AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone Marrow TransplantationPhase 2/3NCT00120575

Hemofiltration for Respiratory Failure After Bone Marrow Transplantation

A Phase 2/3 study testing hemofiltration in people with Bone Marrow Transplantation and Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Stanford University at 7 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

For children undergoing bone marrow transplantation, respiratory failure is a devastating complication, with mortality expectations well above 60%. The researchers have devised a novel strategy that may greatly improve survival. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 21 years
What is being tested?
hemofiltration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
6 participants
Where
7 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jan 2005to 3 Feb 2009
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • hematopoietic stem cell recipient
  • respiratory failure fulfilling ARDS criteria
  • mechanical ventilation (invasive / non-invasive)

Who cannot join

  • extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
  • predominance of congestive heart failure
  • code status: a patient must be willing to accept invasive mechanical ventilation if clinically indicated

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 4 countries.

7 sites in 4 countries

United States4 sites
  • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta @ Egleston

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Children's Hospital and Research Center

    Oakland, California, 94609

  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Children's Hospital of British Columbia

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

Germany1 site
  • University of Ulm

    Ulm

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom1 site
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Hemofiltration for Respiratory Failure Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

For children undergoing bone marrow transplantation, respiratory failure is a devastating complication, with mortality expectations well above 60%. The researchers have devised a novel strategy that may greatly improve survival. Hemofiltration, a continuous form of dialysis, was designed as a therapy for critically ill patients with kidney failure. A semi-permeable membrane removes plasma water and solutes (up to about 35,000 Daltons molecular weight). The researchers have treated immuno-compromised children with respiratory failure with hemofiltration. Many inflammatory molecules are of a size well below the limit of the filter. Hemofiltration might remove a critical amount of this inflammatory material, attenuating the unregulated inflammatory response that is central to the development of respiratory failure and progression to multiple organ failure and death. The researchers are conducting a multi-center trial of early continuous hemofiltration for respiratory failure in children following bone marrow transplantation. The researchers will analyze blood and ultrafiltrate using sensitive proteomic methods to detect several inflammatory biochemicals known to be active in this disease, looking for evidence that early active hemofiltration alters the inflammatory response. The researchers will test whether 'early' hemofiltration produces greater survival from respiratory failure in this vulnerable population.

Read the detailed description

For children undergoing bone marrow transplantation, respiratory failure carries mortality expectations well above 60%. The researchers have published preliminary evidence that continuous hemofiltration may greatly improve survival, if filtration is begun when the child first fulfills clinical criteria for ARDS. This is a departure from standard practice, as hemofiltration is usually begun later in the course (if at all) when multiple organ failure is entrenched. Hemofiltration, a 'renal replacement therapy' for critically ill patients, is a slow, continuous process in which a semi-permeable membrane removes plasma water and solutes (up to about 35 kiloDaltons). Many cytokine and chemokine molecules are smaller than the molecular weight limit of the filter; hemofiltration might remove a critical amount, attenuating the unregulated inflammatory response responsible for respiratory failure and progression to multiple organ failure and death. The researchers will conduct a multi-center randomized trial assessing the effect of hemofiltration on survival from respiratory after bone marrow (or more precisely, hematopoietic stem cell) transplantation. The researchers will perform sensitive proteomic assays of serum and ultrafiltrate, to detect the presence of cytokines and chemokines known to be active in idiopathic pneumonia syndrome. Resulting profiles will constitute a uniquely complex description of ultrafiltrate and may provide evidence for modulation of immune function by hemofiltration.

Being tested
hemofiltration
Keywords
Hemofiltration, Pediatrics
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • hemofiltrationProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Survival

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. PELOD organ failure score

  2. number of ventilator-free days

  3. duration of hospitalization

  4. functional outcome score

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2005
  3. Primary completion3 Feb 2009
  4. Study completion3 Feb 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00120575
Sponsor's protocol ID
BMT CVVH
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
11 Jul 2005
Last updated
4 Jun 2026
Results posted
No

Publications

  • DiCarlo JV, Alexander SR, Agarwal R, Schiffman JD. Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration may improve survival from acute respiratory distress syndrome after bone marrow transplantation or chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Oct;25(10):801-5. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200310000-00012.

    PubMed 14528104
  • Di Carlo JV, Alexander SR. Hemofiltration for cytokine-driven illnesses: the mediator delivery hypothesis. Int J Artif Organs. 2005 Aug;28(8):777-86. doi: 10.1177/039139880502800803.

    PubMed 16211527

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing hemofiltration in people with Bone Marrow Transplantation and Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Stanford University at 7 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Survival. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00120575, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in