AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small-Cell Lung CarcinomaPhase 3NCT00112294

Study of Taxane/Carboplatin +/- Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Paclitaxel (Taxane), Docetaxel (Taxane) and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 124 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if patients treated with the combination of Taxane/Carboplatin plus Cetuximab (C/T/C) have a longer progression-free survival than patients treated with Taxane/Carboplatin (T/C) alone. The safety of this treatment will also be studied. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Paclitaxel (Taxane), Docetaxel (Taxane) and Carboplatin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
755 participants
Where
124 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2004to Aug 2008
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must have advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that has not been previously treated with any chemotherapy.
  • Tumor/disease lesions that can be measured bidimensionally.
  • Must be able to carry-out work of light or sedentary nature (e.g. light house work, office work).
  • Adequate recovery from recent surgery or radiation therapy.
  • Must be at least 4 weeks from last major surgery or prior treatment with an investigational agent. At least 12 weeks from any radiation therapy to chest.
  • Accessible for treatment, follow-up and required visits at a participating center(s).

Who cannot join

  • Prior chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer.
  • Prior treatment with cetuximab or other epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-targeted therapy.
  • Prior severe infusion reaction to antibody therapy.
  • Concurrent malignancy (previous malignancy without evidence of disease for 5 years will be allowed to enter trial).
  • Concurrent chemotherapy or therapy with another investigational agent not indicated in the protocol.
  • Serious uncontrolled medical disorders that would impair the ability to receive therapy.
Show all 14Show fewer
  • History of myocardial infarction within prior 3 months, uncontrolled angina, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or uncontrolled congestive heart failure.
  • Symptomatic or uncontrolled metastases in the central nervous system. Subjects receiving a glucocorticoid for central nervous system (CNS) metastases are not eligible, but those receiving an anticonvulsant are eligible.
  • Peripheral neuropathy >= grade 2 (Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event [CTCAE] Version 3.0).
  • Inadequate hematologic and/or liver and/or kidney function.
  • Sexually active and fertile individuals or partners of these individuals who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of birth control for entire trial and up to 4 weeks after the study.
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrollment prior to study drug administration.
  • Altered mental status or psychiatric condition that prohibits understanding or rendering of consent.

Trial locations and contacts

124 sites in 1 country.

124 sites in 1 country

United States124 sites
  • Local Institution

    Amarillo, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Anaheim, California

  • Local Institution

    Anchorage, Alaska

  • Local Institution

    Annapolis, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Augusta, Georgia

  • Local Institution

    Bakersfield, California

  • Local Institution

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Binghamton, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Local Institution

    Bismarck, North Dakota

  • Local Institution

    Boca Raton, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Local Institution

    Boynton Beach, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Brockton, Massachusetts

  • Local Institution

    Burlington, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Canton, Ohio

  • Local Institution

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Chattanooga, Tennessee

  • Local Institution

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Local Institution

    Cleveland, Ohio

  • Local Institution

    Collierville, Tennessee

  • Local Institution

    Columbia, Missouri

  • Local Institution

    Columbia, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Columbus, Georgia

  • Local Institution

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Local Institution

    Concord, California

  • Local Institution

    Cookeville, Tennessee

  • Local Institution

    Cooperstown, New York

  • Local Institution

    Dallas, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Danville, Virginia

  • Local Institution

    Dayton, Ohio

  • Local Institution

    Dover, New Hampshire

  • Local Institution

    Dulluth, Minnesota

  • Local Institution

    Dunmore, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Evanston, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    Everett, Washington

  • Local Institution

    Flint, Michigan

  • Local Institution

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Fort Myers, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Fort Wayne, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    Fountain Valley, California

  • Local Institution

    Free Soil, Michigan

  • Local Institution

    Gastonia, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Gilroy, California

  • Local Institution

    Grand Rapids, Michigan

  • Local Institution

    Greensboro, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Greenville, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Hartford, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    Hazard, Kentucky

  • Local Institution

    Hickory, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Honolulu, Hawaii

  • Local Institution

    Houston, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Huntington, West Virginia

  • Local Institution

    Inverness, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Jackson, Michigan

  • Local Institution

    Jackson, Mississippi

  • Local Institution

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Jefferson City, Missouri

  • Local Institution

    Joliet, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    La Crosse, Wisconsin

  • Local Institution

    Lacey, Washington

  • Local Institution

    Lakeland, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Lakewood, Colorado

  • Local Institution

    Lecanto, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Long Beach, California

  • Local Institution

    Los Angeles, California

  • Local Institution

    Lubbock, Texas

  • Local Institution

    Lynchburg, Virginia

  • Local Institution

    Madison, Wisconsin

  • Local Institution

    Marietta, Georgia

  • Local Institution

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Local Institution

    Mobile, Alabama

  • Local Institution

    Montebello, California

  • Local Institution

    Morganton, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Muncie, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    Naperville, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    New Albany, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    New City, New York

  • Local Institution

    New London, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    New Rochelle, New York

  • Local Institution

    Newark, New Jersey

  • Local Institution

    Normal, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    Northport, New York

  • Local Institution

    Norwich, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • Local Institution

    Oxnard, California

  • Local Institution

    Paducah, Kentucky

  • Local Institution

    Pembroke Pines, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Pottstown, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Providence, Rhode Island

  • Local Institution

    Rancho Mirage, California

  • Local Institution

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Local Institution

    Rochester, New York

  • Local Institution

    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota

  • Local Institution

    San Diego, California

  • Local Institution

    Sayre, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Skokie, Illinois

  • Local Institution

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Springdale, Arkansas

  • Local Institution

    Stamford, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    Stockton, California

  • Local Institution

    Sumter, South Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Tacoma, Washington

  • Local Institution

    Tamarac, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Tampa, Florida

  • Local Institution

    Terre Haute, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    The Bronx, New York

  • Local Institution

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Local Institution

    Valhalla, New York

  • Local Institution

    Vincennes, Indiana

  • Local Institution

    Vista, California

  • Local Institution

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia

  • Local Institution

    Waterbury, Connecticut

  • Local Institution

    West Reading, Pennsylvania

  • Local Institution

    Westminster, Maryland

  • Local Institution

    Wichita, Kansas

  • Local Institution

    Wilmington, North Carolina

  • Local Institution

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Multicenter Phase III Study of Taxane/Carboplatin/Cetuximab Versus Taxane/Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The primary purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if patients treated with the combination of Taxane/Carboplatin plus Cetuximab (C/T/C) have a longer progression-free survival than patients treated with Taxane/Carboplatin (T/C) alone. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.

Being tested
Paclitaxel (Taxane), Docetaxel (Taxane), Carboplatin, Cetuximab
Keywords
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Paclitaxel (Taxane)Drug

    IV, 225 mg/m^2

  • Docetaxel (Taxane)Drug

    IV, 75 mg/m^2

  • CarboplatinDrug

    AUC=6, q 3 weeks (6 cycles maximum)

  • CetuximabDrug

    Also called Erbitux

    Intravenous, 400 mg/m^2, initial dose followed by 250 mg/m^2, weekly starting on Week 2

Study groups in NCT00112294
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cetuximab+Taxane+Carboplatin (C/T/C)Active comparatorCetuximab was administered at an initial dose (Week 1) of 400 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion (infused over 120 minutes) and a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m^2 IV infusion (infused over 60 minutes). A cycle of therapy was defined as 3 weeks. Taxane was paclitaxel 225 mg/m^2 infused over 180 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 infused over 60 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks. Carboplatin was infused over 30 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel (Taxane); Drug: Docetaxel (Taxane); Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Cetuximab
Taxane+Carboplatin (T/C)Active comparatorA cycle of therapy was defined as 3 weeks. Taxane was paclitaxel 225 mg/m^2 infused over 180 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 infused over 60 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks. Carboplatin was infused over 30 minutes on Day 1 and subsequently every 3 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel (Taxane); Drug: Docetaxel (Taxane); Drug: Carboplatin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Interval between randomization date \& earliest date of disease progression/death due to any cause, assessed by the Independent Radiology Review Committee (IRRC) using modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria to define progressive disease (PD): >=25% increase in sum of products of diameters (SOPD) of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion. If no progression/death, date of last tumor assessment used. For participants who had no on-study tumor assessments \& were still alive, date of randomization used.

    Measured: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last tumor assessment (up to 26 months).

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

    Tumor response was defined as the number of participants whose best response was CR or PR, per the IRRC assessment, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR: >= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression. To qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present.

    Measured: From randomization to end of study drug therapy (up to 174 weeks).

  2. Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD)

    Disease control was defined as the number of participants whose best response was CR, PR, or SD, per the IRRC assessment, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR:>= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression (to qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present); SD: participants who did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, or PD (PD:>=25% increase in SOPD of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion).

    Measured: From randomization to end of study drug therapy (up to 174 weeks).

  3. Median Number of Months of Response

    Median number of months of response (time from first occurrence of CR/PR to date of PD/death, [per IRRC assessment,using modified WHO criteria]) calculated for participants whose best response=CR/PR.For participants who did not progress/die, date of last tumor assessment used.CR:disappearance of all index/non-index lesions;PR:>= 50% reduction in SOPD of index lesions compared with baseline, no evidence of progression.No new lesions present.PD:>=25% increase in SOPD of lesions compared with smallest SOPD recorded for study period or progression of any non-index lesion/appearance of new lesion.

    Measured: Time from first occurrence of CR or PR (whichever was recorded first) to the date of PD, death or date of last tumor assessment (up to 19 months).

  4. Median Number of Months to Response

    The median number of months to response was calculated for participants whose best response was CR or PR. It was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy to the first date that criteria for PR or CR (whichever occurred first)were met. Response was assessed by the IRRC, using the modified WHO criteria: CR: disappearance of all index/non-index lesions; PR: >= 50% reduction in the SOPD of index lesions compared with the baseline SOPD, with no evidence of progression. To qualify as CR or PR, no new lesions could be present.

    Measured: Time from first dose of study therapy to the date of PR or CR, whichever occurred first (up to 13 months).

  5. Median Number of Months of Survival

    The median number of months of survival was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. For participants who did not die, the date of last contact was used.

    Measured: From randomization to death or date of last contact (up to 41 months).

  6. Number of Participants With Improvement of Symptoms

    Symptoms were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS) questionnaire. This 7-item scale has scores ranging from 0 (severely symptomatic in all symptoms assessed) to 28 (symptom-free on all symptoms assessed). Symptom response (improvement) was defined as >= 2-point increase from baseline in score (maintained for 2 consecutive assessments, at least 3 weeks apart). Participants with a baseline score of >= 27 were not evaluable, as it would not have been possible to show an improvement. Participants with no baseline data were also not evaluable.

    Measured: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last symptom assessment (up to 33 weeks).

  7. Median Number of Months Until Symptomatic Progression (Worsening of Symptoms)

    Symptoms were assessed using the FACT-LCS questionnaire. This 7-item scale has scores ranging from 0 (severely symptomatic) to 28 (symptom-free). Symptomatic progression was defined as >= 2-point decrease from baseline in score (maintained for 2 consecutive assessments at least 3 weeks apart). Time to symptomatic progression was defined as the time from randomization to date of symptoms worsening. For participants with no symptom progression, the date of the last symptom assessment was used. See also Outcome Measure 15.

    Measured: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last symptom assessment (up to 33 weeks).

  8. Number of Participants Who Died, or Experienced Other Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). An SAE was defined as an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization), or was an important medical event.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing AEs Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). The results presented are stratified according to which drug was discontinued.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  10. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Acneform Rash

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "acneform rash" were of particular importance. These AEs were: rash, rash pustular, rash erythematous, dermatitis acneiform, dermatitis exfoliative, rash papular, rash pruritic, rash generalised, rash macular, rash maculo-papular, acne, acne pustular, skin desquamation and dry skin.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  11. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Infusion Reaction

    AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "infusion reaction" were of particular importance. These AEs were: infusion-related reaction, hypersensitivity, anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic shock, and anaphylactoid reaction regardless of when they occurred. The terms dyspnea, pyrexia and chills were also grouped under infusion reaction, provided the onset date of these toxicities occurred on the first day of study treatment.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  12. Number of Participants Experiencing Other Significant AEs: Cardiac AEs

    An AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (even if not caused by the study drug). For this study, it was decided that AEs that were categorized under the composite term "cardiac AE" were of particular importance. These AEs, coded as preferred or other level Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] terms were: coronary artery disorders, cardiac arrhythmias, heart failures not elsewhere classified, left ventricular failures, sudden cardiac death, cardiac death and sudden death.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  13. Number of Participants Who Exprienced the Most Frequent Grade 3-4 Hematology Abnormalities Occurring in >=5% Participants

    Abnormalities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), version 3.0. The scale is graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Neutropenia: Grade 3, neutrophils <1.0 - 0.5 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <0.5 x 10^9/L. Leukopenia: Grade 3, leukocytes <2.0 - 1.0 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <1.0 x 10^9/L. Thrombocytopenia: Grade 3, platelets <50.0 - 25.0 x 10^9/L; Grade 4, <25.0 x 10^9/L. Anemia: Grade 3, hemoglobin <4.9 - 4.0 millimoles (mmol)/L, Grade 4, <4.0 mmol/L.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  14. Number of Participants Who Experienced the Most Frequent Grade 3-4 Serum Chemistry Abnormalities Occurring in >=5% Participants

    Abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTC, version 3.0. The scale is graded from 1 (least severe) to 4 (life threatening). Grade 3 and 4 criteria are defined as follows: Hyperglycemia (non-fasting): Grade 3, serum glucose >13.9 - 27.8 mmol/L; Grade 4 >27.8 mmol/L or acidosis. Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3, serum magnesium >1.23 - 3.30 mmol/L; Grade 4 >3.30 mmol/L. Hyponatremia: Grade 3, serum sodium <130 - 120 mmol/L; Grade 4 <120 mmol/L. Low albumin: Grade 3, serum albumin <20 g/L; Grade 4 not applicable.

    Measured: From start of study drug therapy up to 30 days after the last dose (up to 178 weeks).

  15. Number of Participants Who Had Unscheduled Visits to Physicians, Clinics, Hospitals and Other Unscheduled Major Medicinal Procedures

    Participants were to complete log to collect information on unscheduled visits to physicians,clinics,hospitals \& other unscheduled major procedures.If asked, participants were to complete and return log to site upon routinely scheduled visits.The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to understand the economical implications as a secondary objective.This was not a pivotal study \& therefore not needed to support any arguments with regulatory authorities concerning cost-benefit,hence,it was not necessary to conduct this analysis. There is no intent on conducting this analysis in the future.

    Measured: Day 1 of each cycle of treatment, at the end of study therapy evaluation and at the first follow-up visit (6 weeks after the end of study therapy evaluation).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2004
  3. Primary completionApr 2007
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
755 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00112294
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA225-099
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
1 Jun 2005
Last updated
24 Dec 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Paclitaxel (Taxane), Docetaxel (Taxane) and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 124 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 124 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Oct 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization to evidence of disease progression/death or date of last tumor assessment (up to 26 months).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in