AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionNCT00103883

A Novel Method to Determine HIV Incidence Among Youth

An observational study of HIV Infection, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 15 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Identifying young people with early HIV-1 infection is important for increasing linkage to care, for behavioral counseling, and for enrolling individuals into programs that can provide effective interventions to disease progression and improve outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 24 years
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infection
How many people
440 participants
Where
15 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Feb 2003to Mar 2007
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Two hundred fifty subjects will be recruited from the fifteen sites of the Adolescent Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) and 190 from the BCHD STD Clinic, a sexually transmitted disease clinic of the Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD). The age range for subjects from the ATN clinical sites will be 12 through 24 years and those from the BCHD STD Clinic will be 17 through 30 years.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 12 through 24 years
  • HIV infection determined by routine HIV testing strategies
  • Ability to give informed consent or assent with parental permission, where required

Who cannot join

  • Visibly distraught or emotionally unstable
  • Intoxicated or under the influence of psychoactive agents
  • First disclosure of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse
  • Clinically presents as acutely ill

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 2 countries.

15 sites in 2 countries

United States14 sites
  • University of Maryland Medical School

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Childrens Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Stroger Hospital of Cook County

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Children's Diagnostic and Treatment Center

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316

  • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90027

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33101

  • Tulane University

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10128

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • University of California at San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • University of California at San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94118

  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • Children's National Medical Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

Puerto Rico1 site
  • University Pediatric Hospital

    San Juan, 00936

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Identifying young people with early HIV-1 infection is important for increasing linkage to care, for behavioral counseling, and for enrolling individuals into programs that can provide effective interventions to disease progression and improve outcome. This study will develop and evaluate a saliva-based sensitive/less sensitive (S/LS) assay for differentiating persons with recent HIV-1 infection (less than 133 days) from those with established HIV-1 infection.

Read the detailed description

HIV infection incidence estimates are important, not only for determining specific populations where community HIV education sessions can have the most benefit or where changes in infection patterns are occurring, but also to target these populations for therapeutic interventions and measure their effect in the community. It is estimated that half of all new HIV infections in the United States occur in persons under the age of 25 each year, translating to approximately 20,000 new HIV-infected young people annually.

Incidence can be estimated by testing a cohort of individuals for antibody at two different time periods and observing the number of new infections, or by demonstrating the presence of HIV p24 or viral RNA in antibody-negative persons. Since these strategies are logistically difficult, expensive, and/or require significant laboratory infrastructure, new laboratory-based strategies were devised that can classify individuals as recently infected or with established infection. These serologic assays are known as "sensitive/less sensitive (S/LS) assays". They are based on either the concept of antibody titer or the concept of antibody avidity. There are several S/LS tests available but all of them are performed on serum collected via venipuncture. Based on several studies showing that obtaining saliva is a more desirable method of collection for adolescents receiving HIV testing, it is anticipated that the collection of saliva and its use for determining HIV incidence by S/LS methods among adolescents would be a valuable adjunct for population studies and for increasing compliance for testing and enrollment.

The aim of this study is to prove equivalence between the serum S/LS reference method (CDC validated serum S/LS Dilutional Vironostika (DV) from Organon Teknika) and the experimental method that uses an FDA approved saliva collection device (OraSure Technologies). Our rationale follows a syllogism, i.e., if the serum S/LS EIA (DV) is the best serologic method to determine incidence estimates and a saliva S/LS method is found to perform equivalently, then it follows that the saliva S/LS method can be used effectively to determine incidence. Therefore, our purpose is to show equivalence between the two assays. To address the issue of accuracy, further studies are planned to assess the saliva S/LS test against seroconversion panels where the exact time of acquisition of HIV infection is known.

This is a cross-sectional, laboratory-based study designed to develop and evaluate a saliva-based S/LS assay for differentiating individuals with recent HIV infection (less than 133 days) from those with established HIV infection. A total of 440 subjects will be recruited in the study. A serum and two saliva samples will be obtained from every subject. The first 40 patient samples will be used to develop and calibrate the saliva-based S/LS method. The remaining patient samples will be tested using the calibrated saliva based S/LS assay and the reference serum S/LS assay and concordance between the two methods will be analyzed.

Conditions
HIV Infection
Keywords
HIV, Detuned Assay, Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA), HIV Incidence, Laboratory assay, Sensitive/Less sensitive Assay, Acute Infection
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00103883
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HIV Infected Teens -ATN Clinical SitesHIV infected teens who are referred to or engaged in care at any of the 15 ATN clinical sites during the course of the study.
HIV Positive - ATN Clinical SitesYouth who test HIV positive at ATN-managed or ATN-affiliated HIV Counseling and Testing Sites (CTS) during the course of the study.
HIV Positive - BCHD STD ClinicYouth who test HIV positive at the BCHD STD Clinic during the course of the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase I - Serum-based S/LS assay result

    To develop and calibrate a saliva S/LS assay using the FDA licensed OraSure collection device in conjunction with its matched saliva EIA assay to differentiate persons with recent versus established HIV infection (Phase I)

    Measured: 15-20 Months

  2. Phase II - Saliva-based S/LS assay result

    To assess that the saliva S/LS method performs equivalently to the reference serum S/LS method for HIV incidence estimates in populations of youth (Phase II)

    Measured: 15-20 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2003
  3. Primary completionMar 2007
  4. Study completionMar 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
440 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00103883
Sponsor's protocol ID
ATN 022
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
15 Feb 2005
Last updated
1 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of HIV Infection, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 15 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase I - Serum-based S/LS assay result (time frame: 15-20 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in