AzTrials
AzTrials

Major DepressionNCT00105820

Evaluation Study of TIDES Depression Care Quality Improvement Intervention

A study testing System level depression care quality improvement in people with Major Depression and PTSD, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In spite of the impact on veteran�s health status and treatment cost, depression is under-diagnosed and under-treated. The goal of this study is to learn how to implement a previously tested, effective collaborative care model for improving the quality of depression care across multiple Veterans Integrated Service… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Major Depression, PTSD
What is being tested?
System level depression care quality improvement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
750 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2003to Mar 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Enrolled as a pt in the VA Healthcare System
  • screens positive for major depression
  • has a scheduled visit at a primary care site taking part in the study

Who cannot join

  • severe alcohol abuse
  • psychosis
  • dementia
  • acutely suicidal (at screening)
  • lack of access to or ability to use a phone

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

    Seattle, Washington, 98108

  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

    Sepulveda, California, 91343

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Well-being Among Veterans Enhancement Study (WAVES)

In spite of the impact on veteran�s health status and treatment cost, depression is under-diagnosed and under-treated. The goal of this study is to learn how to implement a previously tested, effective collaborative care model for improving the quality of depression care across multiple Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). To achieve this goal, we are conducting a randomized controlled trial of evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI), a dissemination method that relies on expert design and local implementation of evidence-based practice interventions. We hypothesize that EBQI will result in increased rates of assessment and appropriate management of depression. Results will be useful in designing realistic chronic care programs and performance measures for continuing care improvement.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: Our primary objective is to evaluate whether collaborative care EBQI results in increased rates of assessment and appropriate management of depression and decreased depressive symptomatology for veterans. Our secondary objective is to evaluate the effect of EBQI on organizational outcomes.

Methods: Three VISNs, 10, 16 and 23, are participating. Three primary care clinics within each VISN are randomized, two to the intervention and one to usual care, for a total of nine study sites. In the intervention clinics, VA leadership, assisted by study staff, tailor and implement a depression care program for patient assessment, patient self-management support, provider education, primary and mental health collaboration, and care management. The usual care clinics participate only in the evaluation. Patient recruitment is through a telephone interview. Patients who are at risk for major depression are recruited, 67 from each site. Patient outcomes including depression symptom severity on the PHQ-9 and the VA SF-12 are being assessed by telephone at six months post enrollment. Other outcome variables are adequacy of antidepressant trials, psychotherapy and specialty care visits, and treatment adherence. A utilization and cost analysis will be conducted. VISN and VAMC leadership are surveyed to assess organizational outcomes. Data is being collected through VA administrative databases, patient and staff interviews, and study records. Power calculations and data analysis planning reflect the clustered sample design.

Being tested
System level depression care quality improvement
Keywords
Evaluation, Quality improvement, Cluster randomized trial, Care model, Collaborative care, Informatics
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • System level depression care quality improvementProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT00105820
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1OtherNot described
Receives: Procedure: System level depression care quality improvement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. At set time points the following will be measured: Recovery from depression Patient quality of life 1 year before and after: Clinic depression treatment utilization and costs

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Adherence to appropriate treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2003
  3. Study completionMar 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
750 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00105820
Sponsor's protocol ID
MHI 99-375
Status last verified
Feb 2007
First submitted
16 Mar 2005
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Felker BL, Barnes RF, Greenberg DM, Chaney EF, Shores MM, Gillespie-Gateley L, Buike MK, Morton CE. Preliminary outcomes from an integrated mental health primary care team. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Apr;55(4):442-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.4.442.

    PubMed 15067160
  • Kanter JW, Epler AJ, Chaney EF, Liu CF, Heagerty P, Lin P, Felker B, Hedrick SC. Comparison of 3 Depression Screening Methods and Provider Referral in a Veterans Affairs Primary Care Clinic. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;5(6):245-250. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v05n0601.

    PubMed 15213794
  • Felker BL, Chaney E, Rubenstein LV, Bonner LM, Yano EM, Parker LE, Worley LL, Sherman SE, Ober S. Developing effective collaboration between primary care and mental health providers. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;8(1):12-6. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v08n0102.

    PubMed 16862248
  • Fortney JC, Steffick DE, Burgess JF Jr, Maciejewski ML, Petersen LA. Are primary care services a substitute or complement for specialty and inpatient services? Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1422-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00424.x.

    PubMed 16174141
  • Chaney E, Rabuck LG, Uman J, Mittman DC, Simons C, Simon BF, Ritchie M, Cody M, Rubenstein LV. Human subjects protection issues in QUERI implementation research: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008 Feb 15;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-10.

    PubMed 18279507
  • Campbell DG, Felker BL, Liu CF, Yano EM, Kirchner JE, Chan D, Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF. Prevalence of depression-PTSD comorbidity: implications for clinical practice guidelines and primary care-based interventions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):711-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0101-4.

    PubMed 17503104
  • Liu CF, Bolkan C, Chan D, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, Chaney EF. Dual use of VA and non-VA services among primary care patients with depression. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):305-11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0867-7. Epub 2008 Dec 20.

    PubMed 19101777
  • Waltz TJ, Campbell DG, Kirchner JE, Lombardero A, Bolkan C, Zivin K, Lanto AB, Chaney EF, Rubenstein LV. Veterans with depression in primary care: provider preferences, matching, and care satisfaction. Fam Syst Health. 2014 Dec;32(4):367-77. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000071. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

    PubMed 25090611
  • Lombardero A, Campbell DG, Harris KJ, Chaney EF, Lanto AB, Rubenstein LV. Prevalence and correlates of smoking status among veterans affairs primary care patients with probable major depressive disorder. Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;39(3):538-45. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

    PubMed 24290879
  • Bolkan CR, Bonner LM, Campbell DG, Lanto A, Zivin K, Chaney E, Rubenstein LV. Family involvement, medication adherence, and depression outcomes among patients in veterans affairs primary care. Psychiatr Serv. 2013 May 1;64(5):472-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200160.

    PubMed 23370463
  • Bonner LM, Lanto AB, Bolkan C, Watson GS, Campbell DG, Chaney EF, Zivin K, Rubenstein LV. Help-seeking from clergy and spiritual counselors among veterans with depression and PTSD in primary care. J Relig Health. 2013 Sep;52(3):707-18. doi: 10.1007/s10943-012-9671-0.

    PubMed 23297184
  • Yano EM, Chaney EF, Campbell DG, Klap R, Simon BF, Bonner LM, Lanto AB, Rubenstein LV. Yield of practice-based depression screening in VA primary care settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(3):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1904-5.

    PubMed 21975821
  • Zivin K, Campbell DG, Lanto AB, Chaney EF, Bolkan C, Bonner LM, Miller EM, Valenstein M, Waltz TJ, Rubenstein LV. Relationships between mood and employment over time among depressed VA primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):468-77. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

    PubMed 22771108
  • Chaney EF, Rubenstein LV, Liu CF, Yano EM, Bolkan C, Lee M, Simon B, Lanto A, Felker B, Uman J. Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: a cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign. Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 27;6:121. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-121.

    PubMed 22032247

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing System level depression care quality improvement in people with Major Depression and PTSD, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

At set time points the following will be measured: Recovery from depression Patient quality of life 1 year before and after: Clinic depression treatment utilization and costs. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00105820, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in