Renal TransplantationPhase 3BENEFIT-EXTNCT00114777
Study of Belatacept in Subjects Who Are Undergoing a Renal Transplant
A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 79 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this trial is to learn if Belatacept is effective and safe as a first line of immunosuppression treatment in patients undergoing a renal transplant where the donor kidney is obtained in patients with extended criteria. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 595 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2005to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is a first-time recipient of a kidney transplant from a deceased donor.
- Specific donor criteria
Who cannot join
- Donor age <10 years
- Subjects receiving a concurrent solid organ or cell transplant (lung, heart, etc.)
- Subjects with a positive T-cell lymphocytotoxic crossmatch.
- Subjects who are positive for Hepatitis B or C, or HIV
- Active tuberculosis
- History of cancer in the last 5 years
Show all 11Show fewer
- History of substance abuse
- Specific laboratory results are exclusionary
- Mammography suspicious for cancer
- Allergy to iodine
- For Long-term extension study-Subjects who have completed three years of study treatment (through Week 156)
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 19 countries.
79 sites in 19 countries
United States28 sites
Piedmont Transplant Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Northwestern University-Feinberg School Of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
University Of Chicago Hospitals
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Henry Ford Hospital, Transplant Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Ucla Kidney & Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Research Office
Los Angeles, California, 90024
National Institute Of Transplantation
Los Angeles, California, 90057
University Of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Froedtert Memorial Hospital
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
University Of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Yale University School Of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06540
Acadiana Renal Physicians
New Iberia, Louisiana, 70563
Tulane Abdominal Transplant Institute
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Mount Sinai School Of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University College Of Physicians & Surgeons
New York, New York, 10032
Drexel University College Of Medicine, Department Of Surgery
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
University Of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92133
University Of California San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143
Western New England Renal & Transplant Associates, Pc
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Lifelink Healthcare Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33606
France9 sites
Local Institution
Bordeaux, 33076
Local Institution
Brest, 29609
Local Institution
Créteil, 94000
Local Institution
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275
Local Institution
Nantes, 44093
Local Institution
Paris, 75015
Local Institution
Toulouse, 31054
Local Institution
Tours, 37044
Local Institution
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Brazil6 sites
Local Institution
Campinas/sp, São Paulo, 13083
Local Institution
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035
Local Institution
Porto Alegre/rs, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035
Local Institution
Rio de Janeiro, 21041
Local Institution
São Paulo, 05403
Local Institution
São Paulo, 4038-002
Argentina5 sites
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, 1425
Local Institution
Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, C1155APP
Local Institution
Cordoba, Crd, Córdoba Province, X5016KEH
Local Institution
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Local Institution
Santa Fe, S3000EPV
Germany5 sites
Local Institution
Berlin, 10117
Local Institution
Berlin, 13353
Local Institution
Erlangen, 91054
Local Institution
Essen, 45147
Local Institution
Hanover, 30625
Spain5 sites
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08036
Local Institution
Barcelona, 08907
Local Institution
Madrid, 28040
Local Institution
Madrid, 28041
Local Institution
Málaga, 29010
Canada4 sites
Local Institution
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2S2
Local Institution
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Local Institution
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Local Institution
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9
Italy3 sites
Local Institution
Milan, 20162
Local Institution
Padova, 35128
Local Institution
Roma, 00168
Hungary2 sites
Local Institution
Budapest, 1082
Local Institution
Szeged, H-6720
About this study
Official title: Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial - Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT)
The purpose of this trial is to learn if Belatacept is effective and safe as a first line of immunosuppression treatment in patients undergoing a renal transplant where the donor kidney is obtained in patients with extended criteria.
- Conditions
- Renal Transplantation
- Being tested
- Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI), Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cyclosporin ADrug
Also called CsA
tablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months, 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 84 months
Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI)Drug
solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months
Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)Drug
solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporin A | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin A |
| Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) |
| Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 12 Months Post-Transplant
Participant and graft survival at 12 months was summarized within each treatment group. Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) as determined by central laboratory for ≥4 weeks or 56 or more consecutive days of dialysis.
Measured: Month 12 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <60 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or a Decrease in Measured GFR >=10 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via non-radiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure.
Measured: From Month 3 to Month 12
Secondary outcomes (21)
Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Month 12 and 24
GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here, 'n' signifies the number of evaluable participants for the reporting arm at the given time point. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed to a GFR of zero.
Measured: At Month 12 and Month 24
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12
Biopsy-proven CAN was determined by a blinded central histopathologist using the Banff 97 working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Onset of CAN was determined by the biopsy date when it was observed. Participants were considered as having CAN at 12 months if: CAN observed in a biopsy either prior to 12 months (including baseline biopsy) or first post 12 months biopsy; Participant had graft loss during the first year post transplant; no biopsy available post 12 months and CAN not observed in biopsies prior to 12 months; no biopsy available either prior to or post 12 months; and the measured glomerular filtration rate from Month 3 to Month 12 decreases at least 10 mL/min/1.73m^2. All other participants with missing 12 month biopsy were considered having no CAN observed at 12 months.
Measured: At Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 24 and 36 Months Post-Transplant
Participant and graft survival at 12 months was summarized within each treatment group. Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss will be defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) as determined by central laboratory for ≥ 4 weeks or 56 or more consecutive days of dialysis.
Measured: Month 24 and Month 36 post-transplant
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84 Months
GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Change in Calculated GFR at Months 12, 24, 36 and 84
GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via nonradiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure. Missing measured GFR assessments were imputed. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36 and 84
Number of Participants With Anti-Hypertensive Medications Used to Control Hypertension at 12, 24 and 36 Months
Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or participant had received an antihypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Used Anti-Hypertensive Medications to Control Hypertension at Months 12, 24 and 36
Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or subject had received an anti-hypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) at 12, 24 and 36 Months.
NODM was defined as participant who did not have diabetes prior to randomization. Participants were determined for NODM if the participant received an antidiabetic medication for a duration of at least 30 days, or at least two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) tests indicate that FPG is ≥ 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L).
Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36
Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at 12, 24 and 36 Months
Participants were determined to have hypertension at a particular time point if standardized systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg or standardized diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mm Hg or participant had received an anti-hypertensive medication(s) for hypertension. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36
Mean Framingham Risk Score From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36
The risk score was calculated based on the total points from six variables: Age, Level of LDL-cholesterol, Level of HDL-cholesterol, Presence and severity of systolic or diastolic hypertension, Presence or absence of a history of diabetes mellitus and Presence or absence of a history recent cigarette smoking. Total scores can range from <-3 to >14, which translate to a 1% to 56% risk of developing coronary heart disease in 10 years. Totals in the 4 to 6 point range translate to a 7 to 11% risk and 8 to 10 point range translate to a 18 to 27% risk.
Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants Using Lipid-Lowering Therapy at 12, 24, and 36 Months
Dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L], low density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L], and non-elevated high density lipoprotein (HDL) ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36
Change in Total Cholesterol (TC), Non-HDL, LDL and HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides at 12, 24 and 36
Dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride ≥ 500 mg/dL [5.65 mmol/L], low density lipoprotein (LDL) ≥ 100 mg/dL [2.59 mmol/L], and elevated non-high density lipoprotein (HDL) ≥ 130 mg/dL [3.36 mmol/L]. Here 'n' signifies those participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Clinically suspected acute rejection was defined as an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output or fever and graft tenderness or serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post--transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Number of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy and Steroid-Resistant for Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, and 36.
Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Lymphocyte -depletion therapy for treatment of an episode of acute was defined as a participant treated with therapy and provided not treated with steroids earlier while steroid resistant acute rejection was defined as participants initially treated with steroids alone for suspected acute rejection for at least 2 days and then followed by the start of lymphocyte -depletion therapy.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants Based on Severity of Acute Rejection Based on Banff Grade Level by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Acute rejection was defined as central biopsy proven rejection that was either clinically suspected by protocol defined reasons or clinically suspected by other reasons and treated. Clinically suspected acute rejection was defined as an unexplained rise of serum creatinine ≥ 25% from baseline creatinine or an unexplained decreased urine output or fever and graft tenderness or serum creatinine that remains elevated within 14 days post--transplantation and clinical suspicion of acute rejection exists.
Measured: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Mean Changes in Mental Component and Physical Component Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36) From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36
The SF-36 is a 36-item self-administered questionnaire developed to assess health-related quality of life (QOL) and comprises 8 domains, including 4 physical (physical health, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitations) and 4 mental (mental health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional role limitation) subscales. Responses are used to derive physical and mental component summary scores, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QOL (0=Poorest Health; 100=Best Health). Mean change from baseline = post-baseline value - baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs up to 36 Months
Participants with abnormal blood pressure, body weight and body temperature outside the defined normal range were graded as clinically significant vital signs by the investigator.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities up to 36 Months
Participants with laboratory values outside the defined normal range were graded as clinically significant laboratory abnormalities by the investigator. Subjects were analyzed for Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase(AST), Hemoglobin, Platelet Count, Leukocytes, Bilirubin, Creatinine, Calcium, Bicarbonate, Potassium, Magnesium, Sodium, Phosphorus, Albumin, Uric Acid and Protein. Laboratory abnormalities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3. Here 'n' signifies those subjects evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm, respectively.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 36
AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 84
AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), syndrome or disease which either occurs during study, having been absent at baseline, or, if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require (or prolong) hospitalization, cause persistent or significant disability/incapacity, result in congenital anomalies or birth defects, or are other conditions which in judgment of investigators represent significant hazards.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 84
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death to Month 84
Participant and graft survival at 84 months was summarized within each treatment group.
Measured: Randomization to date of death, up to 84 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2005
- Primary completionMay 2008
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Renal TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 595 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00114777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM103-027
- Acronym
- BENEFIT-EXT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.
PubMed 24831918Pestana JO, Grinyo JM, Vanrenterghem Y, Becker T, Campistol JM, Florman S, Garcia VD, Kamar N, Lang P, Manfro RC, Massari P, Rial MD, Schnitzler MA, Vitko S, Duan T, Block A, Harler MB, Durrbach A. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: a phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012 Mar;12(3):630-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
PubMed 22300431
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Belatacept Evaluation of Nephroprotection and Efficacy as First-line Immunosuppression Trial - Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT-EXT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00114777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BENEFIT-EXT / IM103-027
- Conditions
- Renal Transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 595 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2005
- Primary completion
- May 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this trial is to learn if Belatacept is effective and safe as a first line of immunosuppression treatment in patients undergoing a renal transplant where the donor kidney is obtained in patients with extended criteria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporin A | Active comparator | Drug: Cyclosporin A |
| Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) | Experimental | Drug: Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) |
| Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) | Experimental | Drug: Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subject is a first-time recipient of a kidney transplant from a deceased donor.
- Specific donor criteria
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Donor age <10 years
- Subjects receiving a concurrent solid organ or cell transplant (lung, heart, etc.)
- Subjects with a positive T-cell lymphocytotoxic crossmatch.
- Subjects who are positive for Hepatitis B or C, or HIV
- Active tuberculosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporin AAlso: CsAtablet, oral, 1st month target: 150-300 ng/mL, after 1st month target: 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 36 months, 100-250 ng/mL, daily, 84 months | Drug | Cyclosporin A |
| Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI)solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months | Drug | Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) |
| Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI)solution, IV, 10mg/kg: Days 1 and 5, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,12, 16, 20, and 24, then 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 36 months, 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks, q 4 weeks, 84 months | Drug | Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 12 Months Post-Transplant
Time frame: Month 12 post-transplant
Participant and graft survival at 12 months was summarized within each treatment group. Graft loss was defined as either functional loss or physical loss (nephrectomy). Functional loss was defined as a sustained level of serum creatinine ≥ 6.0 mg/dL (530 μmol/L) as determined by central laboratory for ≥4 weeks or 56 or more consecutive days of dialysis.
Percentage of Participants With a Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <60 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 at Month 12 or a Decrease in Measured GFR >=10 mL/Min Per 1.73 m^2 From Month 3 to Month 12
Time frame: From Month 3 to Month 12
GFR was assessed using a true measure of glomerular filtration via non-radiolabeled iothalamate clearance test using a validated procedure.
21 secondary outcomes
Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) by Month 12 and 24
Time frame: At Month 12 and Month 24
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Allograft Nephropathy (CAN) at Month 12
Time frame: At Month 12
Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 24 and 36 Months Post-Transplant
Time frame: Month 24 and Month 36 post-transplant
Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84 Months
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Change in Calculated GFR at Months 12, 24, 36 and 84
Time frame: Baseline and Months 12, 24, 36 and 84
Number of Participants With Anti-Hypertensive Medications Used to Control Hypertension at 12, 24 and 36 Months
Time frame: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Subjects Who Used Anti-Hypertensive Medications to Control Hypertension at Months 12, 24 and 36
Time frame: Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus (NODM) at 12, 24 and 36 Months.
Time frame: Months 12, 24 and 36
Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) at 12, 24 and 36 Months
Time frame: Months 12, 24 and 36
Mean Framingham Risk Score From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36
Time frame: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants Using Lipid-Lowering Therapy at 12, 24, and 36 Months
Time frame: Months 12, 24 and 36
Change in Total Cholesterol (TC), Non-HDL, LDL and HDL Cholesterol and Triglycerides at 12, 24 and 36
Time frame: Months 12, 24 and 36
Percentage of Participants Who Have an Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Number of Participants Using Lymphocyte Depleting Therapy and Steroid-Resistant for Acute Rejection by Months 6, 12, 24, and 36.
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants Based on Severity of Acute Rejection Based on Banff Grade Level by Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Time frame: Months 6, 12, 24, 36 and 84
Mean Changes in Mental Component and Physical Component Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-36) From Baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36
Time frame: Baseline and Months 12, 24 and 36
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs up to 36 Months
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities up to 36 Months
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 36
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Related AEs and SAEs, AEs Leading to Discontinuation and Who Died up to Month 84
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 84
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss or Death to Month 84
Time frame: Randomization to date of death, up to 84 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24831918Dobbels F, Wong S, Min Y, Sam J, Kalsekar A. Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials. Transplantation. 2014 Nov 15;98(9):960-8. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000159.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22300431Pestana JO, Grinyo JM, Vanrenterghem Y, Becker T, Campistol JM, Florman S, Garcia VD, Kamar N, Lang P, Manfro RC, Massari P, Rial MD, Schnitzler MA, Vitko S, Duan T, Block A, Harler MB, Durrbach A. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: a phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012 Mar;12(3):630-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Related trials for Renal Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
79 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cyclosporin A, Belatacept Less Intensive Regimen (LI) and Belatacept More Intensive Regimen (MI) in people with Renal Transplantation, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 79 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in United States, France, Brazil, Argentina, Germany and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Survived With a Graft at 12 Months Post-Transplant (time frame: Month 12 post-transplant). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00114777, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2017.