AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT00096785

Comparative Trial of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

A Phase 3 study testing entecavir and adefovir in people with Hepatitis B and Chronic Disease, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 24 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate antiviral activity and efficacy of entecavir (ETV) compared to adefovir in adults with chronic hepatitis B who have not been treated yet with an antiviral medicine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis B, Chronic Disease
What is being tested?
entecavir and adefovir
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
69 participants
Where
24 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Dec 2004to Apr 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic hepatitis B treatment naive
  • Compensated liver disease

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 8 countries.

24 sites in 8 countries

United States11 sites
  • Local Institution

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Dallas, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Galveston, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Miami, Florida

  • Local Insitution

    New York, New York

  • Local Institution

    New York, New York

  • Local Institution

    North Miami Beach, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    San Diego, California

  • Local Institution

    San Francisco, California

  • Local Institution

    Torrance, California

Other trials in United States

Canada3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • Local Institution

    Toronto, Ontario

  • Local Institution

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

Hong Kong3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Chai Wan

  • Local Institution

    Pokfulham

  • Local Institution

    Tai Po

Other trials in Hong Kong

Philippines2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Cebu

  • Local Institution

    Manila

Other trials in Philippines

Taiwan2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Taichung

  • Local Institution

    Taoyan

Other trials in Taiwan

Indonesia1 site
  • Local Institution

    Jakarta

Other trials in Indonesia

Singapore1 site
  • Local Institution

    Singapore

Other trials in Singapore

Thailand1 site
  • Local Institution

    Bangkok

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study to Evaluate Early Viral Load Reductions and Exploratory Viral Kinetics Following Administration of Entecavir or Adefovir in Nucleoside-Naive Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

The purpose of this study is to evaluate antiviral activity and efficacy of entecavir (ETV) compared to adefovir in adults with chronic hepatitis B who have not been treated yet with an antiviral medicine.

Being tested
entecavir, adefovir
Keywords
chronic hepatitis B infection
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis B, Chronic Disease, Hepatitis B, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • entecavirDrug

    Also called Baraclude

    Tablets, Oral, ETV 0.5 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks

  • adefovirDrug

    Tablets, Oral, ADV 10 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks

Study groups in NCT00096785
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A1Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: entecavir
A2Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: adefovir

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay at Week 12

    Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 12, adjusted for baseline (Week 12 - baseline). A negative value = improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR Assay at Week 48

    Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 48, adjusted for baseline (Week 48 - Baseline). A negative value = improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 48

  2. Viral Load Undetectable (HBV DNA <300 Copies/mL)

    Number of Subjects with HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by Roche COBAS® Amplicor (limit of quantitation 300 copies/mL)

    Measured: Week 48

  3. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization

    Number of participants with ALT ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal (ULN)

    Measured: Week 48

  4. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Efficacy in Blocking Virus Production and de Novo Infections

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the effectiveness of the drug in blocking virus production from infected cells (efficacy, ε) and effectiveness of the study treatment in blocking de novo infection of susceptible cells (η). The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Viral Clearance Rate and Infected Cell Death Rate

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the clearance rate of the free virus (c), the death rate of productively infected cells (δ), The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 12

  6. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Half-Life of Free Virus

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. An important derived parameter is the half-life of free virus (ie, the average amount of time for HBV particles in plasma to be reduced to half the initial level), calculated as 24*ln(2)/c. The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 12

  7. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics - Spline Model

    This analysis uses a 3-parameter piece-wise linear model and describes the biphasic decline in HBV DNA (measured by PCR assay) through Week 12. The 3 parameters are the values for the 2 slopes, describing the first and second phase declines, respectively, and the estimated HBV DNA at the knot (at day 10; the time point where the 2 phases join). The biphasic viral decay kinetics for each treatment were obtained using a spline fitting procedure to estimate the 3 parameters for each subject; these estimates were then averaged within each treatment group.

    Measured: Week 12

  8. Summary of Safety - Most Frequent (> 10%) Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Deaths

    AE=new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship to treatment. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that is life-threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event, or results in death, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, or persistent/significant disability. AE grades: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), death (5). ALT flare= >2x baseline \& >10x ULN up to end of therapy + 5 days. Hepatic SAE=SAEs consistent with worsening of hepatitis or hepatic decompensation.

    Measured: cumulative through the end of on-treatment observation as available at the time of the Week 48 dataset

  9. Summary of Safety - Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Clinical AEs

    Laboratory abnormalities reported as clinical AEs

    Measured: Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2004
  3. Primary completionJan 2006
  4. Study completionApr 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
69 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00096785
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI463-079
Status last verified
Jun 2010
First submitted
15 Nov 2004
Last updated
10 Aug 2010
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Leung N, Peng CY, Hann HW, Sollano J, Lao-Tan J, Hsu CW, Lesmana L, Yuen MF, Jeffers L, Sherman M, Min A, Mencarini K, Diva U, Cross A, Wilber R, Lopez-Talavera J. Early hepatitis B virus DNA reduction in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B: A randomized international study of entecavir versus adefovir. Hepatology. 2009 Jan;49(1):72-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.22658.

    PubMed 19065670

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing entecavir and adefovir in people with Hepatitis B and Chronic Disease, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 24 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada, Hong Kong, Philippines, Taiwan and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00096785, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in