Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungPhase 1/2NCT00128999
Study Using Induction Chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Guided by Combined CT and PET Imaging for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Alberta Health services at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US) and Canada. Because of the high incidence and mortality of this disease, small improvements in the management of this disease translates into large numbers of patients having improved outcomes after treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- What is being tested?
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2003to Aug 2007
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stage I-III
- Unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- EEV1 equal to or greater than 1.0L
Who cannot join
- Positive supraclavicular noce (N2) or malignant pleural effusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study Using Induction Chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Guided by Combined CT and PET Imaging for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US) and Canada. Because of the high incidence and mortality of this disease, small improvements in the management of this disease translates into large numbers of patients having improved outcomes after treatment. Radiation therapy is widely used to treat patients with lung cancer. However, the radiation dose to the tumor has been limited by the proximity of normal structures to the tumor, such as the lung, the spinal cord and the esophagus. The normal structures must not be exposed to excessive radiation doses. A new technique, called intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivers radiation to tumors such that the normal structures around the tumor are exposed to less radiation than previously achievable. This technique is already used to treat head and neck cancers. This study will use this technique to deliver more intensified radiation to the lung tumor after the patient receives two cycles of chemotherapy. A new imaging technique, called positron emission tomography (PET), has been found to be more sensitive and specific at detecting the extent of the tumor in the lung than the older imaging technique of computed tomography (CT). This study will use both the PET and CT to target the radiation beams. Following treatment, the patients will be followed up to assess the side effects of normal tissues and response of the tumor to the treatment.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis and Objectives: The hypothesis that respiratory gated IMRT can escalate safely radiation doses for NSCLC with induction chemotherapy will be tested. The intent of the study is to determine the maximum tolerable dose of radiotherapy for NSCLC, using a novel treatment planning technique with accelerated fractionation, given with state-of-the-art imaging guidance.
Primary Objective:
- To establish the maximum tolerated dose of radiotherapy by assessing treatment toxicity according to the acute RTOG grading scale.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the treatment toxicity of the combination regimen according to the chronic RTOG grading scale;
- Quality of Life: to be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13;
- To determine progression-free survival with this regimen;
- To identify partial organ tolerance doses for lung, esophagus and heart.
Schema and Methods: Eligible patients who have consented will receive two cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy. Thoracic radiotherapy will be given afterwards according to the dose-escalating scale. Only one dose level will open at one time. Dose level 1: 84. Gy in 35 fractions over 7 wks; Dose level 2: 79.5 Gy in 40 fractions over 6 wks; Dose level 3: 75. Gy in 40 fractions over 5 wks.
Eligibility Criteria:
- Patients with histologically-proven, by biopsy or cytology, unresected NSCLC
- Patients with AJC Stage I-III if all detectable tumors can be encompassed by radiation therapy fields
- Patients with positive supraclavicular node (N3) or malignant pleural effusion are not eligible.
- Age >= 18
- Karnofsky performance status >= 70
- ANC > 1.5; Plt > 100,000; Hct > 30%; AST (SGOT) < 1.5 ULN; serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL
- Patients must have measurable disease on the CT and PET images
- Patients must have a FEV1 > 1.0 L
- Evaluation of the total lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) must be < 30%; mean esophageal dose must be < 32 Gy; and the esophageal V 55 < 28%.
- Patients must have a satisfactory IMRT plan prior to start of radiotherapy.
Statistical Considerations
Primary Endpoint: The frequency of patients developing unacceptable (grade 3 or higher) toxicity according to the RTOG acute toxicity scale attributable to radiotherapy. Acute radiotherapy toxicities are defined as those toxicities that occur within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy.
Sample Size: In order to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiotherapy that can be delivered using IMRT following induction chemotherapy, acceptable morbidity criteria must be defined. Based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-10, the dose limiting toxicity (DLT: defined as a grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity) rate for this study is determined to be 40%. After 7 evaluable patients have been followed for a minimum of 90 days from the start of radiation therapy, patients will be evaluated with respect to treatment morbidity. If there are no acute dose limiting toxicities in the first 5 patients (0/5), then the current dose will be deemed to be acceptable and will be escalated. If there is 1 acute DLT observed in the first 5 patients (1/5) and no acute DLTs in the last two patients (0/2), then the dose will be deemed to be acceptable and will be escalated. Otherwise the current dose will be deemed to be too toxic and escalation will end. This design gives at least 90% confidence that the true acute DLT rate at a given dose level is less than 40% and for any given dose level, the probability of not escalating when the true toxicity rate is 40% or higher is at least 88%.
Safety Monitoring and Stoppage Rules: An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that:
- results in death;
- is life-threatening (patient is at immediate risk of death);
- requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
- results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;
- is congenital anomaly/birth defect;
- important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
Reporting of SAEs is as follows:
- Complete the Serious Adverse Event Report;
- Fax the Serious Adverse Event Report within 24 hours of the investigator's or designee's knowledge of the event to the attention of: Dr. Wilson Roa (780) 432-8517 (tel);(780) 432-8380 (fax) and Dr. Don Yee (403) 944-2895 (tel);(403) 283-1651 (fax);
- Accrual may be stopped immediately as indicated upon review and confirmation of the SAE by the two PIs.
Recruitment and Reporting: The projection rate of accrual was based on a previous preliminary study. At this rate, it would take three months to complete accrual for each of the 3 dose levels. A three-month waiting period is required prior to dose escalation to the next level. Hence, an estimate of 7 months is conservatively allowed for each level, amounting to a total of 21 months to complete accrual, treatments and waiting period for the primary endpoint. The first manuscript on this study will be completed by the end of two years. Analysis for the reporting treatment results will contain tabulation of all cases entered and any excluded from analysis, with reasons for the exclusion. Respective institutional accrual and observed endpoints of MTD, toxicity, progression-free survival and quality of life will be analyzed.
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Being tested
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Keywords
- radiation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyProcedure or surgery
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
safety and adverse effects
Secondary outcomes (1)
efficacy and survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2003
- Study completionAug 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alberta Health services
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Wilson Roa, MD, Principal investigator, AHS Cancer Control Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00128999
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LU-11-0035
- Status last verified
- Oct 2007
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2005
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Study Using Induction Chemotherapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Guided by Combined CT and PET Imaging for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00128999
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LU-11-0035
- Conditions
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Keywords
- radiation therapy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Alberta Health servicesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2003
- Study completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States (US) and Canada. Because of the high incidence and mortality of this disease, small improvements in the management of this disease translates into large numbers of patients having improved outcomes after treatment. Radiation therapy is widely used to treat patients with lung cancer. However, the radiation dose to the tumor has been limited by the proximity of normal structures to the tumor, such as the lung, the spinal cord and the esophagus. The normal structures must not be exposed to excessive radiation doses. A new technique, called intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivers radiation to tumors such that the normal structures around the tumor are exposed to less radiation than previously achievable. This technique is already used to treat head and neck cancers. This study will use this technique to deliver more intensified radiation to the lung tumor after the patient receives two cycles of chemotherapy. A new imaging technique, called positron emission tomography (PET), has been found to be more sensitive and specific at detecting the extent of the tumor in the lung than the older imaging technique of computed tomography (CT). This study will use both the PET and CT to target the radiation beams. Following treatment, the patients will be followed up to assess the side effects of normal tissues and response of the tumor to the treatment.
Detailed description
Hypothesis and Objectives: The hypothesis that respiratory gated IMRT can escalate safely radiation doses for NSCLC with induction chemotherapy will be tested. The intent of the study is to determine the maximum tolerable dose of radiotherapy for NSCLC, using a novel treatment planning technique with accelerated fractionation, given with state-of-the-art imaging guidance.
Primary Objective:
- To establish the maximum tolerated dose of radiotherapy by assessing treatment toxicity according to the acute RTOG grading scale.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the treatment toxicity of the combination regimen according to the chronic RTOG grading scale;
- Quality of Life: to be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC13;
- To determine progression-free survival with this regimen;
- To identify partial organ tolerance doses for lung, esophagus and heart.
Schema and Methods: Eligible patients who have consented will receive two cycles of cisplatin-vinorelbine chemotherapy. Thoracic radiotherapy will be given afterwards according to the dose-escalating scale. Only one dose level will open at one time. Dose level 1: 84. Gy in 35 fractions over 7 wks; Dose level 2: 79.5 Gy in 40 fractions over 6 wks; Dose level 3: 75. Gy in 40 fractions over 5 wks.
Eligibility Criteria:
- Patients with histologically-proven, by biopsy or cytology, unresected NSCLC
- Patients with AJC Stage I-III if all detectable tumors can be encompassed by radiation therapy fields
- Patients with positive supraclavicular node (N3) or malignant pleural effusion are not eligible.
- Age >= 18
- Karnofsky performance status >= 70
- ANC > 1.5; Plt > 100,000; Hct > 30%; AST (SGOT) < 1.5 ULN; serum creatinine < 1.5 mg/dL
- Patients must have measurable disease on the CT and PET images
- Patients must have a FEV1 > 1.0 L
- Evaluation of the total lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) must be < 30%; mean esophageal dose must be < 32 Gy; and the esophageal V 55 < 28%.
- Patients must have a satisfactory IMRT plan prior to start of radiotherapy.
Statistical Considerations
Primary Endpoint: The frequency of patients developing unacceptable (grade 3 or higher) toxicity according to the RTOG acute toxicity scale attributable to radiotherapy. Acute radiotherapy toxicities are defined as those toxicities that occur within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy.
Sample Size: In order to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiotherapy that can be delivered using IMRT following induction chemotherapy, acceptable morbidity criteria must be defined. Based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 94-10, the dose limiting toxicity (DLT: defined as a grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity) rate for this study is determined to be 40%. After 7 evaluable patients have been followed for a minimum of 90 days from the start of radiation therapy, patients will be evaluated with respect to treatment morbidity. If there are no acute dose limiting toxicities in the first 5 patients (0/5), then the current dose will be deemed to be acceptable and will be escalated. If there is 1 acute DLT observed in the first 5 patients (1/5) and no acute DLTs in the last two patients (0/2), then the dose will be deemed to be acceptable and will be escalated. Otherwise the current dose will be deemed to be too toxic and escalation will end. This design gives at least 90% confidence that the true acute DLT rate at a given dose level is less than 40% and for any given dose level, the probability of not escalating when the true toxicity rate is 40% or higher is at least 88%.
Safety Monitoring and Stoppage Rules: An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that:
- results in death;
- is life-threatening (patient is at immediate risk of death);
- requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
- results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;
- is congenital anomaly/birth defect;
- important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the patient and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
Reporting of SAEs is as follows:
- Complete the Serious Adverse Event Report;
- Fax the Serious Adverse Event Report within 24 hours of the investigator's or designee's knowledge of the event to the attention of: Dr. Wilson Roa (780) 432-8517 (tel);(780) 432-8380 (fax) and Dr. Don Yee (403) 944-2895 (tel);(403) 283-1651 (fax);
- Accrual may be stopped immediately as indicated upon review and confirmation of the SAE by the two PIs.
Recruitment and Reporting: The projection rate of accrual was based on a previous preliminary study. At this rate, it would take three months to complete accrual for each of the 3 dose levels. A three-month waiting period is required prior to dose escalation to the next level. Hence, an estimate of 7 months is conservatively allowed for each level, amounting to a total of 21 months to complete accrual, treatments and waiting period for the primary endpoint. The first manuscript on this study will be completed by the end of two years. Analysis for the reporting treatment results will contain tabulation of all cases entered and any excluded from analysis, with reasons for the exclusion. Respective institutional accrual and observed endpoints of MTD, toxicity, progression-free survival and quality of life will be analyzed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Stage I-III
- Unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- EEV1 equal to or greater than 1.0L
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Positive supraclavicular noce (N2) or malignant pleural effusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
safety and adverse effects
1 secondary outcome
efficacy and survival
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2010.
Related trials for Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of RAS(ON) Inhibitors in Combination With Ivonescimab in Patients With Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
Adaptive Chemotherapy for Pd-l1 High REsEctablE NSCLC: A Chemo-PHREE Trial
Nsclc, NSCLC Stage II
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Immunotherapy After Surgery for People Who Have No Remaining Cancer Cells After Standard Treatment for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, INSIGHT Trial
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Impact of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Atezolizumab, After Surgery to Prevent Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer From Returning, AASI-NSCLC Trial
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wilson Roa, MD principal investigator
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy in people with Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, run by Alberta Health services at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
safety and adverse effects. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2010.