MalariaPhase 4NCT00125489
CQSP in Malawi: Chloroquine and Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine Efficacy for the Treatment of Malaria in Malawi
A Phase 4 study testing chloroquine sulfate and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in people with Malaria and Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in Malawi.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to find out how well chloroquine works as a drug to treat malaria in children, compared to the standard malaria treatment in Malawi. In preparation for a longer study of the malaria treatment medication chloroquine alone and in combination with other drugs, a shorter pre-study… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 12 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
- What is being tested?
- chloroquine sulfate and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalawi
- Study dates
- May 2005to Dec 2005
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 12 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged >= 6 months to 12 years presenting to Ndirande Health Centre with signs or symptoms consistent with malaria including but not limited to one or more of the following:
- fever at the time of evaluation (axillary temperature 37.5° C by digital thermometer)
- report of fever within the last two days
- profound anemia (conjunctival or palmar pallor)
- headache
- body aches
Show all 13Show fewer
- abdominal pain
- decreased intake of food or fluids
- weakness
- Positive malaria smear for P. falciparum mono-infection
- Parasite density of 2,000-200,000/microliter or < 10%
- Willingness to remain at the Health Centre under continuous observation until the resolution of the infection
- Parental consent for each participant, and child assent for children older than 5 years
Who cannot join
- Signs of severe malaria: One or more of the following:
- hemoglobin < 5 g/dl
- parasitemia > 10%
- prostration * as indicated by inability to drink or breastfeed
- respiratory distress (deep Kussmaul respirations)
- bleeding
Show all 13Show fewer
- recent seizures*, coma* or mental obtundation* (Blantyre coma score less than 5)
- persistent vomiting*
- Presence of a severe disease
- Presence of a febrile condition caused by diseases other than malaria
- Known allergy or history of adverse reaction to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP), sulfa drugs or chloroquine
- Chronic medication with an antifolate drug
- Enrollment in this clinical study in the past 28 days *Each of these symptoms or signs is considered a "danger sign."
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Chloroquine and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Efficacy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Blantyre, Malawi
The purpose of this research study is to find out how well chloroquine works as a drug to treat malaria in children, compared to the standard malaria treatment in Malawi. In preparation for a longer study of the malaria treatment medication chloroquine alone and in combination with other drugs, a shorter pre-study will be done to compare the anti-malarial effectiveness of chloroquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the standard treatment in Malawi. Two hundred ten children, ages 6 months to 12 years, around Blantyre, Malawi, will be given standard dosing of either chloroquine or SP when they come to the Ndirande Health Centre with signs or symptoms consistent with malaria. The first 30 participants in each treatment group will remain under continuous observation at the health center so that the researchers can monitor their response to the medication until the infection goes away. The participants will be followed for 28 days to see if the the treatment works or fails.
Read the detailed description
This study follows the observation that chloroquine-resistant malaria may have returned to Malawi, 10 years after its use was eliminated. There is growing consensus that combination chemotherapy should be the rule in malaria treatment to deter the development of drug resistance and possibly also decrease malaria transmission. As sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) failure rates increase, the reintroduction of chloroquine in Malawi in combination with highly effective rapidly acting drugs such as artesunate and chlorproguanil-dapsone should be considered, and would likely extend the useful life span of each of the drugs. In preparation for a longitudinal clinical trial of chloroquine alone and SP in combination with other drugs, a preliminary trial will be conducted to compare the anti-malarial efficacy of chloroquine versus SP, the standard treatment in Malawi. This is a randomized, open-label clinical trial to compare the antimalarial efficacy of chloroquine versus SP among children with uncomplicated malaria in Blantyre, Malawi. In this study, 210 peri-urban children will be randomly assigned to receive standard dosing of either chloroquine or SP. Follow up will consist of visits on days 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28, according to the standard World Health Organization protocol. Because chloroquine has not been used to treat malaria in Malawi for over a decade, special safety precautions will be taken at the beginning of the study. The first 30 participants in each arm will remain at the Health Centre under continuous observation of the medical staff to monitor response to therapy until they are afebrile for 12 hours and have two consecutive negative 12-hourly blood smears. Observation in an inpatient setting will also help to avoid potential bias due to more intense follow-up of the hospitalized group. A Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) will meet after the first 30 participants have been enrolled in each arm to determine if the study should stop continuous observation and proceed with out-patient follow up only. All participants will be followed for 28 days to monitor for late therapeutic or parasitologic failure. The primary study objective is to assess the efficacy of chloroquine compared with standard SP therapy, in treating malaria in Malawi, where chloroquine has not been used for over 10 years and to compare it to the efficacy of standard therapy with SP. The secondary study objective is to assess the effect of the re-introduction of chloroquine on the molecular markers associated with chloroquine resistance. The primary study endpoint is the rates of adequate clinical and parasitologic response to therapy. The secondary study endpoints are: (1) rates of early and late therapeutic failure; (2) rates of early and late parasitologic failure; (3) prevalence of chloroquine-resistance conferring pfcrt K76T mutation in pre-treatment infections; (4) rates of pre- and post-treatment pfcrt K76T mutation in cases of chloroquine treatment failure; (5) prevalence of SP-resistance conferring dhfr/dhps mutations in pre-treatment infections; (6) rates of pre- and post-treatment dhfr/dhps mutations in cases of SP treatment failure; (7) clearance time of parasitemia; (8) clearance time of fever; and (9) presence of post-treatment anemia.
- Conditions
- Malaria, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
- Being tested
- chloroquine sulfate, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine
- Keywords
- chloroquine, malaria, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, Malawi
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria, Malaria, Falciparum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
chloroquine sulfateDrug
sulfadoxine/pyrimethamineDrug
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Study completionDec 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 210 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00125489
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 05-0012
- Status last verified
- Mar 2007
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2005
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2010
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Eddington ND, Masonga R, Dzinjalamala FK, Takala SL, Taylor TE, Plowe CV. Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 9;355(19):1959-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062032.
PubMed 17093247
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Chloroquine and Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine Efficacy for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Blantyre, Malawi
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00125489
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 05-0012
- Conditions
- Malaria, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria
- Keywords
- chloroquine, malaria, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, Malawi
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 210 participants
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- May 2005
- Study completion
- Dec 2005
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to find out how well chloroquine works as a drug to treat malaria in children, compared to the standard malaria treatment in Malawi. In preparation for a longer study of the malaria treatment medication chloroquine alone and in combination with other drugs, a shorter pre-study will be done to compare the anti-malarial effectiveness of chloroquine versus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the standard treatment in Malawi. Two hundred ten children, ages 6 months to 12 years, around Blantyre, Malawi, will be given standard dosing of either chloroquine or SP when they come to the Ndirande Health Centre with signs or symptoms consistent with malaria. The first 30 participants in each treatment group will remain under continuous observation at the health center so that the researchers can monitor their response to the medication until the infection goes away. The participants will be followed for 28 days to see if the the treatment works or fails.
Detailed description
This study follows the observation that chloroquine-resistant malaria may have returned to Malawi, 10 years after its use was eliminated. There is growing consensus that combination chemotherapy should be the rule in malaria treatment to deter the development of drug resistance and possibly also decrease malaria transmission. As sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) failure rates increase, the reintroduction of chloroquine in Malawi in combination with highly effective rapidly acting drugs such as artesunate and chlorproguanil-dapsone should be considered, and would likely extend the useful life span of each of the drugs. In preparation for a longitudinal clinical trial of chloroquine alone and SP in combination with other drugs, a preliminary trial will be conducted to compare the anti-malarial efficacy of chloroquine versus SP, the standard treatment in Malawi. This is a randomized, open-label clinical trial to compare the antimalarial efficacy of chloroquine versus SP among children with uncomplicated malaria in Blantyre, Malawi. In this study, 210 peri-urban children will be randomly assigned to receive standard dosing of either chloroquine or SP. Follow up will consist of visits on days 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28, according to the standard World Health Organization protocol. Because chloroquine has not been used to treat malaria in Malawi for over a decade, special safety precautions will be taken at the beginning of the study. The first 30 participants in each arm will remain at the Health Centre under continuous observation of the medical staff to monitor response to therapy until they are afebrile for 12 hours and have two consecutive negative 12-hourly blood smears. Observation in an inpatient setting will also help to avoid potential bias due to more intense follow-up of the hospitalized group. A Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC) will meet after the first 30 participants have been enrolled in each arm to determine if the study should stop continuous observation and proceed with out-patient follow up only. All participants will be followed for 28 days to monitor for late therapeutic or parasitologic failure. The primary study objective is to assess the efficacy of chloroquine compared with standard SP therapy, in treating malaria in Malawi, where chloroquine has not been used for over 10 years and to compare it to the efficacy of standard therapy with SP. The secondary study objective is to assess the effect of the re-introduction of chloroquine on the molecular markers associated with chloroquine resistance. The primary study endpoint is the rates of adequate clinical and parasitologic response to therapy. The secondary study endpoints are: (1) rates of early and late therapeutic failure; (2) rates of early and late parasitologic failure; (3) prevalence of chloroquine-resistance conferring pfcrt K76T mutation in pre-treatment infections; (4) rates of pre- and post-treatment pfcrt K76T mutation in cases of chloroquine treatment failure; (5) prevalence of SP-resistance conferring dhfr/dhps mutations in pre-treatment infections; (6) rates of pre- and post-treatment dhfr/dhps mutations in cases of SP treatment failure; (7) clearance time of parasitemia; (8) clearance time of fever; and (9) presence of post-treatment anemia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients aged >= 6 months to 12 years presenting to Ndirande Health Centre with signs or symptoms consistent with malaria including but not limited to one or more of the following:
- Positive malaria smear for P. falciparum mono-infection
- Parasite density of 2,000-200,000/microliter or < 10%
- Willingness to remain at the Health Centre under continuous observation until the resolution of the infection
- Parental consent for each participant, and child assent for children older than 5 years
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Signs of severe malaria: One or more of the following:
- Presence of a severe disease
- Presence of a febrile condition caused by diseases other than malaria
- Known allergy or history of adverse reaction to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP), sulfa drugs or chloroquine
- Chronic medication with an antifolate drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| chloroquine sulfate | Drug | – |
| sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2010.
- Results publication: PubMed 17093247Laufer MK, Thesing PC, Eddington ND, Masonga R, Dzinjalamala FK, Takala SL, Taylor TE, Plowe CV. Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 9;355(19):1959-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062032.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing chloroquine sulfate and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in people with Malaria and Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 1 site in Malawi.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00125489, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2010.