Carcinoma, Renal CellPhase 3NCT00083889
SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon-alfa and SU011248 in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Pfizer at 123 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether SU011248 has activity and is safe compared to interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- What is being tested?
- Interferon-alfa and SU011248
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 750 participants
- Where
- 123 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2004to Sep 2008
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma of clear cell histology with metastases
- Evidence of measurable disease by radiographic technique
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Prior systemic (including adjuvant or neoadjuvant) therapy of any kind for RCC
- History of or known brain metastases
- Serious acute or chronic illness or recent history of significant cardiac abnormality
Trial locations and contacts
123 sites in 11 countries.
123 sites in 11 countries
United States58 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80040-0510
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Pfizer Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5055
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Pfizer Investigational Site
Columbus, Mississippi, 39705
Pfizer Investigational Site
Corinth, Mississippi, 38834
Pfizer Investigational Site
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Pfizer Investigational Site
Detoit, Michigan, 48201
Pfizer Investigational Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Pfizer Investigational Site
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Pfizer Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39213
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66112
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Pfizer Investigational Site
La Jolla, California, 92093
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Pfizer Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Pfizer Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-0001
Pfizer Investigational Site
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Pfizer Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Pfizer Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70002
Pfizer Investigational Site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33176
Pfizer Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Pfizer Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06504
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06511
Pfizer Investigational Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10021
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10022
Pfizer Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-9200
Pfizer Investigational Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Pfizer Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94115
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023
Pfizer Investigational Site
Southaven, Mississippi, 38671
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Pfizer Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, 10466
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74133
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Canada11 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Pfizer Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y5L3
Pfizer Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Pfizer Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Pfizer Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6
Pfizer Investigational Site
Québec, Quebec, G1S 2L6
Pfizer Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Pfizer Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Pfizer Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
Poland9 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-210
Pfizer Investigational Site
Krakow, 31-115
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lodz, 93-509
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-090
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moczowego, Warszawa
Pfizer Investigational Site
Poznan
Pfizer Investigational Site
Warsaw, 00-909
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-043
Pfizer Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-556
Australia7 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lismore, New South Wales, 2480
Pfizer Investigational Site
Perth, Western Australia, 6000
Pfizer Investigational Site
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Pfizer Investigational Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
Pfizer Investigational Site
Victoria, 36184
Pfizer Investigational Site
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
Russia7 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, 454087
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moscow, 115478
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moscow, 117836
Pfizer Investigational Site
Moscow
Pfizer Investigational Site
Obninsk, Kaluga Oblast, 249036
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tomsk, 634050
France6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lyon, 69008
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, Cedex 15, 75908
Pfizer Investigational Site
Paris, 75651
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rennes, 35042
Pfizer Investigational Site
Saint-Herblain
Pfizer Investigational Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Italy6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Modena, 41100
Pfizer Investigational Site
Naples, 80131
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pavia
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00135
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00144
Pfizer Investigational Site
Roma, 00152
United Kingdom6 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
London, SE1 9RT
Pfizer Investigational Site
London, SW3 6JJ
Pfizer Investigational Site
Manchester, Lancashire, M20 4BX
Pfizer Investigational Site
Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Pfizer Investigational Site
Sutton Surrey, SM2 5PT
Pfizer Investigational Site
Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2 TL
Germany5 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aachen, 52074
Pfizer Investigational Site
Essen, 45122
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hanover, 30625
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ulm, 89075
Pfizer Investigational Site
Ulm, 89081
Spain5 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28040
Pfizer Investigational Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Pfizer Investigational Site
Seville, SEVILLA, 41013
Brazil3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090
Pfizer Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Pfizer Investigational Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
The purpose of this study is to test whether SU011248 has activity and is safe compared to interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Being tested
- Interferon-alfa, SU011248
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interferon-alfaDrug
Also called Roferon
3 MIU first week, 6 MIU second week, and 9 MIU thereafter three times a week (non-consecutive days) until progression or unacceptable toxicity
SU011248Drug
Also called Sunitinib, SUTENT
50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks and 2 weeks off treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Interferon-alfa |
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: SU011248 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment
Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.
Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment
Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.
Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Secondary outcomes (22)
Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.
Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.
Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.
Measured: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.
Measured: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.
Measured: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression.
Measured: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase
Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression.
Measured: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns).
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale
Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale
Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale
Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale
Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being.
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index
EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system).
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)
EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state).
Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded.
Measured: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded.
Measured: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting.
Measured: post study measurement
Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).
Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).
Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).
Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2004
- Primary completionSep 2008
- Study completionSep 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Renal CellStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 750 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00083889
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A6181034
- Status last verified
- Jan 2010
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2004
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rini BI, Hutson TE, Figlin RA, Lechuga MJ, Valota O, Serfass L, Rosbrook B, Motzer RJ. Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Risk Group. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 4.
PubMed 29853320de Velasco G, McKay RR, Lin X, Moreira RB, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Comprehensive Analysis of Survival Outcomes in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated in Clinical Trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
PubMed 28410911Grunwald V, Lin X, Kalanovic D, Simantov R. Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1006-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 26.
PubMed 27238653Grunwald V, McKay RR, Krajewski KM, Kalanovic D, Lin X, Perkins JJ, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Depth of remission is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):952-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PubMed 25577718Cella D, Michaelson MD, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Charbonneau C, Kim ST, Li JZ, Motzer RJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib vs interferon-alpha in a phase III trial: final results and geographical analysis. Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 16;102(4):658-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605552. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
PubMed 20104222Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):115-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044.
PubMed 17215529
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00083889
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A6181034
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 750 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2004
- Primary completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Dec 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test whether SU011248 has activity and is safe compared to interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Interferon-alfa |
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: SU011248 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma of clear cell histology with metastases
- Evidence of measurable disease by radiographic technique
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior systemic (including adjuvant or neoadjuvant) therapy of any kind for RCC
- History of or known brain metastases
- Serious acute or chronic illness or recent history of significant cardiac abnormality
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interferon-alfaAlso: Roferon3 MIU first week, 6 MIU second week, and 9 MIU thereafter three times a week (non-consecutive days) until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | 2 |
| SU011248Also: Sunitinib, SUTENT50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks and 2 weeks off treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment
Time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.
22 secondary outcomes
Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment
Time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment
Time frame: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement
Time frame: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase
Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment
Time frame: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)
Time frame: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
Time frame: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis
Time frame: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Time frame: post study measurement
Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662
Time frame: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2010.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29853320Rini BI, Hutson TE, Figlin RA, Lechuga MJ, Valota O, Serfass L, Rosbrook B, Motzer RJ. Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Risk Group. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28410911de Velasco G, McKay RR, Lin X, Moreira RB, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Comprehensive Analysis of Survival Outcomes in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated in Clinical Trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27238653Grunwald V, Lin X, Kalanovic D, Simantov R. Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1006-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25577718Grunwald V, McKay RR, Krajewski KM, Kalanovic D, Lin X, Perkins JJ, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Depth of remission is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):952-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20104222Cella D, Michaelson MD, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Charbonneau C, Kim ST, Li JZ, Motzer RJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib vs interferon-alpha in a phase III trial: final results and geographical analysis. Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 16;102(4):658-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605552. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 17215529Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):115-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Federated Learning in Renal Tumor Model
Renal Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Immunotherapy Drugs (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) With One Anti-cancer Targeted Drug (Cabozantinib) for Rare Genitourinary Tumors
Bladder Adenocarcinoma, Bladder Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Mindfulness Intervention for the Improvement of Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) and Zanzalintinib in People With Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) (LITESPARK-034/LS-034/MK-6482-034)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
123 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Interferon-alfa and SU011248 in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Pfizer at 123 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 123 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Australia, Russia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Dec 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment (time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00083889, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2010.