HIV InfectionsPhase 4PEARLSNCT00084136
Prospective Evaluation of Anti-retroviral Combinations for Treatment Naive, HIV Infected Persons in Resource-limited Settings
A Phase 4 study testing Atazanavir, Didanosine (enteric-coated) and Efavirenz in people with HIV Infections, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 42 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections
- What is being tested?
- Atazanavir, Didanosine (enteric-coated) and Efavirenz
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,571 participants
- Where
- 42 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- May 2005to May 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 infected>
- CD4 count fewer than 300 cells/mm3 >
- Viral load test result>
- Absolute Neutrophil Count at least 750mm3 >
- Hemoglobin at least 7.5 g/dL>
- Platelet count at least 50,000/mm3>
Show all 12Show fewer
- Calculated creatinine clearance at least 60 mL/min>
- A , A, and alkaline phosphatase <= 5 times upper limit of normal>
- total bilirubin <= 2.5 times upper limit of normal>
- Karnofsky performance score of 70 or higher>
- Plans to stay in the area for the duration of the study>
- Agrees to use acceptable forms of contraception for the duration of the study>
Who cannot join
- More than 7 days exposure to ARVs (except for single-dose NVP or ZDV for any period for the purpose of pMTCT)>
- Acute therapy for serious medical illnesses within 14 days prior to study entry>
- Certain abnormal laboratory values>
- Radiation therapy or chemotherapy within 45 days prior to study entry. >
- Any immunomodulator, HIV vaccine, or other investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry. >
- Current alcohol or drug abuse that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with study participation>
Show all 13Show fewer
- Inflamed pancreas within 3 years prior to study entry>
- Allergy/sensitivity to any of the study drugs or their formulations>
- Heart rate less than 40 beats/min>
- History of untreated, active second- or third-degree heart block>
- Currently detained in jail or for treatment of a psychiatric or physical illness>
- Vomiting or inability to swallow medications>
- Pregnancy>
Trial locations and contacts
42 sites in 9 countries.
42 sites in 9 countries
United States27 sites
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
Wake County Health and Human Services Clinical Research Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-3015
Rush-Presbyterian/St. Lukes (Chicago)
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3806
Cook County Hospital Core Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0405
The Ohio State Univ. AIDS CRS
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas
Univ. of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver
Denver, Colorado
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of Texas, Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0435
Univ. of Hawaii at Manoa, Leahi Hosp.
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816-2396
HIV Prevention & Treatment CRS
HVTN 722 West 168th Street MSPH Bldg., New York, 10032
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033-1079
UCLA CARE Center CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1793
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0392
Vanderbilt Therapeutics CRS
Nashville, Tennessee, 37204
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York, 10003
Cornell CRS
New York, New York, 10011
NY Univ. HIV/AIDS CRS
New York, New York, 10016
Hosp. of the Univ. of Pennsylvania CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Stanley Street Treatment and Resource
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
The Miriam Hosp. ACTG CRS
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Community Health Network, Inc.
Rochester, New York, 14642-0001
Univ. of Rochester ACTG CRS
Rochester, New York, 14642-0001
Washington University (St. Louis)
St Louis, Missouri, 63108-2138
Harbor General/UCLA
Torrance, California, 90502-2052
India4 sites
NARI Clinic at NIV CRS
Maharashtra State, Pune
NARI Pune CRS
Pune, Maharashtra
Dr. Kotnis Dispensary
Pune, 411026
YRG CARE Medical Ctr., VHS Chennai CRS
Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani, Chennai, 600113
Brazil2 sites
Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica Evandro Chagas (IPEC) CRS
Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91350-200
Malawi2 sites
University of North Carolina Lilongwe CRS
Mzimba Road, Lilongwe
College of Med. JHU CRS
P.O. Box 1131, Blantyre
Peru2 sites
Asociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion - Miraf CRS
Barranco, Lima region
San Miguel CRS
San Miguel, Lima region
South Africa2 sites
Durban Adult HIV CRS
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4001
Wits HIV CRS
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2092
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Open-Label Evaluation of Efficacy of Once-Daily Protease Inhibitor and Once-Daily Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Containing Therapy Combinations for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 Infected Persons From Resource-Limited Settings (PEARLS) Trial
This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
Read the detailed description
In developed countries, standard effective antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for treatment-naive HIV infected people includes three-drug combinations of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with either a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). However, direct comparisons of ARV efficacy in persons that more closely reflect the worldwide demographics of HIV-1 infection are needed.> > Trial participants were recruited in Africa (Malawi, South Africa, Zimbabwe), Asia (India, Thailand), South America (Brazil, Peru), Haiti, and the United States.>
> All participants were randomly assigned to one of three arms, and random allocation was stratified by 2 factors: country, and screening plasma HIV-1 RNA level (< 100,000 copies/mL versus >= 100,000 copies/mL). Participants assigned to the ZDV/3TC+EFV arm received lamivudine/zidovudine twice daily and efavirenz once daily. Participants assigned to the ddI+FTC+ATV arm received emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine once daily. Participants assigned to the TDF/FTC+EFV arm received emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz once daily. >
>
> Physical exam and blood collection occurred at entry and at most study visits. Participants experiencing virologic failure were offered a switch to another regimen. >
> On May 23, 2008, the ddI+FTC+ATV was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that this arm had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to the ZDV/3TC+EFV arm . Participants still receiving ddI+FTC+ATV were offered alternative medications, and all participants continued to be followed. >
> On November 3, 2009, the DSMB recommended that the study close to all follow-up on May 31, 2010, before the designed termination (based on 30% of participants meeting the primary outcome) was met. The board observed that the recent accumulation of primary efficacy events (i.e. regimen failures) was very slow. Therefore, if the study were to continue another 1-2 years, the precision gained for treatment comparisons would likely be small.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Being tested
- Atazanavir, Didanosine (enteric-coated), Efavirenz, Emtricitabine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- Keywords
- Treatment Naive, Adherence, Drug Resistance, Treatment Failure
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AtazanavirDrug
Also called ATV
400 mg taken orally daily
Didanosine (enteric-coated)Drug
Also called ddI
400 mg taken orally daily
EfavirenzDrug
Also called EFV
600 mg taken orally daily
EmtricitabineDrug
Also called FTC
200 mg taken orally daily
Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateDrug
Also called FTC/TDF
200 mg/300 mg taken orally once daily
Lamivudine/ZidovudineDrug
Also called 3TC/ZDV
150 mg/300 mg taken orally twice daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | Experimental | ZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz Receives: Drug: Efavirenz; Drug: Lamivudine/Zidovudine |
| ddI+FTC+ATV | Experimental | ddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine Receives: Drug: Atazanavir; Drug: Didanosine (enteric-coated); Drug: Emtricitabine |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | Experimental | TDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz Receives: Drug: Efavirenz; Drug: Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Treatment Failure (PI Comparison)
Time from randomization to the earliest of: scheduled week of first plasma sample meeting virologic failure (two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values 1,000 copies/mL or higher, regardless of whether ARV medications being taken at the time); scheduled week of first AIDS defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2005), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis and Chaga's disease), not attributed to Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (reviewed by chairs); date of death (due to any cause). Plasma drawn every 8 weeks (except confirmation samples could be drawn earlier).
Measured: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008).
Time to Treatment Failure (NRTI Comparison)
Time from randomization to the earliest of: scheduled week of first plasma sample meeting virologic failure (two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values 1,000 copies/mL or higher, regardless of whether ARV medications being taken at the time); scheduled week of first AIDS defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2005) plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis and Chaga's disease), not attributed to Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (reviewed by chairs); date of death (due to any cause). Plasma drawn every 8 weeks (except confirmation samples could be drawn earlier).
Measured: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up through study closure (May 31, 2010).
Secondary outcomes (16)
Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (PI Comparison)
Time is measured from date of treatment initiation to earliest of the following: date of last participant contact (premature discontinuation of study follow-up); date all ARV medications were held (if all medications held for at least 8 weeks, for any reason); date that any ARV medication was changed (excluding the following single ARV substitutions: stavudine or tenofovir for zidovudine, nevirapine for efavirenz, or didanosine for tenofovir).
Measured: Throughout follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22,2008)
Time to Immunologic Failure (PI Comparison)
Time from randomization to the first scheduled study visit (week 48 or later) with a CD4+ cell count fewer than 100 cells/mm3.
Measured: At or after Week 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTV+ATV arm closed - May 22,2008)
Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (PI Comparison)
Available pre-randomization CD4 cell counts were limited to the single CD4 cell count used for study eligibility (and therefore must have been fewer than 300 cells/mm3).
Measured: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008)
Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (PI Comparison)
Time from treatment dispensation to the first occurring of the following: week of first ARV medication change; week of first grade 3 or higher sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality (total bilirubin was excluded) that was at least one grade higher than baseline. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables.
Measured: Throughout study follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008)
Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (PI Comparison)
Number of participants with plasma HIV-1 Viral load fewer than 400 copies/mL at study visit weeks 24 and 48. Closest observed result between 20 and up to 28 weeks (for week 24), and between 44 and up to 52 (for week 48) used if multiple results available. Missing values excluded, and both study treatment status and history ignored.
Measured: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response by Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 48: discontinued ARV regimen (see time to discontinuation of initial ARV therapy above); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 48: changed any ARV medication (including permanent discontinuation of all medications); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008)
Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (NRTI Comparison)
Time is measured from date of treatment initiation to earliest of the following: date of last participant contact (premature discontinuation of study follow-up); date all ARV medications were held (if all medications held for at least 8 weeks, for any reason); date that any ARV medication was changed (excluding the following single ARV substitutions: stavudine or tenofovir for zidovudine, nevirapine for efavirenz, or didanosine for tenofovir).
Measured: Throughout follow-up until study closed (May 31,2010)
Time to Immunologic Failure (NRTI Comparison)
Time from randomization to the first scheduled study visit (week 48 or later) with a CD4+ cell count fewer than 100 cells/mm3.
Measured: At or after Week 48 (including all follow-up through study closure - May 31,2010)
Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (NRTI Comparison)
Available pre-randomization CD4 cell counts were limited to the single CD4 cell count used for study eligibility (and therefore must have been fewer than 300 cells/mm3).
Measured: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including all follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010)
Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (NRTI Comparison)
Number of participants with plasma HIV-1 Viral load fewer than 400 copies/mL at study visit weeks 24 and 48. Closest observed result between 20 and up to 28 weeks (for week 24), and between 44 and up to 52 (for week 48) used if multiple results available. Missing values excluded, and both study treatment status and history ignored.
Measured: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 48: discontinued ARV regimen (see time to discontinuation of initial ARV therapy above); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 48 (using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 96: discontinued ARV regimen (see time to discontinuation of initial ARV therapy above); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 96 (using follow-up through to study closure on May 31,2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time from randomization to any of the following events occurring prior to week 48: changed any ARV medication (including permanent discontinuation of all medications); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 48 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time to any of the following events occurring prior to week 96: changed any ARV medication (including permanent discontinuation of all medications); discontinued study follow-up or died; absence of virologic suppression defined as 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values < 400 copies/mL; two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values > 400 copies/mL following virologic suppression.
Measured: Week 96 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010
Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (NRTI Comparison)
Time from treatment dispensation to the first occurring of the following: week of first ARV medication change; week of first grade 3 or higher sign/symptom or laboratory abnormality (total bilirubin was excluded) that was at least one grade higher than baseline. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables.
Measured: Throughout study follow-up until study closure (May 31, 2010)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Primary completionMay 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,571 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas B. Campbell, MD, Study chair, University of Colorado, DenverTimothy Flanigan, MD, Study chair, The Miriam HospitalJames Hakim, MscClinEpi, FRCP, Study chair, Department of Medicine, University of ZimbabweNagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, MD, Study chair, Centre for AIDS Research and Education
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00084136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG A5175
- Other IDs
- 1U01AI068636, PEARLS, A5185s, 5K24AI051966-03
- Acronym
- PEARLS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2004
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bartlett JA, Johnson J, Herrera G, Sosa N, Rodriguez A, Liao Q, Griffith S, Irlbeck D, Shaefer MS; Clinically Significant Long-Term Antiretroviral Sequential Sequencing Study (CLASS) Team. Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and Lamivudine combined with Efavirenz, Amprenavir/Ritonavir, or Stavudine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Nov 1;43(3):284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000243092.40490.26.
PubMed 16967040Saag MS. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy: implications of recent findings. Top HIV Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(3):83-8.
PubMed 15310939Tapper ML, Daar ES, Piliero PJ, Smith K, Steinhart C. Strategies for initiating combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005 Apr;19(4):224-38. doi: 10.1089/apc.2005.19.224.
PubMed 15857194Gatechompol S, Zheng L, Bao Y, Avihingsanon A, Kerr SJ, Kumarasamy N, Hakim JG, Maldarelli F, Gorelick RJ, Welker JL, Lifson JD, Hosseinipour MC, Eron JJ, Ruxrungtham K. Prevalence and risk of residual viremia after ART in low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e26817. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026817.
PubMed 34477118Firnhaber C, Smeaton LM, Grinsztejn B, Lalloo U, Faesen S, Samaneka W, Infante R, Rana A, Kumarasamy N, Hakim J, Campbell TB. Differences in antiretroviral safety and efficacy by sex in a multinational randomized clinical trial. HIV Clin Trials. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):89-99. doi: 10.1179/1528433614Z.0000000013. Epub 2015 May 15.
PubMed 25979186Kantor R, Smeaton L, Vardhanabhuti S, Hudelson SE, Wallis CL, Tripathy S, Morgado MG, Saravanan S, Balakrishnan P, Reitsma M, Hart S, Mellors JW, Halvas E, Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Kumwenda J, La Rosa A, Lalloo UG, Lama JR, Rassool M, Santos BR, Supparatpinyo K, Hakim J, Flanigan T, Kumarasamy N, Campbell TB, Eshleman SH; AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5175 Study Team. Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance and HIV-1 Subtype C Are Independently Associated With Virologic Failure: Results From the Multinational PEARLS (ACTG A5175) Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60(10):1541-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ102. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PubMed 25681380Mollan KR, Smurzynski M, Eron JJ, Daar ES, Campbell TB, Sax PE, Gulick RM, Na L, O'Keefe L, Robertson KR, Tierney C. Association between efavirenz as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection and increased risk for suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide: an analysis of trial data. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/M14-0293.
PubMed 24979445Campbell TB, Smeaton LM, Kumarasamy N, Flanigan T, Klingman KL, Firnhaber C, Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Kumwenda J, Lalloo U, Riviere C, Sanchez J, Melo M, Supparatpinyo K, Tripathy S, Martinez AI, Nair A, Walawander A, Moran L, Chen Y, Snowden W, Rooney JF, Uy J, Schooley RT, De Gruttola V, Hakim JG; PEARLS study team of the ACTG. Efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial in diverse multinational settings. PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001290. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PubMed 22936892Nielsen-Saines K, Komarow L, Cu-Uvin S, Jourdain G, Klingman KL, Shapiro DE, Mofenson L, Moran L, Campbell TB, Hitti J, Fiscus S, Currier J; ACTG 5190/PACTG 1054 Study Team. Infant outcomes after maternal antiretroviral exposure in resource-limited settings. Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):e1525-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2340. Epub 2012 May 14.
PubMed 22585772Safren SA, Hendriksen ES, Smeaton L, Celentano DD, Hosseinipour MC, Barnett R, Guanira J, Flanigan T, Kumarasamy N, Klingman K, Campbell T. Quality of life among individuals with HIV starting antiretroviral therapy in diverse resource-limited areas of the world. AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):266-77. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9947-5.
PubMed 21499794Firnhaber C, Smeaton L, Saukila N, Flanigan T, Gangakhedkar R, Kumwenda J, La Rosa A, Kumarasamy N, De Gruttola V, Hakim JG, Campbell TB. Comparisons of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia at initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;14(12):e1088-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
PubMed 20961784
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Open-Label Evaluation of Efficacy of Once-Daily Protease Inhibitor and Once-Daily Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor-Containing Therapy Combinations for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 Infected Persons From Resource-Limited Settings (PEARLS) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00084136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PEARLS / ACTG A5175
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Keywords
- Treatment Naive, Adherence, Drug Resistance, Treatment Failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,571 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other InfectionsResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- May 2005
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Aug 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compared 3 different three-drug combinations in HIV infected individuals starting their first HIV treatment regimens. Participants were recruited from resource-limited areas in Africa, Asia, South America, Haiti, and also from the United States. The study hypothesis was each of the once daily combinations (PI based, or NNRTI based) would not have inferior efficacy compared to the twice daily NNRTI based combination.
Detailed description
In developed countries, standard effective antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for treatment-naive HIV infected people includes three-drug combinations of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) with either a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). However, direct comparisons of ARV efficacy in persons that more closely reflect the worldwide demographics of HIV-1 infection are needed.> > Trial participants were recruited in Africa (Malawi, South Africa, Zimbabwe), Asia (India, Thailand), South America (Brazil, Peru), Haiti, and the United States.>
> All participants were randomly assigned to one of three arms, and random allocation was stratified by 2 factors: country, and screening plasma HIV-1 RNA level (< 100,000 copies/mL versus >= 100,000 copies/mL). Participants assigned to the ZDV/3TC+EFV arm received lamivudine/zidovudine twice daily and efavirenz once daily. Participants assigned to the ddI+FTC+ATV arm received emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine once daily. Participants assigned to the TDF/FTC+EFV arm received emtricitabine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and efavirenz once daily. >
>
> Physical exam and blood collection occurred at entry and at most study visits. Participants experiencing virologic failure were offered a switch to another regimen. >
> On May 23, 2008, the ddI+FTC+ATV was closed following a planned interim review by the study's independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB recommendation was based upon compelling evidence that this arm had significantly more virologic failure (and therefore was inferior when) compared to the ZDV/3TC+EFV arm . Participants still receiving ddI+FTC+ATV were offered alternative medications, and all participants continued to be followed. >
> On November 3, 2009, the DSMB recommended that the study close to all follow-up on May 31, 2010, before the designed termination (based on 30% of participants meeting the primary outcome) was met. The board observed that the recent accumulation of primary efficacy events (i.e. regimen failures) was very slow. Therefore, if the study were to continue another 1-2 years, the precision gained for treatment comparisons would likely be small.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ZDV/3TC+EFV | Experimental | Drug: Efavirenz, Drug: Lamivudine/ZidovudineZDV/3TC+EFV participants will receive lamivudine/zidovudine and efavirenz |
| ddI+FTC+ATV | Experimental | Drug: Atazanavir, Drug: Didanosine (enteric-coated), Drug: EmtricitabineddI+FTC+ATV participants will receive emtricitabine, atazanavir, and enteric-coated didanosine |
| TDF/FTC+EFV | Experimental | Drug: Efavirenz, Drug: Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateTDF/FTC+EFV participants will receive emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- HIV-1 infected>
- CD4 count fewer than 300 cells/mm3 >
- Viral load test result>
- Absolute Neutrophil Count at least 750mm3 >
- Hemoglobin at least 7.5 g/dL>
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- More than 7 days exposure to ARVs (except for single-dose NVP or ZDV for any period for the purpose of pMTCT)>
- Acute therapy for serious medical illnesses within 14 days prior to study entry>
- Certain abnormal laboratory values>
- Radiation therapy or chemotherapy within 45 days prior to study entry. >
- Any immunomodulator, HIV vaccine, or other investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry. >
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AtazanavirAlso: ATV400 mg taken orally daily | Drug | ddI+FTC+ATV |
| Didanosine (enteric-coated)Also: ddI400 mg taken orally daily | Drug | ddI+FTC+ATV |
| EfavirenzAlso: EFV600 mg taken orally daily | Drug | TDF/FTC+EFV, ZDV/3TC+EFV |
| EmtricitabineAlso: FTC200 mg taken orally daily | Drug | ddI+FTC+ATV |
| Emtricitabine/Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateAlso: FTC/TDF200 mg/300 mg taken orally once daily | Drug | TDF/FTC+EFV |
| Lamivudine/ZidovudineAlso: 3TC/ZDV150 mg/300 mg taken orally twice daily | Drug | ZDV/3TC+EFV |
Primary outcome
Time to Treatment Failure (PI Comparison)
Time frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008).
Time from randomization to the earliest of: scheduled week of first plasma sample meeting virologic failure (two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values 1,000 copies/mL or higher, regardless of whether ARV medications being taken at the time); scheduled week of first AIDS defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2005), plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis and Chaga's disease), not attributed to Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (reviewed by chairs); date of death (due to any cause). Plasma drawn every 8 weeks (except confirmation samples could be drawn earlier).
Time to Treatment Failure (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up through study closure (May 31, 2010).
Time from randomization to the earliest of: scheduled week of first plasma sample meeting virologic failure (two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA values 1,000 copies/mL or higher, regardless of whether ARV medications being taken at the time); scheduled week of first AIDS defining diagnosis (WHO Stage 4 (2005) plus microsporidiosis, cyclospora gastroenteritis and Chaga's disease), not attributed to Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (reviewed by chairs); date of death (due to any cause). Plasma drawn every 8 weeks (except confirmation samples could be drawn earlier).
16 secondary outcomes
Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (PI Comparison)
Time frame: Throughout follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22,2008)
Time to Immunologic Failure (PI Comparison)
Time frame: At or after Week 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTV+ATV arm closed - May 22,2008)
Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (PI Comparison)
Time frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008)
Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (PI Comparison)
Time frame: Throughout study follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008)
Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (PI Comparison)
Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including only follow-up until ddI+FTC+ARV arm closed - May 22, 2008)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response by Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(PI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 48 (using follow-up only until closing of ddI+FTV+ATV arm on May 22,2008)
Time to Discontinuation of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Therapy (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Throughout follow-up until study closed (May 31,2010)
Time to Immunologic Failure (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: At or after Week 48 (including all follow-up through study closure - May 31,2010)
Change in CD4 Count From Screening to Weeks 24, 48, 96 (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: weeks 24, 48 and 96 (including all follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010)
Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Fewer Than 400 Copies/ml (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: At Weeks 24 and 48 (including follow-up through to study closure on May 31, 2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 48 (using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Excluding Study Allowed ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 96 (using follow-up through to study closure on May 31,2010)
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 48 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 48 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010
Time to Loss of Virologic Response at Week 96 (Defined by FDA TLOVR Algorithm - Including All ARV Substitutions)(NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Week 96 using follow-up through study closure on May 31,2010
Time to First Dose Modification or Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Event (NRTI Comparison)
Time frame: Throughout study follow-up until study closure (May 31, 2010)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16967040Bartlett JA, Johnson J, Herrera G, Sosa N, Rodriguez A, Liao Q, Griffith S, Irlbeck D, Shaefer MS; Clinically Significant Long-Term Antiretroviral Sequential Sequencing Study (CLASS) Team. Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and Lamivudine combined with Efavirenz, Amprenavir/Ritonavir, or Stavudine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Nov 1;43(3):284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000243092.40490.26.
- Background: PubMed 15310939Saag MS. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy: implications of recent findings. Top HIV Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;12(3):83-8.
- Background: PubMed 15857194Tapper ML, Daar ES, Piliero PJ, Smith K, Steinhart C. Strategies for initiating combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2005 Apr;19(4):224-38. doi: 10.1089/apc.2005.19.224.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34477118Gatechompol S, Zheng L, Bao Y, Avihingsanon A, Kerr SJ, Kumarasamy N, Hakim JG, Maldarelli F, Gorelick RJ, Welker JL, Lifson JD, Hosseinipour MC, Eron JJ, Ruxrungtham K. Prevalence and risk of residual viremia after ART in low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 3;100(35):e26817. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026817.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25979186Firnhaber C, Smeaton LM, Grinsztejn B, Lalloo U, Faesen S, Samaneka W, Infante R, Rana A, Kumarasamy N, Hakim J, Campbell TB. Differences in antiretroviral safety and efficacy by sex in a multinational randomized clinical trial. HIV Clin Trials. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):89-99. doi: 10.1179/1528433614Z.0000000013. Epub 2015 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25681380Kantor R, Smeaton L, Vardhanabhuti S, Hudelson SE, Wallis CL, Tripathy S, Morgado MG, Saravanan S, Balakrishnan P, Reitsma M, Hart S, Mellors JW, Halvas E, Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Kumwenda J, La Rosa A, Lalloo UG, Lama JR, Rassool M, Santos BR, Supparatpinyo K, Hakim J, Flanigan T, Kumarasamy N, Campbell TB, Eshleman SH; AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5175 Study Team. Pretreatment HIV Drug Resistance and HIV-1 Subtype C Are Independently Associated With Virologic Failure: Results From the Multinational PEARLS (ACTG A5175) Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60(10):1541-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ102. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24979445Mollan KR, Smurzynski M, Eron JJ, Daar ES, Campbell TB, Sax PE, Gulick RM, Na L, O'Keefe L, Robertson KR, Tierney C. Association between efavirenz as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection and increased risk for suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide: an analysis of trial data. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jul 1;161(1):1-10. doi: 10.7326/M14-0293.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22936892Campbell TB, Smeaton LM, Kumarasamy N, Flanigan T, Klingman KL, Firnhaber C, Grinsztejn B, Hosseinipour MC, Kumwenda J, Lalloo U, Riviere C, Sanchez J, Melo M, Supparatpinyo K, Tripathy S, Martinez AI, Nair A, Walawander A, Moran L, Chen Y, Snowden W, Rooney JF, Uy J, Schooley RT, De Gruttola V, Hakim JG; PEARLS study team of the ACTG. Efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial in diverse multinational settings. PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001290. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22585772Nielsen-Saines K, Komarow L, Cu-Uvin S, Jourdain G, Klingman KL, Shapiro DE, Mofenson L, Moran L, Campbell TB, Hitti J, Fiscus S, Currier J; ACTG 5190/PACTG 1054 Study Team. Infant outcomes after maternal antiretroviral exposure in resource-limited settings. Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):e1525-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2340. Epub 2012 May 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21499794Safren SA, Hendriksen ES, Smeaton L, Celentano DD, Hosseinipour MC, Barnett R, Guanira J, Flanigan T, Kumarasamy N, Klingman K, Campbell T. Quality of life among individuals with HIV starting antiretroviral therapy in diverse resource-limited areas of the world. AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):266-77. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9947-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20961784Firnhaber C, Smeaton L, Saukila N, Flanigan T, Gangakhedkar R, Kumwenda J, La Rosa A, Kumarasamy N, De Gruttola V, Hakim JG, Campbell TB. Comparisons of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia at initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;14(12):e1088-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas B. Campbell, MD study chair
University of Colorado, Denver
Timothy Flanigan, MD study chair
The Miriam Hospital
James Hakim, MscClinEpi, FRCP study chair
Department of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe
42 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Atazanavir, Didanosine (enteric-coated) and Efavirenz in people with HIV Infections, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 42 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 42 sites in United States, India, Brazil, Malawi, Peru and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Treatment Failure (PI Comparison) (time frame: Virologic failure starting 14 weeks following randomization; disease progression starting 12 weeks following randomization; and death occurring at any time following randomization. Follow-up until ddI+FTC+ATV arm closed (May 22, 2008).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00084136, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2018.