Hypereosinophilic SyndromePhase 3NCT00097370
Open-Label Extension Of Intravenous Mepolizumab In Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
A Phase 3 study testing mepolizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 24 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This is an open label study of mepolizumab 750 mg intravenous in those subjects who participated in study 100185 to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- mepolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2004to 29 Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent.
- Subjects who have participated in Study MHE100185 and have been administered at least 2 doses of study medication.
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Of non-childbearing potential (i.e., women who had a hysterectomy, are post-menopausal which is defined as 1 year without menses, have both ovaries surgically removed, or have current documented tubule ligation); or
- Of childbearing potential (i.e., women with functional ovaries and no documented impairment of oviductal or uterine function that would cause sterility). This category includes women with oligomenorrhoea [even severe], women who are perimenopausal or have just begun to menstruate. These women must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit, and agree to one of the following:1). Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of investigational product until 3 months after the last dose of investigational product; Or 2). Consistent and correct use of one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for one month prior to the start of the investigation product and three months after the last dose:Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for the female subjects; Implants of levonorgestrel;Injectable progestogen;Any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; Oral contraceptives (either combined or progestogen only)
Who cannot join
- Has developed life-threatening or other serious illness or clinical manifestation deemed inappropriate for inclusion in study per the principal investigator
- Has any of the following abnormal laboratory values at the Week36/EW Visit of Study MHE100185: • Serum creatinine ≥3 times institutional upper limit normal (ULN); • AST or/ALT ≥5 times institutional ULN; • Platelet count < 50,000/uL
- Has developed abnormal cardiac functions, as the following, within past 3 months:• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%; • NYHA class IIIb or IV; • Angina or acute myocardial infarction
- Has developed allergic reaction to Study MHE100185 investigational product Use of an investigational drug as concurrent medication
- Does not complete Week36/EW Visit assessments required in Study MHE100185
- Has completed or been terminated from Study MHE100185 for more than 1 month
- Recent history or suspicion of current drug abuse or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months
- Positive pregnancy test at the Week36/EW Visit of Study MHE100185
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 7 countries.
24 sites in 7 countries
United States10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80206
GSK Investigational Site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203-1424
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Canada4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2T3
GSK Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2
Germany3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Bramstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, 24576
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
GSK Investigational Site
Munich, Bavaria, 80802
Australia2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
GSK Investigational Site
West Perth, Western Australia, 6005
Belgium2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1070
GSK Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000
France2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59000
GSK Investigational Site
Suresnes, 92150
About this study
Official title: An Open Label Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndromes
This is an open label study of mepolizumab 750 mg intravenous in those subjects who participated in study 100185 to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome. The study will also evaluate the optimal dosing frequency for clinical use, the effects on corticosteroid reduction, and decrease of signs and symptoms of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.
- Conditions
- Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
- Being tested
- mepolizumab
- Keywords
- Mepolizumab, Open-label, Anti-IL-5, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Hypereosinophilia
- Medical subject headings
- Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Eosinophilia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
mepolizumabDrug
Study Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mepolizumab | Experimental | 750mg Intravenous, monthly and individual dosing schedule Receives: Drug: mepolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Phase
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Treatment phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE
Measured: From the first dose of study medication up to 7 days after the last dose (up to approximately 6 years)
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Follow-up Phase
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Follow-up phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE
Measured: From end of Treatment Phase up to 97 days after the last dose date (up to approximately 6 years)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Level of =<10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) at the End of Study
Participants who were receiving a prednisone dose level of =<10 mg as their sole background therapy at the end of the study were included for the analysis.
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
Number of Participants Achieving an Eosinophil Level of < 600 Cell/Microliter (uL) (in Addition to the Lowest Background Therapy) at the End of Study
The criteria for eosinophil count was achieved if the participant's eosinophil count remained below <600 cell/uL for the last observation on study i.e. within length of dosing cycle + 7 days of last dose of study drug. For participants who entered in Stage 1, HES medications taking prior to the first infusion date in Stage 2 were considered as the lowest background therapy. For participants who entered in Stage 2, HES medications taken on the date that immediately preceded the first infusion date of study drug and had not been discontinued was regarded as the lowest background therapy. If the dose of the lowest background therapy had increased or the medication had changed or the participant had not reached their lowest background therapy, the participant was regarded as not achieving this endpoint.
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level <=10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <= 10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 3months
Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of <=10 mg of prednisone at study end were analyzed. Duration of doses <=10 mg was determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If it did, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months).
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level >10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <=10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 8 Weeks
Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of prednisone of >10 mg at the end of the study were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg were determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If overap occurred, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 53 days (8 weeks).
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 2 From Study MHE100185 With a Prednisone Level of <=10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for >=3 Months;
Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of <=10 mg of prednisone at study end and participants who withdrew from the study early who were at a prednisone dose level <=10 mg were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg were determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If overlap occurred, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months).
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 1 From Study MHE100185 With >10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for>=3 Months
Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of >10 mg prednisone at the end of the study and participants who withdrew from the study early who were at a prednisone dose level >10 mg were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg was determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they do not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If it did, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months)
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
Blood Eosinophil Count (With Consideration of the HES Background Therapy) During Stages 1-3
Mean blood eosinophil counts were summarized over time taking into account the effect of HES background therapy. Eosinophil count observations for only those participants taking mepolizumab in conjunction with prednisone or as monotherapy were included.
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
Number of Participants by Dosing Frequency Groups (Defined as Two Week Dosing Ranges Greater Than a 4 Week Interval) at the End of Stage 2
The number of participants at the end of Stage 2 with study medication dosing frequencies of 4 weeks, 5-6 weeks, 7-8 weeks, 9-10 weeks, 11-12 weeks, 13-16 weeks, 17-20 weeks, 21-24 weeks and >24 weeks were summarized. The first infusion date in Stage 3 and the last infusion date in Stage 2 were used to calculate the dosing frequency.
Measured: up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in the Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (pVAS) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
The pruritus visual analogue scale asks participants to rate the status of their Pruritus based on the severity of their itch. Scores range from 0-100 with 0 = No itch and 100 = Worst imaginable itch. Change from Baseline in pVAS score is the difference between the pVAS score at the time point being considered to the MHE100901 Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in Erythema/Edema Score 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
The erythema subscale score and edema subscale score are each graded on a 0-3 scale, with 0 = absent , 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicative of more severe Erythema/Edema. The total score was obtained by summing together the responses for each of the two subscale items. Change from Baseline in erythema/edema total score is the difference between erythema/edema total score at the time point being analyzed to the MHE100901 Baseline score..
Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) and Current Health Status: Physical Summary Score of the Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
The SF-12v2 is the 12 item abbreviated form of SF-36v2 survey . It provides information about how participants feel, and how well they have been able to perform their usual activities, over the past 4 weeks. SF-12v2 questions make up 8 scales: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, Mental Health . Transformed physical component summary score (PCS-12) is derived using all the 12 items and scored onto a 0-100 scale such that a higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline in scale or summary measure score is the difference between the score at the time point being analyzed to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in QoL and Current Health Status: Mental Summary Score of the SF12 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
The SF-12v2 is the 12 item abbreviated form of SF-36v2 survey developed by the Medical Outcomes Trust and QualityMetric Incorporated. It provides information about how participants feel, and how well they have been able to perform their usual activities, over the past 4 weeks. SF-12v2 scale questions make up 8 scales: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, Mental Health are for mental component summary. Transformed mental component summary score (MCS-12) is derived using all the 12 items and scored onto a 0-100 scale such that a higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline in scale or summary measure score is the difference between the score at the time point being analyzed to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Nov 2004 (estimated)
- Study start30 Sep 2004
- Primary completion29 Sep 2010
- Study completion29 Sep 2010
Why it stopped: Study terminated by sponsor (29 Sep 2010). Subjects eligible to continue mepolizumab treatment were transferred into the compassionate use program (MHE104317)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Hypereosinophilic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00097370
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 100901
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2004
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open Label Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndromes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00097370
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 100901
- Conditions
- Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
- Keywords
- Mepolizumab, Open-label, Anti-IL-5, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Hypereosinophilia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study terminated by sponsor (29 Sep 2010). Subjects eligible to continue mepolizumab treatment were transferred into the compassionate use program (MHE104317)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2004 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Sep 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Nov 2004 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open label study of mepolizumab 750 mg intravenous in those subjects who participated in study 100185 to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome. The study will also evaluate the optimal dosing frequency for clinical use, the effects on corticosteroid reduction, and decrease of signs and symptoms of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mepolizumab | Experimental | Drug: mepolizumab750mg Intravenous, monthly and individual dosing schedule |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Signed informed consent.
- Subjects who have participated in Study MHE100185 and have been administered at least 2 doses of study medication.
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Of non-childbearing potential (i.e., women who had a hysterectomy, are post-menopausal which is defined as 1 year without menses, have both ovaries surgically removed, or have current documented tubule ligation); or
- Of childbearing potential (i.e., women with functional ovaries and no documented impairment of oviductal or uterine function that would cause sterility). This category includes women with oligomenorrhoea [even severe], women who are perimenopausal or have just begun to menstruate. These women must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit, and agree to one of the following:1). Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of investigational product until 3 months after the last dose of investigational product; Or 2). Consistent and correct use of one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for one month prior to the start of the investigation product and three months after the last dose:Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for the female subjects; Implants of levonorgestrel;Injectable progestogen;Any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; Oral contraceptives (either combined or progestogen only)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Has developed life-threatening or other serious illness or clinical manifestation deemed inappropriate for inclusion in study per the principal investigator
- Has any of the following abnormal laboratory values at the Week36/EW Visit of Study MHE100185: • Serum creatinine ≥3 times institutional upper limit normal (ULN); • AST or/ALT ≥5 times institutional ULN; • Platelet count < 50,000/uL
- Has developed abnormal cardiac functions, as the following, within past 3 months:• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%; • NYHA class IIIb or IV; • Angina or acute myocardial infarction
- Has developed allergic reaction to Study MHE100185 investigational product Use of an investigational drug as concurrent medication
- Does not complete Week36/EW Visit assessments required in Study MHE100185
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| mepolizumabStudy Drug | Drug | mepolizumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Phase
Time frame: From the first dose of study medication up to 7 days after the last dose (up to approximately 6 years)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Treatment phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Follow-up Phase
Time frame: From end of Treatment Phase up to 97 days after the last dose date (up to approximately 6 years)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Follow-up phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE
12 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Level of =<10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) at the End of Study
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
Number of Participants Achieving an Eosinophil Level of < 600 Cell/Microliter (uL) (in Addition to the Lowest Background Therapy) at the End of Study
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level <=10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <= 10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 3months
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level >10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <=10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 8 Weeks
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 2 From Study MHE100185 With a Prednisone Level of <=10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for >=3 Months;
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 1 From Study MHE100185 With >10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for>=3 Months
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
Blood Eosinophil Count (With Consideration of the HES Background Therapy) During Stages 1-3
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
Number of Participants by Dosing Frequency Groups (Defined as Two Week Dosing Ranges Greater Than a 4 Week Interval) at the End of Stage 2
Time frame: up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in the Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (pVAS) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in Erythema/Edema Score 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) and Current Health Status: Physical Summary Score of the Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Change From Baseline in QoL and Current Health Status: Mental Summary Score of the SF12 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
Dupilumab as Add-On Therapy for Hypereosinophilic Syndrome With Partial Clinical Response to Eosinophil-Depleting Biologic Agents
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Study of Familial Hypereosinophilia (FE): Natural History and Markers of Disease Progression
Eosinophilia, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled, Time-to-first Asthma Exacerbation Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Benralizumab in Paediatric Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
Roll-over Study for Participants Who Have Completed a Previous Clinical Study With Benralizumab (Fasenra) and Benefit From Continued Treatment
Asthma, Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (EGPA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
SIM0718 Treatment of Asthma Clinical Study
Asthma; Eosinophilic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
24 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing mepolizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 24 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Australia, Belgium and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Phase (time frame: From the first dose of study medication up to 7 days after the last dose (up to approximately 6 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.