Neoplasms, BreastPhase 2NCT00111787
Study Of Lapatinib In Combination With Paclitaxel In The Treatment Of Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Breast Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in people with Neoplasms, Breast, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 25 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
This Study was designed to determine how effective and safe a new investigational drug, lapatinib, is in combination with paclitaxel in treating patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms, Breast
- What is being tested?
- Lapatinib and Paclitaxel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 49 participants
- Where
- 25 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Apr 2005to 1 Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Tumor accessible for multiple biopsies
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
- Adequate bone marrow
- Renal and hepatic function
- LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) greater than 0% based on ECHO (echocardiogram) or MUGA (multigated acquisition).
Who cannot join
- Females who are pregnant or nursing.
- Any unstable, pre-existing major medical condition.
- Received an investigational drug within the past 4 weeks.
- Had major surgery in the past 2 weeks.
- Currently receiving amiodarone or has received amiodarone in the past 6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
25 sites in 9 countries.
25 sites in 9 countries
Australia7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
GSK Investigational Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
GSK Investigational Site
Campbelltown, New South Wales, 2560
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
GSK Investigational Site
Randwick, New South Wales, 2031
GSK Investigational Site
Ringwood East, Victoria, 3128
GSK Investigational Site
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
United States4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
Zion, Illinois, 60099
Tunisia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Sfax, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Sfax, 3029
GSK Investigational Site
Tunis, 1004
GSK Investigational Site
Tunis, 1007
France3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bayonne, 64100
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59020
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75651
Spain3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08035
GSK Investigational Site
Girona, 17007
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46010
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Lapatinib in Combination With Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Breast Cancer
This Study was designed to determine how effective and safe a new investigational drug, lapatinib, is in combination with paclitaxel in treating patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Tumor tissue collected pre-treatment, following 14 days of treatment and at the time of surgical resection will be examined for pathologic response and biologic activity by IHC (immunohistochemistry) within the tumor. Treatment will consist of 14 days of lapatinib monotherapy followed by 12 weeks of combination therapy with lapatinib and paclitaxel. Blood samples for hematology and chemistry panels, MUGA/ECHO exams and physical exams will be performed throughout the study to monitor safety.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Breast
- Being tested
- Lapatinib, Paclitaxel
- Keywords
- breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LapatinibDrug
Daily-monotherapy [1500 milligrams (mg)] for 14 days, then daily combination therapy (with weekly paclitaxel) for 12 weeks
PaclitaxelDrug
Also called Lapatinib
Weekly (80mg/m^2) combination therapy (with daily Lapatinib) for 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Overall study | Experimental | A Single arm study with 2 cohorts of participants. Cohort A consists of participants with tumors overexpressing HER2 and/or EGFR. Cohort B consists of participants with tumors expressing EGFR without overexpressing HER2. Receives: Drug: Lapatinib; Drug: Paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of participants with pathologic complete response rate (pCR)
pCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an assessment of complete response (CR) following pathologic review of resected tissue. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response (i.e., those that did not undergo surgery) were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population response was considered to be of special interest.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of participants with pCR that underwent surgical resection
pCR for participants that underwent surgical (surg) resection was defined as the percentage of participants within each cohort who achieved an assessment of CR following pathologic review of resected tissue. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. Participants in each cohort that did not undergo surgical resection were excluded from the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population response was considered to be of special interest.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of participants with objective response rate (ORR) at the end of study (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumor [RECIST])
ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or partial response (PR) at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using RECIST criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be of special interest.
Measured: Week 14
Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, HER2+ population was considered to be of special interest.
Measured: Week 14
Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study ('Best' of RECIST and Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
ORR at the end of the study was defined as the number of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of the study divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. The best response of the participant was defined by the 'Best' combined response (RECIST and Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria) provided there is no evidence of disease progression. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be special interest.
Measured: Week 14
Percentage of participants with investigator-Assessed Best Response at the end of monotherapy phase (Day 14) (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
ORR at the end of the monotherapy phase was defined as the percentage of participants within each cohort who had a confirmed CR or PR at the end of lapatinib monotherapy (Day 14) divided by the total number of participants enrolled in each cohort. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as a reference, the Baseline sum longest diameter. Each participant's response was based on the investigator assessment of best response using clinically evaluable skin disease criteria. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response was treated as non-responders; i.e. they were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population was considered to be special interest.
Measured: Day 14
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, resulted in deterioration in left ventricular cardiac function and caused Grade 3 or 4 interstitial pneumonitis.
Measured: Up to Week 14, surgical resection and post treatment
Number of participants with shift from Baseline in hematological toxicity grade
Hematology was summarized for hemoglobin (Hb), platelets, white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophils (Neu), lymphocytes by scheduled assessment and also according to the maximum common terminology criteria (CTC) toxicity grade. Baseline was the most recent lab value prior to and within two weeks of the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at each visit minus Baseline value.
Measured: Day 14 and up to Week 23, surg resection and post treatment
Number of participants with shift from Baseline in clinical chemistry toxicity grade
Clinical chemistry was summarized for sodium, potassium (K), bicarbonate (bicarb), albumin (alb), calcium, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), creatinine (creat), total bilirubin (TB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate amino transferase (AST) and alanine amino transferase (ALT) by scheduled assessment and also according to the maximum CTC toxicity grade. Baseline was the most recent lab value prior to and within two weeks of the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at each visit minus Baseline value.
Measured: Day 14, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, Surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Vitals signs (SBP and DBP) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent blood pressure (BP) mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.
Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Heart Rate (HR)
Vitals signs (HR) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent BP mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.
Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Body temperature
Vitals signs (body temperature) were assessed from screening until the post treatment phase. Baseline was the most recent BP mean prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the mean at each visit minus the mean at Baseline.
Measured: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
ECG was performed at screening and at unscheduled visits. Participants with abnormal clinically significant and abnormal not clinically significant ECG findings was reported.
Measured: Screening and unscheduled
Number of participants with change from Baseline in echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi-gated angiogram (MUGA) results at any post Baseline visit
For ECHO and MUGA scans, the left ventricular ejection fraction (percent) was summarized for each scheduled assessment. Absolute change from Baseline was summarized according to the following categories: any increase, 0 to less than 20 percent decrease, >=20 percent decrease or >=20 percent decrease and below the lower limit of normal (LLN). Baseline was the most recent ECOG evaluation prior to the first dose of lapatinib. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the post treatment minus Baseline value.
Measured: Screening, Week 8, 16, 24, post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2005 (estimated)
- Study start11 Apr 2005
- Primary completion1 Nov 2006
- Study completion1 Nov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neoplasms, BreastStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00111787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EGF102580
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 25 May 2005
- Last updated
- 31 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Boussen H, Cristofanilli M, Zaks T, DeSilvio M, Salazar V, Spector N. Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant lapatinib plus paclitaxel in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3248-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8594. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
PubMed 20530274
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacodynamics of Lapatinib in Combination With Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00111787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EGF102580
- Conditions
- Neoplasms, Breast
- Keywords
- breast cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 49 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Apr 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Study was designed to determine how effective and safe a new investigational drug, lapatinib, is in combination with paclitaxel in treating patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory breast cancer. Tumor tissue collected pre-treatment, following 14 days of treatment and at the time of surgical resection will be examined for pathologic response and biologic activity by IHC (immunohistochemistry) within the tumor. Treatment will consist of 14 days of lapatinib monotherapy followed by 12 weeks of combination therapy with lapatinib and paclitaxel. Blood samples for hematology and chemistry panels, MUGA/ECHO exams and physical exams will be performed throughout the study to monitor safety.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Overall study | Experimental | Drug: Lapatinib, Drug: PaclitaxelA Single arm study with 2 cohorts of participants. Cohort A consists of participants with tumors overexpressing HER2 and/or EGFR. Cohort B consists of participants with tumors expressing EGFR without overexpressing HER2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Tumor accessible for multiple biopsies
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
- Adequate bone marrow
- Renal and hepatic function
- LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) greater than 0% based on ECHO (echocardiogram) or MUGA (multigated acquisition).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Females who are pregnant or nursing.
- Any unstable, pre-existing major medical condition.
- Received an investigational drug within the past 4 weeks.
- Had major surgery in the past 2 weeks.
- Currently receiving amiodarone or has received amiodarone in the past 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LapatinibDaily-monotherapy [1500 milligrams (mg)] for 14 days, then daily combination therapy (with weekly paclitaxel) for 12 weeks | Drug | Overall study |
| PaclitaxelAlso: LapatinibWeekly (80mg/m^2) combination therapy (with daily Lapatinib) for 12 weeks | Drug | Overall study |
Primary outcome
Percentage of participants with pathologic complete response rate (pCR)
Time frame: Week 12
pCR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved an assessment of complete response (CR) following pathologic review of resected tissue. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions. Participants in each cohort with unknown or missing response (i.e., those that did not undergo surgery) were included in the denominator when calculating the percentage. From an efficacy standpoint, the HER2+ population response was considered to be of special interest.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of participants with pCR that underwent surgical resection
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of participants with objective response rate (ORR) at the end of study (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumor [RECIST])
Time frame: Week 14
Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
Time frame: Week 14
Percentage of participants with ORR at the end of study ('Best' of RECIST and Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
Time frame: Week 14
Percentage of participants with investigator-Assessed Best Response at the end of monotherapy phase (Day 14) (Clinically Evaluable Skin Disease Criteria)
Time frame: Day 14
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time frame: Up to Week 14, surgical resection and post treatment
Number of participants with shift from Baseline in hematological toxicity grade
Time frame: Day 14 and up to Week 23, surg resection and post treatment
Number of participants with shift from Baseline in clinical chemistry toxicity grade
Time frame: Day 14, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, Surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
Time frame: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Heart Rate (HR)
Time frame: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Change from Baseline in vital signs- Body temperature
Time frame: Day 14, Week 1 and up to Week 24, surg resection and post treatment
Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
Time frame: Screening and unscheduled
Number of participants with change from Baseline in echocardiogram (ECHO) or Multi-gated angiogram (MUGA) results at any post Baseline visit
Time frame: Screening, Week 8, 16, 24, post treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 20530274Boussen H, Cristofanilli M, Zaks T, DeSilvio M, Salazar V, Spector N. Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant lapatinib plus paclitaxel in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3248-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8594. Epub 2010 Jun 7.
Related trials for Neoplasms, Breast
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
25 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Lapatinib and Paclitaxel in people with Neoplasms, Breast, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 25 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 25 sites in Australia, United States, Tunisia, France, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of participants with pathologic complete response rate (pCR) (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00111787, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2017.