AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT00123747

Study of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FluGlucoScan) in Patients Receiving a Treatment Planning Study of 3 Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Guided by Breath Held CT and PET Imaging for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan Imaging in people with Lung Neoplasms, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

At this time, computed tomography (CT) is the standard tool used at this institution for the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For most patients, treatment planning for NSCLC is performed with the patient breathing freely during CT scanning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan Imaging
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Aug 2005to Oct 2008
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female
  • Histologically proven, resected lung cancer of the following histologic types:
  • squamous cell carcinoma;
  • adenocarcinoma;
  • undifferentiated large cell carcinoma;
  • non-small cell; and
Show all 14Show fewer
  • not otherwise specified.
  • Age equal to or greater than 18 years
  • American Joint Committee (AJC) Stage I-III disease (if all detectable tumours can be encompassed by radiation therapy fields, including both the primary tumour and the involved lymph nodes); patients with positive supraclavicular nodes (N3) are not eligible
  • Able and willing to follow instructions and comply with the protocol
  • Provide written informed consent prior to participation in this study
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale score equal to or greater than 70
  • Measurable disease on the CT and PET images
  • Patient must be deemed eligible for the radical combined-modality therapy.

Who cannot join

  • Nursing or pregnant females
  • MI disease
  • N3 disease (patients with positive supraclavicular nodes are not eligible)
  • Karnofsky performance status less than 70
  • Patients who have undergone complete tumour resection
  • Patients with post-resection intrathoracic tumour recurrence
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Evidence of small cell history
  • Age less than 18 years
  • Prior or concurrent malignancy except non-melanomatous skin cancer (unless disease free for at least 5 years)
  • Prior radiotherapy to the thorax or neck
  • Prior chemotherapy
  • Patients with myocardial infarction within the preceding 6 months or symptomatic heart disease, including angina; congestive heart failure; and uncontrolled arrythmias
  • Inability to maintain a state of deep inspiratory breath-hold for a minimum length of time

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Study of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FluGlucoScan) in Patients Receiving a Treatment Planning Study of 3 Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Guided by Breath Held CT and PET Imaging for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

At this time, computed tomography (CT) is the standard tool used at this institution for the staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For most patients, treatment planning for NSCLC is performed with the patient breathing freely during CT scanning. However, recent research has demonstrated that, by holding one's breath briefly, the NSCLC tumor mass can be held motionless. As a result, the tissue to be treated is better pinpointed and the area treated is significantly decreased through breath-hold planning. This allows for a higher dose of radiation to be given to the cancer. PET scanning is a promising newer imaging modality which has shown to be useful in staging NSCLC. This study hypothesizes that breath-held PET scanning and breath held-CT scanning will allow for more stringent radiotherapy plans, minimizing normal tissue toxicity, as well as potentially increasing the dose deliverable to the primary tumor.

Read the detailed description

Concurrent chemotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), using computed-tomography (CT) simulation, is the current standard approach in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite such therapeutic benefit, local recurrence nonetheless remains a significant impediment to cure. Attempts to improve the accuracy of CT-scanning in radiotherapy treatment planning have been increasingly studied. One such approach is the attempted correlation of CT imaging temporally with the physiologic breathing cycle, a process known as gating. By imaging the tumor only when the tumor is immobilized, gating effectively eliminates the effect of motion, thus leading to typically smaller visible tumor masses and the loss of motion-induced distortions. Lung-tumor immobilization using self-gated breath-holding at extremes of inspiration has been validated clinically, and is associated with improved lung-outcome predictors and normal tissue complication probability overall. Several recent studies have demonstrated PET to be both highly sensitive and moderately to highly specific in the staging of NSCLC, and even more sensitive and specific than CT-scanning in the detection of mediastinal and distant metastases from NSCLC. The co-registration of CT and PET images enables even greater accuracy than either modality alone, while the functional imaging inherent in PET may better facilitate the distinction between benign and malignant structures. Overall, the superior tumor staging capability of PET (or PET-CT fusion) together with the improved dosimetry \& diminished normal-tissue toxicity associated with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is expected to confer considerable clinical advantage to the use of gated PET in the radiotherapeutic planning and treatment of NSCLC.

The first objective is to define the effect of respiratory-gating on PET-based radiotherapy planning in comparison to the free-breathing condition for patients with NSCLC. The endpoints here will be to quantify the variation of both PTV and normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) for certain relevant organs (lung, esophagus, heart) via a direct analysis of calculated volumes.

The second objective is to identify the correlation between PET-based radiotherapy planning volumes and CT-based planning volumes for respiratory-gated patients with NSCLC. The endpoint for this objective will be to quantify the breath-held, PET-based PTVs and NTCPs in comparison to the breath-held, CT-based PTVs and NTCPs.

This study will consider patients with locally advanced non-small-cell cancer of the lung (NSCLC) who are eligible for radical (i.e. with curative intent) combined-modality therapy. Patients will be accrued from the new patient lung clinic at the Cross Cancer Institute. Following a complete clinical assessment comprising a thorough history and physical examination, a thorough analysis of all available imaging, a consideration of all available laboratory results and consideration of any ancillary test results (e.g. pulmonary function testing), a decision will be made whether or not to offer a patient radical therapy. In the case of any uncertainties, further tests, such as repeat CT scanning or diagnostic PET scanning may be arranged to define eligibility.

Eligibility Criteria:

  • Histologically-proven, unresected lung cancer of the following histologic types: *squamous cell carcinoma, *adenocarcinoma, *undifferentiated large cell carcinoma, *non-small cell, not otherwise specified (NOS, diagnosis on cytology alone)
  • AJC Stage I-III disease (if all detectable tumor can be encompassed by radiation therapy fields, including both the primary tumor and the involved regional lymph nodes); patients with positive supraclavicular nodes (N3) are not eligible.
  • Age > 18 and Karnofsky performance status > 70
  • Measurable disease on the CT and PET images
  • Patient must be deemed eligible for radical combined-modality therapy
  • All patients must sign a study-specific informed consent form.

Ineligibility Criteria:

  • M1 disease
  • Karnofsky performance status < 70 and age < 18
  • Patients who have undergone complete tumor resection
  • Patients with post-resection intrathoracic tumor recurrence
  • Evidence of small cell histology
  • Prior or concurrent malignancy except non-melanomatous skin cancer (unless disease-free for at least 5 years)
  • Prior radiotherapy to the thorax or neck
  • Prior chemotherapy
  • Patients with myocardial infarction within the preceding 6 months or symptomatic heart disease, including angina, congestive heart failure and uncontrolled arrhythmias
  • Pregnant women; patients with childbearing potential must practice appropriate contraception.
  • Inability to maintain a state of deep inspiratory breath-hold for a minimum length of time

Statistical Analysis: In a previous study comparing DIBH-gated CT-scanning to free-breathing CT-scanning performed at this institution, it was found that a sample size of 10 patients was appropriate to illustrate both a statistically significant reduction in PTV and a statistically significant reduction in V20 (the volume of lung treated to a dose of =20Gy). For the current study, given that the patient population is essentially the same as the last one, and the fact that PET and CT are comparable imaging modalities for NSCLC in terms of their sensitivity, a total sample size of 10 patients would be an appropriate number to assess the difference between breath-held PET and free-breathing PET (i.e. the first objective). This difference, in terms of both PTV and NTCP, will be assessed for statistical significance with a paired Student's t-test.

Conditions
Lung Neoplasms
Being tested
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan Imaging
Keywords
Positron Emission Tomography, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Tomography scanners, X-Ray Computed
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan ImagingProcedure or surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To define the effect of respiratory-gating upon PET based radiotherapeutic treatment planning parameters relative to the free-breathing condition for patients with NSCLC

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To define the relationship between PET based treatment planning volumes and CT based treatment planning volumes within the realm of respiratory-gating for patients with NSCLC

    Measured: One Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2005
  3. Primary completionOct 2008
  4. Study completionOct 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00123747
Sponsor's protocol ID
LU-11-0044/DX-FDG-007/21389
Status last verified
Mar 2012
First submitted
22 Jul 2005
Last updated
25 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan Imaging in people with Lung Neoplasms, run by AHS Cancer Control Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To define the effect of respiratory-gating upon PET based radiotherapeutic treatment planning parameters relative to the free-breathing condition for patients with NSCLC (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in