AzTrials
AzTrials

Hypereosinophilic SyndromePhase 3NCT00097370

Open-Label Extension Of Intravenous Mepolizumab In Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

A Phase 3 study testing mepolizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 24 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open label study of mepolizumab 750 mg intravenous in those subjects who participated in study 100185 to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
What is being tested?
mepolizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
78 participants
Where
24 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
30 Sep 2004to 29 Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent.
  • Subjects who have participated in Study MHE100185 and have been administered at least 2 doses of study medication.
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Of non-childbearing potential (i.e., women who had a hysterectomy, are post-menopausal which is defined as 1 year without menses, have both ovaries surgically removed, or have current documented tubule ligation); or
  • Of childbearing potential (i.e., women with functional ovaries and no documented impairment of oviductal or uterine function that would cause sterility). This category includes women with oligomenorrhoea [even severe], women who are perimenopausal or have just begun to menstruate. These women must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit, and agree to one of the following:1). Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of investigational product until 3 months after the last dose of investigational product; Or 2). Consistent and correct use of one of the following acceptable methods of birth control for one month prior to the start of the investigation product and three months after the last dose:Male partner who is sterile prior to the female subject's entry into the study and is the sole sexual partner for the female subjects; Implants of levonorgestrel;Injectable progestogen;Any intrauterine device (IUD) with a documented failure rate of less than 1% per year; Oral contraceptives (either combined or progestogen only)

Who cannot join

  • Has developed life-threatening or other serious illness or clinical manifestation deemed inappropriate for inclusion in study per the principal investigator
  • Has any of the following abnormal laboratory values at the Week36/EW Visit of Study MHE100185: • Serum creatinine ≥3 times institutional upper limit normal (ULN); • AST or/ALT ≥5 times institutional ULN; • Platelet count < 50,000/uL
  • Has developed abnormal cardiac functions, as the following, within past 3 months:• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 20%; • NYHA class IIIb or IV; • Angina or acute myocardial infarction
  • Has developed allergic reaction to Study MHE100185 investigational product Use of an investigational drug as concurrent medication
  • Does not complete Week36/EW Visit assessments required in Study MHE100185
  • Has completed or been terminated from Study MHE100185 for more than 1 month
  • Recent history or suspicion of current drug abuse or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months
  • Positive pregnancy test at the Week36/EW Visit of Study MHE100185

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 7 countries.

24 sites in 7 countries

United States10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Denver, Colorado, 80206

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203-1424

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92103

Other trials in United States

Canada4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2T3

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2

Other trials in Canada

Germany3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bad Bramstedt, Schleswig-Holstein, 24576

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 80802

Other trials in Germany

Australia2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • GSK Investigational Site

    West Perth, Western Australia, 6005

Other trials in Australia

Belgium2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brussels, 1070

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

France2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lille, 59000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Suresnes, 92150

Other trials in France

Italy1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: An Open Label Extension Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Mepolizumab in Patients With Hypereosinophilic Syndromes

This is an open label study of mepolizumab 750 mg intravenous in those subjects who participated in study 100185 to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome. The study will also evaluate the optimal dosing frequency for clinical use, the effects on corticosteroid reduction, and decrease of signs and symptoms of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome.

Being tested
mepolizumab
Keywords
Mepolizumab, Open-label, Anti-IL-5, Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Hypereosinophilia
Medical subject headings
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, Eosinophilia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • mepolizumabDrug

    Study Drug

Study groups in NCT00097370
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
mepolizumabExperimental750mg Intravenous, monthly and individual dosing schedule
Receives: Drug: mepolizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Phase

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Treatment phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE

    Measured: From the first dose of study medication up to 7 days after the last dose (up to approximately 6 years)

  2. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Follow-up Phase

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical investigation participants temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs are summarized by Follow-up phase. Safety and tolerability of the study drug was assessed by number of participants with any AE

    Measured: From end of Treatment Phase up to 97 days after the last dose date (up to approximately 6 years)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Level of =<10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) at the End of Study

    Participants who were receiving a prednisone dose level of =<10 mg as their sole background therapy at the end of the study were included for the analysis.

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  2. Number of Participants Achieving an Eosinophil Level of < 600 Cell/Microliter (uL) (in Addition to the Lowest Background Therapy) at the End of Study

    The criteria for eosinophil count was achieved if the participant's eosinophil count remained below <600 cell/uL for the last observation on study i.e. within length of dosing cycle + 7 days of last dose of study drug. For participants who entered in Stage 1, HES medications taking prior to the first infusion date in Stage 2 were considered as the lowest background therapy. For participants who entered in Stage 2, HES medications taken on the date that immediately preceded the first infusion date of study drug and had not been discontinued was regarded as the lowest background therapy. If the dose of the lowest background therapy had increased or the medication had changed or the participant had not reached their lowest background therapy, the participant was regarded as not achieving this endpoint.

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  3. For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level <=10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <= 10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 3months

    Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of <=10 mg of prednisone at study end were analyzed. Duration of doses <=10 mg was determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If it did, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months).

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  4. For Those Participants Who Completed 9 Months of Dosing in Study MHE100185 and Achieved a Prednisone Level >10 mg: Number of Participants Achieving <=10 mg Prednisone (as Sole Background Therapy) for >= 8 Weeks

    Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of prednisone of >10 mg at the end of the study were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg were determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If overap occurred, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 53 days (8 weeks).

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  5. For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 2 From Study MHE100185 With a Prednisone Level of <=10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for >=3 Months;

    Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of <=10 mg of prednisone at study end and participants who withdrew from the study early who were at a prednisone dose level <=10 mg were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg were determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they did not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If overlap occurred, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months).

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  6. For Those Participants Who Entered Stage 1 From Study MHE100185 With >10 mg Prednisone: Number of Participants Achieving a Prednisone Dose <=10 mg (as Sole Background Therapy) for>=3 Months

    Participants from study MHE100185 who completed the 9 months treatment period and achieved a level of >10 mg prednisone at the end of the study and participants who withdrew from the study early who were at a prednisone dose level >10 mg were analyzed. Duration of doses <= 10 mg was determined by examining changes in the prednisone dosing or allowable alternative corticosteroid medication (prednisone equivalents). Start and stop dates of other HES medications were checked to ensure that they do not overlap with the steroid dosing dates. If it did, then the number of days <=10 mg during this overlap was considered as zero and the cumulative days reset to zero, as the endpoint was assessing prednisone dose as sole background therapy. The dosing criteria for this endpoint was considered as achieved if the duration of dosing was minimum of 84 days (3months)

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  7. Blood Eosinophil Count (With Consideration of the HES Background Therapy) During Stages 1-3

    Mean blood eosinophil counts were summarized over time taking into account the effect of HES background therapy. Eosinophil count observations for only those participants taking mepolizumab in conjunction with prednisone or as monotherapy were included.

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  8. Number of Participants by Dosing Frequency Groups (Defined as Two Week Dosing Ranges Greater Than a 4 Week Interval) at the End of Stage 2

    The number of participants at the end of Stage 2 with study medication dosing frequencies of 4 weeks, 5-6 weeks, 7-8 weeks, 9-10 weeks, 11-12 weeks, 13-16 weeks, 17-20 weeks, 21-24 weeks and >24 weeks were summarized. The first infusion date in Stage 3 and the last infusion date in Stage 2 were used to calculate the dosing frequency.

    Measured: up to approximately 6 years

  9. Change From Baseline in the Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (pVAS) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter

    The pruritus visual analogue scale asks participants to rate the status of their Pruritus based on the severity of their itch. Scores range from 0-100 with 0 = No itch and 100 = Worst imaginable itch. Change from Baseline in pVAS score is the difference between the pVAS score at the time point being considered to the MHE100901 Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years

  10. Change From Baseline in Erythema/Edema Score 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter

    The erythema subscale score and edema subscale score are each graded on a 0-3 scale, with 0 = absent , 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The total score ranged from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicative of more severe Erythema/Edema. The total score was obtained by summing together the responses for each of the two subscale items. Change from Baseline in erythema/edema total score is the difference between erythema/edema total score at the time point being analyzed to the MHE100901 Baseline score..

    Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years

  11. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) and Current Health Status: Physical Summary Score of the Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter

    The SF-12v2 is the 12 item abbreviated form of SF-36v2 survey . It provides information about how participants feel, and how well they have been able to perform their usual activities, over the past 4 weeks. SF-12v2 questions make up 8 scales: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, Mental Health . Transformed physical component summary score (PCS-12) is derived using all the 12 items and scored onto a 0-100 scale such that a higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline in scale or summary measure score is the difference between the score at the time point being analyzed to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years

  12. Change From Baseline in QoL and Current Health Status: Mental Summary Score of the SF12 3 Months After the Start of Study MHE100901 and Every 6 Months Thereafter

    The SF-12v2 is the 12 item abbreviated form of SF-36v2 survey developed by the Medical Outcomes Trust and QualityMetric Incorporated. It provides information about how participants feel, and how well they have been able to perform their usual activities, over the past 4 weeks. SF-12v2 scale questions make up 8 scales: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, Mental Health are for mental component summary. Transformed mental component summary score (MCS-12) is derived using all the 12 items and scored onto a 0-100 scale such that a higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline in scale or summary measure score is the difference between the score at the time point being analyzed to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and up to approximately 6 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Nov 2004 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Sep 2004
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2010
  4. Study completion29 Sep 2010

Why it stopped: Study terminated by sponsor (29 Sep 2010). Subjects eligible to continue mepolizumab treatment were transferred into the compassionate use program (MHE104317)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
78 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00097370
Sponsor's protocol ID
100901
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
22 Nov 2004
Last updated
7 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing mepolizumab in people with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 24 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Australia, Belgium and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) During the Treatment Phase (time frame: From the first dose of study medication up to 7 days after the last dose (up to approximately 6 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in