Breast CancerPhase 2WISENCT00090857
Letrozole in Preventing Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
A Phase 2 study testing Letrozole in people with Breast Cancer, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Chemoprevention therapy is the use of certain drugs to try to prevent the development or recurrence of cancer. Letrozole may be effective in preventing the development or recurrence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are at increased risk of developing breast cancer because of elevated estradiol… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 120 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Letrozole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2002to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 120 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- At increased risk for the development or recurrence of breast cancer, defined as an estradiol level ≥ 9 pg/mL
- No evidence of suspicious or malignant disease, based on the following examinations:
- Clinical bilateral breast examination within the past 6 months
- Bilateral* mammogram within 3 months before randomization OR within 30 days after randomization
- Pelvic exam normal within the past 5 years
- General physical exam within the past 6 months NOTE: *Unilateral mammogram of the uninvolved breast for patients with prior invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Bone density scan within 2 standard deviations from normal within the past 30 days
- Bone density scan ≥ 2 standard deviations below normal allowed if approved by the study physician
- At least 1 breast that has not been previously treated with radiotherapy or surgery (for patients with prior invasive breast cancer or DCIS)
- Hormone receptor status:
- Not specified
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 35 and over
Sex
- Female
Menopausal status
- Postmenopausal, defined by any of the following criteria:
- At least 12 months without spontaneous menstrual bleeding
- Prior hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
- ≥ 55 years of age with a prior hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy
- < 55 years of age with a prior hysterectomy without oophorectomy OR the status of the ovaries is unknown AND follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level is in the postmenopausal range
Performance status
- Normal activity must not be restricted for a significant portion of the day
Life expectancy
- At least 10 years
Hematopoietic
- Complete blood count with differential normal
- Prior benign neutropenia allowed provided the granulocyte count is ≥ 1,500/mm^3
Hepatic
- Bilirubin normal
- Alkaline phosphatase normal
- SGOT and SGPT normal
Renal
- Creatinine normal
Cardiovascular
- No uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
Other
- Not pregnant
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No osteoporosis
- No hyperlipidemia
- No mental health status resulting in cognitive or emotional impairment that would preclude study participation
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- Not specified
Endocrine therapy
- More than 30 days since prior AND no concurrent use of any of the following hormonal agents:
- Estrogen or progesterone replacement therapy
- Oral contraceptives
- Raloxifene or other plasma estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs)
- Androgens (e.g., danazol)
- Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs (e.g., goserelin or leuprolide)
- Prolactin inhibitors (e.g., bromocriptine)
- Antiandrogens (e.g., cyproterone)
- More than 60 days since prior AND no concurrent tamoxifen
- No prior aromatase inhibitors (for patients with prior invasive breast cancer or DCIS)
- No concurrent phytoestrogenic dietary supplements (e.g., soy, ginseng, or other natural products)
- Dietary soy allowed
Radiotherapy
- See Disease Characteristics
Surgery
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior bilateral mastectomy
Other
- More than 60 days since prior treatment for invasive breast cancer or DCIS
- More than 30 days since prior bisphosphonates or calcitonin
- No prior or concurrent participation on a treatment study for invasive breast cancer or DCIS
- No concurrent participation in any other cancer prevention study or osteoporosis prevention study involving pharmacologic agents
- No concurrent calcitonin
- No concurrent bisphosphonate therapy
- Concurrent cholecalciferol (vitamin D) and calcium to augment bone mineral density allowed
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center at Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study of Aromatase Inhibitors for Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer Based on Estradiol Levels
RATIONALE: Chemoprevention therapy is the use of certain drugs to try to prevent the development or recurrence of cancer. Letrozole may be effective in preventing the development or recurrence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are at increased risk of developing breast cancer because of elevated estradiol levels.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well letrozole works in preventing breast cancer in postmenopausal women with elevated estradiol levels.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- The primary outcome of the study is the change in bone mineral density following a year on letrozole vs. a year on placebo.
Secondary
- Compare the safety, acceptability, and adherence to letrozole vs placebo in postmenopausal women at increased risk for the development or recurrence of breast cancer based on elevated plasma estradiol levels through evaluation of menopausal symptoms (including hot flushes, weight changes, sexual functioning, and genitourinary effects), blood lipid levels, markers of bone turnover, and multidimensional quality of life.
- Determine the effect of letrozole-induced reduction of plasma estradiol levels on mammographic percent breast density.
- Obtain background information for a future large chemoprevention trial to address the question of whether a reduction in plasma estradiol levels can reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
OUTLINE: This is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 2:1 (experimental treatment: placebo arms).
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 110 patients (73 for arm I and 37 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Letrozole, Placebo
- Keywords
- breast cancer, stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer, breast cancer in situ, ductal breast carcinoma in situ
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Breast Carcinoma In Situ, Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LetrozoleDrug
Also called Femara
PlaceboOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Letrozole | Experimental | Participants in this arm received 2.5 mg of letrozole per day for a duration of 12 months; followed by an optional 4 years. Treatment continued in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or any non-breast primary cancer. Receives: Drug: Letrozole |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants in this arm received 1 tablet per day which contained the inert ingredients from the letrozole tablet, for a duration of 12 months; followed by an optional 5 years of letrozole.Treatment continued in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or any non-breast primary cancer. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Lumbar Density From Baseline to 12 Months
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Measured: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
Change in Femoral Neck Density From Baseline to 12 Months
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Measured: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
Change in Trochanter Density From Baseline to 12 Months
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Measured: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
Change in Hip Density From Baseline to 12 Months
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Measured: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Worst Grade Hot Flashes
Participants reported worst grade hot flashes: 01: mild (<1qd) or 02: moderate (>1qd) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Muscle Aches/Pains
Participants reported worst grade muscle aches/pains defined as grade 01: mild, 02: moderate, 03: severe (CTCAEv3) or 04: disabling (CTCAEv3) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Nausea
Participants reported worst grade nausea grade 01: able to eat, 02: oral intake significantly decreased, 03: no significant intake, requiring IV fluids during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Vomiting
Participants reported worst grade vomiting grade 01: 1x in 24 hours, 02: 2-5x in 24 hours, 03: >/= 6x in 24 hours, grade 04: requiring parenteral nutrition/intensive care during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Abdominal Pain
Participants reported worst grade abdominal pain: 01: mild, 02: moderate, 03: severe (CTCAEv3), 04: disabling (CTCAEv3) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Bone Pain
Participants reported worst grade bone pain: 01: mild, 02: moderate, 03: severe (CTCAEv3), 04: disabling (CTCAEv3) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Headache
Participants reported worst grade headache: 01: mild, 02: moderate, 03: severe (CTCAEv3), 04: disabling (CTCAEv3) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Fatigue
Participants reported worst grade fatigue: 01: mild, 02: moderate, 03: severe (CTCAEv3), 04: disabling (CTCAEv3) during 12 months of treatment.
Measured: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2002
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Judy E. Garber, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Investigators
- Judy Garber, MD, Principal investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer InstitutePatricia A. Ganz, MD, Principal investigator, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00090857
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DFCI-00024
- Other IDs
- P50CA089393, P30CA006516, DFCI-00024, UCLA-0210012-02
- Acronym
- WISE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2004
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study of Aromatase Inhibitors for Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer Based on Estradiol Levels
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00090857
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WISE / DFCI-00024
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer, stage I breast cancer, stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer, stage IIIB breast cancer, stage IIIC breast cancer, stage IV breast cancer, breast cancer in situ
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Study start
- Feb 2002 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jun 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Chemoprevention therapy is the use of certain drugs to try to prevent the development or recurrence of cancer. Letrozole may be effective in preventing the development or recurrence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are at increased risk of developing breast cancer because of elevated estradiol levels.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying how well letrozole works in preventing breast cancer in postmenopausal women with elevated estradiol levels.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- The primary outcome of the study is the change in bone mineral density following a year on letrozole vs. a year on placebo.
Secondary
- Compare the safety, acceptability, and adherence to letrozole vs placebo in postmenopausal women at increased risk for the development or recurrence of breast cancer based on elevated plasma estradiol levels through evaluation of menopausal symptoms (including hot flushes, weight changes, sexual functioning, and genitourinary effects), blood lipid levels, markers of bone turnover, and multidimensional quality of life.
- Determine the effect of letrozole-induced reduction of plasma estradiol levels on mammographic percent breast density.
- Obtain background information for a future large chemoprevention trial to address the question of whether a reduction in plasma estradiol levels can reduce the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
OUTLINE: This is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 2:1 (experimental treatment: placebo arms).
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 110 patients (73 for arm I and 37 for arm II) will be accrued for this study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Letrozole | Experimental | Drug: LetrozoleParticipants in this arm received 2.5 mg of letrozole per day for a duration of 12 months; followed by an optional 4 years. Treatment continued in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or any non-breast primary cancer. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboParticipants in this arm received 1 tablet per day which contained the inert ingredients from the letrozole tablet, for a duration of 12 months; followed by an optional 5 years of letrozole.Treatment continued in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or any non-breast primary cancer. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 120 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LetrozoleAlso: Femara | Drug | Letrozole |
| Placebo | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Lumbar Density From Baseline to 12 Months
Time frame: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Change in Femoral Neck Density From Baseline to 12 Months
Time frame: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Change in Trochanter Density From Baseline to 12 Months
Time frame: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
Change in Hip Density From Baseline to 12 Months
Time frame: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.
The bone mineral density (BMD) test was comprised of the following 4 measurements [total density (g/cm^2)]: lumbar, femoral neck, trochanter, hip.
8 secondary outcomes
Worst Grade Hot Flashes
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Muscle Aches/Pains
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Nausea
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Vomiting
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Abdominal Pain
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Bone Pain
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Headache
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Worst Grade Fatigue
Time frame: Heath assessments during treatment were administered at 3- and 9-months by telephone contact and during clinic visits at 6- and12-months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Judy Garber, MD principal investigator
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Patricia A. Ganz, MD principal investigator
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Letrozole in people with Breast Cancer, run by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Lumbar Density From Baseline to 12 Months (time frame: Evaluation occurred at treatment initiation (BL) and after 12-months of treatment.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2018.