AzTrials
AzTrials

Scleroderma, SystemicPhase 2/3SCOTNCT00114530

Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide or Transplantation

A Phase 2/3 study testing mHSCT and cyclophosphamide in people with Scleroderma, Systemic and Sclerosis, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 17 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

SCOT is a clinical research study designed for people with severe forms of scleroderma. SCOT stands for Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide Or Transplantation. The SCOT study will compare the potential benefits of stem cell transplant and high-dose monthly cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) in the treatment of scleroderma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 69 years
What is being tested?
mHSCT and cyclophosphamide
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
17 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jun 2005to Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR);
  • SSc, including extensive skin and internal organ involvement involving either the lungs or the kidneys, that threatens participant's life; and
  • Willingness to use accepted methods of contraception for at least 15 months after starting study treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Lung, heart, liver, or kidney impairment that would interfere with the study or compromise participant's survival;
  • Active blood vessel dilation in the stomach (Active Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia/GAVE, also known as "watermelon stomach"). Patients found to have this disorder at study screening can receive treatment outside the study and then be re-screened. For more information about this study criterion, refer to the study protocol.
  • Previous treatment with cyclophosphamide, as defined by: a) prior IV cyclophosphamide administration for more than 6 months OR a total cumulative IV dose greater than 3 g/m^2; b) prior oral cyclophosphamide administration for more than 4 months, regardless of dose; or c) combination of prior oral and IV cyclophosphamide administration for more than 6 months, independent of dose.
  • Steroid therapy at doses of greater than 10 mg/day, or more than 2 pulses for concurrent illnesses within prior 12 months;
  • Unwillingness or inability to discontinue certain disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of SSc;
  • Presence of clinically significant rheumatic diseases other than scleroderma requiring significant immunosuppression;
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Any active uncontrolled infection that would interfere with high-dose therapy or pulse cyclophosphamide regimens:
  • Hepatitis B virus infected
  • Hepatitis C virus infected or
  • HIV infected.
  • Blood abnormalities;
  • Diagnosis of cancer within 2 years prior to study entry. Participants with adequately treated squamous cell skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and carcinoma in situ are not excluded.
  • Other comorbid illnesses with an estimated life expectancy of less than 5 years;
  • Defective formation of bone marrow cells (myelodysplasia);
  • Uncontrolled hypertension;
  • History of hypersensitivity to murine or Escherichia coli (e.g., E. coli) proteins; History of noncompliance with prior medical care;
  • History of substance abuse within 5 years prior to study entry; or
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 2 countries.

17 sites in 2 countries

United States15 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Boston University School of Medicine

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • City of Hope National Medical Center

    Duarte, California, 91010-3000

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27709

  • University of Texas-Houston Medical School

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77230

  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0284

  • UCLA Medical School

    Los Angeles, California, 90095-1670

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC)

    Seattle, Washington, 98109

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • University of Toledo Health Science Campus

    Toledo, Ohio, 43606

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • University of Calgary

    Calgary, Alberta

  • Dr. Markland Medical Professional Corporation

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7K OH6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase II Multicenter Study of High-Dose Immunosuppressive Therapy Using Total Body Irradiation, Cyclophosphamide, ATGAM, and Autologous Transplantation With Auto-CD34+HPC Versus Intravenous Pulse Cyclophosphamide for the Treatment of Severe Systemic Sclerosis (SCSSc-01)

SCOT is a clinical research study designed for people with severe forms of scleroderma. SCOT stands for Scleroderma: Cyclophosphamide Or Transplantation. The SCOT study will compare the potential benefits of stem cell transplant and high-dose monthly cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) in the treatment of scleroderma.

Read the detailed description

Severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a serious autoimmune disorder in which a person's own immune cells attack organs in the body. SSc affects the skin, joints, lungs, heart, intestinal tract, and kidneys, and half of the patients with the most severe organ involvement die within 5 years. Treatment for SSc usually includes supportive care or immunosuppressive drugs (drugs to suppress the immune system). As the immune cells are believed to be causing the disease, researchers are looking for new therapies that either slow down or stop this process, while not being too toxic.

The main purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy followed by reinfusion (transplantation) of the participant's own autologous (self) peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) compared to treatment with monthly (for 12 months) intravenous doses of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) therapy for the treatment of severe systemic sclerosis (SSc). These treatments are being given in order to determine if they will slow down or stop SSc from becoming more severe, and if they can reverse the effects of the disease. The researchers are evaluating the effects of the two treatments on serious organ damage and survival related to SSc, while also looking at the side effects of the two treatments.

This trial also includes three optional mechanistic sub-studies open to a subset of participants enrolled in the SCOT trial:

  1. Pharmacokinetics of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in Patients Receiving Cyclophosphamide for the SCOT trial (Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-01, NCT00848614). The purpose of this study is to determine the plasma concentration and exposure time required for cyclophosphamide to produce optimal immunosuppressive activity with minimal toxicity in participants with severe systemic sclerosis.
  2. Vascular Progenitor Cells and the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis(Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-02, NCT00871221). The purpose of this study is to measure and characterize the circulating endothelial progenitor cells from the blood of 30 participants and also to determine the extent of vascular cell apoptosis and proliferation in cutaneous microvasculature in these participants before and after the receipt of the two SCOT treatment regimens.
  3. Molecular Analysis of T Cell Immune Recovery for the SCOT Trial(Originally listed separately as DAIT SCSSc-01-03, NCT00872508). The purpose of this study is [1] to describe the condition of peripheral T cell reactivity and repertoire diversity in SSc patients and evaluate evidence for potential defects prior to randomization, [2] to gain a better understanding of the impact of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) and high-dose immunosuppressive therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation on thymopoiesis, and [3] to describe the kinetics and breadth of T cell immune recovery in SSc patients treated with these interventions.
Being tested
mHSCT, cyclophosphamide
Keywords
systemic sclerosis, hematopoietic stem cell transplant, clinical trial, global rank composite score
Medical subject headings
Scleroderma, Systemic, Sclerosis, Autoimmune Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • mHSCTBiological

    Also called Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

    Hematopoietic progenitors were mobilized with G-CSF. After leukapheresis and CD34+ cell enrichment, the autologous product was cryopreserved. Fractionated TBI (800 cGy), CY (120 mg/kg) and equine antithymocyte globulin (90 mg/kg) were administered as previously reported (References provided in citation section of this ClinicalTrials.gov record: PubMed ID: 17452515 citation and 2.) PubMed ID: 12176878 citation).

  • cyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called cytoxan, CY

    An initial intravenous dose of 500 mg/m^2 was followed by 11 infusions of 750 mg/m^2 with mesna given for bladder protection.

Study groups in NCT00114530
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
mHSCTExperimentalMyeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (mHSCT) Participants will first have hematopoietic stem cells removed from their blood. They then will receive high doses of chemotherapy and radiation to eliminate their developed and presumably abnormal immune system, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation to reintroduce the purified stem cells to re-establish their immune system.
Receives: Biological: mHSCT
cyclophosphamideExperimentalCyclophosphamide (CY) Participants will receive high doses of intravenous cyclophosphamide. The dose being used in this study is about 50% higher than that commonly used by most physicians to treat many other autoimmune diseases. Administration of 12 monthly pulses of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (an initial dose of 500 mg/m^2, followed by 11 doses of 750 mg/m^2).
Receives: Drug: cyclophosphamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT)

    The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis > 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, PP)

    The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis > 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  2. Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, ITT)

    The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis > 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  3. Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 48, PP)

    The GRCS is an analytic tool that accounts for multiple disease manifestations simultaneously. It does not measure clinical disease activity or severity but reflects how participants compared to one another based on a hierarchy of ordered outcomes: death, event-free survival (EFS), forced vital capacity (FVC), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS). Participants alive ranked higher than those who died; those who survived event-free ranked higher than EFS failures. EFS failure included death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted ), renal failure (chronic dialysis > 6 month or renal transplant), or cardiac failure (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%). The lowest 3 GRCS components are ordinal; improvement, stability, or worsening from baseline (±10% change in FVC % predicted, ±0.4 change in HAQ-DI, ±25% change in mRSS).

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  4. Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, ITT)

    Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted or >20% in forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis > 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  5. Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 54, PP)

    Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis > 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  6. Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, ITT)

    Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis > 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  7. Event-Free Survival (EFS) (Month 48, PP)

    Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as survival without significant organ damage or death. EFS failure includes any one of the following: death, respiratory failure (decrease from baseline of >30% in DLCO % predicted or >20% in FVC % predicted, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart), renal failure (requiring chronic dialysis > 6 months or transplantation), or the occurrence of cardiomyopathy (clinical congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, documented on at least 2 successive occasions at least 1 month apart). EFS failures include participants who failed any component of the EFS definition between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  8. Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, ITT)

    Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  9. Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 54, PP)

    Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  10. Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, ITT)

    Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  11. Treatment-Related Mortality (Month 48, PP)

    Death, occurring at any time between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization, which is possibly, probably, or definitely resulting from treatment given in the study.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  12. All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, ITT)

    Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  13. All-Cause Mortality (Month 54, PP)

    Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  14. All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, ITT)

    Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  15. All-Cause Mortality (Month 48, PP)

    Any death, regardless of relationship to treatment, between randomization and Month 48 post-randomization.

    Measured: 48 Months Post-Randomization

  16. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (ITT)

    HAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of >0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of >0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered "no change." Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  17. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (PP)

    HAQ-DI is a self-reported questionnaire of functionality that includes questions in 8 domains (dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities). The final score ranges from 0 to 3, where a higher HAQ-DI score indicates a worse outcome. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: a decrease of >0.4 from baseline in the HAQ-DI score was considered disease improvement, an increase of >0.4 was considered disease worsening, and any change less than 0.4 was considered "no change." Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  18. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (ITT)

    The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a >= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a >= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change <10 points indicated "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  19. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) (PP)

    The SF-36 measures health-related quality of life. It has 36 items and 2 component scores, the Physical Component Score and the Mental Component Score. Each component was transformed into a 0-100 scale (higher numbers indicate greater quality of life) and normalized to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the 1998 general US population. Analysis was based on ordinal response, defined as follows for each component: a >= 10 point increase indicated disease improvement, a >= 10 point decrease indicated disease worsening, and a change <10 points indicated "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  20. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (ITT)

    Diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was <13 or >17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of >15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of >15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of <=15% was considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  21. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Diffusion in Liters of Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (PP)

    Diffusion in liters of carbon monoxide (DLCO) is a measure of lung function. Predicted values for DLCO were computed using the Crapo Morris equations and adjusted per the Cotes formula for anemia, if a participant's hemoglobin was <13 or >17 gm/dL, and altitude (Calgary site only). Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of >15% in DLCO % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of >15% indicated disease worsening, and a change of <=15% was considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  22. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (ITT)

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of >10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of >10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of <=10% was considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  23. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (PP)

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a full breath and is a measure of lung function. Predicted FVC was based on institutional standards. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: an increase from baseline of >10% in FVC % Predicted indicated disease improvement, a decrease of >10% indicated disease worsening, and a change of <=10% was considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  24. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (ITT)

    The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was <=20, a decrease >=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase >= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was >20, then a decrease of >25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of >25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  25. Change From Baseline to Month 54 in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) (PP)

    The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness. Skin thickness in 17 anatomic areas was rated on a 0-3 scale and scores are summed to obtain the mRSS (range from 0 - 51), with higher mRSS scores indicating worse disease activity. Analysis was based on an ordinal response variable, defined as follows: if the baseline mRSS was <=20, a decrease >=5 points from baseline indicated disease improvement and an increase >= 5 points indicated disease worsening; if the baseline mRSS was >20, then a decrease of >25% indicated disease improvement and an increase of >25% indicated disease worsening. Participants who do not meet the disease criteria outlined above were considered "no change". Data for participants without a Month 54 assessment was imputed using a last observation carried forward approach; improvement/worsening was assessed at each participant's last available study visit that occurred prior to or at Month 54, without confirmation at the next visit.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  26. New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (ITT)

    Any events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for >= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening was defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication, or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for >= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  27. New or Worsening Arrhythmias, Congestive Heart Failure, or Pericardial Effusion (PP)

    Any events that met the criteria outlined below or were reported as adverse events between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization are summarized. 1) Development of new or worsening arrhythmias that require medical treatment for >= 3 months or require ablative therapy or pacemaker insertion. (Note that for a participant who has medically controlled arrhythmia at randomization, worsening will be defined as breakthrough episodes severe enough to prompt change in medication, an increase in the dose of a medication or addition of a new medication to maintain control of the arrhythmia.) 2) Congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring clinical treatment for >= 3 months develops. 3) Clinically significant pericardial effusion (excess fluid around the heart) that required pericardial window.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  28. New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (ITT)

    Any pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure > 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization was done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was > 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  29. New or Worsening Pulmonary Hypertension (PP)

    Any pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) events that occurred between randomization and Month 54 post-randomization were summarized. Development of PAH occurred if the participant met the following criteria, where the measurement value(s) could not be explained by other causes such as congestive heart failure or pulmonary emboli: 1) a post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 55 mmHg by echocardiogram or 2) a mean pulmonary artery pressure > 30 mmHg at rest measured by right heart catheterization. If the post-baseline peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was between 40 to 55 mmHg by echocardiogram, a right heart catheterization would be done to confirm a diagnosis of pulmonary artery hypertension. The endpoint was met if the mean pulmonary artery pressure was > 30 mmHg at rest by right heart catheterization. Additionally, any adverse event reported as PAH was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  30. Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (ITT)

    Documented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP >= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP >= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of >= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio > 2.5), 3) hematuria (>= 2+ by dipstick or > 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  31. Occurrence of Scleroderma Renal Crisis (PP)

    Documented scleroderma renal crisis (hypertensive or non-hypertensive) occurring from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization was summarized. A hypertensive scleroderma renal crisis occurred if a participant obtained both of the following: New-onset hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) >= 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >= 90 mmHg, a rise in SBP >= 30 mmHg compared to baseline, or a rise in DBP >= 20 mmHg compared to baseline, and one of the following features: 1) increase of >= 50 % above baseline in serum creatinine, 2) proteinuria (>= 2+ by dipstick confirmed by protein:creatinine ratio > 2.5), 3) hematuria (>= 2+ by dipstick or > 10 RBCs/HPF, without menstruation), 4) thrombocytopenia (< 100,000 plts/mm3), or 5) hemolysis (determined by blood smear or increased reticulocyte count). Additionally, any adverse event reported as a scleroderma renal crisis was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  32. Documented Myositis (ITT)

    Number of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required > 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  33. Documented Myositis (PP)

    Number of participants who experienced any event of myositis that occurred from randomization to Month 54 post-randomization. Documented myositis occurred if the participant had 1) elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK), electromyography, and/or biopsy and 2) required > 30 mg per day prednisone for over 1 month or another therapy such as methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of myositis. Additionally, any adverse event reported as myositis was included in the analysis.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  34. Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) by Month 54 (ITT)

    Initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at > 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  35. Initiating Use of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs by Month 54 (DMARDs) (PP)

    Initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Participants were not expected to receive additional disease-modifying therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the absence of disease progression. In general, this includes the administration of any therapy clearly given for the purpose of treating the underlying SSc. It does not include concomitant treatments permitted in the protocol, such as use of methotrexate (15 g or less), anti-malarials, or minocycline for arthritis only. Systemic corticosteroids given at > 10 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent), without clearly defined non-SSc indications, and methotrexate given for non-arthritis indications are examples of qualifying DMARDs.

    Measured: 54 Months Post-Randomization

  36. Regimen-Related Toxicities

    Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.

    Measured: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization)

  37. Number of Subjects With Regimen-Related Toxicities

    Regimen-related toxicities are defined as Grade 3 or higher adverse events reported by site physicians as possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy.

    Measured: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

  38. Infectious Complications

    Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of "Infections and infestations" or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.

    Measured: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

  39. Number of Subjects With Infectious Complications

    Infectious complications include any events that code to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class of "Infections and infestations" or events that a site has classified as an infectious event. These can include bacteremia, septicemia, fungemia, fever associated with infection, infectious pneumonia, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, clinical infection (i.e. infection diagnosed with clinical features without identification of an organism) and other local/organ site-specific infections.

    Measured: Randomization through end of study follow-up (up to Month 72 post-randomization).

  40. Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count Engraftment

    Time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) engraftment is defined as the number of days post-transplant until required levels of ANC are attained (for the mHSCT arm only). If engraftment did not occur within 28 days post-transplant, then the variable was set to 28 days. ANC engraftment required an ANC of > 500 cells/microliter, maintained for 3 consecutive days.

    Measured: 28 days post-transplant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2005
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00114530
Sponsor's protocol ID
DAIT SCSSc-01
Other IDs
NIAID CRMS ID#: 20133
Acronym
SCOT
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
15 Jun 2005
Last updated
12 Apr 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: The plan is to share IPD in the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort), a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts. This archive is in support of the NIH mission to share data with the public. Data shared through ImmPort has been provided by NIH-funded programs, other research organizations and individual scientists ensuring these discoveries will be the foundation of future research.

Publications

  • Nash RA, McSweeney PA, Crofford LJ, Abidi M, Chen CS, Godwin JD, Gooley TA, Holmberg L, Henstorf G, LeMaistre CF, Mayes MD, McDonagh KT, McLaughlin B, Molitor JA, Nelson JL, Shulman H, Storb R, Viganego F, Wener MH, Seibold JR, Sullivan KM, Furst DE. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study. Blood. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):1388-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-072389. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

    PubMed 17452515
  • Sullivan KM, Shah A, Sarantopoulos S, Furst DE. Review: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Scleroderma: Effective Immunomodulatory Therapy for Patients With Pulmonary Involvement. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;68(10):2361-71. doi: 10.1002/art.39748. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27213276
  • Craciunescu OI, Steffey BA, Kelsey CR, Larrier NA, Paarz-Largay CJ, Prosnitz RG, Chao N, Chute J, Gasparetto C, Horwitz M, Long G, Rizzieri D, Sullivan KM. Renal shielding and dosimetry for patients with severe systemic sclerosis receiving immunoablation with total body irradiation in the scleroderma: cyclophosphamide or transplantation trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 15;79(4):1248-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.036. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

    PubMed 20800376
  • Hosing C, Nash R, McSweeney P, Mineishi S, Seibold J, Griffith LM, Shulman H, Goldmuntz E, Mayes M, Parikh CR, Crofford L, Keyes-Elstein L, Furst D, Steen V, Sullivan KM. Acute kidney injury in patients with systemic sclerosis participating in hematopoietic cell transplantation trials in the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 May;17(5):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 11.

    PubMed 20708086
  • Hung EW, Mayes MD, Sharif R, Assassi S, Machicao VI, Hosing C, St Clair EW, Furst DE, Khanna D, Forman S, Mineishi S, Phillips K, Seibold JR, Bredeson C, Csuka ME, Nash RA, Wener MH, Simms R, Ballen K, Leclercq S, Storek J, Goldmuntz E, Welch B, Keyes-Elstein L, Castina S, Crofford LJ, Mcsweeney P, Sullivan KM. Gastric antral vascular ectasia and its clinical correlates in patients with early diffuse systemic sclerosis in the SCOT trial. J Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;40(4):455-60. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121087. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

    PubMed 23418384
  • Keever-Taylor CA, Heimfeld S, Steinmiller KC, Nash RA, Sullivan KM, Czarniecki CW, Granderson TC, Goldstein JS, Griffith LM. Manufacture of Autologous CD34+ Selected Grafts in the NIAID-Sponsored HALT-MS and SCOT Multicenter Clinical Trials for Autoimmune Diseases. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1463-1472. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

    PubMed 28602891
  • Sullivan KM, Goldmuntz EA, Keyes-Elstein L, McSweeney PA, Pinckney A, Welch B, Mayes MD, Nash RA, Crofford LJ, Eggleston B, Castina S, Griffith LM, Goldstein JS, Wallace D, Craciunescu O, Khanna D, Folz RJ, Goldin J, St Clair EW, Seibold JR, Phillips K, Mineishi S, Simms RW, Ballen K, Wener MH, Georges GE, Heimfeld S, Hosing C, Forman S, Kafaja S, Silver RM, Griffing L, Storek J, LeClercq S, Brasington R, Csuka ME, Bredeson C, Keever-Taylor C, Domsic RT, Kahaleh MB, Medsger T, Furst DE; SCOT Study Investigators. Myeloablative Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Severe Scleroderma. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):35-47. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1703327.

    PubMed 29298160
  • Bellocchi C, Ying J, Goldmuntz EA, Keyes-Elstein L, Varga J, Hinchcliff ME, Lyons MA, McSweeney P, Furst DE, Nash R, Crofford LJ, Welch B, Goldin JG, Pinckney A, Mayes MD, Sullivan KM, Assassi S. Large-Scale Characterization of Systemic Sclerosis Serum Protein Profile: Comparison to Peripheral Blood Cell Transcriptome and Correlations With Skin/Lung Fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Apr;73(4):660-670. doi: 10.1002/art.41570. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

    PubMed 33131208
  • Keyes-Elstein L, Pinckney A, Goldmuntz E, Welch B, Franks JM, Martyanov V, Wood TA, Crofford L, Mayes M, McSweeney P, Nash R, Georges G, Csuka ME, Simms R, Furst D, Khanna D, Clair EWS, Whitfield ML, Sullivan KM. Clinical and Molecular Findings After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation or Cyclophosphamide for Scleroderma: Handling Missing Longitudinal Data. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;75(2):307-316. doi: 10.1002/acr.24785. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

    PubMed 34533286
  • Bruera S, Sidanmat H, Molony DA, Mayes MD, Suarez-Almazor ME, Krause K, Lopez-Olivo MA. Stem cell transplantation for systemic sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 29;7(7):CD011819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011819.pub2.

    PubMed 35904231
  • Shah A, Storek J, Woolson R, Pinckney A, Keyes-Elstein L, Wallace PK, Sempowski GD, McSweeney P, Mayes MD, Crofford L, Csuka ME, Phillips K, Khanna D, Simms R, Ballen K, LeClercq S, Clair WS, Nixon AB, Nash R, Wener M, Brasington R, Silver R, Griffith LM, Furst DE, Goldmuntz E, Sullivan KM. Lymphocyte subset abnormalities in early severe scleroderma favor a Th2 phenotype and are not altered by prior immunosuppressive therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Oct 6;61(10):4155-4162. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac015.

    PubMed 35108379

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing mHSCT and cyclophosphamide in people with Scleroderma, Systemic and Sclerosis, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 17 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Global Rank Composite Score (GRCS) (Month 54, ITT) (time frame: 54 Months Post-Randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00114530, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in