortly after definitive chemoradiotherapy is predictive of local disease control in these patients.
- Determine whether pre-treatment imaging using these techniques is predictive of long-term survival and local disease control in these patients.
- Correlate, if possible, Ki-67 expression with overall survival of patients assessed with these imaging techniques.
OUTLINE: This is a diagnostic, multicenter study.
Before starting chemoradiotherapy, patients undergo baseline whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Patients receive fludeoxyglucose F 18 (^18FDG) IV followed 50-70 minutes later by PET imaging. Patients then receive concurrent definitive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients enrolled in other treatment-oriented clinical trials receive therapy as per that trial. Other patients receive standard thoracic radiotherapy (dose ≥ 60 Gy) and standard chemotherapy comprising a platin (cisplatin or carboplatin) and a second non-platin, non-gemcitabine drug (etoposide, vinblastine, vinorelbine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel). Approximately 14 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (if given), patients undergo post-treatment ^18FDG-PET imaging.
Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for at least 1 year.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 250 patients (including at least 75 with stage IIB/IIIA disease and at least 75 with stage IIIB disease) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin | Drug | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| docetaxel | Drug | – |
| etoposide | Drug | – |
| paclitaxel | Drug | – |
| vinblastine sulfate | Drug | – |
| vinorelbine tartrate | Drug | – |
| gene expression analysis | Genetic | – |
| positron emission tomography | Procedure or surgery | – |
| fludeoxyglucose F 18 | Radiation | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Relationship of survival to post-treatment peak standardized uptake value (SUV) as determined by the imaging institution
8 secondary outcomes
Relationship of survival to post-treatment max SUV as determined by the imaging institute
Relationship of local control to post-treatment peak and max SUV as determined by the imaging institution
Relationship of survival and of local control to pre-treatment peak and max SUV as determined by the imaging institution
Reliability between peak and max SUV measurements both pre- and post-treatment
Proportion of participants who are either upstaged or downstaged by positron emission tomography scan
Reliability between PET scan-defined response to therapy measurements
Correlation of Ki-67 expression with peak and max pre-treatment SUV
Association between Ki-67 expression and overall survival at 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42291584Zhang J, Hu Y, Tian C, Zhang X, Bian Y. Development of a Prognostic Predictive Model for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer using PET-CT Radiomics Based on Multi-Center and Heterogeneous Data and External Validation. Pak J Med Sci. 2026 May;42(5):1214-1221. doi: 10.12669/pjms.42.5.14183.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mitchell Machtay, MD study chair
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University
49 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and docetaxel in people with Lung Cancer, run by American College of Radiology Imaging Network at 49 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 49 sites in United States, Canada, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relationship of survival to post-treatment peak standardized uptake value (SUV) as determined by the imaging institution. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00083083, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2011.