AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerPhase 2NCT00113776

Evaluating ABX-EGF Extended Therapy in Subjects With MetastaticColorectal Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing ABX-EGF in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety of ABX-EGF administered as monotherapy in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously randomized to best supportive care (BSC) in protocol 20020408 and subsequently determined to have progressive disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
ABX-EGF
How many people
Not given
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Start not givento not given
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria: - Subject previously randomized to BSC in protocol 20020408 and subsequently determined to have progressive disease - ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2 - Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function Exclusion Criteria: - Myocardial infarction in time interval between completing 20020408 and enrollment in study - History or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis - Prior anti-tumor therapies including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumor small molecules and biologics during the time interval between completing 20020408 protocol and enrollment in this study - Use of systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy during the time interval between completing 20020408 protocol and enrollment in this study

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-label, Single Arm Clinical Trial to Determine the Safety of ABX-EGF Extended Therapy in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety of ABX-EGF administered as monotherapy in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously randomized to best supportive care (BSC) in protocol 20020408 and subsequently determined to have progressive disease.

Being tested
ABX-EGF
Keywords
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Colon, Colorectal, Rectal Cancer, EGFr, Metastatic, Cancer, ABX-EGF, Panitumumab, Clinical Trial, Immunex, Abgenix, Amgen
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ABX-EGFDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of Adverse events

  2. Changes in Lab values

  3. Incidence of HAHA formation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2005 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00113776
Sponsor's protocol ID
20030194
Status last verified
Jan 2011
First submitted
10 Jun 2005
Last updated
21 Jan 2011
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Humblet Y, Canon JL, Maurel J, Bajetta E, Neyns B, Kotasek D, Santoro A, Scheithauer W, Spadafora S, Amado RG, Hogan N, Peeters M. An open-label, single-arm study assessing safety and efficacy of panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2008 Jan;19(1):92-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm399. Epub 2007 Sep 4.

    PubMed 17785764
  • Safari M, Esmaeili H, Mahjub H, Roshanaei G. Estimation of treatment effect in presence of noncompliance and competing risks: a simulation study. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):13477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40538-2.

    PubMed 37596461
  • Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116. Epub 2008 Mar 3.

    PubMed 18316791

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing ABX-EGF in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of Adverse events. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00113776, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in