AzTrials
AzTrials

Parkinson DiseasePhase 3SAD-PDNCT00086190

Study of Antidepressants in Parkinson's Disease

A Phase 3 study testing paroxetine and venlafaxine in people with Parkinson Disease and Depression, run by University of Rochester at 18 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if two antidepressant medications, paroxetine and venlafaxine, can help control depression in Parkinson's disease, and if these medications affect the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease such as tremor, stiffness, slowness, and balance. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Parkinson Disease, Depression
What is being tested?
paroxetine and venlafaxine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
115 participants
Where
18 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Jun 2005to Nov 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • To be eligible you must be:
  • 30 years old or older
  • diagnosed with Parkinson's disease
  • experiencing symptoms of depression such as sadness, decreased energy, or problems sleeping

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 3 countries.

18 sites in 3 countries

United States15 sites
  • Emory University School of Medicine

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21218

  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21250

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dept. of Neurology E/KS 430, 330 Brookline Avenue

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22901

  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • Baylor College of Medicine, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1801

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

  • University of Tennessee-Memphis

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38163

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Oregon Health Sciences University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • University of Rochester

    Rochester, New York, 14627

  • University of California San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Medical University of Ohio

    Toledo, Ohio

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus Room A10-325, 339 Windermere Road

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Hotel-Dieu Hospital-CHUM

    Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1T8

Other trials in Canada

Puerto Rico1 site
  • University of Puerto Rico

    San Juan, 00936

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

The purpose of this study is to find out if two antidepressant medications, paroxetine and venlafaxine, can help control depression in Parkinson's disease, and if these medications affect the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease such as tremor, stiffness, slowness, and balance.

Read the detailed description

Nearly 50 percent of individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from depression-a condition that causes disability and can reduce quality of life. The University of Rochester Medical Center is conducting a research study of antidepressant medications to find out more about how to treat depression in PD. Antidepressant medications have not been adequately studied in persons with PD.

The purpose of this study is to find out if the antidepressant medications paroxetine and venlafaxine can help control depression in PD and whether or not these medications affect the motor symptoms of PD such as tremor, stiffness, slowness, and balance.

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study of paroxetine immediate release (Paxil) and venlafaxine extended release (Effexor XR). Paroxetine and venlafaxine XR are drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are available by prescription. Paroxetine and venlafaxine XR have been shown to be effective in treating depression in the general population. Two hundred, twenty-eight persons will be enrolled among 15 medical centers throughout the United States and Canada. Each person will participate in the trial for 12 weeks. Each participant will be randomly assigned to take either paroxetine or venlafaxine, or a placebo.

Being tested
paroxetine, venlafaxine, placebo
Keywords
Parkinson disease, depression, Parkinson's disease, paroxetine, venlafaxine, antidepressant
Medical subject headings
Parkinson Disease, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • paroxetineDrug

    Also called Paxil

    Paroxetine 10 mg tablets or matching placebo given once a day for the first two weeks. If depression is not being effectively treated then the paroxetine or matching placebo will be increased to 20 mg, followed by a 10 mg increase every two weeks (if tolerated). Dosage for this study will not exceed 40 mg.

  • venlafaxineDrug

    Also called Effexor XR

    Venlafaxine XR 37.5 mg capsules or matching placebo given once a day for the first two weeks. If depression is not being effectively treated then the venlafaxine XR capsules or matching placebo will be increased to 75 mg followed by 75 mg increments every 2 weeks (if tolerated). Dosage for this study will not exceed 225 mg.

  • placeboOther

    an inactive substance

Study groups in NCT00086190
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
paroxetineActive comparatorParoxetine and venlafaxine will be compared to placebo over 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: paroxetine
venlafaxine extended releaseActive comparatorParoxetine and venlafaxine will be compared to placebo over 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: venlafaxine
placeboPlacebo comparatorParoxetine and venlafaxine will be compared to placebo over 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores

    Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression over 12 weeks. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-50. Higher scores represent more significant depression. Mild depression ranges from 8-13, moderate depression from 14-18, severe 19-22 and very severe any score over 23.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

    Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-60. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-6 normal, 7-19 mild depression, 20-34 moderate depression, greater than 34 severe depression.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  2. Change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    Beck Depression Inventory II ranges from 0-63. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-13 minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, 29-63 severe depression.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  3. Change in Geriatric Depression Rating Scale (GDS)

    Geriatric Depression Scale ranges from 0-30. Higher score indicates more severe depression. 0-9 normal, 10-19 mild depression, 20-30 severe depression.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  4. Change in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)

    Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Maximum score 126. Higher score indicates greater psychiatric difficulties.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  5. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms. Total maximum = 176. Mental maximum = 52, Activities of Daily Living maximum = 52, Motor maximum = 72. Minimum = 0.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  6. Change in Snaith Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS)

    Snaith Clinical Anxiety Scale. Range 0-21. Higher scores indicate increased anxiety. Score greater than 8 indicates clinical anxiety.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  7. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating severe sleep difficulties.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  8. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Motor

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Motor has a maximum score of 72, minimum score of 0. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  9. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Tremor

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Tremor subscale ranges from 0-23. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  10. Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) - Bulbar

    Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - Bulbar maximum score 24, minimum score of 0. Higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's disease symptoms.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  11. Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Overall

    Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total. Range 0-100. Lower score indicates a better perceived health status.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  12. Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) - 39 - Emotional Well-Being

    Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) - Emotional Well-Being maximum score 24, minimum score of 0.Lower score indicates a better perceived health status.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  13. Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Component Summary

    Short Form 36 Health Survey. Range 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  14. Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Vitality

    Short Form 36 Health Survey - Vitality subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  15. Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Role-Emotional

    Short Form 36 Health Survey - Emotional subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

  16. Change in Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Health

    Short Form 36 Health Survey - Mental Health subscale ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates a better perceived quality of life.

    Measured: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2005
  3. Primary completionNov 2009
  4. Study completionNov 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
115 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00086190
Sponsor's protocol ID
R01NS046487
Acronym
SAD-PD
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
28 Jun 2004
Last updated
4 Jan 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Dooneief G, Mirabello E, Bell K, Marder K, Stern Y, Mayeux R. An estimate of the incidence of depression in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Arch Neurol. 1992 Mar;49(3):305-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530270125028.

    PubMed 1536634
  • Liu CY, Wang SJ, Fuh JL, Lin CH, Yang YY, Liu HC. The correlation of depression with functional activity in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 1997 Aug;244(8):493-8. doi: 10.1007/s004150050131.

    PubMed 9309555
  • Kuopio AM, Marttila RJ, Helenius H, Toivonen M, Rinne UK. The quality of life in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2000 Mar;15(2):216-23. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200003)15:23.0.co;2-#.

    PubMed 10752569
  • Phillips P. Keeping depression at bay helps patients with Parkinson disease. JAMA. 1999 Sep 22-29;282(12):1118-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10501101
  • Global Parkinson's Disease Survey (GPDS) Steering Committee.. Factors impacting on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: results from an international survey. Mov Disord. 2002 Jan;17(1):60-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.10010.

    PubMed 11835440
  • Menza M, Dobkin RD, Marin H, Mark MH, Gara M, Buyske S, Bienfait K, Dicke A. A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression. Neurology. 2009 Mar 10;72(10):886-92. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000336340.89821.b3. Epub 2008 Dec 17.

    PubMed 19092112
  • Devos D, Dujardin K, Poirot I, Moreau C, Cottencin O, Thomas P, Destee A, Bordet R, Defebvre L. Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Mov Disord. 2008 Apr 30;23(6):850-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21966.

    PubMed 18311826
  • Yeragani VK, Roose S, Mallavarapu M, Radhakrishna RK, Pesce V. Major depression with ischemic heart disease: effects of paroxetine and nortriptyline on measures of nonlinearity and chaos of heart rate. Neuropsychobiology. 2002;46(3):125-35. doi: 10.1159/000066390.

    PubMed 12422059
  • Yeragani VK, Pesce V, Jayaraman A, Roose S. Major depression with ischemic heart disease: effects of paroxetine and nortriptyline on long-term heart rate variability measures. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Sep 1;52(5):418-29. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01394-x.

    PubMed 12242058
  • Nelson JC, Kennedy JS, Pollock BG, Laghrissi-Thode F, Narayan M, Nobler MS, Robin DW, Gergel I, McCafferty J, Roose S. Treatment of major depression with nortriptyline and paroxetine in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;156(7):1024-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.7.1024.

    PubMed 10401446
  • Simons JA. Fluoxetine in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 1996 Sep;11(5):581-2. doi: 10.1002/mds.870110517. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8866503
  • Steur EN. Increase of Parkinson disability after fluoxetine medication. Neurology. 1993 Jan;43(1):211-3. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.1_part_1.211.

    PubMed 8423889
  • Jimenez-Jimenez FJ, Tejeiro J, Martinez-Junquera G, Cabrera-Valdivia F, Alarcon J, Garcia-Albea E. Parkinsonism exacerbated by paroxetine. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2406. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2406. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7991139
  • Salzman C. Pharmacologic treatment of depression in the elderly. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993 Feb;54 Suppl:23-8.

    PubMed 8444831
  • Altamura AC, De Novellis F, Guercetti G, Invernizzi G, Percudani M, Montgomery SA. Fluoxetine compared with amitriptyline in elderly depression: a controlled clinical trial. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1989;9(6):391-6.

    PubMed 2699465

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing paroxetine and venlafaxine in people with Parkinson Disease and Depression, run by University of Rochester at 18 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in United States, Canada, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jan 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) Scores (time frame: from the beginning (0 weeks) to end (12 weeks) of the double-blind phase). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00086190, which also lists 40 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in