AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 3NCT00105404

Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Triamcinolone Injections Vs. Laser Photocoagulation

A Phase 3 study testing Triamcinolone Acetonide in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the side effects of two treatments for diabetic macular edema, in which blood vessels in the retina (tissue that lines the back of the eye) become leaky and the retina and macula (the center part of the retina that is responsible for fine vision) swell, causing vision loss. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Retinopathy, Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
What is being tested?
Triamcinolone Acetonide
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Mar 2005to 30 Oct 2006
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult
  • ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (Subject-Level Inclusion Criteria:)

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria (1-6) must be met:

  1. Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2). Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
  • Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
  • Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
  • Documented diabetes by ADA and/or WHO criteria
  1. At least one eye meets the study eye criteria.
  2. If only one eye eligible, fellow eye meets criteria
  3. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
  4. Patient understands that (1) if both eyes are eligible at the time of randomization, one eye will receive intravitreal triamcinolone ancetonide and one eye will receive laser, and (2) if only one eye is eligible at the time of randomization and the fellow eye develops DME later, then the fellow eye will not receive intravitreal triamcinolone ancetonide if the study eye received intravitreal triamcinolone ancetonide (however, if the study eye was assigned to the laser group, then the fellow eye may be treated with the 4mg dose of the study intravitreal triamcinolone ancetonide formulation, provided the eye assigned to laser has not received an intravitreal injection; such an eye will not be a study eye but since it is receiving study drug, it will be followed for adverse effects). (Subject-Level Exclusion Criteria:) A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria (7-13) are present:
  5. History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplant.
  6. A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure and glycemic control).
  • Patients in poor gylcemic control who, within the last 4 months, initiated intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) or plan to do so in the next 4 months should not be enrolled.
  1. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of study entry that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval at the time of study entry.
  2. Known allergy to any corticosteroid or any component of the delivery vehicle.
  3. History of systemic (e.g., oral, IV, IM, epidural, bursal) corticosteroids within 4 months prior to randomization or topical, rectal,or inhaled corticosteroids in current use more than 2 times per week.
  4. Patient is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the 3 years of the study.
  5. Blood pressure greater than 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110).
  • If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible. (Study Eye Inclusion Criteria:) The patient must have at least one eye meeting all of the inclusion criteria (a-d) and none of the exclusion criteria (e-x) listed. A patient may have two study eyes only if both are eligible at the time of randomization. The eligibility criteria for a study eye are as follows:
  1. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity score of greater than or equal to 24 letters (i.e., 20/320 or better) and less than or equal to 68 letters (i.e., worse than 20/40).
  • There will be an enrollment limit of approximately 10% of eyes with visual acuity of 64 to 68 letters.
  1. Definite retinal thickening due to diabetic macular edema based on clinical exam involving the center of the macula.
  2. Mean retinal thickness on two OCT measurements greater than or equal to 250 microns in the central subfield.
  3. Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and patient cooperation sufficient for adequate fundus photographs. (Study Eye Exclusion Criteria:)
  4. Macular edema is considered to be due to a cause other than diabetic macular edema.
  • An eye should not be considered eligible: (1) if the macular edema is considered to be related to cataract extraction or (2) clinical exam and/or OCT suggests that vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., a taut posterior hyaloid or epiretinal membrane) is the primary cause of the macular edema.
  1. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hare exudates, nonretinal condition).
  2. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.).
  3. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to 20/40 or worse if eye was otherwise normal).
  4. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  5. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  6. History of focal/grid macular photocoagulation within 15 weeks (3.5 months) prior to randomization.
  • Note: Patients are not required to have had prior macular photocoagulation to be enrolled.
  • Note: If prior macular photocoagulation has been performed, the investigator should believe that the patient may possibly benefit from additional photocoagulation.
  1. History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation (PRP) within 4 months prior to randomization.
  2. Anticipated need for PRP in the 4 months following randomization.
  3. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  4. History of major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, any intraocular surgery, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  5. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  6. Intraocular pressure greater than or equal to 25 mmHg.
  7. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion).
  • A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is less than 25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous.
  • Note: if the intraocular pressure is 22 to less than 25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  1. History of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  2. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  3. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  4. Aphakia.
  5. Exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.
  6. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis. (Fellow Eye Inclusion Criteria:) In patients with only one eye meeting criteria to be a study eye at the time of randomization, the fellow eye must meet the following criteria:
  7. Best corrected E-ETDRS visual acuity score of greater than or equal to 19 letters (i.e., 20/400 or better).
  8. No prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids.
  9. Intraocular pressure less than 25 mmHg.
  10. No history of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open -angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion).
  • A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is less than 25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous.
  • Note: if the intraocular pressure is 22 to less than 25 mmHg, then the above criteria for ocular hypertension eligibility must be met.
  1. No history of steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  2. No exam evidence of pseudoexfoliation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • National Eye Institute (NEI)

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20892

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

This study will compare the side effects of two treatments for diabetic macular edema, in which blood vessels in the retina (tissue that lines the back of the eye) become leaky and the retina and macula (the center part of the retina that is responsible for fine vision) swell, causing vision loss.

Patients 18 years of age and older with diabetes mellitus and macular edema in one or both eyes may be eligible for this study. Candidates are screened with the following tests and procedures:

Read more
  • Blood pressure measurement.
  • Blood tests to measure HbA1c, a measure of the patient's diabetes control.
  • Eye examination to assess visual acuity and eye pressure, and to examine pupils, lens, retina and eye movements. The pupils are dilated with drops for this examination.
  • Eye photography to help evaluate the status of the retina and changes that may occur in the future. Photographs of the inside of the eye are taken using a camera that flashes a bright light into the eye.
  • Electroretinograms (ERG) to measure electrical responses generated in the retina. Wearing eye patches, the patient sits in a dark room for 30 minutes. Then, electrodes are taped to the forehead and an earlobe. The eye patches are removed, the surface of the eye is numbed with eye drops, and contact lenses are placed on the eyes. The patient looks inside a white globe that emits a series of light flashes for about 20 minutes. The contact lenses sense small electrical signals generated by the retina when the light flashes.
  • Optical coherence tomography to measure retinal thickness. The eye is examined with a machine that produces cross-sectional pictures of the retina. These measurements are repeated during the study to determine whether retinal thickening is improving, worsening, or staying the same.

Patients with macular edema in both eyes receive laser therapy in one eye and triamcinolone injections in the other. Patients with just one affected eye are randomly assigned to receive either laser or triamcinolone treatment. Those who receive only laser therapy may later receive triamcinolone injections in the second eye if it, too, develops macular edema.

For the laser treatment, the eye surface is numbed with drops and a contact lens is placed on the eye during the laser beam application. Before the treatment, patients may have fluorescein angiography, in which pictures of the retina are taken using a yellow dye. The dye is injected into a vein and travels to the blood vessels in the eye. The camera flashes a blue light in the eye and takes pictures that show the amount of dye leakage into the retina. This helps guide the laser treatment. Patients return for follow-up visits every 4 months for 3 years. If the macular edema is gone, no additional treatment is given and patients are followed as often as every 2 months. If the edema does return, additional treatments may be done at subsequent visits. Patients whose vision worsens considerably at the end of 1 year may be treated with a steroid injection, unless the other eye has also been treated with triamcinolone.

For the triamcinolone injections, numbing drops, antibiotic drops, and drops to dilate the pupil, and possibly and anesthetic injection, are put in the eye before the medicine is injected into the vitreous (jelly-like substance inside the eye). Then, the patient lies on his or her back for 30 minutes before being discharged home. Patients return for follow-up visits 4 days and 4 weeks after the injection, and then every 4 months for 3 years. Patients whose edema resolves are followed as often as every 2 months. Those whose edema returns have additional injections at the 4-month visits. Patients whose condition does not improve after 1 year or whose vision worsens may undergo laser treatment.

Read the detailed description

Diabetic retinopathy is a major cause of visual impairment in the United States. Diabetic Macular edema (DME) is a manifestation of diabetic retinopathy that produces loss of central vision. Data from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) estimate that after 15 years of known diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic macular edema is approximately 20% in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 25% in patients with type 2 DM who are taking insulin, and 14% in patients with type 2 DM who do not take insulin.

In a review of three early studies concerning the natural history of diabetic macular edema, Ferris and Patz found that 53% of 135 eyes with diabetic macular edema, presumably all involving the center of the macula, lost two or more lines of visual acuity over a two year period. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), 33% of 221 untreated eyes available for follow-up at the 3-year visit, all with edema involving the center of the macula at baseline, had experienced a 15 or more letter decrease in visual acuity score (equivalent to a doubling of the visual angle, e.g., 20/25 to 20/50, and termed moderate visual loss).

The frequency of an unsatisfactory outcome following laser photocoagulation in some eyes with diabetic macular edema has prompted interest in other treatment modalities. One such treatment is pars plana vitrectomy. These studies suggest that vitreomacular traction, or the vitreous itself, may play a role in increased retinal vascular permeability. Removal of the vitreous or relief of mechanical traction with vitrectomy and membrane stripping may be followed by substantial resolution of macular edema and corresponding improvement in visual acuity. However, this treatment may be applicable only to a specific subset of eyes with diabetic macular edema. It also requires a complex surgical intervention with its inherent risks, recovery time, and expense. Other treatment modalities such as pharmacologic therapy with oral protein kinase C inhibitors and antibodies targeted at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are under investigation. The use of intravitreal corticosteroids is another treatment modality that has generated recent interest.

Being tested
Triamcinolone Acetonide
Keywords
Steroid, Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Triamcinolone AcetonideDrug

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Mar 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Mar 2005
  3. Study completion30 Oct 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Enrolment
5 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00105404
Sponsor's protocol ID
050107
Other IDs
05-EI-0107
Status last verified
30 Oct 2006
First submitted
11 Mar 2005
Last updated
2 Jul 2017
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. 1998 Jun;105(6):998-1003. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96025-0.

    PubMed 9627648

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Triamcinolone Acetonide in people with Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema, run by National Eye Institute (NEI) at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00105404, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in