Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00112710
Gemcitabine in Combination With Either Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital Birmingham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- carboplatin, cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride
- How many people
- 1,350 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Mar 2005to not given
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), meeting 1 of the following stage criteria:
- Stage IIIB disease* that is not suitable for radical radiotherapy
- Stage IV disease* NOTE: *Radiographically verified
- At least 1 measurable lesion by clinical examination or radiography
- No mixed histologies of small cell lung cancer and NSCLC
- No clinically apparent brain metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- WHO 0-2
Life expectancy
- At least 12 weeks
Hematopoietic
- WBC ≥ 3,000/mm³
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL
Hepatic
- AST < 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
- Alkaline phosphatase < 3 times ULN
- Bilirubin < 1.5 times ULN
Renal
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min (by Wright equation) OR ≥ 70 mL/min (by ^51Cr-EDTA clearance)
Other
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Able and willing to participate in the quality of life assessment
- No pre-existing neuropathy > grade 2
- No other malignancy that would preclude study treatment or study comparisons
- No evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease, significant clinical disorder, or laboratory finding that would preclude study participation
- No psychiatric disorder that would preclude study participation
- No other condition that would preclude study compliance
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- No concurrent immunotherapy
Chemotherapy
- No prior chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
- No other concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
- No concurrent hormonal therapy except contraceptives or replacement steroids
Radiotherapy
- No prior radiotherapy
Surgery
- Recovered from prior surgery
- Prior surgical resection for NSCLC allowed
Other
- More than 12 weeks since prior investigational agents and recovered
- No other concurrent specific antitumor therapy
- No other concurrent investigational agents
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Clinical Research - Birmingham
Birmingham, England, B15 2TT
Hugh Jarrett, 44-121-414-6425
- Recruiting
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, England, B9 5SS
Joyce Thompson, 44-121-766-6611
About this study
Official title: A British Thoracic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin at 80mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin At 50 mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin AUC 6 in Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine together with cisplatin is more effective than giving gemcitabine together with carboplatin in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine and carboplatin in treating patients with stage III or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 2 different doses of cisplatin vs carboplatin, in terms of survival time, in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Secondary
- Compare symptom control and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the dose intensity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the ratio of courses of treatment given as in-patient vs out-patient in these patients.
- Compare the intensity and number and duration of toxic episodes in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare cost and cost-effectiveness of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to WHO performance status (0 vs 1 or 2), disease stage (IIIB vs IV), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine as in arm I and cisplatin (at a lower dose than in arm I) IV over 1 hour on day 1.
- Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine as in arm I and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1.
In all arms, treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients are reassessed after 2 courses. Patients with responding disease or stable disease with symptom improvement receive 2 additional courses of therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression or stable disease without symptom improvement are removed from the study.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, on day 1 of courses 2-4, at completion of study treatment, and then monthly for 6 months.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed monthly for 6 months and then periodically thereafter for survival.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,350 patients (450 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 6 years.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- carboplatin, cisplatin, gemcitabine hydrochloride
- Keywords
- stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carboplatinDrug
cisplatinDrug
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of survival
Secondary outcomes (6)
Symptom control and quality of life as measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items and Lung Cancer supplement 13 together with EuroQol-5 domain questionnaire
Treatment response as measured by RECIST criteria
Dose intensity of chemotherapy
Ratio of treatment courses given as in-patient versus out-patient
Toxicity as measured by CTCAE v3.0
Treatment cost
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 1,350 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Hugh Jarrett, Study chair, Institute of Clinical Research - Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00112710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000429610
- Other IDs
- CRUK-BTOG2-LU3005, EU-20510
- Status last verified
- May 2007
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Gijtenbeek RG, de Jong K, Venmans BJ, van Vollenhoven FH, Ten Brinke A, Van der Wekken AJ, van Geffen WH. Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
PubMed 37419867Ferry D, Billingham L, Jarrett H, Dunlop D, Woll PJ, Nicolson M, Shah R, Thompson J, Spicer J, Muthukumar D, Skailes G, Leonard P, Chetiyawardana AD, Wells P, Lewanski C, Crosse B, Hill M, Gaunt P, O'Byrne K. Carboplatin versus two doses of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from a British Thoracic Oncology Group randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
PubMed 28780466
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A British Thoracic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin at 80mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin At 50 mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin AUC 6 in Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00112710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000429610
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,350 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2005
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine together with cisplatin is more effective than giving gemcitabine together with carboplatin in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine and carboplatin in treating patients with stage III or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 2 different doses of cisplatin vs carboplatin, in terms of survival time, in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Secondary
- Compare symptom control and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare response in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare the dose intensity of these regimens in these patients.
- Compare the ratio of courses of treatment given as in-patient vs out-patient in these patients.
- Compare the intensity and number and duration of toxic episodes in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare cost and cost-effectiveness of these regimens in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to WHO performance status (0 vs 1 or 2), disease stage (IIIB vs IV), and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1.
- Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine as in arm I and cisplatin (at a lower dose than in arm I) IV over 1 hour on day 1.
- Arm III: Patients receive gemcitabine as in arm I and carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1.
In all arms, treatment repeats every 21 days for 2 courses. Patients are reassessed after 2 courses. Patients with responding disease or stable disease with symptom improvement receive 2 additional courses of therapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression or stable disease without symptom improvement are removed from the study.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, on day 1 of courses 2-4, at completion of study treatment, and then monthly for 6 months.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed monthly for 6 months and then periodically thereafter for survival.
Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,350 patients (450 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 6 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carboplatin | Drug | – |
| cisplatin | Drug | – |
| gemcitabine hydrochloride | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Length of survival
6 secondary outcomes
Symptom control and quality of life as measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items and Lung Cancer supplement 13 together with EuroQol-5 domain questionnaire
Treatment response as measured by RECIST criteria
Dose intensity of chemotherapy
Ratio of treatment courses given as in-patient versus out-patient
Toxicity as measured by CTCAE v3.0
Treatment cost
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37419867Gijtenbeek RG, de Jong K, Venmans BJ, van Vollenhoven FH, Ten Brinke A, Van der Wekken AJ, van Geffen WH. Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28780466Ferry D, Billingham L, Jarrett H, Dunlop D, Woll PJ, Nicolson M, Shah R, Thompson J, Spicer J, Muthukumar D, Skailes G, Leonard P, Chetiyawardana AD, Wells P, Lewanski C, Crosse B, Hill M, Gaunt P, O'Byrne K. Carboplatin versus two doses of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from a British Thoracic Oncology Group randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hugh Jarrett study chair
Institute of Clinical Research - Birmingham
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing carboplatin, cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in people with Lung Cancer, run by University Hospital Birmingham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00112710, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2013.