Cutaneous T-cell LymphomaPhase 2NCT00106431
A Single Agent Phase II Study of Romidepsin (Depsipeptide, FK228) in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
A Phase 2 study testing romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228) in people with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, run by Celgene at 11 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
GPI-04-0001 was a Phase II, non-randomized, open label, single arm study that was conducted at approximately 30 sites, primarily in the United States, Europe and Russia. It assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of romidepsin as a treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2005to 1 Dec 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria: Patients had to fulfill all of the following criteria to be eligible for study participation:
- Males or non-pregnant females aged 18 or over.
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of CTCL, including mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.
- Patients with CTCL stages II-A, II-B, III, and IV-A only.
- Patients with CTCL stage IB who had relapsed following previous therapy and where, in the investigator's opinion, the potential benefit of treatment with romidepsin outweighed the possible risks.
- Patients who had failed standardized skin-directed therapy and had had at least one course of systemic therapy, such as interferon, Ontak®, chemotherapy or Targretin®, etc., which they were deemed to have failed.
- Anticipated life expectancy greater than six months.
- Written informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria: Patients were ineligible for entry if any of the following criteria were met:
- ECOG Performance Status >1.
- Patients who had not received at least 1 course of prior systemic therapy for CTCL.
- Visceral involvement i.e. Stage 4B disease (lymphadenopathy was allowed).
- Patients with known cardiac abnormalities such as:
- Congenital long QT syndrome
- QTc (Corrected QT interval on ECG) interval >480 milliseconds
- Any cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrhythmic medication.
- Patients who had had a myocardial infarction within 12 months of study entry.
- Patients who had a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) e.g. angina Canadian class II to IV. In any patient in whom there was doubt, the patient should have had a stress imaging study and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD was present.
- Patients with an ECG recorded at screening showing evidence of cardiac ischaemia (ST depression of >=2 mm). If in any doubt, the patient should have had a stress imaging study and exercise ECG and, if abnormal, angiography to define whether or not CAD is present.
- Patients with congestive heart failure that met New York Heart Association class II to IV definitions and/or ejection fraction <40% by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or <50% by echocardiogram and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), Torsade de Pointes, or cardiac arrest, unless currently addressed with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD).
- Patients with hypertrophic cardiomegaly or restrictive cardiomyopathy from prior treatment or other causes (if in doubt, see ejection fraction criteria above).
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. >=160/95 mmHg.
- Concomitant use of any anti-cancer therapy.
- Concomitant use of warfarin (due to a drug interaction).
- Concomitant use of any investigational agent.
- Use of any investigational agent within 4 weeks of study entry.
- Concomitant use of drugs which may cause a prolongation of the QTc interval.
- Patients with a potassium level of <3.5 mmol/L and a magnesium level of <0.8 mmol/L.
- Clinically significant active infection.
- Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C.
- Inadequate bone marrow or other organ function, as evidenced by:
- unsupported haemoglobin <9.0 g/dL (transfusions and/or erythropoietin were permitted);
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <=1.5 x 10^9/L;
- platelet count <100 x 10^9/L;
- total bilirubin >1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for institution,
- aspartate transaminase/glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and alanine transaminase/ glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) >2.0 x ULN, serum creatinine >2.0 x ULN for age and sex;
- Coexistent second malignancy or history of prior malignancy within previous 5 years (excluding basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical epithelial neoplasm [CIN1, carcinoma in situ] that had been treated curatively).
- Any significant medical or psychiatric condition that might have prevented the patient from complying with all study procedures.
- Patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding. All women of child bearing potential were to use an effective method of contraception (either an intrauterine device or a double barrier method using condoms or a diaphragm plus spermicide) during the study and for at least one month after receiving the last dose of romidepsin. Male patients were to use a barrier method of contraception (condoms) during the treatment period and for at least 1 month thereafter. Hormonal methods of contraception such as the contraceptive pill or patch (particularly those containing ethinyl estradiol) were to be avoided due to a potential drug interaction.
- Use of topical steroids in the previous 2 weeks or systemic steroids in the previous 4 weeks.
- Having previously given consent to participate in this study.
- Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 6 countries.
11 sites in 6 countries
United States6 sites
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
UCLA Jonsson Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
University of Pennsylvania Abrahamson Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: A Single Agent Phase II Study of Depsipeptide (FK228) in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
GPI-04-0001 was a Phase II, non-randomized, open label, single arm study that was conducted at approximately 30 sites, primarily in the United States, Europe and Russia. It assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of romidepsin as a treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Study patients (pts) received romidepsin in a dose of 14 mg/m^2 intravenously over 4 hours on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The duration of study treatment was 6 cycles although pts who showed an objective response or stable disease could continue to receive therapy, at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression or another withdrawal criterion was met.
Read the detailed description
Responses were evaluated according to a composite assessment (Objective Primary Disease Response Evaluation Criteria [OPDREC]) that included cutaneous manifestations of disease, lymph node involvement, and circulating malignant T-cells (Sézary cells). Skin involvement was measured using a weighted body surface area skin assessment tool (WBSA/SWAT) or an erythroderma score, depending upon the pt's disease. Disease response was assessed by the Investigators and an Independent Response Review Committee (IRRC) with the IRRC assessment considered supportive of the Investigator's evaluations using the following criteria:
Complete Response (CR):
- Complete resolution of skin patches, skin plaques, and skin tumors, or erythroderma
- No evidence of abnormal lymph nodes
- Absence of circulating Sézary cells.
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous or non-cutaneous)
- Findings confirmed by skin biopsy
Clinical complete response (CCR):
- Same as CR but without skin biopsy
Partial Response (PR):
- ≥50% improvement in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood) with
- At least >30% improvement in Skin and
- No worsening in Lymph Node or Sézary cells.
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous/non-cutaneous)
Stable Disease (SD):
- Not enough improvement or worsening in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood to qualify as PR or PD
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous/non-cutaneous)
SD90:
- SD90 was defined as documented evidence of SD for at least 90 Days Duration
Progressive Disease (PD):
- Evidence of new tumor (cutaneous or non-cutaneous), OR
- >25% worsening in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood) with >15% worsening in change in Skin.
- Conditions
- Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
- Being tested
- romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228)
- Keywords
- romidepsin
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228)Drug
Study patients received romidepsin at a dose of 14 mg/m^2 intravenously over 4 hours on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The duration of study treatment was 6 cycles although patients who showed an objective response or stable disease could continue to receive therapy, at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression or another withdrawal criterion was met.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Percent of Patients (Pts) With Objective Disease Response
The percent of pts with confirmed Objective Disease Response (confirmed best responses of complete response [CR], clinical complete response [CCR], or partial response [PR]). Responses were evaluated according to a composite assessment (Objective Primary Disease Response Evaluation Criteria - OPDREC).
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Duration of Objective Disease Response
Duration of Objective Response was defined as the number of months from the date of the first disease response (clinical complete response [CCR], or partial response [PR]) (later confirmed) until the date of progression and was determined using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. In this analysis, pts who did not progress were censored as of their last evaluation with an OPDREC assessment.
Measured: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 5.1 months
Time to Objective Disease Response
Time to Objective Response was defined as the time in months from first dose date to the first date of objective disease response (later confirmed) and time to CCR was defined as the time in months from first dose date to the first date of CCR (later confirmed).
Measured: Up to 10 months
Time to Disease Progression
Time To Progression was defined as the duration from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of progression (PD). In this analysis, pts who did not progress were censored at their last evaluation with an OPDREC assessment.
Measured: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 6.1 months
Decrease in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score of ≥30 mm or a Score of 0 for at Least 2 Consecutive Cycles.
Pruritus was reported monthly by pts using a 0 (no itching) to 100 (unbearable itching) mm visual analog scale (VAS). Pts were considered to have significant pruritus if the baseline VAS score was ≥ 30 mm. Clinically meaningful reduction in pruritus was defined as a decrease in VAS score of ≥ 30 mm or a score of 0 for at least 2 consecutive cycles.
Measured: Up to 10 months
Duration of Objective Disease Control (ODC)
For pts with confirmed ODC (pts with CR, CCR, PR, SD90 [stable disease for 90 days]) based on OPDREC, duration of ODC was summarized with descriptive statistics, including number of censored observations, and 25th, 50th, 75th percentiles of distribution, based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates. For pts with confirmed progressive disease (PD), duration of ODC was calculated from first date of study drug to first date of diagnosis of confirmed PD. For pts without confirmed PD, duration of ODC was calculated from first date of study drug to date of the last visit with any OPDREC data.
Measured: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 6.0 months
Percent of Pts With Objective Disease Control
The percent of pts with confirmed ODC (CR, CCR, PR and SD90) based on OPDREC was summarized.
Measured: Up to 10 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2005 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2005
- Primary completion1 Jun 2008
- Study completion1 Dec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cutaneous T-cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean Nichols, Ph.D., Study director, Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00106431
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GPI-04-0001
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2005
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Duvic M, Bates SE, Piekarz R, Eisch R, Kim YH, Lerner A, Robak T, Samtsov A, Becker JC, McCulloch W, Waksman J, Whittaker S. Responses to romidepsin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Apr;59(4):880-887. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1361022. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
PubMed 28853310Foss F, Duvic M, Lerner A, Waksman J, Whittaker S. Clinical Efficacy of Romidepsin in Tumor Stage and Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Nov;16(11):637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
PubMed 27637428Foss F, Coiffier B, Horwitz S, Pro B, Prince HM, Sokol L, Greenwood M, Lerner A, Caballero D, Baran E, Kim E, Nichols J, Balser B, Wolfson J, Whittaker S. Tolerability to romidepsin in patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma. Biomark Res. 2014 Sep 8;2:16. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-2-16. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25279222Demierre M, et al. Pooled analyses of two international, multicenter clinical studies of romidepsin in 167 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Presented at 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting, May 29-June 2, 2009, Orlando, FL. Abstract No: 8546. J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009 (suppl)
Cabell C, et al. Systematic Assessment of Potential Cardiac Effects of the Novel Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor Romidepsin. Presented at 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting, May 29-June 2, 2009, Orlando, FL. Abstract No: e19533. C J Clin Oncol 2009;27(suppl)
Kim YH, et al. Clinically Significant Responses Achieved with Romidepsin in 37 Patient with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) with Blood Involvement. Presented at American Society of Hematology 2009, New Orleans, LA. Abstract No. 2683.
Whittaker SJ, Demierre MF, Kim EJ, Rook AH, Lerner A, Duvic M, Scarisbrick J, Reddy S, Robak T, Becker JC, Samtsov A, McCulloch W, Kim YH. Final results from a multicenter, international, pivotal study of romidepsin in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 10;28(29):4485-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9066. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
PubMed 20697094
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Agent Phase II Study of Depsipeptide (FK228) in the Treatment of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00106431
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GPI-04-0001
- Conditions
- Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
- Keywords
- romidepsin
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Celgene Corporation
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
GPI-04-0001 was a Phase II, non-randomized, open label, single arm study that was conducted at approximately 30 sites, primarily in the United States, Europe and Russia. It assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of romidepsin as a treatment for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Study patients (pts) received romidepsin in a dose of 14 mg/m^2 intravenously over 4 hours on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The duration of study treatment was 6 cycles although pts who showed an objective response or stable disease could continue to receive therapy, at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression or another withdrawal criterion was met.
Detailed description
Responses were evaluated according to a composite assessment (Objective Primary Disease Response Evaluation Criteria [OPDREC]) that included cutaneous manifestations of disease, lymph node involvement, and circulating malignant T-cells (Sézary cells). Skin involvement was measured using a weighted body surface area skin assessment tool (WBSA/SWAT) or an erythroderma score, depending upon the pt's disease. Disease response was assessed by the Investigators and an Independent Response Review Committee (IRRC) with the IRRC assessment considered supportive of the Investigator's evaluations using the following criteria:
Complete Response (CR):
- Complete resolution of skin patches, skin plaques, and skin tumors, or erythroderma
- No evidence of abnormal lymph nodes
- Absence of circulating Sézary cells.
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous or non-cutaneous)
- Findings confirmed by skin biopsy
Clinical complete response (CCR):
- Same as CR but without skin biopsy
Partial Response (PR):
- ≥50% improvement in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood) with
- At least >30% improvement in Skin and
- No worsening in Lymph Node or Sézary cells.
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous/non-cutaneous)
Stable Disease (SD):
- Not enough improvement or worsening in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood to qualify as PR or PD
- No evidence of new tumors (cutaneous/non-cutaneous)
SD90:
- SD90 was defined as documented evidence of SD for at least 90 Days Duration
Progressive Disease (PD):
- Evidence of new tumor (cutaneous or non-cutaneous), OR
- >25% worsening in the summation of (change in Skin + change in Lymph Node + change in Peripheral Blood) with >15% worsening in change in Skin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228)Study patients received romidepsin at a dose of 14 mg/m^2 intravenously over 4 hours on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The duration of study treatment was 6 cycles although patients who showed an objective response or stable disease could continue to receive therapy, at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression or another withdrawal criterion was met. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
The Percent of Patients (Pts) With Objective Disease Response
Time frame: 6 months
The percent of pts with confirmed Objective Disease Response (confirmed best responses of complete response [CR], clinical complete response [CCR], or partial response [PR]). Responses were evaluated according to a composite assessment (Objective Primary Disease Response Evaluation Criteria - OPDREC).
6 secondary outcomes
Duration of Objective Disease Response
Time frame: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 5.1 months
Time to Objective Disease Response
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Time to Disease Progression
Time frame: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 6.1 months
Decrease in Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score of ≥30 mm or a Score of 0 for at Least 2 Consecutive Cycles.
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Duration of Objective Disease Control (ODC)
Time frame: Up to 10 months; median duration of follow up was 6.0 months
Percent of Pts With Objective Disease Control
Time frame: Up to 10 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28853310Duvic M, Bates SE, Piekarz R, Eisch R, Kim YH, Lerner A, Robak T, Samtsov A, Becker JC, McCulloch W, Waksman J, Whittaker S. Responses to romidepsin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Apr;59(4):880-887. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1361022. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
- Background: PubMed 27637428Foss F, Duvic M, Lerner A, Waksman J, Whittaker S. Clinical Efficacy of Romidepsin in Tumor Stage and Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Nov;16(11):637-643. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 25279222Foss F, Coiffier B, Horwitz S, Pro B, Prince HM, Sokol L, Greenwood M, Lerner A, Caballero D, Baran E, Kim E, Nichols J, Balser B, Wolfson J, Whittaker S. Tolerability to romidepsin in patients with relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma. Biomark Res. 2014 Sep 8;2:16. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-2-16. eCollection 2014.
- BackgroundDemierre M, et al. Pooled analyses of two international, multicenter clinical studies of romidepsin in 167 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Presented at 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting, May 29-June 2, 2009, Orlando, FL. Abstract No: 8546. J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009 (suppl)
- BackgroundCabell C, et al. Systematic Assessment of Potential Cardiac Effects of the Novel Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor Romidepsin. Presented at 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting, May 29-June 2, 2009, Orlando, FL. Abstract No: e19533. C J Clin Oncol 2009;27(suppl)
- BackgroundKim YH, et al. Clinically Significant Responses Achieved with Romidepsin in 37 Patient with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) with Blood Involvement. Presented at American Society of Hematology 2009, New Orleans, LA. Abstract No. 2683.
- Results publication: PubMed 20697094Whittaker SJ, Demierre MF, Kim EJ, Rook AH, Lerner A, Duvic M, Scarisbrick J, Reddy S, Robak T, Becker JC, Samtsov A, McCulloch W, Kim YH. Final results from a multicenter, international, pivotal study of romidepsin in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 10;28(29):4485-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.9066. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
Related trials for Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dosing of Brentuximab Vedotin for Mycosis Fungoides, Sezary Syndrome Patients
Mycosis Fungoides, Lymphomatoid Papulosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Golidocitinib in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides/Sézary Syndrome and T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia
Mycosis Fungoides/Sezary Syndrome, T-cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Sezary Syndrome
Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective, US-based Study Assessing Mogamulizumab-associated Rash in Patients Diagnosed With Mycosis Fungoides or Sezary Syndrome and Treated With Standard of Care Mogamulizumab
Recurrent Mycosis Fungoides, Recurrent Sezary Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean Nichols, Ph.D. study director
Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
11 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing romidepsin (depsipeptide, FK228) in people with Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, run by Celgene at 11 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in United States, France, Germany, Poland, Russia and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Percent of Patients (Pts) With Objective Disease Response (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00106431, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2019.