AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure, CongestiveCHF ENCORENCT00105703

Evaluation of a Nurse Case Management Model for Chronic Heart Failure

A study testing Case management using advanced nurse practitioners in people with Heart Failure, Congestive, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite established clinical practice guidelines, wide variations exist in the care of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients in Veterans Health Administration. Previous randomized, controlled studies have suggested that a nurse case management model may improve the outcomes of care for patients with CHF. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure, Congestive
What is being tested?
Case management using advanced nurse practitioners
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
969 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2002to Jun 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient receives all cardiology care at a VISN 11 VAMC.
  • Must have chronic heart failure (CHF) secondary to systolic or diastolic dysfunction, as defined by meeting (1) or (2) below:
  • Systolic Dysfunction, defined by a history or documentation of LVEF = 40% (or fractional shortening = 20%-if LVEF not documented)
  • AND at least ONE of the following:
  • Current diagnosis or history of CHF and/or
  • Physical findings and/or symptoms of CHF within two months of enrollment and/or
  • Hospitalization for CHF within 12 months OR
  • Diastolic Dysfunction, defined by a history of documentation of LVEF > 40% (or fractional shortening > 20% if LVEF not documented) AND Physical findings and/or symptoms of CHF within two months of enrollment.

Who cannot join

  • Based on medical record data, patient does not have any co-morbidity other than CHF which, in the opinion of the investigator, limits life expectancy to less than six months (e.g., metastatic CA, hospice care, renal failure with a creatinine above 5.0 mg/dL or on dialysis, HIV).

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105

  • VA Illiana Health Care System, Danville, IL

    Danville, Illinois, 61832

  • John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2884

Other trials in United States

About this study

Despite established clinical practice guidelines, wide variations exist in the care of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients in Veterans Health Administration. Previous randomized, controlled studies have suggested that a nurse case management model may improve the outcomes of care for patients with CHF. However, these studies involved selected groups of patients (i.e., those who agreed to participate in randomized trials) in selected settings (i.e., tertiary care facilities); so, the findings are not likely to be indicative of the true effectiveness of case management in a large population of CHF patients.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND / RATIONALE:

Despite established clinical practice guidelines, wide variations exist in the care of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients in Veterans Health Administration. Previous randomized, controlled studies have suggested that a nurse case management model may improve the outcomes of care for patients with CHF. However, these studies involved selected groups of patients (i.e., those who agreed to participate in randomized trials) in selected settings (i.e., tertiary care facilities); so, the findings are not likely to be indicative of the true effectiveness of case management in a large population of CHF patients.

OBJECTIVE(S):

This study will evaluate the impact of a nurse practitioner case management model compared with usual care in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Outcomes include health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, compliance with medication guidelines, mortality, readmissions, bed days of care, outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and pharmacy costs.

METHODS:

Patients with CHF will be identified by review of admission/discharge logs, review of clinic schedules, and referrals from medical personnel. All patients in the northern half of VISN 11 (Ann Arbor, Detroit, Saginaw, and Battle Creek) will participate in a case management program, in which they will receive care from nurse practitioners who will be supported by practice guidelines, treatment algorithms, and guidance from cardiologists at the VA Ann Arbor Health Care System. Patients in the southern half of the VISN (Indianapolis and Danville) will make up the comparison group and will receive usual care for CHF patients.

All study participants will complete baseline and one and two year follow-up questionnaires on health related quality of life, including the SF-36V and the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the VA National Ambulatory Care Survey. Additional data on the use of health care resources over the two years following each patient�s index hospitalization will be collected from the Patient Treatment File (PTF) and the Outpatient Census (OPC) File. Data on compliance with medication guidelines will be obtained from the VISN 11 pharmacy database. Multivariate analyses will be used, with the main study outcomes as dependent variables and intervention vs. comparison group membership as independent variables, controlling for baseline differences between intervention and comparison groups. Additional analyses will compare the study outcomes for patients served by primary versus tertiary sites.

Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participating providers at the beginning, middle, and end of the study, to determine satisfaction with the program, as well as specific components that were perceived to help or hinder its effectiveness.

STATUS:

All two-year follow-up questionnaires have been received and entered. Medical record abstraction, which includes data on severity of disease, will continue through Dec 2007. All interviews with medical center staff have been conducted, transcribed, and coded. We are in the process of pulling one-year prior and one and two-year post data on comorbidities and resource utilization. Analysis of survey, medical record, interview, and secondary data will continue through spring of 2008, when the final report will be written.

Being tested
Case management using advanced nurse practitioners
Keywords
Nurse practitioners, Case management
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Case management using advanced nurse practitionersBehavioural

Study groups in NCT00105703
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1OtherNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Case management using advanced nurse practitioners

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The following outcomes will be measured at one and two years following each participant's enrollment in the study: mortality, health related quality of life, patient satisfaction with care, resource utilization (outpatient visits, admissions.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Feedback regarding the intervention from the directors, chiefs of staff, cardiologists, nurse practitioners, and primary care providers at the participating sites.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2002
  3. Study completionJun 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
969 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00105703
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHI 99-236
Acronym
CHF ENCORE
Status last verified
Sep 2007
First submitted
16 Mar 2005
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Subramanian U, Weinberger M, Eckert GJ, L'Italien GJ, Lapuerta P, Tierney W. Geographic variation in health care utilization and outcomes in veterans with acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug;17(8):604-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11048.x.

    PubMed 12213141
  • Subramanian U, Sutherland J, Hopp F, Lowery J, Doebbeling B. Patient self-efficacy, provider self-management counseling and health status among patients with chronic heart failure. Journal of general internal medicine. 2005 Oct 1; 20(Supplement 1):70.

  • Subramanian U, Weinberger M, Fihn SD, Tierney WM. Diagnostic challenges defining heart failure when using echocardiograms. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Apr 15;91(8):1015-7, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00130-9. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12686354
  • Subramanian U, Hopp F, Mitchinson A, Lowery J. Impact of provider self-management education, patient self-efficacy, and health status on patient adherence in heart failure in a Veterans Administration population. Congest Heart Fail. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2008.07174.x.

    PubMed 18256563

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Case management using advanced nurse practitioners in people with Heart Failure, Congestive, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The following outcomes will be measured at one and two years following each participant's enrollment in the study: mortality, health related quality of life, patient satisfaction with care, resource utilization (outpatient visits, admissions.. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00105703, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in