AzTrials
AzTrials

PancreatitisPhase 3NCT00121901

Does Glyceryl Nitrate Prevent Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) Pancreatitis?

A Phase 3 study testing glyceryl nitrate in people with Pancreatitis, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 14 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Post-ERCP pancreatitis can be a serious complication to ERCP. Two studies have shown a promising preventive effect of glyceryl nitrate. This study should provide a final answer to the clinical question: Does glyceryl nitrate prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? The study is a prospective, randomized, double blind… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreatitis
What is being tested?
glyceryl nitrate
How many people
1,600 participants
Where
14 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Oct 2004to Oct 2007
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients (men and women) more than 18 years old who are going to have an ERCP procedure performed at the different centers from September 1, 2004 to about January 31, 2005 will be included.

Who cannot join

  • Before the study: active acute pancreatitis (defined as: acute upper abdominal pain and S-amylases x 3 upper normal limit OR upper abdominal pain + radiological findings [CAT-/MR-scan] consistent with acute pancreatitis OR pathoanatomical findings consistent with acute pancreatitis by surgery)
  • Known previous sphincterotomy
  • Chronic pancreatitis with known calcifications
  • Hypotension (definition: systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg)
  • Anemia, men/women (hemoglobin < 6 mmol/l or <9.7 g/dl)
  • Constrictive pericarditis
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Pericardial tamponade
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis
  • Mitral stenosis sildenafil within 24 hours before the ERCP procedure and 24 hours after the procedure
  • Hypersensibility to nitroglycerine
  • Hypersensibility to the applied glue on the patch
  • Known untreated hypothyroidism
  • Pregnancy or a potential to become pregnant, i.e. those who are not using safe contraception (intrauterine device [IUD] or oral contraception)
  • Included earlier in the study
  • Exchange of stent

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 4 countries.

14 sites in 4 countries

Denmark6 sites
  • Department of Medical and Surgical Gastroenterology, KAS Glostrup

    Copenhagen, Glostrup, 2600

  • Dept. of Medical Gastroenterology F, KAS Gentofte

    Copenhagen, Hellerup, 2900

  • Gastroenheden, Hvidovre Hospital

    Copenhagen, Hvidovre, 2650

  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, København Ø, 2100

  • Køge County Hospital

    Køge, Køge, 4600

  • Dept of Medical Gastroenterology S, Odense Universitetshospital

    Odense, Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Norway4 sites
  • Div of Gastroenterology, dept. of Int Medicine Affiliated Hospital University of Oslo, Østfold Fredrikstad

    Fredrikstad, Fredrikstad, N-1603

  • Helse Fonna HF Haugesund Sjukehus Kirurgisk - vest blokk gastro

    Haugesund, Haugesund, 5504

  • Ullevål Hospital

    Oslo, Oslo

  • Stavanger Hospital

    Stavanger, Stavanger

Other trials in Norway

France2 sites
  • Serv Gastroenterologie Hopital Sainte Marguerite

    Marseille, Marseille Cedex 09, F-13274

  • North Hospital

    Marseille, Marseille

Other trials in France

Sweden2 sites
  • Halmstad Hospital

    Halmstad, Halmstad

  • Dept of Surgery, University Hospital Malmö

    Malmö, Malmö, S-205 02

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Post-ERCP pancreatitis can be a serious complication to ERCP. Two studies have shown a promising preventive effect of glyceryl nitrate. This study should provide a final answer to the clinical question: Does glyceryl nitrate prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? The study is a prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. The investigators intend to include 1600 patients from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and France.

The patients will receive either placebo or a glyceryl nitrate patch (15 mg/24 hours). Follow-up will occur after 7 days. The primary outcome measure will be post-ERCP pancreatitis, and secondary outcome measures will be mild, moderate and severe pancreatitis; post procedure pancreatitis-related mortality; and adverse events.

Read the detailed description

Project:

This study will compare glyceryl nitrate (GN) treatment to non-active treatment for the prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis, which is an inflammation of the pancreas that can occur after a procedure known as ERCP.

Background:

ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography) is an examination of the pancreas by which it is possible to perform therapeutic measures such as stone removal from the common bile duct and visualisation of the pancreas. Inflammation of the pancreas after the ERCP procedure (called: post-ERCP pancreatitis) is the most feared and common complication of the ERCP. It occurs in 1-40% of patients, with rates of 5% or more being more typical. Currently, the background of post-ERCP pancreatitis is poorly known.

Attempts at preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis have been carried out through a change to low-risk techniques, by avoiding high-risk patients, and by use of pharmacological prophylaxis.

Glyceryl Nitrate:

Glyceryl nitrate is a well-known medicine used for many years in other diseases. Possible side effects are headache and low blood pressure. Other side effects such as dizziness, tiredness, nausea, local redness at the application site and allergic reactions of the skin are rare.

Aim:

The purpose of this study is to document that pre-treatment with GN is effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. In two earlier GN studies, sample sizes were relatively small (less than one hundred) and the rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the control group were quite high (15-17%). Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm the promising effect of GN in the prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Participants:

The study includes every patient undergoing ERCP above the age of 18 years. Patients are excluded if they have active acute pancreatitis, previous sphincterotomy (cut in the sphincter at the end of the biliary and pancreatic ducts in the duodenum) or chronic pancreatitis with calcifications. Also, patients may not take sildenafil (Viagra) as GN should not be taken together with sildenafil. Patients allergic to glyceryl nitrate or glue should not be included. Patients with constrictive pericarditis (inflammation and fibrosis in the sack around the heart); pericardial tamponade (blood or liquor in the sack around the heart); low blood pressure; aortic stenosis (stenosis of the aortic valve); hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (a special disease with thickness of the heart); mitral stenosis (stenosis of the mitral valve); anemia (low hemoglobin); and untreated hypothyroidism (thyroid disease) are excluded because these are other diseases to which glyceryl nitrate should not be used. Pregnant women are excluded. Patients can only be included once.

Practical:

Patients have been preparing for the study as if it was a normal procedure. Prior to the procedure, patients will be asked to participate in the study. If the patients accept, after oral and written consent, they will receive either a GN patch or non-active patch on the chestwall 40-60 minutes prior to the ERCP procedure.

A canula is inserted in a cubital vein for medication. The ERCP is initiated, and patients are observed afterwards according to local practice, which is typically 3 hours. Patients are asked to fill out a letter with questions related to symptoms of pancreatitis (pain, fever, nausea, vomiting, hospitalization) to send to the investigating center after 7 days. If patients do not send the letter they will be contacted by phone within 14 days.

Interim analysis:

An interim analysis will be made, when 800 patients have been included. The study will stop, if 1) the interim analysis shows a significant higher mortality in one group than in the other or 2) if the study has proceeded more than 2 years.

Economy:

The project is a multicenter trial of the European Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Preventing Study Group. This local project is located at XX-department. No commercial interests are involved. The investigators/authors work for free against authorship. Finances are sought through funds for research.

References:

  1. Freeman M. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-related risk factors. JOP 2002;3(6):169-176.
  2. Demols A, Deviere J. New frontiers in the pharmacological prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: the cytokines. JOP 2003; 4(1):49-57.
  3. Testoni P. Preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis: where are we?. JOP 2003; 4(1):22-32.
  4. Mariani A. Pharmacological prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis:which therapy is best?. JOP 2003; 4(1):68-74.
  5. Murray B, Carter R et al. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2003; 124:1786-1791.
  6. Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion 1993; 54:105-11.
  7. Sudhindran S, Bromwich E et al. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography-induced pancreatitis. British J of Surg 2001; 88:1178-1182.
  8. Moreto M, Zaballa M. et al. Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endoscopy 2003;57:1-7.
  9. Harrison et al. Bioequivalence comparison of two drug-in-adhesive transdermal nitroglycerine patches. Am J Ther 1996;3:580-585.
  10. Pande H, Thuluvath PJ. Pharmacological prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Drugs 2003;63(17):1799-1812.
  11. Freeman ML. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: Pharmacologic solution or patient selection and pancreatic stents? Gastroenterology 2003;124(7):1977-1980.
  12. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383-393.
Conditions
Pancreatitis
Being tested
glyceryl nitrate
Keywords
Pancreatitis, Cholangiopancreatograpy, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse, Nitroglycerin, Randomized Controlled Trial,
Medical subject headings
Pancreatitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • glyceryl nitrateDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. acute pancreatitis within 7 days after the ERCP procedure. (An independent committee at each center will retrospectively judge whether patients have had post-ERCP pancreatitis or not in respect to a specific definition.)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. mild, moderate, and severe pancreatitis as a criterion proposed by Cotton et al [12]

  2. post procedure pancreatitis-related mortality

  3. adverse events (severe and non-severe such as headache, dizziness, hypotension, hypersensibility, and others)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Study completionOct 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
1,600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00121901
Sponsor's protocol ID
EPEPPS-06-2005
Status last verified
Oct 2007
First submitted
30 Jun 2005
Last updated
18 Oct 2007
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Freeman ML. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: patient and technique-related risk factors. JOP. 2002 Nov;3(6):169-76. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12432183
  • Demols A, Deviere J. New frontiers in the pharmacological prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: the cytokines. JOP. 2003 Jan;4(1):49-57.

    PubMed 12555016
  • Testoni PA. Preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis: where are we? JOP. 2003 Jan;4(1):22-32.

    PubMed 12555013
  • Mariani A. Pharmacological prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: which therapy is best? JOP. 2003 Jan;4(1):68-74.

    PubMed 12555018
  • Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C, Evans S, O'Suilleabhain C. Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2003 Jun;124(7):1786-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00384-6.

    PubMed 12806612
  • Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion. 1993;54(2):105-11. doi: 10.1159/000201021.

    PubMed 8319838
  • Sudhindran S, Bromwich E, Edwards PR. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced pancreatitis. Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1178-82. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01842.x.

    PubMed 11531863
  • Moreto M, Zaballa M, Casado I, Merino O, Rueda M, Ramirez K, Urcelay R, Baranda A. Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):1-7. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.29.

    PubMed 12518122
  • Harrison LI, Riedel DJ, Machacek JH, Crowley JK, Kanniainen CM, Hoglin JA, Robison TS, Zumhofe JM. Bioequivalence Comparison of Two Drug-in-Adhesive Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patches. Am J Ther. 1996 Aug;3(8):580-585. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199608000-00006.

    PubMed 11862294
  • Pande H, Thuluvath P. Pharmacological prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Drugs. 2003;63(17):1799-812. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363170-00003.

    PubMed 12921486
  • Freeman ML. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: pharmacologic solution or patient selection and pancreatic stents? Gastroenterology. 2003 Jun;124(7):1977-80. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00553-5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12806633
  • Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.

    PubMed 2070995
  • Nojgaard C, Hornum M, Elkjaer M, Hjalmarsson C, Heyries L, Hauge T, Bakkevold K, Andersen PK, Matzen P; European Post-ERCP Pancreatitis Preventing Study Group. Does glyceryl nitrate prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 May;69(6):e31-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.042.

    PubMed 19410035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing glyceryl nitrate in people with Pancreatitis, run by Hvidovre University Hospital at 14 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2007. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Denmark, Norway, France, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

acute pancreatitis within 7 days after the ERCP procedure. (An independent committee at each center will retrospectively judge whether patients have had post-ERCP pancreatitis or not in respect to a specific definition.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00121901, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2007.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in