Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 2NCT00124449
Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Abatacept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 48 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- What is being tested?
- Abatacept
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2005to Apr 2008
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis
- Clinical synovitis of two or more joints
- At least one but not more than three of the criteria for diagnosis of RA (1987).
- No prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics.
- Duration of disease must be 18 months or less.
- Positive for antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides.
Who cannot join
- Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy.
- Active vasculitis of a major organ system.
- Severe or recurrent bacterial infection.
- History of cancer in the last five years except certain skin cancers.
- Herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 10 countries.
48 sites in 10 countries
United States20 sites
Local Institution
Arlington, Virginia
Local Institution
Austin, Texas
Local Institution
Boulder, Colorado
Local Institution
Charleston, South Carolina
Local Institution
Chicago, Illinois
Local Institution
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Local Institution
Cumberland, Maryland
Local Institution
Duluth, Minnesota
Local Institution
Durham, North Carolina
Local Institution
Evansville, Indiana
Local Institution
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Local Institution
Hagerstown, Maryland
Local Institution
Huntington Beach, California
Local Institution
Huntsville, Alabama
Local Institution
Los Angeles, California
Local Institution
Mobile, Alabama
Local Institution
New Orleans, Louisiana
Local Institution
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Local Institution
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania
Local Institution
Wilmington, North Carolina
Germany5 sites
Local Institution
Berlin
Local Institution
Dresden
Local Institution
Hamburg
Local Institution
Hanover
Local Institution
Heidelberg
Spain5 sites
Local Institution
A Coruña
Local Institution
Barcelona
Local Institution
Madrid
Local Institution
Oviedo
Local Institution
Seville
Australia4 sites
Local Institution
Cairns, Queensland
Local Institution
Clayton, Victoria
Local Institution
Malvern, Victoria
Local Institution
Shenton Park, Western Australia
Mexico4 sites
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Mexico City
Local Institution
León, Guanajuato
Local Institution
Morelia, Michioacan
Italy3 sites
Local Institution
Bari
Local Institution
Ferrara
Local Institution
Milan
United Kingdom2 sites
Local Institution
Leeds, North Yorkshire
Local Institution
Liverpool, Merseyside
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients With Undifferentiated Arthritis Who Are at High Risk for the Development of RA
The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2).
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Being tested
- Abatacept, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbataceptDrug
Also called Orencia
solution, intravenous injection, monthly, 169 days
weight based:
<60 kg = 500 mg
60 to 100 kg = 750 mg
>100 kg = 1 g
placeboDrug
solution, intravenous injection, 0 mg, monthly, 169 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Abatacept |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for RA classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting primary endpoint also.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (14)
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of RA by 1987 ARA Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting endpoint also.
Measured: 24 months
Number of Participants With Undifferentiated Inflammatory Arthritis (UA) Who Develop Another Rheumatic Disease
Clinical diagnosis of other rheumatic diseases at 12 and 24 months. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting endpoint also.
Measured: 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing Score at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Mean change from baseline using the Genant-Modified Sharp Score. Erosion score=assessment of 14 sites in each hand and wrist + 6 joints in each foot, using an 8-point scale from 0 (no erosions) to 3.5 (erosions of 100% or articular surfaces). Joint score= assessment of 13 sites in each wrist and hand + 6 sites in each foot using a 9-point scale from 0 (normal) to 4.0 (definite ankylosis). As-observed data. Change from Baseline=postbaseline score at timepoint (6 or 12 or 24 months) minus baseline score; a lower value signifies improvement.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Total Erosion, Edema, Synovitis Scores at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Mean change from baseline. Degree of synovitis and structural joint damage (erosion, edema) of the carpal and metacarpophalangeal joints, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) assessment. Edema scale=0 (no bone involved) to 3 (67% to 100% of bone involved). Synovitis scale=0 (normal) and 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe. Bone erosion scale=0 (0% of bone involved) to 10 (91% to 100% of bone involved). Change from baseline=postbaseline score at timepoint - baseline score.
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With Persistent Symptomatic Clinical Synovitis
Synovitis, assessed by clinical signs and symptoms
Measured: 6, 12, and 24 months
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores - Mean Change From Baseline
SF-36, a 36-item instrument that covers 8 quality of life domains, which were used to derive the physical and mental component summary scores, which ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. Change from baseline=postbaseline - baseline value; a higher value signifies improvement.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Cytokine Levels and Second Generation Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP2) Antibodies at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
To assess pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, mean change from baseline in cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], interleukin-1B [IL-1B], tumor necrosis factor Alpha [TNF-Alpha], Matrix Metalloproteinase 3T [MMP3T], and anti-CCP2), as measured by standard laboratory investigations, were assessed. Change from baseline=postbaseline value at timepoint (6 or 12 or 24 months) minus baseline value; a lower value signifies improvement.
Measured: Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With Anti-CCP2 Positive and/or Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Positive Over Time
To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, number of participants with Anti-CCP2 Positive of Rheumatoid Factor (RF) positive
Measured: Day 1, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Typing
To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of abatacept on serum levels of autoantibodies, a blood sample was obtained for HLA typing to determine the presence or absence of alleles associated with RA susceptibility and severity (shared epitope alleles HLA-DRB10401 and HLA-DRB10404).
Measured: Day 1
DAS 28 C Reactive Protein (CRP) Score - Mean Change From Baseline
The DAS 28 (CRP) is a composite of 4 variables: 28 tender joint count, 28 swollen joint count, CRP, and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100 mm. Change from Baseline=postbaseline score-baseline score; a lower value signifies improvement.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With a DAS 28 (CRP) Score of ≤3.2 (Low Disease Activity) or <2.6 (in Remission)
The DAS 28 (CRP) is a composite of 4 variables: tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP, and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a VAS of 100 mm. Scores for disease activity are defined as low (≤ 3.2) and in remission (< 2.6).
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Subjects With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index Response
This questionnaire includes 20 questions assessing physical function in 8 domains. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty and 3=unable to do. Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response =improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Overall Safety - Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, and Deaths
AEs were monitored at all scheduled visits of the study drug treatment and observation periods and at the follow-up visits performed 28, 56, and 85 days after the last infusion of study medication for participants who were withdrawn prematurely
Measured: Throughout the treatment period (6 months)
Number of Participants With Positive Responses for Serum Levels of Abatacept-specific Antibodies
Immunogenicity, as measured by the number of positive repsonses for serum levels of abatacept-specific antibodies measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Postive response for whole molecule assessment was a value of > 400 and for tip assessment was ≥25.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2005
- Primary completionMay 2007
- Study completionApr 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthritis, RheumatoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00124449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM101-046
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2005
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, Legerton CW, Becker JC, Vratsanos G, Genant HK, Peterfy C, Mitra P, Overfield S, Qi K, Westhovens R. Impact of T-cell costimulation modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis or very early rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and imaging study of abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):510-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119016. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
PubMed 19933744
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients With Undifferentiated Arthritis Who Are at High Risk for the Development of RA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00124449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM101-046
- Conditions
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2005
- Primary completion
- May 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2).
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Abatacept |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis
- Clinical synovitis of two or more joints
- At least one but not more than three of the criteria for diagnosis of RA (1987).
- No prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics.
- Duration of disease must be 18 months or less.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy.
- Active vasculitis of a major organ system.
- Severe or recurrent bacterial infection.
- History of cancer in the last five years except certain skin cancers.
- Herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbataceptAlso: Orenciasolution, intravenous injection, monthly, 169 days weight based: <60 kg = 500 mg 60 to 100 kg = 750 mg >100 kg = 1 g | Drug | 1 |
| placebosolution, intravenous injection, 0 mg, monthly, 169 days | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: 12 months
ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for RA classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting primary endpoint also.
14 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of RA by 1987 ARA Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: 24 months
Number of Participants With Undifferentiated Inflammatory Arthritis (UA) Who Develop Another Rheumatic Disease
Time frame: 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing Score at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Total Erosion, Edema, Synovitis Scores at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With Persistent Symptomatic Clinical Synovitis
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) Scores - Mean Change From Baseline
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Cytokine Levels and Second Generation Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP2) Antibodies at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With Anti-CCP2 Positive and/or Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Positive Over Time
Time frame: Day 1, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Frequency of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Typing
Time frame: Day 1
DAS 28 C Reactive Protein (CRP) Score - Mean Change From Baseline
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With a DAS 28 (CRP) Score of ≤3.2 (Low Disease Activity) or <2.6 (in Remission)
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Subjects With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index Response
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Overall Safety - Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, and Deaths
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period (6 months)
Number of Participants With Positive Responses for Serum Levels of Abatacept-specific Antibodies
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19933744Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, Legerton CW, Becker JC, Vratsanos G, Genant HK, Peterfy C, Mitra P, Overfield S, Qi K, Westhovens R. Impact of T-cell costimulation modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis or very early rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and imaging study of abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):510-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119016. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
Related trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
48 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Abatacept in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 48 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Australia, Mexico and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00124449, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.