AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain and Central Nervous System TumorsPhase 2NCT00112502

Temozolomide Alone or in Combination With Thalidomide and/or Isotretinoin and/or Celecoxib in Treating Patients Who Have Undergone Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme

A Phase 2 study testing Celecoxib, Isotretinoin and Temozolomide in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors and Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 12 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of glioblastoma multiforme by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Celecoxib, Isotretinoin and Temozolomide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
178 participants
Where
12 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2005to Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme
  • Must have undergone a biopsy OR subtotal or gross total resection of the tumor
  • Must have completed post-operative (or post-biopsy) radiotherapy within the past 5 weeks
  • No progressive disease after radiotherapy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • Karnofsky 60-100%

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3

Hepatic

  • Serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Alkaline phosphatase < 2 times ULN
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL

Renal

  • blood urea nitrogen (BUN) ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN

Immunologic

  • No history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biological composition to celecoxib or to sulfonamides
  • No asthma, urticaria, or allergic reactions to aspirin or other NSAIDs
  • No active infection

Gastrointestinal

  • No inflammatory bowel disease
  • No history of peptic ulcer disease
  • No gastrointestinal bleeding within past 3 months

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective double-method contraception during and for 2 months after study participation
  • Fertile female patients randomized to receive thalidomide must use effective double-method contraception for ≥ 4 weeks before, during, and ≥ 4 weeks after completion of study therapy
  • Fertile male patients randomized to receive thalidomide must use effective contraception during and for ≥ 4 weeks after completion of study therapy
  • No blood donation (for patients randomized to receive thalidomide)
  • No history of any other cancer except nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or cancer that is in complete remission and patient completed all therapy for that disease ≥ 3 years ago
  • No other disease that would obscure toxicity or dangerously alter drug metabolism (e.g., severe connective tissue disease)
  • No other serious medical illness

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • Prior temozolomide in combination with radiotherapy allowed
  • No other prior or concurrent chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • See Chemotherapy

Surgery

  • See Disease Characteristics
  • No concurrent surgery

Other

  • No other concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (for patients randomized to receive celecoxib)
  • No other concurrent investigational drugs
  • No other concurrent anticancer therapy

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country.

12 sites in 1 country

United States12 sites
  • CCOP - Atlanta Regional

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342-1701

  • Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240

  • CCOP - Central Illinois

    Decatur, Illinois, 62526

  • Hembree Mercy Cancer Center at St. Edward Mercy Medical Center

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72913

  • CCOP - Grand Rapids

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030-4009

  • CCOP - Kalamazoo

    Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007-3731

  • CCOP - Kansas City

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64131

  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando

    Orlando, Florida, 32806-2134

  • CCOP - Upstate Carolina

    Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303

  • Cancer Research for the Ozarks

    Springfield, Missouri, 65804

  • CCOP - Wichita

    Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Factorial-Design, Phase II Trial of Temozolomide Alone and in Combination With Possible Permutations of Thalidomide, Isotretinoin and/or Celecoxib as Post-Radiation Adjuvant Therapy of Glioblastoma Multiforme

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Thalidomide may stop the growth of glioblastoma multiforme by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Isotretinoin may help cells that are involved in the body's immune response to work better. Celecoxib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known which temozolomide-containing regimen is more effective in treating glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying eight different temozolomide-containing regimens to compare how well they work in treating patients who have undergone radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the efficacy of adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) alone or in combination with thalidomide and/or isotretinoin and/or celecoxib, in terms of 6-month progression-free survival, in patients who have undergone radiotherapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme.
  • Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 8 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive oral temozolomide once daily on days 1-7 and 15-21.
  • Arm II: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral thalidomide once daily on days 1-28.
  • Arm III: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral isotretinoin twice daily on days 1-21.
  • Arm IV: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I and oral celecoxib twice daily on days 1-28.
  • Arm V: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, and isotretinoin as in arm III.
  • Arm VI: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, and celecoxib as in arm IV.
  • Arm VII: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, isotretinoin as in arm III, and celecoxib as in arm IV.
  • Arm VIII: Patients receive temozolomide as in arm I, thalidomide as in arm II, isotretinoin as in arm III, and celecoxib as in arm IV.

In all arms, treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patient may receive additional courses of therapy at the discretion of the treating physician.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed for at least 30 days and then every 3 months thereafter.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 180 patients will be accrued for this study.

Being tested
Celecoxib, Isotretinoin, Temozolomide, Thalidomide
Keywords
adult giant cell glioblastoma, adult gliosarcoma, adult glioblastoma
Medical subject headings
Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, Gliosarcoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CelecoxibDrug

    Also called Celebrex

    400 mg orally twice a day continuous dosing

  • IsotretinoinDrug

    Also called Accutane, 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid

    40 mg/m^2 orally twice a day (total daily dose = 80 mg/m^2) days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle.

  • TemozolomideDrug

    Also called Temodar

    150 mg/m2 orally daily, 7 days on treatment, 7 days off.

  • ThalidomideDrug

    Also called Thalomid

    400 mg orally every day continuous dosing (starting at 200 mg each day and escalating weekly by 100 mg until the maximum dose of 400 mg/day is achieved)

Study groups in NCT00112502
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I: TMZActive comparatorOral Temozolomide (TMZ) 150 mg/m^2 once daily on days 1-7 and 15-21.
Receives: Drug: Temozolomide
Arm II: TMZ + ThalidomideExperimentalTemozolomide as in arm I and oral Thalidomide (Thal) once daily on days 1-28 (starting dose 200 mg).
Receives: Drug: Temozolomide; Drug: Thalidomide
Arm III: TMZ + IsotretinoinExperimentalTemozolomide as in Arm I and oral Isotretinoin 40 mg/m^2 twice daily on days 1-21.
Receives: Drug: Isotretinoin; Drug: Temozolomide
Arm IV: TMZ + CelecoxibExperimentalTemozolomide as in arm I and oral Celecoxib 400 mg twice daily on days 1-28.
Receives: Drug: Celecoxib; Drug: Temozolomide
Arm V: TMZ + Thalidomide + IsotretinoinExperimentalTemozolomide as in arm I, Thalidomide as in arm II, and Isotretinoin as in arm III.
Receives: Drug: Isotretinoin; Drug: Temozolomide; Drug: Thalidomide
Arm VI: TMZ + Thalidomide + CelecoxibExperimentalTemozolomide as in Arm I, Thalidomide as in Arm II, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Receives: Drug: Celecoxib; Drug: Temozolomide; Drug: Thalidomide
Arm VII: TMZ + Isotretinoin + CelecoxibExperimentalTemozolomide as in Arm I, Isotretinoin as in Arm III, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Receives: Drug: Celecoxib; Drug: Isotretinoin; Drug: Temozolomide
Arm VIII: TMZ + Thalidomide + Isotretinoin + CelecoxibExperimentalTemozolomide as in Arm I, Thalidomide as in Arm II, Isotretinoin as in Arm III, and Celecoxib as in Arm IV.
Receives: Drug: Celecoxib; Drug: Isotretinoin; Drug: Temozolomide; Drug: Thalidomide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms

    Thalidomide versus not Thalidomide analysis: Comparison of median PFS outcome of participants in arms II, VI, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, III, IV and V. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up, up to one year (12 study cycles).

  2. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms

    Celecoxib versus not Celecoxib analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms III, V, VI and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, IV and VII. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  3. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms

    Isotretinoin versus not Isotretinoin analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms IV, V, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, III and VI. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy

    Doublet (2 agents) versus Triplet (3 agents) therapy analysis: We compared the median PFS outcome of participants in arms II, III, IV, versus participants in arms V, VI and VII. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  2. Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Individual Arms

    Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  3. Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms

    Thalidomide versus not Thalidomide analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms II, VI, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, III, IV and V. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  4. Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Celecoxib Arms Versus no Celecoxib Arms

    Celecoxib versus not Celecoxib analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms III, V, VI and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, IV and VII. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  5. Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Isotretinoin Arms Versus no Isotretinoin Arms

    Isotretinoin versus not Isotretinoin analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms IV, V, VII and VIII, versus participants in arms I, II, III and VI. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  6. Median Overall Survival (OS) Comparison of Doublet Versus Triplet Therapy

    Doublet (2 agents) versus Triplet (3 agents) therapy analysis: We compared the median OS outcome of participants in arms II, III, IV, versus participants in arms V, VI and VII. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  7. Overall Survival of Individual Arms

    Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from time of randomization to time of progression, death, or last follow-up. Progression defined as 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to this cancer).

    Measured: Every 3 months from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2005
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
178 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00112502
Sponsor's protocol ID
2004-0662
Other IDs
MDA-ID-02586, NCI-6636, MDA-2004-0662, CDR0000432954, NCI-2009-00076
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
2 Jun 2005
Last updated
18 Oct 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gilbert MR, Gonzalez J, Hunter K, Hess K, Giglio P, Chang E, Puduvalli V, Groves MD, Colman H, Conrad C, Levin V, Woo S, Mahajan A, de Groot J, Yung WK. A phase I factorial design study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with thalidomide, isotretinoin, and/or celecoxib as postchemoradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2010 Nov;12(11):1167-72. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq100. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

    PubMed 20729242
  • Penas-Prado M, Hess KR, Fisch MJ, Lagrone LW, Groves MD, Levin VA, De Groot JF, Puduvalli VK, Colman H, Volas-Redd G, Giglio P, Conrad CA, Salacz ME, Floyd JD, Loghin ME, Hsu SH, Gonzalez J, Chang EL, Woo SY, Mahajan A, Aldape KD, Yung WK, Gilbert MR; MD Anderson Community Clinical Oncology Program; Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative. Randomized phase II adjuvant factorial study of dose-dense temozolomide alone and in combination with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Feb;17(2):266-73. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou155. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

    PubMed 25239666

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Celecoxib, Isotretinoin and Temozolomide in people with Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors and Glioblastoma Multiforme, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 12 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Comparison of Thalidomide Arms Versus no Thalidomide Arms (time frame: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days) from randomization until progression of disease, death or last follow-up, up to one year (12 study cycles).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00112502, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in