AzTrials
AzTrials

Type I HypersensitivityPhase 2NCT00110786

Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed MATAMPL, Pollinex-R and Placebo in Patients With Ragweed Allergy

A Phase 2 study testing Ragweed MATAMPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with hypersensitivity to ragweed pollen (hay fever). This novel formulation is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only four escalating dose injections administered before the start of the pollen… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Type I Hypersensitivity
What is being tested?
Ragweed MATAMPL
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
May 2005to Dec 2005
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • at least a 2-year clinical history of seasonal allergic rhinitis
  • allergy to a ragweed allergen, defined by positive case history and positive skin prick test
  • Specific IgE for ragweed as documented by a radioallergosorbent test (RAST), or equivalent test, with class >= 2
  • minimum qualifying symptom scores on at least one Symptom Diary Card during EEC exposure at both Visits 4 and 5.
  • Patients must observe drug washout times listed in the protocol prior to Screening.
  • Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females who are post-menopausal or naturally or surgically sterile
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Females of childbearing potential should be using acceptable birth control methods
  • Patients who are normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health
  • Patients must be willing and able to give written informed consent and must provide this consent
  • Patients must be willing and able to attend required study visits
  • Patients must be able to follow instructions

Who cannot join

  • Symptomatic for allergic rhinitis or allergic conjunctivitis from allergy to grass or trees
  • Symptomatic for significant perennial rhinitis
  • Concurrent disease that might complicate or interfere with investigation or evaluation of the study medications
  • Concurrent use of any prohibited medication(s) or inadequate washout of medication
  • Chronic or intermittent use of inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous, or potent or super-potent topical corticosteroids
  • Chronic use of long acting antihistamines and other concomitant medications that would affect assessment of the effectiveness of study drug(s)
Show all 28Show fewer
  • Any systemic disorder that could interfere with the evaluation of the study medication(s)
  • Upper or lower respiratory infection requiring antibiotics within 14 days of the first Baseline EEC Visit
  • Diagnosis of sinusitis within 30 days of the first Baseline EEC Visit
  • Any ocular disorder (other than allergic conjunctivitis) which could interfere with the evaluation of the study medication
  • Hypersensitivity to the study drug excipients
  • active or quiescent tuberculous infection of the respiratory tract, untreated local or systemic fungal or bacterial or systemic viral infections or parasitic or ocular herpes simplex
  • nasal septal ulcers, nasal surgery or nasal trauma within 90 days of enrollment
  • Clinical history of anaphylaxis
  • Patients with contraindications for allergy vaccines
  • Clinical history of immunodeficiency, including immunosuppressant therapy
  • Patients in whom tyrosine metabolism is disturbed
  • Patients with contraindications to adrenaline
  • Subject is taking β-blockers
  • Current diagnosis of chickenpox or measles
  • Clinical history of drug or alcohol abuse that would interfere with the patient's participation in the study
  • Clinical history of severe or uncontrolled cardiovascular, hepatic, renal and/or other disease/illness that could be expected to interfere with the study
  • Clinical history, or evidence, of nasolacrimal drainage system malfunction
  • Study site staff or immediate relatives of study site staff or other individuals who would have access to the clinical study protocol
  • Patient that has received Ragweed MATAMPL in any previous clinical trial
  • History of immunotherapy with ragweed pollen extract
  • Patient received treatment with preparation containing MPL during the past 12 months
  • Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days before entry into this study or concomitantly with this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Allied Research International Inc.

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1N2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Double Blind Study to Investigate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ragweed MATAMPL (Allergy Therapeutics®), Pollinex®-R (Allergy Therapeutics®) and Placebo in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis With Ragweed Allergy, in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model, With Follow-Up During a Natural Ragweed Pollen Season

Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with hypersensitivity to ragweed pollen (hay fever). This novel formulation is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only four escalating dose injections administered before the start of the pollen season.

In this study, the safety and efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL will be assessed by exposing allergic subjects to Ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC). Patient symptomatic response to pollen and patient quality of life in the EEC will be determined.

Read the detailed description

Allergic rhinitis is a nasal inflammatory disorder initiated by an immunoglobulin-E (IgE) mediated hypersensitivity to allergens. This condition is characterized by sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and congestion. When a patient is exposed to an allergen to which they are sensitive, the allergen cross-links with the Ig E antibody, which is bound to the surface of tissue mast cells. This cross-linking then triggers the release of proinflammatory substances, such as histamine and eicosanoids, and is known as the early response. In a skin prick test, this reaction produces a wheal-and-flare response. Normally, systemic exposure to an allergen also leads to the more prolonged late reaction, in which eosinophils, basophils, and activated T cells are recruited to the site of exposure. The recruited T cells also secrete inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-5, typically associated with helper T cells type 2 (TH2), which further propagate the inflammatory cascade. Typically, the early response occurs within 15 to 30 minutes (but as quickly as a few seconds) and usually resolves within 1 to 3 hours, and the late response occurs within 6 to 12 hours and resolves in 24 hours.

Allergic vaccination (AV), also referred to as immunotherapy or allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), is a curative approach that is available for allergic diseases, which directly treats the underlying disease. AV is the practice of administering gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient to ameliorate the symptoms associated with the subsequent exposure to the causative allergen. AV is believed to exert its beneficial effects on the immune system, at least in part, by modifying the T-lymphocyte response to subsequent natural allergen exposure. AV has been shown to inhibit both early and late responses to allergen exposure. AV acts on T cells to modify peripheral and mucosal TH2 responses to allergen in favor of helper T cell type 1 (TH1) responses. One of the hallmarks of successful AV is the redressing of a "healthy" TH1/TH2-balance.

Although efficacious, immunotherapy is generally considered a long-term disease modifying measure that requires months to years of treatment, entails multiple injection regimens and involves some risk for adverse immune reactions.

Recent improvements, such as optimal dosing, allergen modification (to reduce allergenicity while maintaining immunogenicity), adjuvant adsorption (to control release) and adjuvant activity (to assist immunomodulatory action) are being explored to reduce the risk of anaphylaxis and decrease the commitment to multiple injections.

A novel allergy vaccine (Ragweed MATAMPL) has been developed for the prevention or relief of allergic symptoms caused by a variety of pollens. Ragweed MATAMPL, which contains the allergens of ragweed (chemically modified by glutaraldehyde) adsorbed onto L-tyrosine with the addition of the adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), is being evaluated for the specific treatment of ragweed seasonally induced allergic rhinitis. Ragweed MATAMPL is intended for use as a pre-seasonal therapeutic allergy vaccine in patients with proven seasonal allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis due to IgE mediated allergy to ragweed. This novel vaccine formulation is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only four escalating dose injections, in contrast to the longer schedules currently in use.

This placebo-controlled clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL as determined by patient symptomatic response to pollen and patient quality of life in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) that reproduces the clinical setting. The development of the EEC, which delivers a controlled pollen challenge over time and allows evaluation of a patient's response at any time point throughout the challenge process, provides the opportunity to examine various aspects of efficacy of anti-allergic treatments within a single center at various times of the year. The EEC affords a more controlled environment than natural pollen exposure in which variables such as unpredictable pollen levels, varying weather conditions during the study period, and varying levels of pollen exposure within the patient population are eliminated. Furthermore, the question of patient compliance is largely eliminated because the patients are scrutinized closely while they are recording symptoms. In addition, an EEC study is an acceptable study model for determining the dose response for an allergic rhinitis drug as outlined in the draft U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines "Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Development Programs for Drug Products," April 2000.

Being tested
Ragweed MATAMPL
Keywords
Allergy, Specific Immunotherapy, Ragweed, Environmental Exposure Chamber
Medical subject headings
Hypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ragweed MATAMPLBiological

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of the clinical efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms caused by ragweed pollen in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Comparison of the efficacy of Pollinex-R (modified Ragweed Tyrosine adsorbate) versus placebo in reducing SAR symptoms caused by ragweed pollen in an EEC Model

  2. Assessment of the immunological response to Ragweed MATAMPL, Pollinex-R, versus placebo immunotherapy in patients with SAR

  3. Evaluation of the impact of Ragweed MATAMPL and Pollinex-R versus placebo on quality-of-life in patients with SAR using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire for use in the Environmental Exposure Chamber (RQLQ-EEC)

  4. Assessment of the safety and tolerability of Ragweed MATAMPL and Pollinex-R versus placebo in patients with SAR

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 May 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2005
  3. Study completionDec 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
240 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00110786
Sponsor's protocol ID
RagweedMATAMPL204
Other IDs
P2DP05001
Status last verified
Sep 2009
First submitted
13 May 2005
Last updated
17 Jun 2010
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Ragweed MATAMPL in people with Type I Hypersensitivity, run by Allergy Therapeutics at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of the clinical efficacy of Ragweed MATAMPL versus placebo in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms caused by ragweed pollen in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in