Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 2NCT00111800
A New Oral Treatment For Type II Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 2 study testing DEN 2.5 mg, DEN 7.5 mg and DEN 15 mg in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 109 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
This is a 24-week study investigating the safety and efficacy of several dosages of a potential new oral medicine for Type II diabetes mellitus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- DEN 2.5 mg, DEN 7.5 mg and DEN 15 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 375 participants
- Where
- 109 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2005to 21 Jul 2006
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women must not be pregnant and must not be breastfeeding.
- Have Type II diabetes.
- Not taking any medicine for diabetes, or taking one oral medicine for their diabetes.
Who cannot join
- Have any underlying or significant active disease that would prevent the subject from safely participating in the trial by the judgement of the study doctor.
Trial locations and contacts
109 sites in 10 countries.
109 sites in 10 countries
United States36 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Albany, New York, 12208
GSK Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76017
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
GSK Investigational Site
Bellingham, Washington, 98226
GSK Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, 14209
GSK Investigational Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80220
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
GSK Investigational Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
GSK Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
GSK Investigational Site
Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025
GSK Investigational Site
Johnson City, New York, 13790
GSK Investigational Site
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
GSK Investigational Site
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90806
GSK Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30066
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
GSK Investigational Site
Oxon Hill, Maryland, 20745
GSK Investigational Site
Pahrump, Nevada, 89048
GSK Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91105
GSK Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
GSK Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14642
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78237
GSK Investigational Site
Sewickley, Pennsylvania, 15143
GSK Investigational Site
Sunset, Louisiana, 70584
GSK Investigational Site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98403
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, Washington, 98664
Germany28 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Kreuznach, Hesse, 55545
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Lower Saxony, 37431
GSK Investigational Site
Bammental, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69245
GSK Investigational Site
Deggingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73326
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01129
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01219
GSK Investigational Site
Freital, Saxony, 01705
GSK Investigational Site
Haag, Bavaria, 83527
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120
GSK Investigational Site
Hirschhorn, Hesse, 69434
GSK Investigational Site
Höhenkirchen-Siegertsbrunn, Bavaria, 85635
GSK Investigational Site
Ingelheim, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55218
GSK Investigational Site
Kelkheim, Hesse, 65779
GSK Investigational Site
Kippenheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 77971
GSK Investigational Site
Königsfeld im Schwarzwald, Baden-Wurttemberg, 78126
GSK Investigational Site
Lüneburg, Lower Saxony, 21335
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55116
GSK Investigational Site
Offenbach, Hesse, 63067
GSK Investigational Site
Offenbach, Hesse, 63073
GSK Investigational Site
Offenburg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 77654
GSK Investigational Site
Pirna, Saxony, 01796
GSK Investigational Site
Rhaunen, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55624
GSK Investigational Site
Schmiedeberg, Saxony, 01762
GSK Investigational Site
Sinsheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 74889
GSK Investigational Site
Speyer, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67346
GSK Investigational Site
Stockach, Baden-Wurttemberg, 78333
GSK Investigational Site
Tostedt, Lower Saxony, 21255
GSK Investigational Site
Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69469
Canada12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bay Roberts, Newfoundland and Labrador, A0G 1G0
GSK Investigational Site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 3T1
GSK Investigational Site
Coquitlam, British Columbia, V3K 3P4
GSK Investigational Site
Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 6S8
GSK Investigational Site
Mirabel, Quebec, J7J 2K8
GSK Investigational Site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 4S3
GSK Investigational Site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4
GSK Investigational Site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 4J6
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4R 2G4
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 4L6
GSK Investigational Site
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
GSK Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4
Czechia8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brno, 656 51
GSK Investigational Site
České Budějovice, 370 87
GSK Investigational Site
Cheb, 350 02
GSK Investigational Site
Liberec, 46004
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 128 21
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 150 05
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 158 00
GSK Investigational Site
Třebíč, 674 01
Greece8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 115 26
GSK Investigational Site
Heraklion, Crete, 71409
GSK Investigational Site
Lávrio, 19500
GSK Investigational Site
Melíssia, 15127
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 546 42
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 551 32
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 564 29
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 564 34
Latvia7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Jelgava, LV 3001
GSK Investigational Site
Ogre, LV 5001
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV 1002
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV1002
GSK Investigational Site
Riga, LV1079
GSK Investigational Site
Talsi, LV 3201
GSK Investigational Site
Valmiera, LV 4201
Finland3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Helsinki, 00260
GSK Investigational Site
Kuopio, 70210
GSK Investigational Site
Oulu, 90100
Romania3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brasov, 500366
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 020045
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 020475
Sweden3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Gothenburg, SE-413 45
GSK Investigational Site
Malmö, SE-205 02
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-182 88
About this study
Official title: A 12-Week, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Denagliptin, Administered Orally, Once Daily, as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Followed by a 12-week Active Treatment Extension
This is a 24-week study investigating the safety and efficacy of several dosages of a potential new oral medicine for Type II diabetes mellitus.
Read the detailed description
A 12-Week, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GW823093, Administered Orally, Once Daily, as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus followed by a 12-week Active Treatment Extension
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Placebo, DEN 2.5 mg, DEN 7.5 mg, DEN 15 mg, DEN 30 mg
- Keywords
- NIDDM
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
DEN 2.5 mgDrug
Also called GW823093 2.5 mg
DEN 2.5 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
DEN 7.5 mgDrug
Also called GW823093 7.5 mg
DEN 7.5 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
DEN 15 mgDrug
Also called GW823093 15 mg
DEN 15 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
DEN 30 mgDrug
Also called GW823093 30 mg
DEN 30 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
DEN 45 mgDrug
Also called GW823093 45 mg
DEN 45 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received oral dose of matching placebo capsule to denagliptin (DEN) once daily in the morning, 30 minutes (min) prior to breakfast during the main phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants who were randomized to placebo in the main phase 12-weeks treatment period received oral dose of DEN 2.5 milligram (mg) once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of placebo to the participants. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| DEN 2.5 mg | Experimental | Participants received oral dose of DEN 2.5 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 2.5 mg to the participants. Receives: Drug: DEN 2.5 mg |
| DEN 7.5 mg | Experimental | Participants received oral dose of DEN 7.5 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 7.5 mg to the participants. Receives: Drug: DEN 7.5 mg |
| DEN 15 mg | Experimental | Participants received oral dose of DEN 15 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 15 mg to the participants. Receives: Drug: DEN 15 mg |
| DEN 30 mg | Experimental | Participants received oral dose of DEN 30 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 30 mg to the participants. Receives: Drug: DEN 30 mg |
| DEN 45 mg | Experimental | Participants received oral dose of DEN 45 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 45 mg to the participants. Receives: Drug: DEN 45 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 12
HbA1c is used to show in participants with diabetes, how well their diabetes is being controlled. The HbA1c test gives the average blood glucose levels over the pervious two to three months. The sample for HbA1c assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and Baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset defined as carrying forward of the last valid observation recorded on-treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) for participants who withdrew from the study to all remaining main phase visits was used. Adjusted mean is reported as least square (LS) mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (26)
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24
HbA1c is use d to show in participants with diabetes, how well their diabetes is being controlled. The HbA1c test gives the average blood glucose levels over the pervious two to three months. The sample for HbA1c assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 12
The glycemic assessment of FPG measures a participant's blood sugar level after fasting or not eating anything for at least eight hours (h). The samples of FPG was collected was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. ANCOVA model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and Baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Adjusted mean is reported as LS mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20 and 24
The glycemic assessment of FPG measures a participant's blood sugar level after fasting or not eating anything for at least eight h. The sample for FPG assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20 and 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Number of Participants Who Were HbA1c Responders at Week 12
HbA1c is used to show in participants with diabetes, how well their diabetes is being controlled. The HbA1c test gives the average blood glucose levels over the pervious two to three months. The responders were defined as HbA1c values of <=6.5%, <7% and HbA1c reduction of >=0.7%. Analysis was done based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment, gender, prior therapy and Baseline measurement.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants of FPG Responders at Week 12
The glycemic assessment of FPG measures a participant's blood sugar level after fasting or not eating anything for at least eight h. The responders were defined as FPG value of <7 mmol/L and FPG reduction value of >=1.7 mmol/L. Analysis was done based on a logistic regression model with terms included for treatment, gender, prior therapy and Baseline measurement.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fructosamine at Week 12
The sample for fructosamine (total and corrected protein) assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. ANCOVA model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and Baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Adjusted mean is reported as LS mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fructosamine at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24
The sample for fructosamine (total and corrected protein) assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin and Pro-insulin at Week 12
The assessment of fasting serum insulin measures a participant's serum insulin level after fasting or not eating anything for at least eight h. The sample for fasting serum insulin and pro-insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. ANCOVA model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Adjusted mean is reported as LS mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, 24 and Pro-insulin at Weeks 4 and 8
The assessment of fasting serum insulin measures a participant's serum insulin level after fasting or not eating anything for at least eight h. The sample for fasting serum insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). The sample for pro-insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 4) and Visit 11 (Week 8). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin at Week 16, 20 and 24.
The sample for pro-insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 16, 20 and 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin to Insulin Ratio at Week 12
The samples for pro-insulin and insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. ANCOVA model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Adjusted mean is reported as LS mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin to Insulin Ratio at Week 4 and 8
The samples for pro-insulin and insulin was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 4) and Visit 11 (Week 8). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 4 and 8) values. ANCOVA model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Adjusted mean is reported as LS mean.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4 and 8
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Events of Hypoglycaemia
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in this definition. Medications that lowered blood glucose were capable of producing hypoglycemia or symptoms of hypoglycemia. Participants were provided with a hypoglycemic symptoms log at each visit and were asked to record symptoms of hypoglycemia.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With AE and Event of Hypoglycaemia of Mild, Moderate and Severe
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Medications that lowered blood glucose were capable of producing hypoglycemia or symptoms of hypoglycemia. Participants were provided with a hypoglycemic symptoms log at each visit and were asked to record symptoms of hypoglycemia. The assessment of severity was done by the investigator. A mild AE was defined as an event that was easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with everyday activities. A moderate AE was defined as an event that was sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal everyday activities. A severe AE was defined as an event that prevents normal everyday activities.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Value of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) in Vital Signs at Any Time During Therapy
The vital sign assessments include systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR). The assessments were done pre-dose at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 1 to 24) values. The criteria for PCC included: HR increase or decrease from Baseline >30 beats per minute (bpm) and <50 or >120 bpm; SBP increase or decrease from Baseline >30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) in the same posture and >170 or <100 mmHg; increase or decrease from Baseline >20 mmHg in same posture and >110 or <50 mmHg.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Over Time
The assessment of body weight was done during the run-in phase, randomized treatment phase and Follow-up at Visit 2 (Week -5), Visit 3 (Week -4), Visit 4 (Week -2), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 18 (Week 24) and Visit 19 (Week 25). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week -5 to 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week -5 to 25 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Over Time
BMI is an estimated the body fat of the participants, based on body weight divided by height squared. Height was assessed at Screening (Visit 2, Week -5) and confirmed at Baseline (Visit 5, Week 0). Weight was assessed at all Visits (Visit -5 to Visit 19). BMI was calculated during the run-in phase, randomized treatment phase and Follow-up at Visit 2 (Week -5), Visit 3 (Week -4), Visit 4 (Week -2), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 18 (Week 24) and Visit 19 (Week 25). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week -5 to 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week -5 to 25 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference and Hip Circumference Over Time
Waist and hip measurements were done at Screening (Visit 2, Week -5), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 12 (Week 12) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week -5 to 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio Over Time
Waist to hip ratio calculation from the waist and hip measurements were done at Screening (Visit 2, Week -5), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 12 (Week 12) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week -5 to 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in 12-lead ECG Over Time
12-lead ECGs were obtained during the study using an ECG machine that automatically calculated the HR and measured PR, QRS, RR, QT, and QTc intervals. The mean PR interval, RR interval, QRS duration, uncorrected QT interval (UncQT) and QTcB (QT corrected by Bazett's formula) and QTcF (corrected by Friedericia's formula) was calculated from automated ECG readings. ECG was read centrally and locally at Visit 2 (Week -5), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 16 (Week 16) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week -5 to 24) values.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Values of PCC at Any Time on Therapy
The parameters of clinical chemistry included sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, lactate dehydrogenase ([LDH] if >2x upper limit of reference range, LDH isoenzymes were collected), total protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), Calcium, phosphorus (inorganic) and uric acid. The assessments were done at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Only those parameters for which at least one value of PCC was reported are summarized.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Haematology Values of PCC at Any Time on Therapy
The parameters of hematology included red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count and total white blood cell (WBC) count. The assessments were done at Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20) and Visit 18 (Week 24). Only those parameters for which at least one value of PCC was reported are summarized.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Dipstick Result
The parameters of dipstick urinalysis included glucose, bilirubin, protein and ketones. The abnormal results of dispstick parameters were categorized for glucose as trace or 1/10 gram (g)/deciliter (dL %), 1+ or ¼ g/dL (%), 2+ or ½ g/dL (%), 3+ or 1 g/dL (%); for ketones as 1+ and trace; for proteins as 1+, 2+, 3+ and trace. The assessments were done at Visit 2 (Week -5), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20), Visit 18 (Week 24) and Visit 19 (Week 25).
Measured: Up to Follow-up (Week 25)
Number of Participants With Urinalysis Microscopic Result
The parameters of microscopic urinalysis included RBC and WBC. The microscopic urinalysis results for the parameters were categorized as cells of 0-1, 1-3, 3-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-25, 25-50, 50-100 and innumerable. The assessments were done at Visit 2 (Week -5), Visit 5 (Week 0), Visit 6 (Week 1), Visit 7 (Week 2), Visit 8 (Week 3), Visit 9 (Week 4), Visit 10 (Week 6), Visit 11 (Week 8), Visit 12 (Week 12), Visit 13 (Week 13), Visit 14 (Week 14), Visit 15 (Week 15), Visit 16 (Week 16), Visit 17 (Week 20), Visit 18 (Week 24) and Visit 19 (Week 25).
Measured: Up to Follow-up (Week 25)
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter of Plasma Concentration of DEN
A total of 6 blood samples, 2 milliliter each were planned to be obtained over the course of the study for determination of DEN plasma concentrations. For each PK sampling visit a sampling interval was defined. PK samples were planned to be collected at any time during the defined sampling intervals.
Measured: Pre-dose at Week 0, 0.5 to 1.5 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20, 2 to 4 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20 and 6 to 10 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20
Descriptive Statistics of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) Inhibition Performed as Part of the Population PK
A total of 6 blood samples, 2 milliliter each were planned to be obtained over the course of the study for determination of DPP-IV inhibition. For each PK sampling visit a sampling interval was defined. PK samples were planned to be collected at any time during the defined sampling intervals.
Measured: Pre-dose at Week 0, 0.5 to 1.5 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20, 2 to 4 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20 and 6 to 10 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2005 (estimated)
- Study start28 Apr 2005
- Primary completion1 Jul 2006
- Study completion21 Jul 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00111800
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DPB100925
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 25 May 2005
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-Week, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Denagliptin, Administered Orally, Once Daily, as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Followed by a 12-week Active Treatment Extension
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00111800
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPB100925
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- NIDDM
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 375 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2005 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2006 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2006 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Mar 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 24-week study investigating the safety and efficacy of several dosages of a potential new oral medicine for Type II diabetes mellitus.
Detailed description
A 12-Week, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GW823093, Administered Orally, Once Daily, as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus followed by a 12-week Active Treatment Extension
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received oral dose of matching placebo capsule to denagliptin (DEN) once daily in the morning, 30 minutes (min) prior to breakfast during the main phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants who were randomized to placebo in the main phase 12-weeks treatment period received oral dose of DEN 2.5 milligram (mg) once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of placebo to the participants. |
| DEN 2.5 mg | Experimental | Drug: DEN 2.5 mgParticipants received oral dose of DEN 2.5 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 2.5 mg to the participants. |
| DEN 7.5 mg | Experimental | Drug: DEN 7.5 mgParticipants received oral dose of DEN 7.5 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 7.5 mg to the participants. |
| DEN 15 mg | Experimental | Drug: DEN 15 mgParticipants received oral dose of DEN 15 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 15 mg to the participants. |
| DEN 30 mg | Experimental | Drug: DEN 30 mgParticipants received oral dose of DEN 30 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 30 mg to the participants. |
| DEN 45 mg | Experimental | Drug: DEN 45 mgParticipants received oral dose of DEN 45 mg capsule once daily in the morning, 30 min prior to breakfast during the main phase/extension phase 12-weeks treatment period. Participants were dispensed 3 bottles (bottle A, B and C) and were instructed to take 1 capsule daily from each bottle such that taking 1 capsule from each bottle daily provided the appropriate dose of DEN 45 mg to the participants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Women must not be pregnant and must not be breastfeeding.
- Have Type II diabetes.
- Not taking any medicine for diabetes, or taking one oral medicine for their diabetes.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Have any underlying or significant active disease that would prevent the subject from safely participating in the trial by the judgement of the study doctor.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | Placebo |
| DEN 2.5 mgAlso: GW823093 2.5 mgDEN 2.5 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | DEN 2.5 mg |
| DEN 7.5 mgAlso: GW823093 7.5 mgDEN 7.5 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | DEN 7.5 mg |
| DEN 15 mgAlso: GW823093 15 mgDEN 15 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | DEN 15 mg |
| DEN 30 mgAlso: GW823093 30 mgDEN 30 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | DEN 30 mg |
| DEN 45 mgAlso: GW823093 45 mgDEN 45 mg capsules which were white, opaque capsules with no identifying markings, containing white to off-white beads. | Drug | DEN 45 mg |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
HbA1c is used to show in participants with diabetes, how well their diabetes is being controlled. The HbA1c test gives the average blood glucose levels over the pervious two to three months. The sample for HbA1c assessment was collected at Visit 5 (Week 0) and Visit 12 (Week 12). Baseline value was defined as the assessment done at Week 0. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value (Week 0) from the individual post-Baseline (Week 12) value. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model for analysis was used with the terms for gender, prior therapy (diet \& exercise/monotherapy), treatment, region and Baseline measurement (continuous covariate). Last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset defined as carrying forward of the last valid observation recorded on-treatment (scheduled or unscheduled) for participants who withdrew from the study to all remaining main phase visits was used. Adjusted mean is reported as least square (LS) mean.
26 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Number of Participants Who Were HbA1c Responders at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants of FPG Responders at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fructosamine at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fructosamine at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin and Pro-insulin at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Insulin at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, 24 and Pro-insulin at Weeks 4 and 8
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin at Week 16, 20 and 24.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin to Insulin Ratio at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Pro-insulin to Insulin Ratio at Week 4 and 8
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4 and 8
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) or Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Events of Hypoglycaemia
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With AE and Event of Hypoglycaemia of Mild, Moderate and Severe
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline Value of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) in Vital Signs at Any Time During Therapy
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week -5 to 25 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week -5 to 25 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference and Hip Circumference Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip Ratio Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in 12-lead ECG Over Time
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Values of PCC at Any Time on Therapy
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Laboratory Haematology Values of PCC at Any Time on Therapy
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis Dipstick Result
Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Week 25)
Number of Participants With Urinalysis Microscopic Result
Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Week 25)
Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter of Plasma Concentration of DEN
Time frame: Pre-dose at Week 0, 0.5 to 1.5 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20, 2 to 4 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20 and 6 to 10 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20
Descriptive Statistics of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) Inhibition Performed as Part of the Population PK
Time frame: Pre-dose at Week 0, 0.5 to 1.5 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20, 2 to 4 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20 and 6 to 10 h post-dose at Week 4, 12, 16 or 20
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
109 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing DEN 2.5 mg, DEN 7.5 mg and DEN 15 mg in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 109 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 109 sites in United States, Germany, Canada, Czechia, Greece and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2018.