AzTrials
AzTrials

Neoplasms, BreastPhase 2NCT00111787

Study Of Lapatinib In Combination With Paclitaxel In The Treatment Of Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in people with Neoplasms, Breast, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 25 sites in 9 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This Study was designed to determine how effective and safe a new investigational drug, lapatinib, is in combination with paclitaxel in treating patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasms, Breast
What is being tested?
Lapatinib and Paclitaxel
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
25 sitesin 9 countries
Study dates
11 Apr 2005to 1 Nov 2006
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Tumor accessible for multiple biopsies
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
  • Adequate bone marrow
  • Renal and hepatic function
  • LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) greater than 0% based on ECHO (echocardiogram) or MUGA (multigated acquisition).

Who cannot join

  • Females who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Any unstable, pre-existing major medical condition.
  • Received an investigational drug within the past 4 weeks.
  • Had major surgery in the past 2 weeks.
  • Currently receiving amiodarone or has received amiodarone in the past 6 months.

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 9 countries.

25 sites in 9 countries

Australia7 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Box Hill, Victoria, 3128

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Campbelltown, New South Wales, 2560

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Randwick, New South Wales, 2031

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ringwood East, Victoria, 3128

  • GSK Investigational Site

    South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101

Other trials in Australia

United States4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zion, Illinois, 60099

Other trials in United States

Tunisia4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sfax, 3000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sfax, 3029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tunis, 1004

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tunis, 1007

Other trials in Tunisia

France3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bayonne, 64100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lille, 59020

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Paris, 75651

Other trials in France

Spain3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Girona, 17007

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Valencia, 46010

Other trials in Spain

Canada1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

Israel1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ramat Gan, 52621

Other trials in Israel

New Zealand1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Auckland

Other trials in New Zealand

United Kingdom1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, SW3 6JJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Lapatinib in Combination With Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Breast Cancer

This Study was designed to determine how effective and safe a new investigational drug, lapatinib, is in combination with paclitaxel in treating patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Tumor tissue collected pre-treatment, following 14 days of treatment and at the time of surgical resection will be examined for pathologic response and biologic activity by IHC (immunohistochemistry) within the tumor. Treatment will consist of 14 days of lapatinib monotherapy followed by 12 weeks of combination therapy with lapatinib and paclitaxel. Blood samples for hematology and chemistry panels, MUGA/ECHO exams and physical exams will be performed throughout the study to monitor safety.

Being tested
Lapatinib, Paclitaxel
Keywords
breast cancer
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LapatinibDrug

    Daily-monotherapy [1500 milligrams (mg)] for 14 days, then daily combination therapy (with weekly paclitaxel) for 12 weeks

  • PaclitaxelDrug

    Also called Lapatinib

    Weekly (80mg/m^2) combination therapy (with daily Lapatinib) for 12 weeks

Study groups in NCT00111787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Overall studyExperimentalA Single arm study with 2 cohorts of participants. Cohort A consists of participants with tumors overexpressing HER2 and/or EGFR. Cohort B consists of participants with tumors expressing EGFR without overexpressing HER2.
Receives: Drug: Lapatinib; Drug: Paclitaxel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of participants with pathologic complete response rate (pCR)

    pCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an assessment of complete response (CR) following pathologic review of resected tissue. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response (i.e., those that did not undergo surgery) were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population response was considered to be of special interest.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Percentage of participants with pCR that underwent surgical resection

    pCR for participants that underwent surgical (surg) resection was defined as the percentage of participants within each cohort who achieved an assessment of CR following pathologic review of resected tissue. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. Participants in each cohort that did not undergo surgical resection were excluded from the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population response was considered to be of special interest.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of participants with objective response rate (ORR) at the end of study (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumor [RECIST])

    ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or partial response (PR) at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using RECIST criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be of special interest.

    Measured: Week 14

  3. Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)

    ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, HER2+ population was considered to be of special interest.

    Measured: Week 14

  4. Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study ('Best' of RECIST and Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)

    ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. The best response of the participant was defined by the 'Best' combined response (RECIST and Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria) provided there is no evidence of disease progression. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be special interest.

    Measured: Week 14

  5. Percentage of participants with investigator-Assessed Best Response at the end of monotherapy phase (Day 14) (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)

    ORR at the end of the monotherapy phase was defined as the percentage of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of lapatinib monotherapy (Day 14) divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using clinically evaluable skin disease criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be special interest.

    Measured: Day 14

  6. Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, resulted in deterioration in left ventricular cardiac function and caused Grade 3 or 4 interstitial pneumonitis.

    Measured: Up to Week 14, surgical resection and post treatment

  7. Number of participants with shift from Baseline in hematological toxicity grade

    Hematology was summarized for hemoglobin (Hb), platelets, white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes by scheduled assessment and also according to the maximum common terminology criteria (CTC) toxicity grade. Baseline was the most recent lab value prior to and within two weeks of the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at each visit minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Day 14 and up to Week 23, surg resection and post treatment

  8. Number of participants with shift from Baseline in clinical chemistry toxicity grade

    Clinical chemistry was summarized for sodium, potassium (K), bicarbonate (bicarb), albumin (alb), calcium, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), creatinine (creat), total bilirubin (TB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate amino transferase (AST) and alanine amino transferase (ALT) by scheduled assessment and also according to the maximum CTC toxicity grade. Baseline was the most recent lab value prior to and within two weeks of the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at each visit minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Day 14, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, Surg resection and post treatment

  9. Change from Baseline in vital signs- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)

    Vitals signs (SBP and DBP) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent blood pressure (BP) mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.

    Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment

  10. Change from Baseline in vital signs- Heart Rate (HR)

    Vitals signs (HR) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent BP mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.

    Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment

  11. Change from Baseline in vital signs- Body temperature

    Vitals signs (body temperature) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent BP mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.

    Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment

  12. Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings

    ECG was performed at screening and at unscheduled visits. Participants with abnormal clinically significant and abnormal not clinically significant ECG findings was reported.

    Measured: Screening and unscheduled

  13. Number of participants with change from Baseline in echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi-gated angiogram (MUGA) results at any post Baseline visit

    For ECHO and MUGA scans, the left ventricular ejection fraction (percent) was summarized for each scheduled assessment. Absolute change from Baseline was summarized according to the following categories: any increase, 0 to less than 20 percent decrease, >=20 percent decrease or >=20 percent decrease and below the lower limit of normal (LLN). Baseline was the most recent ECOG evaluation prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the post treatment minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Screening, Week 8, 16, 24, post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 May 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Apr 2005
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2006
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00111787
Sponsor's protocol ID
EGF102580
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
25 May 2005
Last updated
31 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Boussen H, Cristofanilli M, Zaks T, DeSilvio M, Salazar V, Spector N. Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant lapatinib plus paclitaxel in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3248-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8594. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

    PubMed 20530274

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in people with Neoplasms, Breast, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 25 sites in 9 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in Australia, United States, Tunisia, France, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of participants with pathologic complete response rate (pCR) (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00111787, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in