Coronary DiseaseNCT00091780
Epidemiology of Breast Arterial Calcification
An observational study of Coronary Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Mayo Clinic.
Trial summary
To test the hypothesis that breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammograms can identify women with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 2004to Jul 2007
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
No eligibility criteria
About this study
To test the hypothesis that breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammograms can identify women with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study hypothesis is that breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammograms can identify women with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Annual mammograms are now routinely obtained on nearly 70% of women over forty years of age. The nearly 40 million examinations performed every year could be used to evaluate for BAC without any additional cost or change in current mammographic techniques. Identification of women with BAC has potential to substantially decrease the rate of heart attack and sudden death due to CAD in asymptomatic women. Before BAC can be used in a clinical setting, the age-specific prevalence of BAC needs to be fully defined using state of the art mammographic techniques. BAC then needs to be compared with well understood CAD risk factors and measures of coronary atherosclerosis. While this could be accomplished in a prospective study, the same goals can be attained using data already acquired in the Epidemiology of Coronary Calcification (ECAC) Study.
The study uses existing data on 612 non-high risk, non-referred women who are participants in the community-based ECAC Study funded by NIH from 1991-2006. This database includes traditional and newer coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors and the results of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) examinations for CAC at a baseline examination. Most of the women also have had risk factors and CAC measured during a follow-up examination, on average, five years after baseline examinations. The women in the ECAC Study, who do not have a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, represent the full age range routinely evaluated with mammograms. Almost all these women have their usual care, including annual mammograms, in Rochester, Minnesota.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The ECAC study has been instrumental in establishing the distribution of presence and quantity of CAC as well as the predictors of CAC. The database includes clinical and laboratory assessments of CAD risk factors, results of EBCTs, and findings on physical examinations. It will ultimately include information on adverse clinical events. There are 612 female participants who had one or more mammograms during the 12-year history of that study. Many women had 10 or more mammograms. The study will evaluate all of these mammograms for BAC and compare the findings with information already in the database. The combination of newly acquired data from mammograms with the existing data allows this to be a very comprehensive study and still be completed in the two-year time period. The findings can then be used to help design a future study to prospectively evaluate the impact of instituting preventive and early therapeutic measures for CAD in asymptomatic women with the appropriate features of BAC on mammography.
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2004
- Primary completionJul 2007
- Study completionJul 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Investigators
- Dana Whaley, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00091780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1271
- Other IDs
- R21HL077123
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2004
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Epidemiology of Breast Arterial Calcification
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00091780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1271
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
- Study start
- Sep 2004
- Primary completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To test the hypothesis that breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammograms can identify women with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
The study hypothesis is that breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammograms can identify women with an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Annual mammograms are now routinely obtained on nearly 70% of women over forty years of age. The nearly 40 million examinations performed every year could be used to evaluate for BAC without any additional cost or change in current mammographic techniques. Identification of women with BAC has potential to substantially decrease the rate of heart attack and sudden death due to CAD in asymptomatic women. Before BAC can be used in a clinical setting, the age-specific prevalence of BAC needs to be fully defined using state of the art mammographic techniques. BAC then needs to be compared with well understood CAD risk factors and measures of coronary atherosclerosis. While this could be accomplished in a prospective study, the same goals can be attained using data already acquired in the Epidemiology of Coronary Calcification (ECAC) Study.
The study uses existing data on 612 non-high risk, non-referred women who are participants in the community-based ECAC Study funded by NIH from 1991-2006. This database includes traditional and newer coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors and the results of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) examinations for CAC at a baseline examination. Most of the women also have had risk factors and CAC measured during a follow-up examination, on average, five years after baseline examinations. The women in the ECAC Study, who do not have a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke, represent the full age range routinely evaluated with mammograms. Almost all these women have their usual care, including annual mammograms, in Rochester, Minnesota.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The ECAC study has been instrumental in establishing the distribution of presence and quantity of CAC as well as the predictors of CAC. The database includes clinical and laboratory assessments of CAD risk factors, results of EBCTs, and findings on physical examinations. It will ultimately include information on adverse clinical events. There are 612 female participants who had one or more mammograms during the 12-year history of that study. Many women had 10 or more mammograms. The study will evaluate all of these mammograms for BAC and compare the findings with information already in the database. The combination of newly acquired data from mammograms with the existing data allows this to be a very comprehensive study and still be completed in the two-year time period. The findings can then be used to help design a future study to prospectively evaluate the impact of instituting preventive and early therapeutic measures for CAD in asymptomatic women with the appropriate features of BAC on mammography.
Study design
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2014.
Related trials for Coronary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dana Whaley
Mayo Clinic
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Disease and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Mayo Clinic.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2014.