AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionsNCT00119093

Home-based AIDS Care Project

A study testing Laboratory and clinical monitoring regimens in people with HIV Infections, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Uganda.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Home-based AIDS care program pilot project delivers and monitors antiretroviral (ARV) and tuberculosis (TB) medications at the homes of 1,000 people with HIV living in a rural area of Uganda. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infections
What is being tested?
Laboratory and clinical monitoring regimens
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteUganda
Study dates
May 2003to Mar 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HIV infection
  • CD4 cell count <250 or symptomatic AIDS
  • Age >13 years
  • Karnofsky score >40%
  • AST or ALT < 5 times normal values
  • Creatinine clearance >25 ml/min

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Uganda1 site
  • Tororo Hospital/CDC-Uganda

    Tororo, Tororo

Other trials in Uganda

About this study

Official title: Home-based AIDS Care Project, Tororo, Uganda

The Home-based AIDS care program pilot project delivers and monitors antiretroviral (ARV) and tuberculosis (TB) medications at the homes of 1,000 people with HIV living in a rural area of Uganda. This study is evaluating how well this program reduces illness and prolongs the life of participants, changes sexual behavior, influences levels of adherence to medication, affects aspects of perceived stigma by participants and their communities, and other operational components of the program including cost-effectiveness. This study is evaluating the hypothesis that frequent home visits by a trained lay person with a standard questionnaire is equivalent in terms of health outcomes to frequent viral load and CD4 cell count measurements.

Read the detailed description

In Uganda, the high cost and complexity of administering antiretroviral therapy is an obstacle to full implementation country-wide. The Home-based AIDS care program (HBAC) pilot project was designed to deliver and monitor ARV and tuberculosis (TB) medications at the homes of 1,000 people with HIV living in a rural area of Uganda. In addition, the cost and complexity of frequent laboratory monitoring of viral load and CD4 cell counts is a major impediment to widespread use of ARV therapies in Uganda and other resource-limited settings. Nested within the Home-Based AIDS Care (HBAC) project, is a randomized study of strategies for monitoring ARV therapy that involves 3 arms: 1) Quarterly CD4 cell counts, viral loads and home visits by trained lay persons; 2) Quarterly CD4 cell counts and home visits; and 3) Home visits alone.

Conditions
HIV Infections
Being tested
Laboratory and clinical monitoring regimens
Keywords
Antiretroviral therapy, HIV, Adherence, Viral Load, Opportunistic illness
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laboratory and clinical monitoring regimensProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Equivalence of 3 different monitoring regimens for ART

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Sexual risk behavior

  2. medication adherence

  3. quality of life

  4. depression

  5. cost-effectiveness

  6. viral load

  7. CD4 cell count

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2003
  3. Primary completionMar 2009
  4. Study completionMar 2009

Why it stopped: Terminated by IRB for non-compliance with human subject regulations.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00119093
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDC-NCHSTP-3666
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
8 Jul 2005
Last updated
11 Sep 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ekwaru JP, Campbell J, Malamba S, Moore DM, Were W, Mermin J. The effect of opportunistic illness on HIV RNA viral load and CD4+ T cell count among HIV-positive adults taking antiretroviral therapy. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 Apr 1;16(1):17355. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.17355.

    PubMed 23547778
  • Campbell JD, Moore D, Degerman R, Kaharuza F, Were W, Muramuzi E, Odongo G, Wetaka M, Mermin J, Tappero JW. HIV-infected ugandan adults taking antiretroviral therapy with CD4 counts >200 cells/muL who discontinue cotrimoxazole prophylaxis have increased risk of malaria and diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;54(8):1204-11. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis013. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

    PubMed 22423133
  • Mermin J, Ekwaru JP, Were W, Degerman R, Bunnell R, Kaharuza F, Downing R, Coutinho A, Solberg P, Alexander LN, Tappero J, Campbell J, Moore DM. Utility of routine viral load, CD4 cell count, and clinical monitoring among adults with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: randomised trial. BMJ. 2011 Nov 9;343:d6792. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6792.

    PubMed 22074711
  • Weidle PJ, Moore D, Mermin J, Buchacz K, Were W, Downing R, Kigozi A, Ndazima V, Peters P, Brooks JT. Liver enzymes improve over twenty-four months of first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy in rural Uganda. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2008 Oct;22(10):787-95. doi: 10.1089/apc.2008.0020.

    PubMed 18778241

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laboratory and clinical monitoring regimens in people with HIV Infections, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Uganda.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Uganda. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Terminated by IRB for non-compliance with human subject regulations.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Equivalence of 3 different monitoring regimens for ART. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00119093, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2012.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in