AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CancerPhase 3FUTURE IINCT00092534

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasm (CIN) in Women (Gardasil) (V501-015)

A Phase 3 study testing Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in people with Cervical Cancer and Genital Warts, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of the study is to determine if GARDASIL™ (V501) is able to prevent cervical cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 23 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Cancer, Genital Warts
What is being tested?
Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
12,167 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
14 Jun 2002to 13 Jun 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 23 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy women with an intact uterus with lifetime history of 0-4 sexual partners
  • --For Extension Phase:
  • Participant received placebo or an incomplete vaccination series in the original study
  • --For LTFU:
  • Participant was randomized into the Base Study from Denmark, Iceland, Norway, or Sweden.
  • Agreed to allow passive follow-up (retrospective review of registry data), analysis of biopsy specimens, future contact from National Registry Study Center and serum collection

Who cannot join

  • Prior Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination
  • Prior abnormal Paps
  • Prior history of genital warts
  • --For Extension Phase:
  • Prior complete HPV vaccination series
  • Subject lives in a country in which Gardasil is approved and is within the age range of the local labeling for Gardasil
  • --For LTFU Study:
  • There were no exclusion criteria that did not overlap the inclusion criteria for this study.

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Worldwide, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Investigate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy on the Incidence of HPV 16/18-Related CIN 2/3 or Worse of the Quadrivalent HPV (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 Virus-Like Particle (VLP) Vaccine in 16- to 23-Year Old Women - The FUTURE II Study (Females United to Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease)

The primary purpose of the study is to determine if GARDASIL™ (V501) is able to prevent cervical cancer.

Read the detailed description

In the 4-year Base Study (V501-015) (NCT00092534), participants were randomized in a 1:1 order to receive 3 doses of GARDASIL™ or matching placebo at Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6 and were assessed for efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety.

In the Base Study Extension (EXT) [V501-015-10], participants who received placebo or only 1 dose of GARDASIL™ in the Base Study, were given 3 doses of open-label GARDASIL™ at EXT Day 1, EXT Month 2, and EXT Month 6, and were followed to EXT Month 7. Participants who who received 2 doses of GARDASIL™ in the Base Study were given 1 dose of GARDASIL™ at EXT Day 1 and were followed for 15 days (day of vaccination plus 14 days).

In the 10-year Base Study Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) [V501-015-21] the effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of GARDASIL™ was assessed during a period of 10 years following completion of the Base Study (V501-015) [14 years after the first dose of GARDASIL™] and, for some measures, the Base Study EXT (V501-015-10) [10 years after the first dose of GARDASIL™]. Participants from Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden who participated in the Base Study were eligible to enroll in the LTFU. Effectiveness and safety was assessed by registry-based follow-up, and immunogenicity was assessed by serological testing at approximately Year 5 and Year 10 of the V501-015-21 LTFU.

An 8-year extension was added to the LTFU (V501-015-22] to continue the evaluation of the long-term effectiveness and immunogenicity of GARDASIL™. Effectiveness and safety will be assessed by registry-based follow-up, and immunogenicity will be assessed by serological testing at approximately Year 4 and Year 8 of the extension of the LTFU.

Being tested
Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine, Matching Placebo
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Condylomata Acuminata

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccineBiological

    Also called V501, qHPV vaccine

    A 0.5 mL intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle at Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6 in the Base Study.

  • Matching PlaceboBiological

    A placebo 0.5 mL intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle at Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6 in the Base Study.

Study groups in NCT00092534
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) VaccineExperimentalThe Vaccination Period for the base study encompassed Day 1 through Month 7, during which time study subjects in Group 1 were vaccinated (at Day 1, Month 2 and Month 6) with the Quadrivalent HPV vaccine.
Receives: Biological: Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorThe Vaccination Period for the base study encompassed Day 1 through Month 7, during which time study subjects in Group 2 were vaccinated (at Day 1, Month 2 and Month 6) with placebo.
Receives: Biological: Matching Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18-related Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 or Worse in the Base Study

    This measure is defined to have occurred when, on a single cervical biopsy, endocervical curettage (ECC), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or conization specimen, there was HPV Vaccine consensus diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse up to 4 years after the first vaccination. For this measure, CIN 2 or worse includes CIN 2, CIN 3, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or cervical cancer related to HPV 16 or 18.

    Measured: Up to 4 years

  2. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18-related Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 or Worse in the Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study

    This measure is defined to have occurred when, on a single cervical biopsy, endocervical curettage (ECC), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or conization specimen, there was HPV Vaccine Nordic pathology panel (NPP) consensus diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse up to 14 years after the first vaccination. For this measure, CIN 2 or worse includes CIN 2, CIN 3, AIS or cervical cancer related to HPV 16 or 18. Only participants who received qHPV vaccine during the Base Study vaccination period and consented for inclusion in the LTFU are included. Because the objective was to demonstrate qHPV vaccine prophylactic efficacy at 14 years, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Up to 14 years since Vaccine Dose 1

  3. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of HPV16/18-related CIN 2 or Worse in the Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study

    This measure is defined to have occurred when, on a single cervical biopsy, ECC, LEEP, or conization specimen, there was HPV Vaccine NPP consensus diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse up to 22 years after the first vaccination. For this measure, CIN 2 or worse includes CIN 2, CIN 3, AIS or cervical cancer related to HPV 16 or 18. Only participants who received qHPV vaccine during the Base Study vaccination period and consented for inclusion in the LTFU will be included.

    Measured: up to 22 years post Vaccination Dose 1

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Number of Participants With Anti-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 6 Titer ≥20 mMU/mL Based on Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Base Study

    Anti-HPV levels >20 mMU/mL neutralize a large input load of HPV 6 pseudovirions in vitro; thus, the number of participants with anti-HPV 6 ≥20 mMU/mL 4 four weeks after the third quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) or placebo vaccination in the Base Study was determined.

    Measured: Month 7 (4 weeks after Vaccination 3)

  2. Number of Participants With Anti-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 11 Titer ≥16 mMU/mL Based on Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Base Study

    Anti-HPV levels >20 mMU/mL neutralize a large input load of HPV 11 virions in vitro; thus, the number of participants with anti-HPV 11 ≥16 mMU/mL 4 four weeks after the third quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) or placebo vaccination in the Base Study was determined.

    Measured: Week 4 Postdose 3

  3. Number of Participants With Anti-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 Titer ≥20 mMU/mL Based on Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Base Study

    Anti-HPV levels >20 mMU/mL neutralize a large input load of HPV 16 pseudovirions in vitro; thus, the number of participants with anti-HPV 16 ≥20 mMU/mL 4 four weeks after the third quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) or placebo vaccination in the Base Study was determined.

    Measured: Week 4 Postdose 3

  4. Number of Participants With Anti-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 18 Titer ≥24 mMU/mL Based on Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Base Study

    Anti-HPV levels >20 mMU/mL neutralize a large input load of HPV 18 pseudovirions in vitro; thus, the number of participants with anti-HPV 18 ≥24 mMU/mL 4 four weeks after the third quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) or placebo vaccination in the Base Study was determined.

    Measured: Week 4 Postdose 3

  5. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59-related Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Grade 2 or Worse in the Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study

    This measure is defined to have occurred when, on a single cervical biopsy, endocervical curettage (ECC), loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or conization specimen, there was HPV Vaccine Nordic pathology panel (NPP) consensus diagnosis of CIN 2 or worse related to nonvaccine HPV types up to 14 years after the first vaccination. For this measure, CIN 2 or worse includes CIN 2, CIN 3, AIS or cervical cancer related to nonvaccine HPV types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, or 59. Only participants who received qHPV vaccine during the Base Study vaccination period and consented for inclusion in the LTFU are included. Because the objective was to demonstrate qHPV vaccine prophylactic efficacy at 14 years, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Up to 14 years since Vaccination Dose 1

  6. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of HPV 6/11/16/18-related CIN (Any Grade), AIS, Cervical Cancer, Vulvar Cancer or Vaginal Cancer the Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study

    This measure was defined to have occurred if on a single biopsy or excised tissue, there was the NPP consensus diagnosis of CIN 1, CIN 2, CIN 3, AIS, cervical cancer, vulvar cancer or vaginal cancer AND at least 1 of HPV types 6, 11, 16 or 18 was detected by Thin-section PCR in an adjacent section from the same tissue block. Only participants who received qHPV vaccine during the Base Study vaccination period and consented for inclusion in the LTFU are included. Because the objective was to demonstrate qHPV vaccine prophylactic efficacy at 14 years, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: Up to 14 years since Vaccination Dose 1

  7. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of HPV 6/11/16/18-related CIN (Any Grade), AIS, Cervical Cancer, Vulvar Cancer or Vaginal Cancer the Long-term Follow-up (LTFU) Study

    This measure is defined to have occurred if on a single biopsy or excised tissue, there is the NPP consensus diagnosis of CIN 1, CIN 2, CIN 3, AIS, cervical cancer, vulvar cancer or vaginal cancer AND at least 1 of HPV types 6, 11, 16 or 18 is detected by Thin-section PCR in an adjacent section from the same tissue block.

    Measured: up to 22 years since Vaccination Dose 1

  8. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 108 Assessed by Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using cLIA. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 108 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  9. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 168 Assessed by Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using cLIA. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 168 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  10. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 108 Assessed by Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using cLIA. Seropositivity was assessed by competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA); the serostatus cut-offs for anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 serum cLIA were 20, 16, 20 and 24 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 108 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  11. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 168 Assessed by Competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using cLIA. Seropositivity was assessed by cLIA; the serostatus cut-offs for anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 serum cLIA were 20, 16, 20 and 24 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 168 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  12. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 108 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using IgG LIA. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 108 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  13. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 168 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types were measured using IgG LIA. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 168 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  14. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 108 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to HPV types were measured using anti-HPV IgG LIA. The serostatus cut-offs for IgG LIA anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 at Month 108 were 15, 15, 7, and 10 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 108 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  15. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 168 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to HPV types were measured using anti-HPV IgG LIA. The serostatus cut-offs for IgG LIA anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 at Month 168 were 9, 6, 5, and 5 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. Because the objective was to demonstrate antibody persistence at 14 years following vaccination in susceptible individuals, Cohort 2 was not included in the analysis.

    Measured: At 168 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  16. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 216 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types will be measured using IgG LIA..

    Measured: At 216 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  17. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 216 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) ) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to HPV types will be measured using anti-HPV IgG LIA. The serostatus cut-offs for IgG LIA anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 are 15, 15, 7, and 10 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. The percentage of participants that are seropositive for each type will be summarized.

    Measured: At 216 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  18. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 264 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to human papillomavirus (HPV) types will be measured using IgG LIA..

    Measured: At 264 months since Vaccination Dose 1

  19. Percentage of Participants With Seropositivity to HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18 at Month 264 Assessed by Immunoglobulin G Luminex Immunoassay (IgG LIA) in the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Study

    Antibodies to HPV types will be measured using anti-HPV IgG LIA. The serostatus cut-offs for IgG LIA anti-HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18 are 15, 15, 7, and 10 milliMerck units (mMU)/mL, respectively. The percentage of participants that are seropositive for each type will be summarized.

    Measured: At 264 months since Vaccination Dose 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study start14 Jun 2002
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2007
  4. Study completion13 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
12,167 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00092534
Sponsor's protocol ID
V501-015
Other IDs
2004_082, V501-015
Acronym
FUTURE II
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
23 Sep 2004
Last updated
1 Aug 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: https://trialstransparency.msdclinicaltrials.com/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Publications

  • FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 10;356(19):1915-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061741.

    PubMed 17494925
  • Garland SM, Steben M, Sings HL, James M, Lu S, Railkar R, Barr E, Haupt RM, Joura EA. Natural history of genital warts: analysis of the placebo arm of 2 randomized phase III trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 15;199(6):805-14. doi: 10.1086/597071.

    PubMed 19199546
  • Barr E, Gause CK, Bautista OM, Railkar RA, Lupinacci LC, Insinga RP, Sings HL, Haupt RM. Impact of a prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in a sexually active population of North American women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;198(3):261.e1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.09.001.

    PubMed 18313445
  • Joura EA, Leodolter S, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, Koutsky LA, Garland SM, Harper DM, Tang GW, Ferris DG, Steben M, Jones RW, Bryan J, Taddeo FJ, Bautista OM, Esser MT, Sings HL, Nelson M, Boslego JW, Sattler C, Barr E, Paavonen J. Efficacy of a quadrivalent prophylactic human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against high-grade vulval and vaginal lesions: a combined analysis of three randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2007 May 19;369(9574):1693-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60777-6.

    PubMed 17512854
  • Perez G, Lazcano-Ponce E, Hernandez-Avila M, Garcia PJ, Munoz N, Villa LL, Bryan J, Taddeo FJ, Lu S, Esser MT, Vuocolo S, Sattler C, Barr E. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine in Latin American women. Int J Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;122(6):1311-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23260.

    PubMed 18000825
  • FUTURE II Study Group. Prophylactic efficacy of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in women with virological evidence of HPV infection. J Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 15;196(10):1438-46. doi: 10.1086/522864. Epub 2007 Oct 31.

    PubMed 18008221
  • Ault KA; Future II Study Group. Effect of prophylactic human papillomavirus L1 virus-like-particle vaccine on risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2, grade 3, and adenocarcinoma in situ: a combined analysis of four randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2007 Jun 2;369(9576):1861-1868. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60852-6.

    PubMed 17544766
  • Giuliano AR, Lazcano-Ponce E, Villa L, Nolan T, Marchant C, Radley D, Golm G, McCarroll K, Yu J, Esser MT, Vuocolo SC, Barr E. Impact of baseline covariates on the immunogenicity of a quadrivalent (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) human papillomavirus virus-like-particle vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15;196(8):1153-62. doi: 10.1086/521679. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

    PubMed 17955433
  • Garland SM, Insinga RP, Sings HL, Haupt RM, Joura EA. Human papillomavirus infections and vulvar disease development. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jun;18(6):1777-84. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0067.

    PubMed 19505910
  • Skjeldestad FE, Mehta V, Sings HL, Ovreness T, Turpin J, Su L, Boerckel P, Roberts C, Bryan J, Jansen KU, Esser MT, Liaw KL. Seroprevalence and genital DNA prevalence of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 in a cohort of young Norwegian women: study design and cohort characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(1):81-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340701714703.

    PubMed 17943470
  • Nygard M, Saah A, Munk C, Tryggvadottir L, Enerly E, Hortlund M, Sigurdardottir LG, Vuocolo S, Kjaer SK, Dillner J. Evaluation of the Long-Term Anti-Human Papillomavirus 6 (HPV6), 11, 16, and 18 Immune Responses Generated by the Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Aug;22(8):943-8. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00133-15. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

    PubMed 26084514
  • Tay EH, Garland S, Tang G, Nolan T, Huang LM, Orloski L, Lu S, Barr E. Clinical trial experience with prophylactic HPV 6/11/16/18 VLP vaccine in young women from the Asia-Pacific region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Sep;102(3):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.03.021. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

    PubMed 18555997
  • Majewski S, Bosch FX, Dillner J, Iversen OE, Kjaer SK, Munoz N, Olsson SE, Paavonen J, Sigurdsson K, Bryan J, Esser MT, Giacoletti K, James M, Taddeo F, Vuocolo S, Barr E. The impact of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, 18) virus-like particle vaccine in European women aged 16 to 24. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Oct;23(10):1147-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03266.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

    PubMed 19453788
  • Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernandez-Avila M, Wheeler CM, Perez G, Brown DR, Koutsky LA, Tay EH, Garcia P, Ault KA, Garland SM, Leodolter S, Olsson SE, Tang GW, Ferris DG, Paavonen J, Lehtinen M, Steben M, Bosch FX, Dillner J, Joura EA, Majewski S, Munoz N, Myers ER, Villa LL, Taddeo FJ, Roberts C, Tadesse A, Bryan J, Maansson R, Lu S, Vuocolo S, Hesley TM, Saah A, Barr E, Haupt RM. A pooled analysis of continued prophylactic efficacy of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (Types 6/11/16/18) vaccine against high-grade cervical and external genital lesions. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Oct;2(10):868-78. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0031. Epub 2009 Sep 29.

    PubMed 19789295
  • FUTURE I/II Study Group; Dillner J, Kjaer SK, Wheeler CM, Sigurdsson K, Iversen OE, Hernandez-Avila M, Perez G, Brown DR, Koutsky LA, Tay EH, Garcia P, Ault KA, Garland SM, Leodolter S, Olsson SE, Tang GW, Ferris DG, Paavonen J, Lehtinen M, Steben M, Bosch FX, Joura EA, Majewski S, Munoz N, Myers ER, Villa LL, Taddeo FJ, Roberts C, Tadesse A, Bryan JT, Maansson R, Lu S, Vuocolo S, Hesley TM, Barr E, Haupt R. Four year efficacy of prophylactic human papillomavirus quadrivalent vaccine against low grade cervical, vulvar, and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia and anogenital warts: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010 Jul 20;341:c3493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3493.

    PubMed 20647284

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Gardasil, human papillomavirus (type 6, 11, 16, 18) recombinant vaccine in people with Cervical Cancer and Genital Warts, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18-related Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 or Worse in the Base Study (time frame: Up to 4 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00092534, which also lists 33 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in