Myocardial InfarctionPhase 2/3NCT00121446
Which Therapy for Acute Heart Attacks? (The WEST Study)
A Phase 2/3 study testing tenecteplase, enoxaparin and clopidogrel in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Alberta at 16 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- tenecteplase, enoxaparin and clopidogrel
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Jul 2003to not given
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant female patients aged >18 years
- Patients with symptoms presumed secondary to STEMI lasting at least 20 minutes and accompanied by ECG evidence >2 mm of ST elevation in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads or in 2 or more limb leads;or > 1mm ST elevation in 2 or more limb leads coupled with >1 mm ST depression in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads such that the total ST deviation is >4 mm; or presumed new left bundle branch block
- Earliest point of care and randomisation must be within 6 hours of onset of symptoms as defined in previous criteria
- Females of child-bearing age, not using a generally accepted method of contraception must have a negative urine pregnancy test
- Written informed consent prior to randomisation of study
Who cannot join
- PCI expected to commence within < 60 minutes from identification of suitable candidate
- Inability to have angiography/PCI within 3 hrs from randomisation
- Active bleeding or known hemorrhagic diathesis
- Any history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, dementia or structural CNS damage e.g. neoplasm, aneurysm, AV malformation
- Major surgery or trauma within the past 3 months
- Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Show all 20Show fewer
- Use of abciximab (ReoPro) or other GP IIb/IIIa antagonists within the preceding 7 days
- Any minor head trauma and/or any other trauma occurring after onset of the current myocardial infarction
- Significant hypertension (i.e. SBP > 180 mm HG and/or DBP > 110mm HG) at any time from presentation (earliest point of care) to randomisation
- Current treatment with vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) resulting with an INR > 1.5
- Anticipated difficulty obtaining vascular access
- Prolonged (>10 min) cardiopulmonary resuscitation or cardiogenic shock
- Patients who have participated in an investigational drug study within 7 days prior to randomisation
- Known renal insufficiency (prior creatinine >2.5 mg% for men and >2.0 mg% for women)
- Treatment with standard unfractionated heparin (heparin sodium) >5000 IU or a therapeutic dose of any low molecular weight heparin, within 6 hours prior to randomisation
- Known thrombocytopenia (prior platelet count below 100 000/ul)
- Known sensitivity to TNKase, clopidogrel, heparin, low molecular weight heparin or abciximab
- Pregnancy or lactation, parturition within the previous 30 days
- Any serious concomitant systemic or life limiting disorder that would be incompatible with the trial
- Inability to follow protocol and comply with follow-up requirements
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
Canada16 sites
Dartmouth General Hospital
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
Grey Nuns Community Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta
Misericordia Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta
Queen Elizabeth II Hospital
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Leduc General Hospital
Leduc, Alberta
Cobequid Community Health Centre Emergency Department
Lower Sackville, Nova Scotia
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec
Pierre Le Gardeur Hospital
Repentigny, Quebec
Richmond Hospital
Richmond, British Columbia
Sturgeon Community Health Care Centre
St. Albert, Alberta
Surrey Memorial Hospital
Surrey, British Columbia
Lions Gate Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia
About this study
Official title: Which Early ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy? The WEST Study
In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty.
WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
Read the detailed description
The principal objective of WEST is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of the following three treatment groups defined as Group A: optimal pharmacologic therapy (prompt administration of tenecteplase (TNKase) and enoxaparin) at the earliest point of medical contact with usual post MI care; Group B: an identical pharmacological reperfusion strategy followed by an early invasive strategy including timely mechanical intervention, Group C: timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), undertaken after enoxaparin and an oral loading dose of clopidogrel.
The secondary objective of WEST is to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving optimal pharmacologic therapy and a strategy of usual post-MI care, Group A versus protocol-mandated early catheterisation and PCI, Group B.
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- tenecteplase, enoxaparin, clopidogrel, percutaneous coronary intervention
- Keywords
- Heart Attack, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Medical subject headings
- Myocardial Infarction, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tenecteplaseDrug
enoxaparinDrug
clopidogrelDrug
percutaneous coronary interventionProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
composite of 6 elements defined by: death
recurrent myocardial infarction
heart failure
cardiogenic shock
refractory ischemia
major ventricular arrhythmia
Secondary outcomes (3)
90 and 180 minute ECG ST resolution
QRS determined infarct size at discharge/day 7
CK infarct size determined by area under the curve or peak CK-MB
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2003
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company
- Investigators
- Paul W. Armstrong, M.D., Study chair, Canadian VIGOUR Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121446
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CVC1002
- Status last verified
- Jul 2005
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 19 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Armstrong PW; WEST Steering Committee. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl088. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
PubMed 16757491Westerhout CM, Bonnefoy E, Welsh RC, Steg PG, Boutitie F, Armstrong PW. The influence of time from symptom onset and reperfusion strategy on 1-year survival in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention from CAPTIM and WEST. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.033.
PubMed 21315210
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Which Early ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Therapy? The WEST Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00121446
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CVC1002
- Conditions
- Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Heart Attack, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hoffmann-La Roche, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- Jul 2003
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (heart attacks), the principle objective of the WEST Study is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of 3 different treatment strategies. The first is using medical (drug) therapy alone with standard care. The second strategy is identical medical (drug) therapy as the first group combined with early heart catheterization (within 24 hours) for angiography and if required, intervention. The third treatment strategy is direct admission (within 3 hrs) to the heart catheterization lab for angioplasty.
WEST patients will be enrolled at first medical contact (using emergency medical services, e.g. ambulance) if possible or through Emergency Departments in participating health care facilities.
Detailed description
The principal objective of WEST is to compare the impact on clinical outcomes of the following three treatment groups defined as Group A: optimal pharmacologic therapy (prompt administration of tenecteplase (TNKase) and enoxaparin) at the earliest point of medical contact with usual post MI care; Group B: an identical pharmacological reperfusion strategy followed by an early invasive strategy including timely mechanical intervention, Group C: timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), undertaken after enoxaparin and an oral loading dose of clopidogrel.
The secondary objective of WEST is to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving optimal pharmacologic therapy and a strategy of usual post-MI care, Group A versus protocol-mandated early catheterisation and PCI, Group B.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant female patients aged >18 years
- Patients with symptoms presumed secondary to STEMI lasting at least 20 minutes and accompanied by ECG evidence >2 mm of ST elevation in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads or in 2 or more limb leads;or > 1mm ST elevation in 2 or more limb leads coupled with >1 mm ST depression in 2 or more contiguous precordial leads such that the total ST deviation is >4 mm; or presumed new left bundle branch block
- Earliest point of care and randomisation must be within 6 hours of onset of symptoms as defined in previous criteria
- Females of child-bearing age, not using a generally accepted method of contraception must have a negative urine pregnancy test
- Written informed consent prior to randomisation of study
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- PCI expected to commence within < 60 minutes from identification of suitable candidate
- Inability to have angiography/PCI within 3 hrs from randomisation
- Active bleeding or known hemorrhagic diathesis
- Any history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, dementia or structural CNS damage e.g. neoplasm, aneurysm, AV malformation
- Major surgery or trauma within the past 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tenecteplase | Drug | – |
| enoxaparin | Drug | – |
| clopidogrel | Drug | – |
| percutaneous coronary intervention | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
composite of 6 elements defined by: death
recurrent myocardial infarction
heart failure
cardiogenic shock
refractory ischemia
major ventricular arrhythmia
3 secondary outcomes
90 and 180 minute ECG ST resolution
QRS determined infarct size at discharge/day 7
CK infarct size determined by area under the curve or peak CK-MB
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2017.
- Background: PubMed 16757491Armstrong PW; WEST Steering Committee. A comparison of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs. primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (Which Early ST-elevation myocardial infarction Therapy) study. Eur Heart J. 2006 Jul;27(13):1530-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl088. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 21315210Westerhout CM, Bonnefoy E, Welsh RC, Steg PG, Boutitie F, Armstrong PW. The influence of time from symptom onset and reperfusion strategy on 1-year survival in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of an early fibrinolytic strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention from CAPTIM and WEST. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.033.
- Canadian VIGOUR Centre HomepageLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
ODSSEY-SCD_Identification Of Markers to preDict the rISk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Moderated LVEF in ischEmic cardiomyopathY
Myocardial Infarction (MI), Sudden Cardiac Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmia
RecruitingObservational study
Breisgau PHENO-HEART MI
Myocardial Infarction, STEMI
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
CRP Apheresis in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
Recruiting
Reducing Slow/No-Reflow With Prophylactic High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Protocol in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The REFLOW AMI Trial
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul W. Armstrong, M.D. study chair
Canadian VIGOUR Centre
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing tenecteplase, enoxaparin and clopidogrel in people with Myocardial Infarction, run by University of Alberta at 16 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
composite of 6 elements defined by: death. The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00121446, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2017.