TuberculosisPhase 3NCT00128206
Treatment of Latent TB Infection for Jailed Persons
A Phase 3 study testing Isoniazid and Rifampin in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an alternative drug, (rifampin) given daily, is better at treating tuberculosis (TB) and more tolerable than the usual drug treatment, isoniazid (INH). Study participants will include 972, TB infected, San Francisco Jail inmates, aged 18 or older. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tuberculosis
- What is being tested?
- Isoniazid and Rifampin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 364 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2004to Sep 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The inclusion criteria for this study will be San Francisco Jail inmates, age 18 or older (the jail does not house juveniles) having evidence of M. tuberculosis infection by positive tuberculin skin test (a documented reactive tuberculin skin test to 0.1 mL containing 5 Tuberculin Units) who meet current national criteria for therapy for tuberculosis infection and can provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Ineligible for either therapy regimen for any of the following reasons:
- history of treatment-limiting reaction to isoniazid or rifamycins;
- pregnancy or breast feeding;
- active tuberculosis;
- an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 times the upper limit of normal;
- bilirubin >2 times the upper limit of normal;
Show all 12Show fewer
- platelets <150 K/mm3;
- taking protease inhibitors or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs);
- Unable to communicate in English or Spanish;
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent;
- Not in the routine level of jail security for any reason (housed in "special security" areas);
- Any condition that, in the best judgment of the investigator, would pose a risk to the subject during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-0608
About this study
Official title: Clinical Trial of Short Course Rifampin Versus INH for LTBI in Jail
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an alternative drug, (rifampin) given daily, is better at treating tuberculosis (TB) and more tolerable than the usual drug treatment, isoniazid (INH). Study participants will include 972, TB infected, San Francisco Jail inmates, aged 18 or older. One group of volunteers will take INH two times a week for 9 months, and the other group will take rifampin daily for 4 months. Medication will be administered in jail and at the San Francisco TB Clinic if the volunteer is released from jail prior to completing the study. Participants will be seen daily for 4 months (rifampin group), and 2 times a week for 9 months (INH group) for directly observed therapy. Study procedures will include 5 symptom review visits and blood samples for lab testing. Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effect of two accepted regimens for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in jail. Tuberculosis (TB) in incarcerated populations continues to be a serious problem, due to the large proportion of persons who are at high risk of both having latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developing active disease. Completion of treatment of LTBI, while an important component of overall TB control efforts, has not been successful in jails. This is primarily because inmates are frequently released before finishing a 6-9 month course of standard therapy, and have low rates of completing therapy in the community. This study proposes to look at toxicity and adherence for this 4-month regimen compared to the nine-month regimen of to isoniazid (INH), and to examine costs, both cost of delivered care and the cost of TB disease prevented, with examination of reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Short-course therapies for LTBI may address this problem but they are more expensive and have not been studied adequately to answer questions about side effects, completion rates, and overall cost. The investigators propose a randomized trial to test the effects of a short course therapy, rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months, as compared to (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months. Both regimens are listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Thoracic Society as acceptable treatments for persons with LTBI. The study participants will include 972 San Francisco Jail inmates, 18 years and older, enrolled over a 28-month period, for a sample of 486 in each study group. Subjects, followed in jail and after release, will be followed to test three hypotheses: the null hypothesis of a difference in toxicity of rifampin as compared to INH within a 95% confidence interval of (.4-1.87) and no difference by study group in adherence and in cost-effectiveness. A secondary aim is to describe reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Toxicity is defined as complications leading to stopping drug. Adherence is defined as completion of care, or 120 doses taken within 6 months for the rifampin group and 76 doses of INH taken within 12 months for the INH group. Cost effectiveness will be calculated as the total cost of care (nursing, medical, laboratory, as well as facility costs), and measured against costs of TB cases prevented. All treatments will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT) in jail, and by DOT after release at the San Francisco TB Clinic. Counseling on adherence (going to the TB Clinic if released before completing therapy) and on possible side effects will be given to all study subjects at enrollment and during follow-up clinic visits. All subjects will be routinely evaluated by study personnel every two weeks for the first 6 weeks, and thereafter to detect possible drug toxicity including hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, arthralgias, rash, memory loss, and other clinical symptoms. All patients will undergo laboratory assessment at regular intervals according to a schedule which compares study group participation and the usual care in the jail. All blood test results, and new symptoms or changes in symptoms found at follow-up, will be added to the jail medical record. A final interview will be done with subjects at the time that they have completed or not completed this course of therapy for LTBI, to determine reasons (barriers and enablers). Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study, to measure study endpoint (completion of care, taken off drugs for toxicity or loss to follow-up) and to measure subsequent treatment for LTBI or development of active TB by record review.
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Being tested
- Isoniazid, Rifampin
- Keywords
- LTBI, tuberculosis, rifampin, isoniazid, prisoners
- Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IsoniazidDrug
Isoniazid 900 mg twice weekly
RifampinDrug
Rifampin 600mg once per day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| B | Active comparator | isoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months Receives: Drug: Isoniazid |
| A | Active comparator | rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months Receives: Drug: Rifampin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication
Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.
Measured: up to one year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Completion of Therapy
Measured: course of treatment
Cost Effectiveness
Measured: course of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2004
- Primary completionOct 2008
- Study completionSep 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TuberculosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 364 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary C White, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00128206
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 03-135
- Other IDs
- U01AI051315
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
White MC, Tulsky JP, Lee JR, Chen L, Goldenson J, Spetz J, Kawamura LM. Isoniazid vs. rifampin for latent tuberculosis infection in jail inmates: toxicity and adherence. J Correct Health Care. 2012 Apr;18(2):131-42. doi: 10.1177/1078345811435973. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PubMed 22419641
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Trial of Short Course Rifampin Versus INH for LTBI in Jail
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00128206
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 03-135
- Conditions
- Tuberculosis
- Keywords
- LTBI, tuberculosis, rifampin, isoniazid, prisoners
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 364 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- Nov 2004
- Primary completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Dec 2010
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an alternative drug, (rifampin) given daily, is better at treating tuberculosis (TB) and more tolerable than the usual drug treatment, isoniazid (INH). Study participants will include 972, TB infected, San Francisco Jail inmates, aged 18 or older. One group of volunteers will take INH two times a week for 9 months, and the other group will take rifampin daily for 4 months. Medication will be administered in jail and at the San Francisco TB Clinic if the volunteer is released from jail prior to completing the study. Participants will be seen daily for 4 months (rifampin group), and 2 times a week for 9 months (INH group) for directly observed therapy. Study procedures will include 5 symptom review visits and blood samples for lab testing. Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study.
Detailed description
The purpose of this project is to evaluate the effect of two accepted regimens for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in jail. Tuberculosis (TB) in incarcerated populations continues to be a serious problem, due to the large proportion of persons who are at high risk of both having latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and developing active disease. Completion of treatment of LTBI, while an important component of overall TB control efforts, has not been successful in jails. This is primarily because inmates are frequently released before finishing a 6-9 month course of standard therapy, and have low rates of completing therapy in the community. This study proposes to look at toxicity and adherence for this 4-month regimen compared to the nine-month regimen of to isoniazid (INH), and to examine costs, both cost of delivered care and the cost of TB disease prevented, with examination of reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Short-course therapies for LTBI may address this problem but they are more expensive and have not been studied adequately to answer questions about side effects, completion rates, and overall cost. The investigators propose a randomized trial to test the effects of a short course therapy, rifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months, as compared to (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months. Both regimens are listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Thoracic Society as acceptable treatments for persons with LTBI. The study participants will include 972 San Francisco Jail inmates, 18 years and older, enrolled over a 28-month period, for a sample of 486 in each study group. Subjects, followed in jail and after release, will be followed to test three hypotheses: the null hypothesis of a difference in toxicity of rifampin as compared to INH within a 95% confidence interval of (.4-1.87) and no difference by study group in adherence and in cost-effectiveness. A secondary aim is to describe reasons for completion or noncompletion of therapy. Toxicity is defined as complications leading to stopping drug. Adherence is defined as completion of care, or 120 doses taken within 6 months for the rifampin group and 76 doses of INH taken within 12 months for the INH group. Cost effectiveness will be calculated as the total cost of care (nursing, medical, laboratory, as well as facility costs), and measured against costs of TB cases prevented. All treatments will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT) in jail, and by DOT after release at the San Francisco TB Clinic. Counseling on adherence (going to the TB Clinic if released before completing therapy) and on possible side effects will be given to all study subjects at enrollment and during follow-up clinic visits. All subjects will be routinely evaluated by study personnel every two weeks for the first 6 weeks, and thereafter to detect possible drug toxicity including hepatitis, peripheral neuropathy, arthralgias, rash, memory loss, and other clinical symptoms. All patients will undergo laboratory assessment at regular intervals according to a schedule which compares study group participation and the usual care in the jail. All blood test results, and new symptoms or changes in symptoms found at follow-up, will be added to the jail medical record. A final interview will be done with subjects at the time that they have completed or not completed this course of therapy for LTBI, to determine reasons (barriers and enablers). Follow-up will continue for each subject for five years after enrollment into the study, to measure study endpoint (completion of care, taken off drugs for toxicity or loss to follow-up) and to measure subsequent treatment for LTBI or development of active TB by record review.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| B | Active comparator | Drug: Isoniazidisoniazid (INH) (900 mg orally) given twice weekly for 9 months |
| A | Active comparator | Drug: Rifampinrifampin (600 mg orally) given daily for 4 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The inclusion criteria for this study will be San Francisco Jail inmates, age 18 or older (the jail does not house juveniles) having evidence of M. tuberculosis infection by positive tuberculin skin test (a documented reactive tuberculin skin test to 0.1 mL containing 5 Tuberculin Units) who meet current national criteria for therapy for tuberculosis infection and can provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Ineligible for either therapy regimen for any of the following reasons:
- Unable to communicate in English or Spanish;
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent;
- Not in the routine level of jail security for any reason (housed in "special security" areas);
- Any condition that, in the best judgment of the investigator, would pose a risk to the subject during the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IsoniazidIsoniazid 900 mg twice weekly | Drug | B |
| RifampinRifampin 600mg once per day | Drug | A |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication
Time frame: up to one year
Liver function tests were taken at regular intervals and clinical symptoms were reviewed at regular intervals in both study groups. On the basis of these tests and examinations, physicians determined whether the study drug needed to be stopped.
2 secondary outcomes
Completion of Therapy
Time frame: course of treatment
Cost Effectiveness
Time frame: course of treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22419641White MC, Tulsky JP, Lee JR, Chen L, Goldenson J, Spetz J, Kawamura LM. Isoniazid vs. rifampin for latent tuberculosis infection in jail inmates: toxicity and adherence. J Correct Health Care. 2012 Apr;18(2):131-42. doi: 10.1177/1078345811435973. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
Related trials for Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 4
Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Paradoxical Tuberculosis Reactions in Patients Without HIV Infection
Tuberculosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Re-evaluating the Duration in Children of TB Treatment
Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Daily Rifapentine Combined With Isoniazid (1HP) for Tuberculosis Prevention in Children Less Than 13 Years of Age With and Without HIV
Tuberculosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Protecting Households On Exposure to Newly Diagnosed Index Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients
Tuberculosis, MDR
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary C White, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Isoniazid and Rifampin in people with Tuberculosis, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Dec 2010). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test or Clinical Judgment Resulting in the Need to Stop Study Medication (time frame: up to one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00128206, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2020.