AzTrials
AzTrials

Carcinoma, Renal CellPhase 3NCT00083889

SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon-alfa and SU011248 in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Pfizer at 123 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether SU011248 has activity and is safe compared to interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
What is being tested?
Interferon-alfa and SU011248
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
750 participants
Where
123 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
Aug 2004to Sep 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma of clear cell histology with metastases
  • Evidence of measurable disease by radiographic technique
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 0 or 1

Who cannot join

  • Prior systemic (including adjuvant or neoadjuvant) therapy of any kind for RCC
  • History of or known brain metastases
  • Serious acute or chronic illness or recent history of significant cardiac abnormality

Trial locations and contacts

123 sites in 11 countries.

123 sites in 11 countries

United States58 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80040-0510

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5055

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Columbus, Mississippi, 39705

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Corinth, Mississippi, 38834

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Covington, Louisiana, 70433

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Detoit, Michigan, 48201

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39213

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66112

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64131

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    La Jolla, California, 92093

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40207

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792-0001

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38120

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70002

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06504

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06511

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06520

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10022

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68198-9200

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66210

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111-2497

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98101

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seattle, Washington, 98109-1023

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Southaven, Mississippi, 38671

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    The Bronx, New York, 10466

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74133

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tyler, Texas, 75702

Other trials in United States

Canada11 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y5L3

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4L6

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1S 2L6

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6

Other trials in Canada

Poland9 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Gdansk, 80-210

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Krakow, 31-115

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lodz, 93-509

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lublin, 20-090

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Moczowego, Warszawa

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Poznan

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 00-909

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Wroclaw, 50-043

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Wroclaw, 50-556

Other trials in Poland

Australia7 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lismore, New South Wales, 2480

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Perth, Western Australia, 6000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Victoria, 36184

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Woodville South, South Australia, 5011

Other trials in Australia

Russia7 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Chelyabinsk, 454087

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Moscow, 117836

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Moscow

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Obninsk, Kaluga Oblast, 249036

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Tomsk, 634050

Other trials in Russia

France6 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lyon, 69008

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, Cedex 15, 75908

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Paris, 75651

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Rennes, 35042

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Saint-Herblain

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Italy6 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Modena, 41100

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Naples, 80131

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Pavia

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Roma, 00135

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Roma, 00144

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Roma, 00152

Other trials in Italy

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, SE1 9RT

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Manchester, Lancashire, M20 4BX

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Sutton Surrey, SM2 5PT

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2 TL

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany5 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Aachen, 52074

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Essen, 45122

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Ulm, 89075

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Spain5 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28040

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28041

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Seville, SEVILLA, 41013

Other trials in Spain

Brazil3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The purpose of this study is to test whether SU011248 has activity and is safe compared to interferon-alfa as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Being tested
Interferon-alfa, SU011248
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interferon-alfaDrug

    Also called Roferon

    3 MIU first week, 6 MIU second week, and 9 MIU thereafter three times a week (non-consecutive days) until progression or unacceptable toxicity

  • SU011248Drug

    Also called Sunitinib, SUTENT

    50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks and 2 weeks off treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity

Study groups in NCT00083889
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Interferon-alfa
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: SU011248

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment

    Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.

    Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment

    Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods.

    Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment

    Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

    Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

  2. Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment

    Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response.

    Measured: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

  3. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.

    Measured: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death

  4. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment

    TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.

    Measured: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

  5. Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment

    TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day.

    Measured: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

  6. Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement

    Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression.

    Measured: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase

  7. Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment

    Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression.

    Measured: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  8. FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale

    FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  9. FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale

    FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns).

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  10. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

    Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  11. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale

    Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  12. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale

    Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  13. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale

    Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  14. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale

    Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being.

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  15. EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index

    EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system).

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  16. Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)

    EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state).

    Measured: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

  17. Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

    Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded.

    Measured: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

  18. Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

    Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded.

    Measured: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

  19. Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

    Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting.

    Measured: post study measurement

  20. Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248

    Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

  21. Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662

    Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

  22. Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662

    Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]).

    Measured: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2004
  3. Primary completionSep 2008
  4. Study completionSep 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
750 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00083889
Sponsor's protocol ID
A6181034
Status last verified
Jan 2010
First submitted
3 Jun 2004
Last updated
26 Jan 2010
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rini BI, Hutson TE, Figlin RA, Lechuga MJ, Valota O, Serfass L, Rosbrook B, Motzer RJ. Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium Risk Group. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 May 4.

    PubMed 29853320
  • de Velasco G, McKay RR, Lin X, Moreira RB, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Comprehensive Analysis of Survival Outcomes in Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated in Clinical Trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Dec;15(6):652-660.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

    PubMed 28410911
  • Grunwald V, Lin X, Kalanovic D, Simantov R. Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):1006-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 26.

    PubMed 27238653
  • Grunwald V, McKay RR, Krajewski KM, Kalanovic D, Lin X, Perkins JJ, Simantov R, Choueiri TK. Depth of remission is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):952-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

    PubMed 25577718
  • Cella D, Michaelson MD, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Charbonneau C, Kim ST, Li JZ, Motzer RJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib vs interferon-alpha in a phase III trial: final results and geographical analysis. Br J Cancer. 2010 Feb 16;102(4):658-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605552. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

    PubMed 20104222
  • Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Kim ST, Chen I, Bycott PW, Baum CM, Figlin RA. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 11;356(2):115-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044.

    PubMed 17215529

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Interferon-alfa and SU011248 in people with Carcinoma, Renal Cell, run by Pfizer at 123 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 123 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Australia, Russia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Dec 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment (time frame: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00083889, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2010.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in