Ovarian CancerPhase 3NCT00102414
Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine in people with Ovarian Cancer, run by AGO Study Group.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to progressive disease in patients treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus carboplatin monotherapy. Patients will have advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and have failed first-line platinum-containing therapy 6 months after treatment discontinuation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine
- How many people
- 356 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Sep 1999to Nov 2004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically proven ovarian cancer with evidence of recurrence or progression
- Failed first-line platinum containing therapy after 6 months of treatment discontinuation
- Documented lesion as evidenced by appropriate computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, chest x-ray, or ultrasound.
- Previous hormonal therapy or radiotherapy must be terminated at least 3 weeks before study drug administration
- Adequate bone marrow reserve: neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelets ≥ 100 x 10^9/L
Who cannot join
- Receiving concomitant cytotoxic or other antineoplastic treatment. Hormone replacement therapy is allowed, as are steroid antiemetics
- Clinical evidence of central nervous system metastases
- Active infection
- Cannot adequately be followed up for the duration of the study
- A second primary malignancy (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
- Use of any investigational agent in the 3 weeks prior to inclusion
Show all 10Show fewer
- Serious concomitant systematic disorders incompatible with the study
- Received more than one previous chemotherapy regimen or had prior gemcitabine treatment
- Patients with tumor of borderline malignancy
- Patients with estimated GFR ≤ 50 mL/min
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Who Failed First-Line Platinum-Based Therapy
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to progressive disease in patients treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus carboplatin monotherapy. Patients will have advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and have failed first-line platinum-containing therapy 6 months after treatment discontinuation.
Read the detailed description
Carboplatin is commonly used for the treatment of ovarian cancer in first- and second-line therapy. The efficacy of gemcitabine in ovarian carcinoma was researched in various Phase 2 studies.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine
- Keywords
- Ovarian cancer, Recurrence or progression, Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin vs Carboplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Ovarian Neoplasms, Recurrence, Disease Progression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GemcitabineDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to progressive disease
Secondary outcomes (5)
Response rate
Duration of response
Survival time
Toxicity
Quality of Life
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 1999
- Study completionNov 2004
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 356 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AGO Study Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Jacobus Pfisterer, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, AGO Study Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00102414
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AGO-OVAR 2.5
- Status last verified
- Jan 2005
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2005
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, du Bois A, Hirte H, Lacave AJ, Wagner U, Stahle A, Stuart G, Kimmig R, Olbricht S, Le T, Emerich J, Kuhn W, Bentley J, Jackisch C, Luck HJ, Rochon J, Zimmermann AH, Eisenhauer E; AGO-OVAR; NCIC CTG; EORTC GCG. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 10;24(29):4699-707. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0913. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
PubMed 16966687
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Carboplatin Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma Who Failed First-Line Platinum-Based Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00102414
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AGO-OVAR 2.5
- Conditions
- Ovarian Cancer
- Keywords
- Ovarian cancer, Recurrence or progression, Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin vs Carboplatin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 356 participants
- Lead sponsor
- AGO Study GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 1999
- Study completion
- Nov 2004
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to progressive disease in patients treated with gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus carboplatin monotherapy. Patients will have advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and have failed first-line platinum-containing therapy 6 months after treatment discontinuation.
Detailed description
Carboplatin is commonly used for the treatment of ovarian cancer in first- and second-line therapy. The efficacy of gemcitabine in ovarian carcinoma was researched in various Phase 2 studies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Histologically proven ovarian cancer with evidence of recurrence or progression
- Failed first-line platinum containing therapy after 6 months of treatment discontinuation
- Documented lesion as evidenced by appropriate computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, chest x-ray, or ultrasound.
- Previous hormonal therapy or radiotherapy must be terminated at least 3 weeks before study drug administration
- Adequate bone marrow reserve: neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L and platelets ≥ 100 x 10^9/L
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Receiving concomitant cytotoxic or other antineoplastic treatment. Hormone replacement therapy is allowed, as are steroid antiemetics
- Clinical evidence of central nervous system metastases
- Active infection
- Cannot adequately be followed up for the duration of the study
- A second primary malignancy (except in situ carcinoma of the cervix or adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Time to progressive disease
5 secondary outcomes
Response rate
Duration of response
Survival time
Toxicity
Quality of Life
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2006.
- Results publication: PubMed 16966687Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, du Bois A, Hirte H, Lacave AJ, Wagner U, Stahle A, Stuart G, Kimmig R, Olbricht S, Le T, Emerich J, Kuhn W, Bentley J, Jackisch C, Luck HJ, Rochon J, Zimmermann AH, Eisenhauer E; AGO-OVAR; NCIC CTG; EORTC GCG. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 10;24(29):4699-707. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0913. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
Related trials for Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
A Study to Compare Two Surgical Procedures in Individuals With BRCA1 Mutations to Assess Reduced Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Investigation of Ubamatamab Combination Therapy in Adult Participants With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacobus Pfisterer, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
AGO Study Group
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Gemcitabine in people with Ovarian Cancer, run by AGO Study Group.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to progressive disease. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00102414, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2006.