OsteoarthritisPhase 1/2NCT00085722
Joint Injections for Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
A Phase 1/2 study testing Dextrose Prolotherapy, Saline Prolotherapy and At-home physical therapy exercise group in people with Osteoarthritis, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether prolotherapy (PrT), a therapy based on injection of a sugar solution in and around the knee, can decrease pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis (OA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Dextrose Prolotherapy, Saline Prolotherapy and At-home physical therapy exercise group
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2004to 1 May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pain from knee osteoarthritis that has impacted life for 3 months to 10 years
- X-ray results indicating knee osteoarthritis
Who cannot join
- Knee osteoarthritis surgical candidate
- History of total knee joint repair
- Prior use of PrT
- Prior fracture of the knee joint
- Joint injection of steroids or other drugs within the past 3 months
- Rheumatoid or inflammatory arthritis
Show all 13Show fewer
- Chronic use of narcotic medication
- Other chronic pain diagnoses
- diabetes mellitus
- Body mass index (BMI) greater than 45
- Unresolved litigation
- Pregnancy
- Co-morbidity that may interfere with the study
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Northeast Family Medical Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53704
University of Wisconsin General Clinical Research Center
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
The purpose of this study is to determine whether prolotherapy (PrT), a therapy based on injection of a sugar solution in and around the knee, can decrease pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Read the detailed description
OA is a common, debilitating condition for which there is no cure and no known cause. Prolotherapy (PrT) is an injection-based therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain in which an irritant solution is injected at painful ligaments and tendons to produce stronger connective tissue and decrease pain. Although limited studies suggest PrT is effective may be effective for low back pain, its use has not been rigorously studied in human clinical trials for osteoarthritis.
Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: standard PrT, injections with a saline placebo, or a pamphlet with recommendations for home knee physical therapy. Injections will be given at Weeks 1, 5, and 9; injection group subjects will have the option to receive an additional 2 sets of injections. All participants will be assessed for a total of 1 year. A set of disease-specific and general quality-of-life questionnaires will be used to assess participants' outcomes . A randomized subset of participants (N=38)will receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)of the knee at baseline and 52 weeks. At study completion, participants who did not receive PrT will have the option to receive up to five sessions of PrT at no cost. Data will be collected for this group (minus MRI) and will be analyzed separately. Enrollment is limited to residents of Southern Wisconsin.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Dextrose Prolotherapy, Saline Prolotherapy, At-home physical therapy exercise group
- Keywords
- Injection Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dextrose ProlotherapyProcedure or surgery
Also called Dextrose
Injection procedure: 50% dextrose is diluted with .9% 'normal' saline and 1% lidocaine to achieve 15% dextrose for ligament injections and 25% dextrose for intra-articular injection.
Saline ProlotherapyProcedure or surgery
Also called Saline
7 mL 9% 'normal' saline and 3mL 1% lidocaine
At-home physical therapy exercise groupOther
Also called Exercise
Subjects in the at-home physical therapy exercise group will receive a patient information pamphlet about knee osteoarthritis and conservative care instructions for standard at-home physical therapy exercises
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dextrose | Experimental | Subjects in Group 1 receive PrT with 15% and 25% dextrose solution, as it is generally practiced in the US today. Receives: Procedure: Dextrose Prolotherapy |
| Normal saline | Placebo comparator | Subjects in Group 2 will receive the same treatment as Group 1, except that a 0.9% 'normal' saline solution with no known benefit will be used instead of dextrose. Receives: Procedure: Saline Prolotherapy |
| Exercise | Other | At-home physical therapy exercises as a non-injection control Receives: Other: At-home physical therapy exercise group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life, pain scores and disability at wks 0, 5, 9, 12, 24, 52
Measured: Participants will be followed for one year.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary outcomes include disease and general quality of life indicators (all subjects) and magnetic resonance image (in a subset of 37 subjects).
Measured: Participants will be monitored for one year.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2004
- Primary completion1 Nov 2008
- Study completion1 May 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David P. Rabago, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin Dept of Family Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00085722
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-2004-0112
- Other IDs
- K23AT001879-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2004
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rejeski WJ, Ettinger WH Jr, Shumaker S, Heuser MD, James P, Monu J, Burns R. The evaluation of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: the knee pain scale. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1124-9.
PubMed 7674241Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):311-20. doi: 10.1089/10755530050120673.
PubMed 10976977Eberle E, Ottillinger B. Clinically relevant change and clinically relevant difference in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Sep;7(5):502-3. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0246. No abstract available.
PubMed 10489324Klein RG, Eek BC, DeLong WB, Mooney V. A randomized double-blind trial of dextrose-glycerine-phenol injections for chronic, low back pain. J Spinal Disord. 1993 Feb;6(1):23-33.
PubMed 8439713Ongley MJ, Klein RG, Dorman TA, Eek BC, Hubert LJ. A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1987 Jul 18;2(8551):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92340-3.
PubMed 2439856Dechow E, Davies RK, Carr AJ, Thompson PW. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sclerosing injections in patients with chronic low back pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Dec;38(12):1255-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.12.1255.
PubMed 10587555Yelland MJ, Glasziou PP, Bogduk N, Schluter PJ, McKernon M. Prolotherapy injections, saline injections, and exercises for chronic low-back pain: a randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 1;29(1):9-16; discussion 16. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105529.07222.5B.
PubMed 14699269Hackett GS, Hemwall GA, Montgomery GA. Ligament and Tendon Relaxation Treated by Prolotherapy. Fifth Ed. ed. Oak Park: Gustav A. Hemwall, 1993
Linetsky FS, FRafael M,. Pain Management, 2002:381-402.
Dorman TA. Prolotherapy: A survey. The Journal of Orthopaedic Medicine 1993;15(2):49-50
Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Mar;6(2):68-74, 77-80.
PubMed 10710805Rogers WH, Wittink H, Wagner A, Cynn D, Carr DB. Assessing individual outcomes during outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment by means of an augmented SF-36. Pain Med. 2000 Mar;1(1):44-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.99102.x.
PubMed 15101963Rabago D, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, Zgierska A, Fortney L, Grettie J, Kijowski R. Dextrose and morrhuate sodium injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective open-label trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2014 May;20(5):383-91. doi: 10.1089/acm.2013.0225. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
PubMed 24635447Rabago D, Patterson JJ, Mundt M, Kijowski R, Grettie J, Segal NA, Zgierska A. Dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;11(3):229-37. doi: 10.1370/afm.1504.
PubMed 23690322Rabago D, Zgierska A, Fortney L, Kijowski R, Mundt M, Ryan M, Grettie J, Patterson JJ. Hypertonic dextrose injections (prolotherapy) for knee osteoarthritis: results of a single-arm uncontrolled study with 1-year follow-up. J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Apr;18(4):408-14. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0030.
PubMed 22515800
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of Prolotherapy in Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00085722
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-2004-0112
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Injection Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Study start
- Jul 2004
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether prolotherapy (PrT), a therapy based on injection of a sugar solution in and around the knee, can decrease pain and disability from knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Detailed description
OA is a common, debilitating condition for which there is no cure and no known cause. Prolotherapy (PrT) is an injection-based therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain in which an irritant solution is injected at painful ligaments and tendons to produce stronger connective tissue and decrease pain. Although limited studies suggest PrT is effective may be effective for low back pain, its use has not been rigorously studied in human clinical trials for osteoarthritis.
Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: standard PrT, injections with a saline placebo, or a pamphlet with recommendations for home knee physical therapy. Injections will be given at Weeks 1, 5, and 9; injection group subjects will have the option to receive an additional 2 sets of injections. All participants will be assessed for a total of 1 year. A set of disease-specific and general quality-of-life questionnaires will be used to assess participants' outcomes . A randomized subset of participants (N=38)will receive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)of the knee at baseline and 52 weeks. At study completion, participants who did not receive PrT will have the option to receive up to five sessions of PrT at no cost. Data will be collected for this group (minus MRI) and will be analyzed separately. Enrollment is limited to residents of Southern Wisconsin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dextrose | Experimental | Procedure: Dextrose ProlotherapySubjects in Group 1 receive PrT with 15% and 25% dextrose solution, as it is generally practiced in the US today. |
| Normal saline | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Saline ProlotherapySubjects in Group 2 will receive the same treatment as Group 1, except that a 0.9% 'normal' saline solution with no known benefit will be used instead of dextrose. |
| Exercise | Other | Other: At-home physical therapy exercise groupAt-home physical therapy exercises as a non-injection control |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pain from knee osteoarthritis that has impacted life for 3 months to 10 years
- X-ray results indicating knee osteoarthritis
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Knee osteoarthritis surgical candidate
- History of total knee joint repair
- Prior use of PrT
- Prior fracture of the knee joint
- Joint injection of steroids or other drugs within the past 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dextrose ProlotherapyAlso: DextroseInjection procedure: 50% dextrose is diluted with .9% 'normal' saline and 1% lidocaine to achieve 15% dextrose for ligament injections and 25% dextrose for intra-articular injection. | Procedure or surgery | Dextrose |
| Saline ProlotherapyAlso: Saline7 mL 9% 'normal' saline and 3mL 1% lidocaine | Procedure or surgery | Normal saline |
| At-home physical therapy exercise groupAlso: ExerciseSubjects in the at-home physical therapy exercise group will receive a patient information pamphlet about knee osteoarthritis and conservative care instructions for standard at-home physical therapy exercises | Other | Exercise |
Primary outcome
Quality of life, pain scores and disability at wks 0, 5, 9, 12, 24, 52
Time frame: Participants will be followed for one year.
1 secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes include disease and general quality of life indicators (all subjects) and magnetic resonance image (in a subset of 37 subjects).
Time frame: Participants will be monitored for one year.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
- Background: PubMed 7674241Rejeski WJ, Ettinger WH Jr, Shumaker S, Heuser MD, James P, Monu J, Burns R. The evaluation of pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis: the knee pain scale. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1124-9.
- Background: PubMed 10976977Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):311-20. doi: 10.1089/10755530050120673.
- Background: PubMed 10489324Eberle E, Ottillinger B. Clinically relevant change and clinically relevant difference in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 Sep;7(5):502-3. doi: 10.1053/joca.1999.0246. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8439713Klein RG, Eek BC, DeLong WB, Mooney V. A randomized double-blind trial of dextrose-glycerine-phenol injections for chronic, low back pain. J Spinal Disord. 1993 Feb;6(1):23-33.
- Background: PubMed 2439856Ongley MJ, Klein RG, Dorman TA, Eek BC, Hubert LJ. A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1987 Jul 18;2(8551):143-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92340-3.
- Background: PubMed 10587555Dechow E, Davies RK, Carr AJ, Thompson PW. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sclerosing injections in patients with chronic low back pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999 Dec;38(12):1255-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.12.1255.
- Background: PubMed 14699269Yelland MJ, Glasziou PP, Bogduk N, Schluter PJ, McKernon M. Prolotherapy injections, saline injections, and exercises for chronic low-back pain: a randomized trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jan 1;29(1):9-16; discussion 16. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000105529.07222.5B.
- BackgroundHackett GS, Hemwall GA, Montgomery GA. Ligament and Tendon Relaxation Treated by Prolotherapy. Fifth Ed. ed. Oak Park: Gustav A. Hemwall, 1993
- BackgroundLinetsky FS, FRafael M,. Pain Management, 2002:381-402.
- BackgroundDorman TA. Prolotherapy: A survey. The Journal of Orthopaedic Medicine 1993;15(2):49-50
- Background: PubMed 10710805Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Mar;6(2):68-74, 77-80.
- Background: PubMed 15101963Rogers WH, Wittink H, Wagner A, Cynn D, Carr DB. Assessing individual outcomes during outpatient multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment by means of an augmented SF-36. Pain Med. 2000 Mar;1(1):44-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.99102.x.
- University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Web SiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruiting
Balneotherapy in Hand Osteoarthritis
Hand Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David P. Rabago, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin Dept of Family Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Dextrose Prolotherapy, Saline Prolotherapy and At-home physical therapy exercise group in people with Osteoarthritis, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life, pain scores and disability at wks 0, 5, 9, 12, 24, 52 (time frame: Participants will be followed for one year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00085722, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019.