Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 3ATLASNCT00085644
Human Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab (D2E7) in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Abbott at 22 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab 40 mg given every other week (eow) in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have had an inadequate response to, or who are intolerant to, treatment with at least 1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and who may… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- What is being tested?
- adalimumab (D2E7)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 315 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2004to Jul 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be >= 18 years of age
- meet Modified NY Criteria definition of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
- have diagnosis of active AS based on protocol specified criteria
- inadequate response or intolerance to >= 1 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)
- be able and willing to learn to self-administer subcutaneous (SC) injections
Who cannot join
- Active tuberculosis, listeriosis,or hepatitis B, or any history of hepatitis C
- History of demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, or lymphoproliferative disease
- Previous anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy
- Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs - other than methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine)
- Treatment with intra-articular corticosteroid joint injections within 4 weeks of study dosing
- Biologic or investigational therapy within 6 weeks of study dosing
- Treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 30 days of study dosing
- Treatment with oral antibiotics within 14 days of study dosing
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
United States22 sites
Study site
Albany, New York, 12206
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35924
Study site
Boise, Idaho, 83706
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
Study site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Study site
Portland, Maine, 04102
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94143
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Study site
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
Study site
Wheaton, Maryland, 20902
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab 40 mg given every other week (eow) in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have had an inadequate response to, or who are intolerant to, treatment with at least 1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and who may have also failed treatment with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Being tested
- adalimumab (D2E7), placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
adalimumab (D2E7)Biological
Also called ABT-D2E7, adalimumab, Humira
Adalimumab 40 mg every other week, subcutaneous
placeboBiological
Placebo every other week, subcutaneous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: adalimumab (D2E7) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Responders With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) as Measured With ASAS International Working Group Response Criteria (ASAS 20).
ASAS 20 responders - improvement of >=20% and absolute improvement of >=10 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains; Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS (0 [none]-100 [severe]), Total Back Pain VAS (0 [no pain]-100 [severe]), BASFI VAS (0 [easy]-100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (0 [none]-10 [very severe]) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, defined as a worsening of >=20% and a net worsening of >=10 units. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Measured: Week 12
Mean Change in the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) Compared Against a Historical Control Group (Outcomes in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study [OASIS]) Using the ANCOVA Model Adjusting for Baseline mSASSS Score
Radiographic progression was based on change in mSASSS scoring (comparison of the means) from double-blind Baseline visit to Week 104. The mSASSS is the sum of the lumbar and cervical spine score ( 0 [no change] to 72 [progression]), derived from scoring the anterior site of the lumbar spine (T12 to S1) and the cervical spine (C2 to T1) as either 0 (normal), 1 (erosion, sclerosis, or squaring), 2 (syndesmophyte), 3 (bridging syndesmophyte), or N (vertebral body not evaluable). Data from NCT00195819 was compared with data from AS patients in OASIS.
Measured: Week 104
Secondary outcomes (35)
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASAS 20 responders - improvement of >=20% and absolute improvement of >=10 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains; Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS; (0[none]-100 [severe]), Total Back Pain VAS; (0 [no pain]-100 [severe]), BASFI VAS (0 [easy ]-100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (0 [none] to 10 [very severe]) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, defined as a worsening of >=20% and a net worsening of >=10 units. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASAS 50 responders - improvement of >=50% and absolute improvement of >=20 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS (0 [none] to 100 [severe]); Total Back Pain VAS (0 [no pain] to 100 [severe]); BASFI VAS (0 [easy] to 100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (1 [none] to 10 [very severe]); and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, defined as a worsening of >=20% and a net worsening of >=10 units. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASAS 70 responders - improvement of >=70% and absolute improvement of >=30 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains: Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS (0 [none] to 100 [severe]), Total Back Pain VAS; (0 [no pain] - 100 [severe]), BASFI VAS (0 [easy] to 100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (1 [none] to 10 [very severe]); and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, defined as defined as a worsening of >= 20% and a net worsening of >= 10 units. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Evaluation of the effect of adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow) on patient's global assessment of disease activity. The patient was to assess his/her disease activity in the past week using a visual analog scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The patient assesses his/her disease activity for the past week using a Patient Global Assessment of Disease on visual analog scale (VAS) with 0 being none and 100 being severe.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
BASFI consist of a set of 10 questions designed to determine the degree of functional limitation in subjects with AS. The BASFI score was derived based on the average of questions 1 through 10. The first 8 questions considered activities related to functional anatomy and the final 2 questions assessed the subject's ability to cope with everyday life over the last week. A 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) was used to answer the questions and the mean of the ten scales gave the BASFI score a value between 0 (easy) and 100 (impossible).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in BASFI (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
BASFI consisted of 10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questions with a response ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible). The BASFI score was derived based on the average of questions 1 through 10. A responder is a subject who demonstrates an absolute improvement of at least 10 units and a percentage improvement of at least 20% from Baseline.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Total Back Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Evaluation of the effect of 40 mg every other week (eow) adalimumab on Total Back Pain VAS. The subject was to assess his/her disease activity in the past week using a total spine VAS on a scale 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Total Back Pain (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Participants assessed disease activity in the past week using a total spine VAS on a scale 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). A responder is a participant who demonstrates an absolute improvement of at least 10 units and a percentage improvement of at least 20% from Baseline.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Inflammation (Mean of BASDAI Questions 5 and 6) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
The inflammation score is the mean of the two morning stiffness-related BASDAI visual analog scale (VAS) scores (items 5 and 6 of the BASDAI): overall level of morning stiffness (0 [none] to 10 [very severe]) and duration of morning stiffness (0 [0 hours] to 10 [2 or more hours]). A decrease in inflammation represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Inflammation (Individual Component of ASAS 20) (Mean of BASDAI Questions 5 and 6) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The inflammation score is the mean of the two morning stiffness-related BASDAI visual analog scale (VAS) scores (items 5 and 6 of the BASDAI): overall level of morning stiffness (0 [none] to 10 [very severe]) and duration of morning stiffness (0 [0 hours] to 10 [2 or more hours]). A decrease in inflammation represents improvement.
A responder is a participant who demonstrates an absolute improvement of at least 10 units and a percentage improvement of at least 20% from Baseline in inflammation (mean of the BASDAI questions 5 and 6 on scale of 0 [none] to 10 [very severe].
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 20 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The BASDAI is a questionnaire with 6 questions that subject completes by marking answers on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the last week with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe). Improvement in BASDAI by 20% was assessed. BASDAI Scoring:
Measure each item of the BASDAI in centimeters (out of a total of 10) BASDAI Score = 0.2 (Item 1 + Item 2 + Item 3 + Item 4 + Item 5/2 + Item 6/2).
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The BASDAI is a questionnaire with 6 questions that subject completes by marking answers on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the last week with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Improvement in BASDAI by 50% was assessed. BASDAI Scoring:
Measure each item of the BASDAI in centimeters (out of a total of 10) BASDAI Score = 0.2 (Item 1 + Item 2 + Item 3 + Item 4 + Item 5/2 + Item 6/2).
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 70 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The BASDAI is a questionnaire with 6 questions that subject completes by marking answers on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the last week with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Improvement in BASDAI by 70% was assessed. BASDAI Scoring:
Measure each item of the BASDAI in centimeters (out of a total of 10) BASDAI Score = 0.2 (Item 1 + Item 2 + Item 3 + Item 4 + Item 5/2 + Item 6/2).
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in BASDAI in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
The BASDAI is a questionnaire with 6 questions that subject completes by marking answers on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during the last week with responses that range from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) and measures severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness. The final BASDAI score ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (severe). A decrease in BASDAI represents improvement. BASDAI Scoring: 1) Measure each item of the BASDAI in centimeters (out of a total of 10) 2) BASDAI Score = 0.2 (Item 1 + Item 2 + Item 3 + Item 4 + Item 5/2 + Item 6/2).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Evaluation of the mean changes in CRP in subjects with adalimumab exposure from Baseline through 5 years. The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation via the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation. A decrease in CRP indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 40 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASAS 40 responders - improvement of >=40% and absolute improvement of >=20 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains; Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS (0 [none] to 100 [severe]); Total Back Pain VAS (0 [no pain] to 100 [severe]); BASFI VAS (0 [easy] to 100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (1 [none] to 10 [very severe]); and absence of any deterioration in the potential remaining domain. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 5/6 in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
The change in ASAS 5/6 was evaluated for the effect of adalimumab on structural damage.
ASAS 5/6 criteria is the 20% improvement in 5 out of 6 domains (physical function [BASFI], Total Back Pain, Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Inflammation [mean of Questions 5 and 6 of the BASDAI], spinal mobility [BASMI], and acute phase reactants [CRP]).
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured by ASAS Partial Remission Response in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
ASAS partial remission was calculated as follows: A value below 20 on a 0 - 100 point scale in each of the four domains of the ASAS (Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, Pain, Function, and Inflammation). Partial remission is also regarded as a low disease activity state.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
BASMI measures the range of motion based on five clinical measurements: 1) cervical rotation, 2) tragus to wall distance, 3) lumbar side flexion, 4) lumbar flexion (modified Schober's) and 5) intermalleolar distance. BASMI 0 = indicates mild disease involvement, 1 = moderate disease, and 2 = severe disease involvement. The results for cervical rotation and lumbar side flexion are the means of the left and right measurements. Scoring range 0-10. The higher the BASMI score, the more severe was the subject's limitation of movement due to their AS.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Chest Expansion (CE) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260 [
The patient is in a sitting position on the examination table with the hands on the hips. A pen mark is made at the xiphisternum and a tape measure placed around the circumference of the patient's chest at this level. The patient is asked to take a deep breath and to exhale as completely as possible while looking directly ahead. The measurement (in cm) is noted. The patient is asked to inhale as deeply as possible and the measurement (in cm) is noted. The difference in the 2 measurement points (in cm) constitutes the value for CE.
An increase in chest expansion represents improvement
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
MASES is measured by scoring of entheses of 0 (no tenderness) to 3 (severe tenderness) at 13 sites on the body. The score was derived as the sum of the 13 scores divided by 3 and the total range is 0 to 13 (minimum to maximum number and severity of enthesitis).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Index (BAS-G) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
BAS-G was measured by two VAS scores (0 to 100 mm) to reflect the effect of Ankylosing Spondylitis on subject's well-being over the past week and over the last 6 months, respectively. The average of these two scores was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Swollen Joint Count for 44 Joints (44 SJC) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Change from Baseline in the swollen joint index. An assessment of 44 joints for SJC done by physical examination. Joint swelling was classified as present ("1"), absent ("0") or injected/replaced ("9"). The joints assessed were: Sternoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Metacarpophalangeal (1-5), Thumb interphalangeal, Proximal interphalangeal (2-5, Knee, Ankle, and Metatarsophalangeal (1-5).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count for 46 Joints (TJC 46) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Assessment of 46 joints for TJC was done by physical examination. Joint tenderness was classified as present ("1"), absent ("0") or injected/replaced ("9"). The joints assessed were: Sternoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Metacarpophalangeal (1-5), Thumb interphalangeal, Proximal interphalangeal (2-5, Hip, Knee, Ankle, and Metatarsophalangeal (1-5).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
The physician will globally assess the subject's current disease state using a 100-mm VAS scale with 0 being very good and 100 being very bad.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Nocturnal Pain in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
The subject was to assess his/her nocturnal pain intensity for the past week using a Nocturnal Pain Visual Analog Scale (Nocturnal Pain VAS). The range was 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and worse possible pain by 100.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the SF-36 Health Survey Index Physical Component Summary (PCS) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being; physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (no functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning). The SF-36 Health Survey Index was completed by participants. Components of the SF-36 included the PCS and MCS, respectively. An increase in SF-36 PCS or MCS indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Response Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being; physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0(no functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning).
Responders were subjects whose change in PCS score fulfilled the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The MCID for PCS was determined by a >= 3.0 point increase during exposure to adalimumab.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in the SF-36 Health Survey Index Mental Component Summary (MCS) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being; physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0 (no functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning). The SF-36 Health Survey Index was completed by participants. Components of the SF-36 included the PCS and MCS, respectively. An increase in SF-36 PCS or MCS indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Response Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being; physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0(no functioning) to 100 (highest level of functioning).
Responders were subjects whose change in MCS fulfilled the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The MCID for MCS was determined by a >= 3.0 point increase during exposure to adalimumab.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in Health Utilities Index-3 (HUI-3) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
The HUI-3 is a generic approach to the measurement of health status and assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HUI-3 classification is comprised of a total score and 8 attributes - Vision, Hearing, Speech, Ambulation, Dexterity, Emotion, Cognition and Pain. The attributes are measures on a scale from the worst score of 0 to best score of 1. The total score scale ranges from dead (= 0) and perfect health (= 1). The total score can have a negative score that is interpreted as worse than dead and the lower limit is -0.36. An increase in the HUI-3 score represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionaire (ASQoL) in Subjects Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASQoL determined participants' quality of life and is comprised of 18 questions (yes or no) to be completed by the participant. Each statement on the ASQoL is given a score of "1" or "0." All item scores were summed to give a total score or index. Total scores ranged from 0 (good quality of life) to 18 (poor quality of life) related to ability to cope, relationships, mood, sleep, motivation, activities of everyday living, independence, and social life. Decrease in ASQoL score represents improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionaire (ASQoL) MCID Response (MCID <= -1.8 Points) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
ASQoL determined participants' quality of life and is comprised of 18 questions (yes or no) to be completed by the participant. Total scores ranged from 0 (good quality of life) to 18 (poor quality of life) related to ability to cope, relationships, mood, sleep, motivation, activities of everyday living, independence, and social life. Decrease in ASQoL score represents improvement. Responders are participants with a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) <= -1.8 points. MCID was determined by a >= 1.8 score decrease during exposure to adalimumab.
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects Achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Completed by subject at each visit. The Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) was a participant-reported outcome where participants were expected to respond (yes/no) to the following question:
Considering all the different ways your disease is affecting you, if you would stay in this state for the next months, do you consider that your current state is satisfactory?
Measured: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2004
- Primary completionDec 2004
- Study completionJul 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankylosing SpondylitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 315 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Laura Redden, MD, PhD, Study director, Abbott
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00085644
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M03-607
- Acronym
- ATLAS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2004
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
van der Heijde D, Breban M, Halter D, DiVittorio G, Bratt J, Cantini F, Kary S, Pangan AL, Kupper H, Rathmann SS, Sieper J, Mease PJ. Maintenance of improvement in spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 5 years in a clinical trial of adalimumab. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Jul;54(7):1210-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu438. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
PubMed 25541333Kimel M, Revicki D, Rao S, Fryback D, Feeny D, Harnam N, Thompson C, Cifaldi M. Norms-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes associated with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):624-32. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
PubMed 21813060Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Luo MP, Wong RL. Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-36.
PubMed 21600054Reilly MC, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, van der Heijde D. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):812-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep457. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PubMed 20100797van der Heijde D, Salonen D, Weissman BN, Landewe R, Maksymowych WP, Kupper H, Ballal S, Gibson E, Wong R; Canadian (M03-606) study group; ATLAS study group. Assessment of radiographic progression in the spines of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab for up to 2 years. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127. doi: 10.1186/ar2794. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
PubMed 19703304van der Heijde DM, Revicki DA, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, Harnam N, Thompson C, Sieper J; ATLAS Study Group. Physical function, disease activity, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes after 3 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R124. doi: 10.1186/ar2790. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
PubMed 19686597van der Heijde D, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Kivitz AJ, Wong RL, Kupper H, Dijkmans BA, Mease PJ, Davis JC Jr; ATLAS Study Group. Adalimumab effectiveness for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is maintained for up to 2 years: long-term results from the ATLAS trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):922-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.087270. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
PubMed 18701556Dougados M, Luo MP, Maksymowych WP, Chmiel JJ, Chen N, Wong RL, Davis JC Jr, van der Heijde D; ATLAS STUDY GROUP. Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state as an outcome measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: data from a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr 15;59(4):553-60. doi: 10.1002/art.23527.
PubMed 18383418van der Heijde D, Pangan AL, Schiff MH, Braun J, Borofsky M, Torre J, Davis JC Jr, Wong RL, Kupper H, Collantes E; ATLAS Study Group. Adalimumab effectively reduces the signs and symptoms of active ankylosing spondylitis in patients with total spinal ankylosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Sep;67(9):1218-21. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.082529. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
PubMed 18056755
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Multicenter Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Human Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00085644
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATLAS / M03-607
- Conditions
- Ankylosing Spondylitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 315 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbottIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2004
- Primary completion
- Dec 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Mar 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adalimumab 40 mg given every other week (eow) in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have had an inadequate response to, or who are intolerant to, treatment with at least 1 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and who may have also failed treatment with at least 1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Biological: adalimumab (D2E7) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects must be >= 18 years of age
- meet Modified NY Criteria definition of ankylosing spondylitis (AS)
- have diagnosis of active AS based on protocol specified criteria
- inadequate response or intolerance to >= 1 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)
- be able and willing to learn to self-administer subcutaneous (SC) injections
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Active tuberculosis, listeriosis,or hepatitis B, or any history of hepatitis C
- History of demyelinating disease, multiple sclerosis, cancer, or lymphoproliferative disease
- Previous anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy
- Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs - other than methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and sulfasalazine)
- Treatment with intra-articular corticosteroid joint injections within 4 weeks of study dosing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| adalimumab (D2E7)Also: ABT-D2E7, adalimumab, HumiraAdalimumab 40 mg every other week, subcutaneous | Biological | Adalimumab |
| placeboPlacebo every other week, subcutaneous | Biological | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Responders With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) as Measured With ASAS International Working Group Response Criteria (ASAS 20).
Time frame: Week 12
ASAS 20 responders - improvement of >=20% and absolute improvement of >=10 units from Baseline in a visual analog scale (VAS) for >=3 of 4 domains; Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity VAS (0 [none]-100 [severe]), Total Back Pain VAS (0 [no pain]-100 [severe]), BASFI VAS (0 [easy]-100[impossible]); and Inflammation VAS (0 [none]-10 [very severe]) and absence of deterioration in the potential remaining domain, defined as a worsening of >=20% and a net worsening of >=10 units. Applied to each scale and not to an overall global scale.
Mean Change in the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) Compared Against a Historical Control Group (Outcomes in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Study [OASIS]) Using the ANCOVA Model Adjusting for Baseline mSASSS Score
Time frame: Week 104
Radiographic progression was based on change in mSASSS scoring (comparison of the means) from double-blind Baseline visit to Week 104. The mSASSS is the sum of the lumbar and cervical spine score ( 0 [no change] to 72 [progression]), derived from scoring the anterior site of the lumbar spine (T12 to S1) and the cervical spine (C2 to T1) as either 0 (normal), 1 (erosion, sclerosis, or squaring), 2 (syndesmophyte), 3 (bridging syndesmophyte), or N (vertebral body not evaluable). Data from NCT00195819 was compared with data from AS patients in OASIS.
35 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 50 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 70 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in BASFI (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Total Back Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Total Back Pain (an Individual Component of ASAS 20) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Inflammation (Mean of BASDAI Questions 5 and 6) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Inflammation (Individual Component of ASAS 20) (Mean of BASDAI Questions 5 and 6) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 20 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 50 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms as Measured in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) 70 Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in BASDAI in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 40 - Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured in Assessments of Ankylosing Spondylitis Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 5/6 in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Number of Subjects With a Disease Controlling Clinical Response From Adalimumab as Measured by ASAS Partial Remission Response in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Chest Expansion (CE) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260 [
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Index (BAS-G) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Swollen Joint Count for 44 Joints (44 SJC) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count for 46 Joints (TJC 46) in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in Nocturnal Pain in Subjects With Adalimumab Exposure Through Week 260
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 220, 232, 244, and 260
Mean Change in the SF-36 Health Survey Index Physical Component Summary (PCS) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Response Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in the SF-36 Health Survey Index Mental Component Summary (MCS) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Response Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in Health Utilities Index-3 (HUI-3) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Mean Change in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionaire (ASQoL) in Subjects Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects With Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionaire (ASQoL) MCID Response (MCID <= -1.8 Points) Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Number of Subjects Achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State Through Week 260 of Adalimumab Exposure
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, 76, 104, 128, 156, 180, 208, 232, and 260
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25541333van der Heijde D, Breban M, Halter D, DiVittorio G, Bratt J, Cantini F, Kary S, Pangan AL, Kupper H, Rathmann SS, Sieper J, Mease PJ. Maintenance of improvement in spinal mobility, physical function and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after 5 years in a clinical trial of adalimumab. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Jul;54(7):1210-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu438. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21813060Kimel M, Revicki D, Rao S, Fryback D, Feeny D, Harnam N, Thompson C, Cifaldi M. Norms-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes associated with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jul-Aug;29(4):624-32. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21600054Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Luo MP, Wong RL. Psychometric characteristics of the short form 36 health survey and functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 May 22;9:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-36.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20100797Reilly MC, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, van der Heijde D. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):812-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep457. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19703304van der Heijde D, Salonen D, Weissman BN, Landewe R, Maksymowych WP, Kupper H, Ballal S, Gibson E, Wong R; Canadian (M03-606) study group; ATLAS study group. Assessment of radiographic progression in the spines of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with adalimumab for up to 2 years. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127. doi: 10.1186/ar2794. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 19686597van der Heijde DM, Revicki DA, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, Harnam N, Thompson C, Sieper J; ATLAS Study Group. Physical function, disease activity, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes after 3 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R124. doi: 10.1186/ar2790. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18701556van der Heijde D, Schiff MH, Sieper J, Kivitz AJ, Wong RL, Kupper H, Dijkmans BA, Mease PJ, Davis JC Jr; ATLAS Study Group. Adalimumab effectiveness for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is maintained for up to 2 years: long-term results from the ATLAS trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):922-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.087270. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18383418Dougados M, Luo MP, Maksymowych WP, Chmiel JJ, Chen N, Wong RL, Davis JC Jr, van der Heijde D; ATLAS STUDY GROUP. Evaluation of the patient acceptable symptom state as an outcome measure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: data from a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr 15;59(4):553-60. doi: 10.1002/art.23527.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 18056755van der Heijde D, Pangan AL, Schiff MH, Braun J, Borofsky M, Torre J, Davis JC Jr, Wong RL, Kupper H, Collantes E; ATLAS Study Group. Adalimumab effectively reduces the signs and symptoms of active ankylosing spondylitis in patients with total spinal ankylosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Sep;67(9):1218-21. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.082529. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
Related trials for Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Redden, MD, PhD study director
Abbott
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing adalimumab (D2E7) in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Abbott at 22 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Mar 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Responders With a Reduction of Signs and Symptoms of Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) as Measured With ASAS International Working Group Response Criteria (ASAS 20). (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00085644, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2011.